Re: [VOTE] Apache Annotator

[Sergio Fernández]

+1 (binding)

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Brian McCallister  wrote:

> +1 from me!
>
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:23 AM Daniel Gruno 
> wrote:
>
> > Obviously a binding +1 from me :)
> >
> > With regards,
> > Daniel.
> >
> > On 08/08/2016 09:41 PM, Benjamin Young wrote:
> > > Hi all!
> > >
> > > Thanks for everyone who's contributed to the discussion around the
> > Apache Annotator proposal:
> > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AnnotatorProposal
> > >
> > > From what our Champion tells me, we're now ready to go to a vote!
> > >
> > > We have a long and eager list of contributors, a key focus around
> > existing code and completed W3C standards for annotation, and a growing
> > world of annotation-centric tools on and off the Web (including NLP and
> > machine learning).
> > >
> > > I'd also like to say a quick "thanks" to our Champion to our Mentors
> for
> > their input and help along the way.
> > >
> > > Cheers!
> > > Benjamin
> > > --
> > > http://bigbluehat.com/
> > > http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>



-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

wiki write access for PhilSorber

[Phil Sorber]

Hi all, can you grant karma to "PhilSorber" to edit the incubator
wiki?

Thanks.

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - August 2016

[John D. Ament]

We're still missing sign off from Slider and TrafficControl.
TrafficControl's MLs don't seem to work yet, as a result this email
includes the mentors directly.

John

On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 10:00 PM John D. Ament  wrote:

> All,
>
> Below is the current draft of the IPMC board report.
>
> We're still missing sign off from: slider, systemml, toree, trafficcontrol
>  (added them to the to to help get sign off)
>
> Please see below
>
> Incubator PMC report for August 2016
>
> The Apache Incubator is the entry path into the ASF for projects and
> codebases wishing to become part of the Foundation's efforts.
>
> There are 59 podlings currently undergoing incubation.  We added two
> podlings to the roster and have no graduations this month.  July was
> a quiet month, completing four releases and no other major activities.
>
> * Community
>
>   New IPMC members:
>
>   - None
>
>   People who left the IPMC:
>
>   - None
>
> * New Podlings
>
>   - SensSoft
>   - Traffic Control
>
>
> * Graduations
>
>   The board has motions for the following:
>
>   - None
>
> * Releases
>
>   The following releases entered distribution during the month of
>   July:
>
>   - Apache Trafodion 2.0.1-incubating
>   - Apache Atlas 0.7-incubating
>   - Apache Ranger 0.6.0-incubating
>   - Apache Eagle 0.4.0-incubating
>
>
> * Legal / Trademarks
>
>   - See also: Fluo's report
>
> * Credits
>
>   - Report Manager: John D. Ament
>
>  Summary of podling reports 
>
> * Still getting started at the Incubator
>
>   - CarbonData
>   - DistributedLog
>   - Juneau
>   - Pirk
>   - Pony Mail
>   - SensSoft
>   - Trafic Control
>
> * Not yet ready to graduate
>
>   No release:
>
>   - Blur
>   - CMDA
>   - Guacamole
>   - Impala
>   - iota
>   - PredictionIO
>   - Quickstep
>   - S2Graph
>
>   Community growth:
>
>   - Beam
>   - Eagle
>   - Fluo
>   - Joshua
>   - Slider
>   - SystemML
>
> * Did not report, expected next month
>
>   - Fineract
>   - Quarks
>
> --
>Table of Contents
> BatchEE
> Beam
> Blur
> CarbonData
> Climate Model Diagnostic Analyzer
> DistributedLog
> Eagle
> Fluo
> Guacamole
> Impala
> iota
> Joshua
> Juneau
> OpenAz
> Pirk
> Pony Mail
> PredictionIO
> Quickstep
> S2Graph
> SensSoft
> Sirona
> Slider
> SystemML
> Tamaya
> Toree
> Traffic Control
> Unomi
>
> --
>
> 
>
> BatchEE
>
> BatchEE projects aims to provide a JBatch implementation (aka JSR352) and a
> set of useful extensions for this specification.
>
> BatchEE has been incubating since 2013-10-03.
>
> Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
>
>  None, as the PPMC feels the project is ready to graduate
>
> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be aware
> of?
>
>  No
>
> How has the community developed since the last report?
>
>  We got several new users and interest in advanced integration (in
>  particular our GUI).
>
> How has the project developed since the last report?
>
>  Not much but it is quite stable and no new spec was out since last report
>  so it behaves as expected.
>  BatchEE is used in TomEE and many industry projects.
>  So we also get feedback in indirect ways via TomEE, Geronimo, etc.
>
> Date of last release:
>
>  2015-12-08 batchee-0.3-incubating
>
> When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
>
>  * Reinhard Sandtner on 2015-12-01
>
>
> Signed-off-by:
>
>  [ ](batchee) Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>  [ ](batchee) Olivier Lamy
>  [X](batchee) Mark Struberg
>
> Shepherd/Mentor notes:
>  struberg: I think this podling is ready to graduate.
>
>
> 
>
> Beam
>
> Apache Beam is an open source, unified model and set of language-specific
> SDKs
> for defining and executing data processing workflows, and also data
> ingestion
> and integration flows, supporting Enterprise Integration Patterns
> (EIPs) and Domain Specific Languages (DSLs). Beam pipelines simplify the
> mechanics of large-scale batch and streaming data processing and can run
> on a
> number of runtimes such as Apache Flink, Apache Gearpump, Apache Spark, and
> Google Cloud Dataflow (a cloud service). Beam also brings SDKs in different
> languages, allowing users to easily implement their data integration
> processes.
>
> Beam has been incubating since 2016-02-01.
>
> Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
>
>  1. Additional and continued Beam releases
>  2. Grow the community of Beam users and contributors
>  3. Add to and improve upon documentation, code samples, and project
> website
>
> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be aware
> of? None.
>
> How has the community developed since the last report?
>
>  * 425 closed/merged pull requests
>  * High engagement on dev and user mailing lists (590 / 455 

