Re: Heron Grant Status & Monthly Reporting

[Fu Maosong]

I was also under the impression that an SGA was required. I will also check
with Twitter Lgeal to get more context on it.

2017-09-14 19:38 GMT-07:00 Bill Graham :

> I was under the impression that an SGA was required, hence we've pursued
> that route. If we could instead just do individual ICLAs, that seems like a
> much easier route. +1 for that.
>
> Bill
>
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 7:18 PM P. Taylor Goetz  wrote:
>
> > +1 for ICLAs. That would make things easier, and I imagine (hope) many
> > have already been filed.
> >
> > -Taylor
> >
> > > On Sep 14, 2017, at 9:09 PM, John D. Ament 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > Changing the subject to avoid any confusion and also looping in the
> Heron
> > > team to this question/concern.
> > >
> > > Personally, I'd like to understand why Heron is inclined to do a SGA
> > rather
> > > than ICLAs.  Typically, an SGA would be used if the source code isn't
> > > already Apache Licensed and if we don't receive ICLAs from all
> > > contributors.
> > >
> > > Based on [1] there have been 69 contributors to Heron (plus some
> > ambiguity
> > > since source code is being dropped in from other sources).  A SGA would
> > > only work if Twitter has full custody to the source code.  We have to
> be
> > > very careful that such an SGA doesn't list too much within it, or
> carry a
> > > broad disclaimer on it (based on lessons learned from the Netbeans
> SGA).
> > >
> > > With this in mind, I'd actually formally recommend against a SGA for
> > Heron,
> > > and instead import the code as is and sort through the relevant
> licensing
> > > issues here at Apache.
> > >
> > > Further, in the below thread, there's a recommendation that the podling
> > be
> > > left at monthly until repositories are brought over.  I have no opinion
> > on
> > > the matter, and defer to those recommending the action.  Does the
> podling
> > > have any concerns staying monthly?
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > > [1]: https://github.com/twitter/heron/graphs/contributors
> > >
> > >> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 5:09 PM Fu Maosong 
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> For Heron, Twitter Legal is working on the SGA. We have sent emails
> for
> > the
> > >> progress last week but they haven't replied yet.
> > >>
> > >> 2017-09-12 17:24 GMT-07:00 John D. Ament :
> > >>
> > >>> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 6:02 PM Dave Fisher 
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> >  Pulsar is now signed off and also shepherd notes done.
> > 
> >  Heron is a little slow moving over should we keep them monthly until
> > >> the
> >  repos is moved?
> > 
> > >>>
> > >>> Any thoughts on why Heron may be slow moving?  I'd like to understand
> > the
> > >>> problem(s) first before condemning them to monthly reporting.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > 
> >  Regards,
> >  Dave
> > 
> > > On Sep 12, 2017, at 2:40 PM, Dave Fisher 
> > >>> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'll be signing Pulsar shortly.
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone
> > >
> > >> On Sep 12, 2017, at 2:38 PM, John D. Ament  >
> >  wrote:
> > >>
> > >> All,
> > >>
> > >> Below please find the revised report.  I'm extremely happy to see
> > >> two
> > >>> of
> > >> the missing podlings reported.  Hopefully we can get the remaining
> > >>> sign
> > >> offs in place (Griffin & Pulsar).  Hopefully Spot can file a
> report
> > >> as
> >  well.
> > >>
> > >> Incubator PMC report for September 2017
> > >>
> > >> The Apache Incubator is the entry path into the ASF for projects
> and
> > >> codebases wishing to become part of the Foundation's efforts.
> > >>
> > >> There are currently 54 podlings incubating.  We executed nine
> > >> podling
> > >> releases and have one podling planning to graduate this month.  No
> >  changes
> > >> to the PMC structure this month.
> > >>
> > >> * Community
> > >>
> > >> New IPMC members:
> > >>
> > >> - None
> > >>
> > >> People who left the IPMC:
> > >>
> > >> - None
> > >>
> > >> * New Podlings
> > >>
> > >> - Amaterasu
> > >> - Daffodil
> > >>
> > >> * Podlings that Retired
> > >>
> > >> - MRQL
> > >>
> > >> * Podlings that failed to report, expected next month
> > >>
> > >> - Myriad
> > >> - Spot
> > >>
> > >> * Reports Missing Sign off
> > >>
> > >> - Griffin
> > >> - Pulsar
> > >>
> > >> * Graduations
> > >>
> > >> The board has motions for the following:
> > >>
> > >> - RocketMQ
> > >> - Your podling here?
> > >>
> > >> * Releases
> > >>
> > >> The following releases entered distribution during the month of
> > >> August:
> > >>
> > >> - 2017-08-01 Apache Juneau 6.3.1
> > >> - 2017-08-01 Apache Tamaya 0.3.0
> > >> 

