Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

The vote has started, so the proposal text is frozen. Assuming the vote is successful, adding more folk can be an early order of business for the newly created PPMC :) Thanks, Hen On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 7:27 PM, tornadomeet wuwei wrote: > hello, > > Please sign me

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

The vote has started, so the proposal text is frozen. Assuming the vote is successful, adding more folk can be an early order of business for the newly created PPMC :) Thanks, Hen On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Yihe Tang wrote: > Hi Henri, > > I am Larry Tang, working

Re: New website to go with new logo?

On 15.01.2017 15:47, John D. Ament wrote: > So I want to put this out there as an idea I had been toying with. With > our new logo we should launch a new incubator website. Something more > modern looking and easier to maintain. This is in part what I was trying > to do with the git conversion,

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

Hi Henri, I am Larry Tang, working with Minjie Wang (@jermainewang) on imperative programming part of MXNet. Please add me to the list of committers for MXNet project. I will work intensively on merging a NumPy interface into MXNet as its imperative subsystem in the next few months. My GitHub

Re: [VOTE] MXNet to enter the Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 3:28 AM, 梁德澎 wrote: > +1 > > 2017-01-17 19:09 GMT+08:00 YiZhi Liu : > > > +1 (binding) > > > > 2017-01-17 16:37 GMT+08:00 Xingjian SHI : > > > +1 > > > > > > > > >

Re: LDAP changes to support podlings

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 1:57 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 1:11 PM Sam Ruby wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes >> wrote: >> > Not sure what was the decision to be made here, but

Re: LDAP changes to support podlings

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 1:11 PM Sam Ruby wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes > wrote: > > Not sure what was the decision to be made here, but +1 to all > suggestions. > > All of PPMC as podling owners makes sense to me as long

Re: LDAP changes to support podlings

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > Not sure what was the decision to be made here, but +1 to all suggestions. > All of PPMC as podling owners makes sense to me as long as private@podling > is notified. The following four podlings don't have

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree (incubating) 0.1.0-rc4 as 0.1.0

Hello, TL/DR +1 (non-binding). So I had a go at running toree & jupyter from the artifacts and it all seems ok although there were a couple of things I noticed. I downloaded toree-pip from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/toree/0.1.0/rc4/ since that is what the original vote

Re: [VOTE] Impala 2.8.0 release candidate 1

Hello, Thanks Jim. I hadn't realised that I needed to download the apache-rat jar (I got it from Maven https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.rat/apache-rat/0.12). I also had to clone the impala repo from github to create the git archive since the archive available from

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Fineract 0.6.0-incubating Release

Hey all, congrats for the new release ;-). I heard about Fineract the first time and had a look to the website and the wiki pages (just scanned a bit). It sounds interesting. I would love to read more about real life usecases. Can anyone point me to some posts or info where I get an idea how

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Fineract 0.6.0-incubating Release

Hi all, The Apache Fineract team would like to announce the release of Apache Fineract 0.6.0-incubating with source and binary artifacts. *Apache Fineract is an open source system for core banking as a platform. Fineract provides a reliable, robust, and affordable solution for entrepreneurs,

[RESULT][VOTE] [APACHE FINERACT] 0.6.0-incubating for release

Hi all, The Apache Fineract 0.6.0-incubating release vote is now closed and has passed as follows: *3 binding votes.* *Justin McLean* *Jim Jagielski* *John D Ament* [*3*] +1 (binding) votes [0] -1 (binding) votes Thanks to all reviewing the release. Nazeer

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Fineract 0.6.0 (incubating)

Thank you John. On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 5:26 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Yes, please treat my vote as a +1 :-) > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 4:42 AM Nazeer Shaik < > nazeer.sh...@confluxtechnologies.com> wrote: > > > Hi John, > > > > As you suggested we have closed the issue

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Fineract 0.6.0 (incubating)

Yes, please treat my vote as a +1 :-) On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 4:42 AM Nazeer Shaik < nazeer.sh...@confluxtechnologies.com> wrote: > Hi John, > > As you suggested we have closed the issue https://issues.apache.org/ > jira/browse/FINERACT-357 >

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

hello, Please sign me up as a committer for MXNet. i've been contributed some `operators` and examples to MXNet, and i'll continue contribute to MXNet in the furture. GitHub ID: tornadomeet Thanks, Wei Wu - To

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

hello, Please sign me up as a committer for MXNet. i've been contributed some `operators` and examples to MXNet, and i'll continue contribute to MXNet in the furture. GitHub ID: tornadomeet Thanks, Wei Wu - To

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

hello, Please sign me up as a committer for MXNet. i've been contributed some `operators` and examples to MXNet, and i'll continue contribute to MXNet in the furture. GitHub ID: tornadomeet Thanks, Wei Wu - To

Re: [VOTE] MXNet to enter the Incubator

+1 2017-01-17 19:09 GMT+08:00 YiZhi Liu : > +1 (binding) > > 2017-01-17 16:37 GMT+08:00 Xingjian SHI : > > +1 > > > > > > > > From: Henri Yandell > > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 12:20 PM > > To:

Re: [VOTE] MXNet to enter the Incubator

+1 (binding) 2017-01-17 16:37 GMT+08:00 Xingjian SHI : > +1 > > > > From: Henri Yandell > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 12:20 PM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] MXNet to enter the Incubator > > Hi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Fineract 0.6.0 (incubating)

Hi John, As you suggested we have closed the issue https://issues.apache.org/ jira/browse/FINERACT-357 and created two separate issues to address remaining 2 suggestions/reviews. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-371 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-368 With this

Re: [VOTE] MXNet to enter the Incubator

+1 From: Henri Yandell Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 12:20 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] MXNet to enter the Incubator Hi Incubator folk, I would like to call a vote for accepting "MXNet" for incubation in the