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache Fluo parent POM 1 and Build Resources 1.0.0

[Christopher]

This vote passes with +3 (johndament, jmclean, elserj), and no -1.
Thanks all!

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 4:27 PM Christopher  wrote:

> Just a quick reminder about this vote, which expires tomorrow. So far,
> there are +3
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 1:38 PM Josh Elser  wrote:
>
>> Forwarding my (binding) +1 from the PPMC vote.
>>
>> Christopher wrote:
>> > IPMC,
>> >
>> > Please consider the following candidates for Fluo Parent POM
>> 1-incubating
>> > and Fluo Build Resources 1.0.0-incubating. There are two artifacts,
>> which
>> > we are releasing together. They do not contain Fluo itself, but are
>> > prerequisites for the Maven build of Fluo, which will be released via
>> Maven
>> > upon successful passing of this vote. Releasing these to Maven will
>> bring
>> > us a step closer to preparing release candidates for Fluo itself.
>> >
>> > Passing PPMC release vote thread:
>> >
>> >
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7f9a1db3798ddc4123ba3c66c632cedde6272ba55f1132d556f24a67@%3Cdev.fluo.apache.org%3E
>> >
>> > Since the last attempted vote, we have taken significant steps to ensure
>> > that Apache retains exclusive use of the Fluo trademark. Historical
>> > releases still exist in Maven Central under the "io.fluo" groupId, but
>> the
>> > original fluo.io site has been redirected to fluo.apache.org (until its
>> > domain registration expires, at which point our plan is to let it
>> lapse),
>> > and references to pre-Apache releases have been marked explicitly as
>> such
>> > on the Fluo website. The organization containing related 3rd party
>> software
>> > for Fluo was renamed in GitHub from fluo-io to astralway, so as not to
>> > misappropriate the Fluo trademark, and references to Fluo on those
>> external
>> > projects have made it a point to explicitly refer to "Apache Fluo". The
>> > fluo.apache.org website will continue to be updated as we start making
>> > Apache releases, but we don't anticipate any future trademark concerns
>> such
>> > as those noted in the previously canceled vote thread. Please let us
>> know
>> > if we've overlooked something.
>> >
>> > Release artifacts are staged at:
>> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/fluo/
>> > and in a Nexus Staging repo:
>> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefluo-1004
>> > for convenience.
>> >
>> > Signing key fingerprint is:
>> >8CC4F8A2B29C2B040F2B835D6F0CDAE700B6899D
>> > KEYS in:
>> >https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/fluo/KEYS
>> >
>> > Git Commits (branches) in
>> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-fluo.git:
>> >  02d4ea2332598a94285985ee8a1c8e92a42b4770
>> (build-resources-1.0.0-rc1)
>> >  95c48e3f14faf5cdca259d8ec60ec68b640fce1e (fluo-parent-1-rc3)
>> >
>> > If this vote passes, gpg-signed tags will be created using:
>> >  git tag -f -m 'Apache Fluo Build Resources 1.0.0-incubating' -s
>> > rel/build-resources-1.0.0-incubating
>> > 02d4ea2332598a94285985ee8a1c8e92a42b4770
>> >  git tag -f -m 'Apache Fluo Parent POM 1-incubating' -s
>> > rel/fluo-parent-1-incubating 95c48e3f14faf5cdca259d8ec60ec68b640fce1e
>> >
>> > Please vote one of:
>> > [ ] +1 - I have verified and accept...
>> > [ ] +0 - I have reservations, but not strong enough to vote against...
>> > [ ] -1 - Because..., I do not accept...
>> > ... these artifacts as the 1-incubating release of Apache Fluo Parent
>> POM
>> > and 1.0.0-incubating release of Apache Fluo Build Resources.
>> >
>> > This vote will end on Thu Aug 11 21:30:00 UTC 2016
>> > (Thu Aug 11 17:30:00 EDT 2016 / Thu Aug 11 14:30:00 PDT 2016)
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> >
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Annotator