Re: Heron Grant Status & Monthly Reporting

[Bill Graham]

I was under the impression that an SGA was required, hence we've pursued
that route. If we could instead just do individual ICLAs, that seems like a
much easier route. +1 for that.

Bill

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 7:18 PM P. Taylor Goetz  wrote:

> +1 for ICLAs. That would make things easier, and I imagine (hope) many
> have already been filed.
>
> -Taylor
>
> > On Sep 14, 2017, at 9:09 PM, John D. Ament 
> wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > Changing the subject to avoid any confusion and also looping in the Heron
> > team to this question/concern.
> >
> > Personally, I'd like to understand why Heron is inclined to do a SGA
> rather
> > than ICLAs.  Typically, an SGA would be used if the source code isn't
> > already Apache Licensed and if we don't receive ICLAs from all
> > contributors.
> >
> > Based on [1] there have been 69 contributors to Heron (plus some
> ambiguity
> > since source code is being dropped in from other sources).  A SGA would
> > only work if Twitter has full custody to the source code.  We have to be
> > very careful that such an SGA doesn't list too much within it, or carry a
> > broad disclaimer on it (based on lessons learned from the Netbeans SGA).
> >
> > With this in mind, I'd actually formally recommend against a SGA for
> Heron,
> > and instead import the code as is and sort through the relevant licensing
> > issues here at Apache.
> >
> > Further, in the below thread, there's a recommendation that the podling
> be
> > left at monthly until repositories are brought over.  I have no opinion
> on
> > the matter, and defer to those recommending the action.  Does the podling
> > have any concerns staying monthly?
> >
> > John
> >
> > [1]: https://github.com/twitter/heron/graphs/contributors
> >
> >> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 5:09 PM Fu Maosong  wrote:
> >>
> >> For Heron, Twitter Legal is working on the SGA. We have sent emails for
> the
> >> progress last week but they haven't replied yet.
> >>
> >> 2017-09-12 17:24 GMT-07:00 John D. Ament :
> >>
> >>> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 6:02 PM Dave Fisher 
> >> wrote:
> >>>
>  Pulsar is now signed off and also shepherd notes done.
> 
>  Heron is a little slow moving over should we keep them monthly until
> >> the
>  repos is moved?
> 
> >>>
> >>> Any thoughts on why Heron may be slow moving?  I'd like to understand
> the
> >>> problem(s) first before condemning them to monthly reporting.
> >>>
> >>>
> 
>  Regards,
>  Dave
> 
> > On Sep 12, 2017, at 2:40 PM, Dave Fisher 
> >>> wrote:
> >
> > I'll be signing Pulsar shortly.
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> >> On Sep 12, 2017, at 2:38 PM, John D. Ament 
>  wrote:
> >>
> >> All,
> >>
> >> Below please find the revised report.  I'm extremely happy to see
> >> two
> >>> of
> >> the missing podlings reported.  Hopefully we can get the remaining
> >>> sign
> >> offs in place (Griffin & Pulsar).  Hopefully Spot can file a report
> >> as
>  well.
> >>
> >> Incubator PMC report for September 2017
> >>
> >> The Apache Incubator is the entry path into the ASF for projects and
> >> codebases wishing to become part of the Foundation's efforts.
> >>
> >> There are currently 54 podlings incubating.  We executed nine
> >> podling
> >> releases and have one podling planning to graduate this month.  No
>  changes
> >> to the PMC structure this month.
> >>
> >> * Community
> >>
> >> New IPMC members:
> >>
> >> - None
> >>
> >> People who left the IPMC:
> >>
> >> - None
> >>
> >> * New Podlings
> >>
> >> - Amaterasu
> >> - Daffodil
> >>
> >> * Podlings that Retired
> >>
> >> - MRQL
> >>
> >> * Podlings that failed to report, expected next month
> >>
> >> - Myriad
> >> - Spot
> >>
> >> * Reports Missing Sign off
> >>
> >> - Griffin
> >> - Pulsar
> >>
> >> * Graduations
> >>
> >> The board has motions for the following:
> >>
> >> - RocketMQ
> >> - Your podling here?
> >>
> >> * Releases
> >>
> >> The following releases entered distribution during the month of
> >> August:
> >>
> >> - 2017-08-01 Apache Juneau 6.3.1
> >> - 2017-08-01 Apache Tamaya 0.3.0
> >> - 2017-08-05 Apache Tamaya Extensions 0.3.0
> >> - 2017-08-08 Apache Pulsar 1.19.0
> >> - 2017-08-16 Apache HTrace 4.3.0
> >> - 2017-08-16 Apache Spot 1.0
> >> - 2017-08-17 Apache Fluo 1.0.0
> >> - 2017-08-23 Apache S2Graph 0.2.0
> >> - 2017-08-29 Apache Livy 0.4.0
> >>
> >> * IP Clearance
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> * Legal / Trademarks
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> * Infrastructure
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> * Miscellaneous
> >>
> >>
> >>
> 

