[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Apex Malhar Release 3.3.1-incubating (RC1)

2016-03-02 Thread Bhupesh Chawda
The vote passes with 4, +1 binding votes from IPMC members and no -1s: Justin Mclean Chris Nauroth Hitesh Shah Alan Gates Thanks for voting, we will proceed with the release activities. -Bhupesh On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 10:23 PM, Alan Gates wrote: > Forwarding my +1 from the dev list. > > Alan.

RE: [VOTE] Accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-02 Thread ozawa
+1(non-binding) - Tsuyoshi -Original Message- From: Andrew Purtell [mailto:apurt...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:53 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator Greetings, The discussion of the Gearpump proposal has conc

[RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache MRQL 0.9.6 incubating (RC1)

2016-03-02 Thread Leonidas Fegaras
Hello, This vote is now closed and it has passed with 3 binding IPMC +1. There were no -1 votes, and no 0 votes. We now have the required number of positive binding votes and will therefore proceed with publishing this release. Thank you all for voting! Leonidas Fegaras Binding votes: +1 Alan D.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.0 RC3

2016-03-02 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Justin Mclean > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> > OK. In the case that we've incorporated code, we could switch to doing: >> > >> > """ >> > src/kudu/gutil/valgrind.h: Hybrid BSD (half BSD, half zlib) >> > src/kudu/util (s

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9alpha-rc1

2016-03-02 Thread Frank McQuillan
Thank you all for your comments and suggestions. At this point I would like to cancel the vote on MADlib v1.9alpha-rc1. The following JIRAs have been identified based on comments received; they have either been fixed or are in the process of being fixed: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAD

Re: [VOTE] Accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-02 Thread Todd Lipcon
+1 (binding) On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:00 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > +1 (binding) > > -Taylor > > > On Mar 1, 2016, at 7:53 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > > > > Greetings, > > > > The discussion of the Gearpump proposal has concluded. Please vote to > > accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator.

Re: [VOTE] Accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-02 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
+1 (binding) -Taylor > On Mar 1, 2016, at 7:53 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > > Greetings, > > The discussion of the Gearpump proposal has concluded. Please vote to > accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator. I will leave this vote open for > at least the next 72 hours and will aim to close it M

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.0 RC3

2016-03-02 Thread Todd Lipcon
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > OK. In the case that we've incorporated code, we could switch to doing: > > > > """ > > src/kudu/gutil/valgrind.h: Hybrid BSD (half BSD, half zlib) > > src/kudu/util (some portions): 3-clause BSD license > > src/kudu/util (HdrHistog

Re: [DISCUSS] Gearpump incubation proposal

2016-03-02 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
> On Mar 1, 2016, at 11:35 PM, Sean Zhong wrote: > > > Gearpump has some code for Storm compatibility under directory experiments. > Those are experiment modules. We are doing some experiments on integrating > with other DSLs. Gearpump now has a Akka-Stream DSL experiment module, and > Storm DS

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.2 (incubating)

2016-03-02 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > - Sources for the release: > http://people.apache.org/~madhan/ranger/ranger-0.5.2-rc1/apache-ranger-incubating-0.5.2.tar.gz > > No files seem to found there. Note also that this is not the

Re: VOTE: HTrace 4.1 release

2016-03-02 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Colin P. McCabe wrote: > Thanks for the comments so far, guys. > > Porting over the votes from the HTrace development list: > Michael Stack: +1 > Lewis John McGibbney: +1 > Masatake Iwasaki: +1 > Elliot Clark: +1 > and of course myself, +1. > > It seems like we nee

Re: VOTE: HTrace 4.1 release

2016-03-02 Thread Colin P. McCabe
Thanks for the comments so far, guys. Porting over the votes from the HTrace development list: Michael Stack: +1 Lewis John McGibbney: +1 Masatake Iwasaki: +1 Elliot Clark: +1 and of course myself, +1. It seems like we need another IPMC vote on this; does anyone have time to take a look? cheers,

Re: [VOTE] Accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-02 Thread Henri Yandell
+1 (should be binding by vote end :) ). On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > Greetings, > > The discussion of the Gearpump proposal has concluded. Please vote to > accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator. I will leave this vote open for > at least the next 72 hours and will

Re: [VOTE] Accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-02 Thread Jakob Homan
+1 binding. On 2 March 2016 at 10:55, Alan Cabrera wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > Regards, > Alan > >> On Mar 1, 2016, at 4:53 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: >> >> Greetings, >> >> The discussion of the Gearpump proposal has concluded. Please vote to >> accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator. I will

Re: [MARKETING] [DISCUSS] Tephra incubator proposal

2016-03-02 Thread Poorna Chandra
Hi Dor, If there is no more feedback then I'll send out a VOTE thread tomorrow. Thanks, Poorna. On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:24 AM, Henry Saputra wrote: > Looks like no more comments or objection for Tephra coming to incubator. > > We shall send VOTE thread to follow up. > > - Henry > > On Wed, M

Re: [VOTE] Accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-02 Thread Alan Cabrera
+1 (binding) Regards, Alan > On Mar 1, 2016, at 4:53 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > > Greetings, > > The discussion of the Gearpump proposal has concluded. Please vote to > accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator. I will leave this vote open for > at least the next 72 hours and will aim to clo

Re: [VOTE] Accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-02 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
+1 Jarcec > On Mar 1, 2016, at 4:53 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > > Greetings, > > The discussion of the Gearpump proposal has concluded. Please vote to > accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator. I will leave this vote open for > at least the next 72 hours and will aim to close it Monday the 7

Fwd: [VOTE] Release taverna-language-0.15.1-incubating-RC5 and taverna-osgi-0.2.1-incubating-RC5

2016-03-02 Thread Stian Soiland-Reyes
I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache Taverna Maven Parent 2-incubating Apache Taverna Language 0.15.1-incubating Apache Taverna OSGi plugin system 0.2.1-incubating The Apache Taverna IPMC has voted in favour of this release with 5 IPMC votes: http://markmai

Re: [VOTE] Accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-02 Thread Gangumalla, Uma
+1 (non-binding) Regards, Uma On 3/1/16, 4:53 PM, "Andrew Purtell" wrote: >Greetings, > >The discussion of the Gearpump proposal has concluded. Please vote to >accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator. I will leave this vote open for >at least the next 72 hours and will aim to close it Monday

Re: [MARKETING] [DISCUSS] Tephra incubator proposal

2016-03-02 Thread Henry Saputra
Looks like no more comments or objection for Tephra coming to incubator. We shall send VOTE thread to follow up. - Henry On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:14 AM, Dor Ben Dov wrote: > Poorna, > > What's the status of Tephra project, is it already joined the incubator ? > > Regards, > Dor > > -Origin

RE: [MARKETING] [DISCUSS] Tephra incubator proposal

2016-03-02 Thread Dor Ben Dov
Poorna, What's the status of Tephra project, is it already joined the incubator ? Regards, Dor -Original Message- From: Poorna Chandra [mailto:poo...@apache.org] Sent: יום ה 25 פברואר 2016 02:35 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: [MARKETING] [DISCUSS] Tephra incubator proposal

RE: [VOTE] Accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-02 Thread Zheng, Kai
+1 (non-binding). Regards, Kai -Original Message- From: JiangAlan [mailto:whji...@outlook.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 3:21 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator +1 (non-binding) > From: r...@databricks.com > Date: Tue

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.0 RC3

2016-03-02 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I haven't been following carefully, but isn't there a BSD header in these > files? If so, couldn't your LICENSE refer people to the headers in those > files? You can and it's nice and useful to do so but it not legally required. All BSD ask for is a full text of the license and the header