[Brian McCallister]

+1 from me!

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:23 AM Daniel Gruno  wrote:

> Obviously a binding +1 from me :)
>
> With regards,
> Daniel.
>
> On 08/08/2016 09:41 PM, Benjamin Young wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > Thanks for everyone who's contributed to the discussion around the
> Apache Annotator proposal:
> > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AnnotatorProposal
> >
> > From what our Champion tells me, we're now ready to go to a vote!
> >
> > We have a long and eager list of contributors, a key focus around
> existing code and completed W3C standards for annotation, and a growing
> world of annotation-centric tools on and off the Web (including NLP and
> machine learning).
> >
> > I'd also like to say a quick "thanks" to our Champion to our Mentors for
> their input and help along the way.
> >
> > Cheers!
> > Benjamin
> > --
> > http://bigbluehat.com/
> > http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung
> >
> >
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Annotator

[Daniel Gruno]

Obviously a binding +1 from me :)

With regards,
Daniel.

On 08/08/2016 09:41 PM, Benjamin Young wrote:
> Hi all!
> 
> Thanks for everyone who's contributed to the discussion around the Apache 
> Annotator proposal:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AnnotatorProposal
> 
> From what our Champion tells me, we're now ready to go to a vote!
> 
> We have a long and eager list of contributors, a key focus around existing 
> code and completed W3C standards for annotation, and a growing world of 
> annotation-centric tools on and off the Web (including NLP and machine 
> learning).
> 
> I'd also like to say a quick "thanks" to our Champion to our Mentors for 
> their input and help along the way.
> 
> Cheers!
> Benjamin
> --
> http://bigbluehat.com/
> http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung
> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Annotator

[Nick Kew]

On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 19:41:29 +
Benjamin Young  wrote:

> Hi all!
> 
> Thanks for everyone who's contributed to the discussion around the
> Apache Annotator proposal:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AnnotatorProposal
> 
> From what our Champion tells me, we're now ready to go to a vote!
> 
> We have a long and eager list of contributors, a key focus around
> existing code and completed W3C standards for annotation, and a
> growing world of annotation-centric tools on and off the Web
> (including NLP and machine learning).

+1

You have potential to be a great Apache project.
Let's make it happen!

-- 
Nick Kew

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron 0.2.0BETA-RC3

[David Lyle]

Thanks Billie and Taylor,

We've got https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-297 opened to
address this.

Thanks again,

-David..


On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 2:05 PM, P. Taylor Goetz  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Checked:
> - signatures
> - “incubating” in filename
> - ALv2 license headers
> - build from source
> - DISCLAIMER exists
> - LICENCE and NOTICE look okay
>
> As Billie mentioned, the license issue for the STIX extractor code still
> needs to be addressed. Can you add a lira for that and correct it in your
> next release?
>
> -Taylor
>
> > On Jul 27, 2016, at 12:32 PM, James Sirota 
> wrote:
> >
> > This release is exactly the same as RC2, but the Mozilla licensed file
> was removed so it doesn’t cause problems for us on the incubator general
> boards. We no longer use it so we just removed it.
> >
> > This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Metron 0.2.0BETA-RC3
> incubating
> >
> > Full list of changes in this release:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.2.
> 0BETA-RC3-incubating/CHANGES
> >
> > The tag/commit to be voted upon is Metron_0.2.0BETA_rc3:
> >
> >  metron.git;a=commit;h=75642001803396e8884385b0fc297a2312ead3eb>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metron.git;a=commit;h=
> 75642001803396e8884385b0fc297a2312ead3eb
> >
> > The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.2.
> 0BETA-RC3-incubating/apache-metron-0.2.0BETA-RC3-incubating.tar.gz
> >
> > Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.2.
> 0BETA-RC3-incubating/
> >  incubating/>
> > The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> >
> >  metron.git;a=blob;f=KEYS;h=c11bcb9b7385b4d155501aa097afd890f1070a18;hb=
> 75642001803396e8884385b0fc297a2312ead3eb>https://git-wip-us.
> apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metron.git;a=blob;f=KEYS;h=
> c11bcb9b7385b4d155501aa097afd890f1070a18;hb=75642001803396e8884385b0fc297a
> 2312ead3eb
> >
> >
> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Metron 0.2.0BETA-RC3
> incubating
> >
> > When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
> > Recommended build validation and verification instructions are posted
> here:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/METRON/Verifying+Builds
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Metron 0.2.0BETA-RC3 incubating
> > [ ] 0 No opinion
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron 0.2.0BETA-RC3