Re: Heron Grant Status & Monthly Reporting

[P. Taylor Goetz]

+1 for ICLAs. That would make things easier, and I imagine (hope) many have 
already been filed.

-Taylor

> On Sep 14, 2017, at 9:09 PM, John D. Ament  wrote:
> 
> All,
> 
> Changing the subject to avoid any confusion and also looping in the Heron
> team to this question/concern.
> 
> Personally, I'd like to understand why Heron is inclined to do a SGA rather
> than ICLAs.  Typically, an SGA would be used if the source code isn't
> already Apache Licensed and if we don't receive ICLAs from all
> contributors.
> 
> Based on [1] there have been 69 contributors to Heron (plus some ambiguity
> since source code is being dropped in from other sources).  A SGA would
> only work if Twitter has full custody to the source code.  We have to be
> very careful that such an SGA doesn't list too much within it, or carry a
> broad disclaimer on it (based on lessons learned from the Netbeans SGA).
> 
> With this in mind, I'd actually formally recommend against a SGA for Heron,
> and instead import the code as is and sort through the relevant licensing
> issues here at Apache.
> 
> Further, in the below thread, there's a recommendation that the podling be
> left at monthly until repositories are brought over.  I have no opinion on
> the matter, and defer to those recommending the action.  Does the podling
> have any concerns staying monthly?
> 
> John
> 
> [1]: https://github.com/twitter/heron/graphs/contributors
> 
>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 5:09 PM Fu Maosong  wrote:
>> 
>> For Heron, Twitter Legal is working on the SGA. We have sent emails for the
>> progress last week but they haven't replied yet.
>> 
>> 2017-09-12 17:24 GMT-07:00 John D. Ament :
>> 
>>> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 6:02 PM Dave Fisher 
>> wrote:
>>> 
 Pulsar is now signed off and also shepherd notes done.
 
 Heron is a little slow moving over should we keep them monthly until
>> the
 repos is moved?
 
