Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

Thanks for the info Greg! Ralph > On Apr 6, 2017, at 9:14 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 4:04 AM, Thorsten Schöning > wrote: > >... > > and I am not quite sure what the process is to move > > from svn

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 4:04 AM, Thorsten Schöning wrote: >... > > and I am not quite sure what the process is to move > > from svn to git without losing history. I guess I will just create > > a Jira issue for infra and find out. > > From my understanding, a logging PMC

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.6.2 (incubating)

We are still in need of two further +1 votes. Is there someone else so kind to support us, please? Thanks in advance, Svante ᐧ 2017-04-03 15:00 GMT+02:00 Tom Barber : > Compiles, RAT looks okay, artefacts look okay, sigs look okay. > > +1 from me > > Tom > > On Sun, Apr 2,

Re: Revisit policy that all IPMC members have commit privs to all incubator repositories.

John, your email confuses me for many reasons. On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 6:57 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > This solution describes one of the many reasons I feel the incubator itself > is broken. We're trying to rewrite policy, as a means to work around some > awkward setup

Re: Revisit policy that all IPMC members have commit privs to all incubator repositories.

John D. Ament wrote on 4/6/17 6:57 AM: > This solution describes one of the many reasons I feel the incubator itself > is broken. We're trying to rewrite policy, as a means to work around some > awkward setup sitting around, instead of just treating podlings as regular > projects, with some

Re: Revisit policy that all IPMC members have commit privs to all incubator repositories.

Hi I think this sounds very reasonable. +1 Regards Felix > Am 06.04.2017 um 07:06 schrieb Sam Ruby : > > Background, from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13804 > >> With this feedback and review, I believe we're still operating as expected. >> >> * Per

Re: Revisit policy that all IPMC members have commit privs to all incubator repositories.

This solution describes one of the many reasons I feel the incubator itself is broken. We're trying to rewrite policy, as a means to work around some awkward setup sitting around, instead of just treating podlings as regular projects, with some restrictions in place. Create something in ldap

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

Guten Tag Ralph Goers, am Donnerstag, 6. April 2017 um 07:10 schrieben Sie: > No. To be honest, I’m not 100% sure if the community wants to move > to git or not "We" want, as nobody objected in the discussion and Matts description of how to deal with GitHub PRs sounds very promising. > and I am

Re: Revisit policy that all IPMC members have commit privs to all incubator repositories.

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 7:06 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > ...I believe that the alternative is technically feasible: have each podling > manage a list of committers for that podling: > > https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/ Which is what they will have to do anyway after

Re: Revisit policy that all IPMC members have commit privs to all incubator repositories.

That conclusion sounds pretty scary in isolation. But if taken along the garden path in small steps, it seems really very right. Given that under this proposal any IPMC member could get access to anything needed, I don't see any particular loss. Also, with reasonable whimsy tooling, the