[P. Taylor Goetz]

+1 (binding)

Checked:
- signatures
- “incubating” in filename
- ALv2 license headers
- build from source
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENCE and NOTICE look okay

As Billie mentioned, the license issue for the STIX extractor code still needs 
to be addressed. Can you add a lira for that and correct it in your next 
release?

-Taylor

> On Jul 27, 2016, at 12:32 PM, James Sirota  wrote:
> 
> This release is exactly the same as RC2, but the Mozilla licensed file was 
> removed so it doesn’t cause problems for us on the incubator general boards. 
> We no longer use it so we just removed it.
> 
> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Metron 0.2.0BETA-RC3 incubating
> 
> Full list of changes in this release:
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.2.0BETA-RC3-incubating/CHANGES
> 
> The tag/commit to be voted upon is Metron_0.2.0BETA_rc3:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metron.git;a=commit;h=75642001803396e8884385b0fc297a2312ead3eb
> 
> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.2.0BETA-RC3-incubating/apache-metron-0.2.0BETA-RC3-incubating.tar.gz
> 
> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.2.0BETA-RC3-incubating/
> 
> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metron.git;a=blob;f=KEYS;h=c11bcb9b7385b4d155501aa097afd890f1070a18;hb=75642001803396e8884385b0fc297a2312ead3eb
> 
> 
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Metron 0.2.0BETA-RC3 
> incubating
> 
> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
> Recommended build validation and verification instructions are posted here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/METRON/Verifying+Builds
> 
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Metron 0.2.0BETA-RC3 incubating
> [ ] 0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron 0.2.0BETA-RC3

[Billie Rinaldi]

+1 binding
verified signatures and checksums
file name contains incubating
disclaimer is correct
L look good
tarball matches the tag
build successful

For the next release, please look into the issue that Justin brought up on
RC2:
"For the license I think this file [1] may incorrectly have an apache
header. I’m also unsure of its license, but it’s likely to be permissive
[2] and needs to be mentioned in LICENSE. Can you fix this in the next
release please."

1.
./metron-platform/metron-data-management/src/test/java/org/apache/metron/dataloads/extractor/stix/StixExtractorTest.java
2. http://stixproject.github.io/legal/


> On Jul 27, 2016, at 9:32 AM, James Sirota  wrote:
>
> This release is exactly the same as RC2, but the Mozilla licensed file
was removed so it doesn’t cause problems for us on the incubator general
boards. We no longer use it so we just removed it.
>
> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Metron 0.2.0BETA-RC3 incubating
>
> Full list of changes in this release:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.2.
0BETA-RC3-incubating/CHANGES
>
> The tag/commit to be voted upon is Metron_0.2.0BETA_rc3:
>
> https://git-wip-us.
apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metron.git;a=commit;h=
75642001803396e8884385b0fc297a2312ead3eb
>
> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.2.
0BETA-RC3-incubating/apache-metron-0.2.0BETA-RC3-incubating.tar.gz
>
> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.2.
0BETA-RC3-incubating/
> 
> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>
> https://git-wip-us.
apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metron.git;a=blob;f=KEYS;h=
c11bcb9b7385b4d155501aa097afd890f1070a18;hb=75642001803396e8884385b0fc297a
2312ead3eb
>
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Metron 0.2.0BETA-RC3
incubating
>
> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
> Recommended build validation and verification instructions are posted
here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/METRON/Verifying+Builds
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Metron 0.2.0BETA-RC3 incubating
> [ ] 0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...

Re: [VOTE] Apache HAWQ (incubating) 2.0.0.0-incubating Release

[Jim Jagielski]

> On Aug 9, 2016, at 4:46 PM, Roman Shaposhnik  wrote:
> 
> 
> Personally, I feel like those types of files definitely need to be
> included in the SGA.
> After all, Pivotal did own the modifications on top of the pristine PG
> source and it is
> important for the company to explicitly signal donation of that code.
> 
+1


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org