>>> 
>>> Any thoughts on why Heron may be slow moving?  I'd like to understand the
>>> problem(s) first before condemning them to monthly reporting.
>>> 
>>> 
 
 Regards,
 Dave
 
> On Sep 12, 2017, at 2:40 PM, Dave Fisher 
>>> wrote:
> 
> I'll be signing Pulsar shortly.
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Sep 12, 2017, at 2:38 PM, John D. Ament 
 wrote:
>> 
>> All,
>> 
>> Below please find the revised report.  I'm extremely happy to see
>> two
>>> of
>> the missing podlings reported.  Hopefully we can get the remaining
>>> sign
>> offs in place (Griffin & Pulsar).  Hopefully Spot can file a report
>> as
 well.
>> 
>> Incubator PMC report for September 2017
>> 
>> The Apache Incubator is the entry path into the ASF for projects and
>> codebases wishing to become part of the Foundation's efforts.
>> 
>> There are currently 54 podlings incubating.  We executed nine
>> podling
>> releases and have one podling planning to graduate this month.  No
 changes
>> to the PMC structure this month.
>> 
>> * Community
>> 
>> New IPMC members:
>> 
>> - None
>> 
>> People who left the IPMC:
>> 
>> - None
>> 
>> * New Podlings
>> 
>> - Amaterasu
>> - Daffodil
>> 
>> * Podlings that Retired
>> 
>> - MRQL
>> 
>> * Podlings that failed to report, expected next month
>> 
>> - Myriad
>> - Spot
>> 
>> * Reports Missing Sign off
>> 
>> - Griffin
>> - Pulsar
>> 
>> * Graduations
>> 
>> The board has motions for the following:
>> 
>> - RocketMQ
>> - Your podling here?
>> 
>> * Releases
>> 
>> The following releases entered distribution during the month of
>> August:
>> 
>> - 2017-08-01 Apache Juneau 6.3.1
>> - 2017-08-01 Apache Tamaya 0.3.0
>> - 2017-08-05 Apache Tamaya Extensions 0.3.0
>> - 2017-08-08 Apache Pulsar 1.19.0
>> - 2017-08-16 Apache HTrace 4.3.0
>> - 2017-08-16 Apache Spot 1.0
>> - 2017-08-17 Apache Fluo 1.0.0
>> - 2017-08-23 Apache S2Graph 0.2.0
>> - 2017-08-29 Apache Livy 0.4.0
>> 
>> * IP Clearance
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> * Legal / Trademarks
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> * Infrastructure
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> * Miscellaneous
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> * Credits
>> 
>> 
>>> --
>> Table of Contents
>> AriaTosca
>> Daffodil
>> Gearpump
>> Gobblin
>> Griffin
>> Heron
>> Hivemall
>> HTrace
>> Livy
>> Mnemonic
>> MRQL
>> Myriad
>> Omid
>> OpenWhisk
>> Pony Mail
>> Pulsar
>> Quickstep
>> SAMOA
>> SINGA
>> Spot
>> Superset
>> Taverna
>> Tephra
>> Trafodion
>> Wave
>> 
>> 

Incubator PMC report submitted

[John D. Ament]

I've submitted the current wiki report to the board.

John

Heron Grant Status & Monthly Reporting

[John D. Ament]

All,

Changing the subject to avoid any confusion and also looping in the Heron
team to this question/concern.

Personally, I'd like to understand why Heron is inclined to do a SGA rather
than ICLAs.  Typically, an SGA would be used if the source code isn't
already Apache Licensed and if we don't receive ICLAs from all
contributors.

Based on [1] there have been 69 contributors to Heron (plus some ambiguity
since source code is being dropped in from other sources).  A SGA would
only work if Twitter has full custody to the source code.  We have to be
very careful that such an SGA doesn't list too much within it, or carry a
broad disclaimer on it (based on lessons learned from the Netbeans SGA).

With this in mind, I'd actually formally recommend against a SGA for Heron,
and instead import the code as is and sort through the relevant licensing
issues here at Apache.

Further, in the below thread, there's a recommendation that the podling be
left at monthly until repositories are brought over.  I have no opinion on
the matter, and defer to those recommending the action.  Does the podling
have any concerns staying monthly?

