Re: [VOTE] Apache DataFu 1.3.1 release RC1

Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - release contains incubating - signatures and hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE OK - Most files has ASF headers - No unexpected binaries in release - Can compile from source Minor issues: - year is wrong in NOTICE file - year range in site footed

Re: [VOTE] Apache DataFu 1.3.1 release RC1

+1 as well On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Jakob Homan wrote: > +1 (binding) (carrying my vote over from the podling thread) > > -Jakob > > > On 21 July 2016 at 10:55, Matthew Hayes wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > The Apache DataFu community has voted on and

Re: [VOTE] Apache DataFu 1.3.1 release RC1

+1 (binding) (carrying my vote over from the podling thread) -Jakob On 21 July 2016 at 10:55, Matthew Hayes wrote: > Hi all, > > The Apache DataFu community has voted on and approved the release of Apache > DataFu 1.3.1 (incubating): > >

[VOTE] Apache DataFu 1.3.1 release RC1

Hi all, The Apache DataFu community has voted on and approved the release of Apache DataFu 1.3.1 (incubating): http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-datafu-dev/201607.mbox/%3CCAA4Vo8AQ_gbDvvVN49LcU%3DgdneSnjyc%2Bd%2BrfNd2u5imJUxBJUQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E Results: 4 binding +1 votes

RE: [PROPOSAL] Apache Annotator

Good thought, Bertrand! I'll clear that up in a revision soon. AnnotatorJS's code actually pre-dates (and is in part the reason for) the W3C's Annotation Working Group (which I'm a part of fwiw). Now that we've got a handful of specs out the door (much of it based on the influence of this

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Annotator

Hi, On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 9:26 PM, Benjamin Young wrote: > ... https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AnnotatorProposal > Please let me know your thoughts on this proposal,... Looks like a nice project with a diverse community and very experienced mentors! As a nitpick, I