Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Atlas 0.7.1 (incubating) RC3

+1 (binding) From: Madhan Neethiraj Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 12:24 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: d...@atlas.incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Atlas 0.7.1 (incubating) RC3 Incubator PMC, Apache Atlas

[VOTE] Apache DistributedLog release 0.4.0-incubating

Hi everyone, Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the Apache DistributedLog version 0.4.0-incubating, as follows: [ ] +1, Approve the release [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) The complete staging area is available for your

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Atlas 0.7.1 (incubating) RC3

+1 (binding) - Verified md5 - DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, NOTICE exist - Downloaded & Compiled the source On 1/23/17, 1:49 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >+1 (binding) > >I checked: >- incubating in name >- DISCLAIMER exists >- LICENSE is good >- NOTICE Is good (but year

Re: [DISCUSS] Podling report format changes

Jim, No, its all good and I appreciate your time on this. The APMM has been a source of confusion repeatedly. If nothing else, this email reminded me I need to shake that tree out a bit. John On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:03 AM Jim Apple wrote: > Ah, sorry for the

Re: [DISCUSS] Podling report format changes

+1 -Taylor > On Jan 25, 2017, at 10:43 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > > Just to provide, here's the proposed patch I have for the website > > Index: content/guides/ppmc.xml > === > --- content/guides/ppmc.xml

Re: Mentor docs: Incubator Access Authorization

Hen, Actually I just added a note to your PR. Just to be clear, the section you're following is if and only if the podling is using SVN as their source control. John On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 1:59 PM John D. Ament wrote: > TBH, I can't comprehend the first line. Raising

Re: Mentor docs: Incubator Access Authorization

TBH, I can't comprehend the first line. Raising a PR is the only option. Let me see what infra guys say. On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 1:25 PM Henri Yandell wrote: > Even with that, I've found the process to edit the git file to be pain. > > I sent a pull request instead, much

Re: Mentor docs: Incubator Access Authorization

Even with that, I've found the process to edit the git file to be pain. I sent a pull request instead, much simpler :) Any thoughts on making that the default instruction? It works for everyone rather than relying on PMC Chair access. On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 3:37 AM, John D. Ament

Re: [DISCUSS] Podling report format changes

(so sorry, I think my fingers got a little antsy and sent a blank reply) +1 on #1 +1 on #2 given the clarification later in the thread. +1 on #3. I don't view it as a burden to leave a comment. Most of the time, I can just parrot events I was involved with, or a slightly more detailed version

Re: [DISCUSS] Podling report format changes

Just to provide, here's the proposed patch I have for the website Index: content/guides/ppmc.xml === --- content/guides/ppmc.xml (revision 1780221) +++ content/guides/ppmc.xml (working copy) @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ Private

Re: [RESULT] MXNet to enter the Incubator

I fixed the link for it. It was added, but for whatever reason wasn't clickable. On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 6:59 AM Craig Russell wrote: > Hi Hen, > > To make it easier for secretary to request new accounts, can you post the > proposal to

Re: [RESULT] MXNet to enter the Incubator

Hi Hen, To make it easier for secretary to request new accounts, can you post the proposal to https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ProjectProposals Thanks, Craig > On Jan 23, 2017, at 9:19 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > > Vote is closed and successful. > > 7 binding +1 votes. >

Re: [DISCUSS] Podling report format changes

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:40 AM P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > I'm fine with 1 and 3, but 2 gives me pause. I like the idea of the > maturity model, but is it yet another burden on mentors? > > I would hope not. How often are mentors writing the reports for podlings, vs pushing

Re: Mentor docs: Incubator Access Authorization

Heh. Last time I chased this one, I got as far as getting infra to update the first couple of lines to note that the file was in git instead of in SVN (long story, before the SVN blow up the file was maintained in SVN and mirrored in git, its now maintained in git and mirrored to SVN) I'll

[CANCEL] [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.6.3 (incubating) - rc1

I propose to cancel the vote here for the incubating release. Ranger has graduated to TLP. This release will be taken up as per TLP release process. > On Jan 13, 2017, at 9:53 AM, Velmurugan Periasamy wrote: > > Incubator PMC: > > Apache Ranger community has voted on and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.6.3 (incubating) - rc1

Thanks for the clarification Justin/John. I will cancel the vote here and follow TLP release process. License issues need some clarification. Could you please take a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-1326 for details? > On Jan 20, 2017, at 11:37 PM, Justin Mclean