John

[1]: https://github.com/twitter/heron/graphs/contributors

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 5:09 PM Fu Maosong  wrote:

> For Heron, Twitter Legal is working on the SGA. We have sent emails for the
> progress last week but they haven't replied yet.
>
> 2017-09-12 17:24 GMT-07:00 John D. Ament :
>
> > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 6:02 PM Dave Fisher 
> wrote:
> >
> > > Pulsar is now signed off and also shepherd notes done.
> > >
> > > Heron is a little slow moving over should we keep them monthly until
> the
> > > repos is moved?
> > >
> >
> > Any thoughts on why Heron may be slow moving?  I'd like to understand the
> > problem(s) first before condemning them to monthly reporting.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Dave
> > >
> > > > On Sep 12, 2017, at 2:40 PM, Dave Fisher 
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'll be signing Pulsar shortly.
> > > >
> > > > Sent from my iPhone
> > > >
> > > >> On Sep 12, 2017, at 2:38 PM, John D. Ament 
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> All,
> > > >>
> > > >> Below please find the revised report.  I'm extremely happy to see
> two
> > of
> > > >> the missing podlings reported.  Hopefully we can get the remaining
> > sign
> > > >> offs in place (Griffin & Pulsar).  Hopefully Spot can file a report
> as
> > > well.
> > > >>
> > > >> Incubator PMC report for September 2017
> > > >>
> > > >> The Apache Incubator is the entry path into the ASF for projects and
> > > >> codebases wishing to become part of the Foundation's efforts.
> > > >>
> > > >> There are currently 54 podlings incubating.  We executed nine
> podling
> > > >> releases and have one podling planning to graduate this month.  No
> > > changes
> > > >> to the PMC structure this month.
> > > >>
> > > >> * Community
> > > >>
> > > >> New IPMC members:
> > > >>
> > > >> - None
> > > >>
> > > >> People who left the IPMC:
> > > >>
> > > >> - None
> > > >>
> > > >> * New Podlings
> > > >>
> > > >> - Amaterasu
> > > >> - Daffodil
> > > >>
> > > >> * Podlings that Retired
> > > >>
> > > >> - MRQL
> > > >>
> > > >> * Podlings that failed to report, expected next month
> > > >>
> > > >> - Myriad
> > > >> - Spot
> > > >>
> > > >> * Reports Missing Sign off
> > > >>
> > > >> - Griffin
> > > >> - Pulsar
> > > >>
> > > >> * Graduations
> > > >>
> > > >> The board has motions for the following:
> > > >>
> > > >> - RocketMQ
> > > >> - Your podling here?
> > > >>
> > > >> * Releases
> > > >>
> > > >> The following releases entered distribution during the month of
> > > >> August:
> > > >>
> > > >> - 2017-08-01 Apache Juneau 6.3.1
> > > >> - 2017-08-01 Apache Tamaya 0.3.0
> > > >> - 2017-08-05 Apache Tamaya Extensions 0.3.0
> > > >> - 2017-08-08 Apache Pulsar 1.19.0
> > > >> - 2017-08-16 Apache HTrace 4.3.0
> > > >> - 2017-08-16 Apache Spot 1.0
> > > >> - 2017-08-17 Apache Fluo 1.0.0
> > > >> - 2017-08-23 Apache S2Graph 0.2.0
> > > >> - 2017-08-29 Apache Livy 0.4.0
> > > >>
> > > >> * IP Clearance
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> * Legal / Trademarks
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> * Infrastructure
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> * Miscellaneous
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> * Credits
> > > >>
> > > >> 
> > --
> > > >>  Table of Contents
> > > >> AriaTosca
> > > >> Daffodil
> > > >> Gearpump
> > > >> Gobblin
> > > >> Griffin
> > > >> Heron
> > > >> Hivemall
> > > >> HTrace
> > > >> Livy
> > > >> Mnemonic
> > > >> MRQL
> > > >> Myriad
> > > >> Omid
> > > >> OpenWhisk
> > > >> Pony Mail
> > > >> Pulsar
> > > >> Quickstep
> > > >> SAMOA
> > > >> SINGA
> > > >> Spot
> > > >> Superset
> > > >> Taverna
> > > >> Tephra
> > > >> Trafodion
> > > >> Wave
> > > >>
> > > >> 
> 

Re: [DISCUSS] The draft graduation resolution

[John D. Ament]

At this point, if you see anyone raise a concern please feel free to start
the vote.

