Re: Page for gathering CFP submissions

Thoughts? Preferences? Shall I post the full call on blogs.apache.org  and point to the upload instructions at incubator.apache.org? If so, please forward the URL so I can link. I'll also send you the link to the blog post so we can point to each other. If not, please let me know how you'd like

Re: Omitting "-incubating" suffix in Maven artifact version attribute for FreeMarker

Saturday, December 31, 2016, 5:33:19 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Just to level set. I don't think its fair to expect a special policy for a > single podling. To be clear, I'm just asking a question, since there's no written policy regarding the Maven version number as far as I know. So I suppose

Re: Omitting "-incubating" suffix in Maven artifact version attribute for FreeMarker

I'll point out that the link Martjin pointed to is a follow up conversation after the vote thread that originally introduced allowing podling artifacts to be distributed via Maven.

Re: Omitting "-incubating" suffix in Maven artifact version attribute for FreeMarker

Just to level set. I don't think its fair to expect a special policy for a single podling. On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 9:40 AM Daniel Dekany wrote: > The original question in this thread is much less generic than in the > linked one though, so it's certainly easier to answer.

Re: Omitting "-incubating" suffix in Maven artifact version attribute for FreeMarker

Hi all Am .12.2016, 15:40 Uhr, schrieb Daniel Dekany : The original question in this thread is much less generic than in the linked one though, so it's certainly easier to answer. Just as a reminder, the specialities are these: - This project already have suffixless

Re: Omitting "-incubating" suffix in Maven artifact version attribute for FreeMarker

The original question in this thread is much less generic than in the linked one though, so it's certainly easier to answer. Just as a reminder, the specialities are these: - This project already have suffixless releases from before incubation, which are widely used. If the incubation fails,

Re: Omitting "-incubating" suffix in Maven artifact version attribute for FreeMarker

Thanks for the link Martjin! Definitely a late night reading exercise. Maybe since Jukka and Bertrand are around they can give us feedback as well :-) Either way will digest. John On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 7:50 AM Martijn Dashorst wrote: > For reference, please read

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop the 2013 Alternate Voting Policy

On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 12:02 AM Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 11:46 AM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > Pssst really need you guys looking at the proposed replacement > > documentation. > > > >

Re: Omitting "-incubating" suffix in Maven artifact version attribute for FreeMarker

For reference, please read this thread from 2008: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0b6c065a908c5f9ec39fa78c31b39c83a6fea29eb34fada0ee070413@1222432864@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E It has all the arguments for and against the -incubating versioning label, and why the disclaimer exists.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Juneau 6.0.1-incubating-RC3

PGP is silly in that the order of the identifies is fixed; and the first one is shown in debug outputs. I managed to rearrange mine to put st...@apache.org in top by using tools to split my key into its constituent parts and then cat it together in a modified order. Not recommended! Much