Here's my own +1 that Mnemonic is good to go.

John

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 5:31 PM Han Luke  wrote:

> This looks good to me, love to see Mnemonic will graduate from incubate.
>
>
>
> _
> From: Gang(Gary) Wang >
> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 11:15
> Subject: [DISCUSS] The draft graduation resolution
> To: >
>
>
> Hi everyone
>
> Please give your feedback on this draft graduation resolution below,
> that is proposed by our community and hope we can reach a
> consensus on this resolution here before we start recommendation
> vote.
>
> Thanks!
>
> 
>
> Establish the Apache Mnemonic Project
>
> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of
> the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish
> a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance
> of open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public,
> related to a transparent nonvolatile hybrid memory oriented library for
> Big data, High-performance computing, and Analytics.
>
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee
> (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Mnemonic Project", be and hereby is
> established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation, and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the Apache Mnemonic Project be and hereby is responsible
> for the creation and maintenance of software related to a transparent
> nonvolatile hybrid memory oriented library for Big data,
> High-performance computing and Analytics; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Mnemonic" be and
> hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the
> direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Mnemonic
> Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the
> projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Mnemonic
> Project, and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are
> appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Mnemonic
> Project:
>
> * Andrew Kyle Purtell >
> * Debo >
> * Gang Wang >
> * Hao Cheng >
> * James R. Taylor >
> * Johnu George >
> * Kai Zheng >
> * Patrick D. Hunt >
> * Rakesh Radhakrishnan >
> * Uma Maheswara Rao G >
> * Yanping Wang >
>
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Gang Wang be appointed to
> the office of Vice President, Apache Mnemonic, to serve in accordance
> with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the
> Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal
> or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed, and be it
> further
>
> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Mnemonic PMC be and hereby is tasked
> with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to encourage open
> development and increased participation in the Apache Mnemonic Project;
> and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the Apache Mnemonic Project be and hereby is tasked with
> the migration and rationalization of the Apache Incubator Mnemonic
> podling; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator
> Mnemonic podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator PMC are hereafter
> discharged.
>
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] The draft graduation resolution

[Han Luke]

This looks good to me, love to see Mnemonic will graduate from incubate.



_
From: Gang(Gary) Wang >
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 11:15
Subject: [DISCUSS] The draft graduation resolution
To: >


Hi everyone

Please give your feedback on this draft graduation resolution below,
that is proposed by our community and hope we can reach a
consensus on this resolution here before we start recommendation
vote.

Thanks!



Establish the Apache Mnemonic Project

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of
the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish
a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance
of open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public,
related to a transparent nonvolatile hybrid memory oriented library for
Big data, High-performance computing, and Analytics.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee
(PMC), to be known as the "Apache Mnemonic Project", be and hereby is
established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation, and be it further

RESOLVED, that the Apache Mnemonic Project be and hereby is responsible
for the creation and maintenance of software related to a transparent
nonvolatile hybrid memory oriented library for Big data,
High-performance computing and Analytics; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Mnemonic" be and
hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the
direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Mnemonic
Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the
projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Mnemonic
Project, and be it further

RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are
appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Mnemonic
Project:

* Andrew Kyle Purtell >
* Debo >
* Gang Wang >
* Hao Cheng >
* James R. Taylor >
* Johnu George >
* Kai Zheng >
* Patrick D. Hunt >
* Rakesh Radhakrishnan >
* Uma Maheswara Rao G >
* Yanping Wang >

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Gang Wang be appointed to
the office of Vice President, Apache Mnemonic, to serve in accordance
with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the
Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal
or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed, and be it
further

RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Mnemonic PMC be and hereby is tasked
with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to encourage open
development and increased participation in the Apache Mnemonic Project;
and be it further

RESOLVED, that the Apache Mnemonic Project be and hereby is tasked with
the migration and rationalization of the Apache Incubator Mnemonic
podling; and be it further

RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator
Mnemonic podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator PMC are hereafter
discharged.