Re: Accepting Fineract CN code into TLP Apache Fineract

2017-10-21 Thread Greg Stein 
Easy peasy ... what you're looking for is this:
https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/

Just follow that process. Get the software grant filed with the Secretary.

Will you be lifting the github/mifosio repositories whole? If so, then file
a ticket with Infra to move them under the apache/ org on GitHub (and to
use the "gitbox" beta to work with them read/write on github). If you're
going to take HEAD from those repositories and merge them into existing
fineract repositories, then that's direct community work (tho somebody
should then mark the mifosio repositories as obsolete/read-only/closed).

Cheers,
-g


On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Myrle Krantz  wrote:

> Hello Incubator,
>
> The Fineract community just voted to accept mifos I/O code into Apache
> Fineract.
>
> The code consists of all of the repositories found here:
> https://github.com/mifosio
>
> Here's the discussion thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ed514d35ffd582c856d5b2e88d4423
> ad78036e3ed55e278045f7b56e@%3Cdev.fineract.apache.org%3E
>
> Here's the vote thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9bab35a9c5bcde6f460afc72d50e1c
> decd57c8675abdbaefcc1d48b8@%3Cdev.fineract.apache.org%3E
>
> And here's the vote result:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8a791e91aa1295c84cd51f0429af2f
> cdada7db57fdb65b4185ea5fc0@%3Cdev.fineract.apache.org%3E
>
> Apache Incubator policy is that all new code enters via the incubator:
> https://incubator.apache.org/faq.html
>
> The code currently belongs to the Mifos Initiative.  Ed Cable, CEO of
> the Mifos Initiative, is preparing the software grant.  What are our
> next steps to get the code accepted by the Apache Software Foundation?
>
> Best Regards,
> Myrle Krantz,
> Committer, Apache Fineract
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Accepting Fineract CN code into TLP Apache Fineract

2017-10-21 Thread Myrle Krantz 
Hello Incubator,

The Fineract community just voted to accept mifos I/O code into Apache Fineract.

The code consists of all of the repositories found here:
https://github.com/mifosio

Here's the discussion thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ed514d35ffd582c856d5b2e88d4423ad78036e3ed55e278045f7b56e@%3Cdev.fineract.apache.org%3E

Here's the vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9bab35a9c5bcde6f460afc72d50e1cdecd57c8675abdbaefcc1d48b8@%3Cdev.fineract.apache.org%3E

And here's the vote result:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8a791e91aa1295c84cd51f0429af2fcdada7db57fdb65b4185ea5fc0@%3Cdev.fineract.apache.org%3E

Apache Incubator policy is that all new code enters via the incubator:
https://incubator.apache.org/faq.html

The code currently belongs to the Mifos Initiative.  Ed Cable, CEO of
the Mifos Initiative, is preparing the software grant.  What are our
next steps to get the code accepted by the Apache Software Foundation?

Best Regards,
Myrle Krantz,
Committer, Apache Fineract

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

2017-10-21 Thread Mark Struberg 
> Even though there is no
> veto vote on releases, if someone raised a valid issue, the group might
> postpone a release as well, even after +1s.


Yes indeed. Sometimes a single person discovers a problem during the voting 
process and casts -1.
A -1 always should come with good arguments.
Usually that leads to the others (who already voted) review this argument. And 
if it turns out to really be a problem which the others have simply overlooked, 
then they often amend their vote to a -1 as well.

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 21.10.2017 um 19:15 schrieb Wade Chandler :
> 
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> 
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
> 
> It is technically both with nuances. Time and 3 binding +1s plus a majority
> +1s. The 72 hours is a participation enabler. The 3 bindings is the minimum
> required, but a majority -1s would be a big deal. Even though there is no
> veto vote on releases, if someone raised a valid issue, the group might
> postpone a release as well, even after +1s.
> 
> Wade
> 
> 
> 
> On Oct 21, 2017 08:55, "Geertjan Wielenga" 
> wrote:
> 
>> Many thanks -- so, right now, Bertrand, John, and Mark have done binding
>> votes -- i.e., two of our mentors and the VP Incubator.
>> 
>> How many binding votes are needed or is it simply a question of time, i.e.,
>> at the time that the vote expires, if there's no -1, and only +1 binding
>> votes, then the release of this specific repo that is one of the repose of
>> Apache NetBeans is approved?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Gj
>> 
>> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Mark Struberg 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> +1 IPMC binding
>>> 
>>> LICENSE, NOTICE, rat, dependencies, signing, etc all looks good.
>>> 
>>> However when building it from the distribution zip on my macbook with
>>> java8 144 I sometimes get test errors.
>>> All of them in knockout.js, but each time something different:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Configuring TestNG with: TestNG652Configurator
>>> Oct 21, 2017 1:55:53 PM org.glassfish.grizzly.http.
>> server.NetworkListener
>>> start
>>> INFORMATION: Started listener bound to [0.0.0.0:18572]
>>> Oct 21, 2017 1:55:53 PM org.glassfish.grizzly.http.server.HttpServer
>> start
>>> INFORMATION: [HttpServer] Started.
>>> Tests run: 78, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 6.451
>> sec
>>> <<< FAILURE!
>>> displayContentOfComputedArrayOnComputedASubpair(org.
>> netbeans.html.ko4j.KOFx)
>>> Time elapsed: 0.03 sec  <<< FAILURE!
>>> java.lang.AssertionError: We got callback from 2nd child null expecting:
>>> null actual: Last
>>>at net.java.html.json.tests.Utils.assertEquals(Utils.java:217)
>>>at net.java.html.json.tests.KnockoutTest.
>>> displayContentOfComputedArrayOnComputedASubpair(KnockoutTest.java:622)
>>>at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>>at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>>> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>>>at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>>> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>>at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>>>at org.netbeans.html.ko4j.KOFx.run(KOFx.java:73)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Tests run: 78, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 7.772
>> sec
>>> <<< FAILURE!
>>> rawObject(org.netbeans.html.ko4j.KOFx)  Time elapsed: 0.067 sec  <<<
>>> FAILURE!
>>> netscape.javascript.JSException: netscape.javascript.JSException:
>>> java.lang.NullPointerException
>>>at org.netbeans.html.ko4j.$JsCallbacks$.raw$org_netbeans_
>>> html_ko4j_Knockout$setValue$ILjava_lang_Object_2($JsCallbacks$.java:156)
>>>at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>>at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>>> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>>>at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>>> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>>at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>>>at sun.reflect.misc.Trampoline.invoke(MethodUtil.java:71)
>>>at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor1.invoke(Unknown Source)
>>>at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>>> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>>at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>>>at sun.reflect.misc.MethodUtil.invoke(MethodUtil.java:275)
>>>at com.sun.webkit.Utilities.lambda$fwkInvokeWithContext$
>>> 60(Utilities.java:94)
>>>at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
>>>at com.sun.webkit.Utilities.fwkInvokeWithContext(
>>> Utilities.java:94)
>>>at com.sun.webkit.dom.JSObject.callImpl(Native Method)
>>>at com.sun.webkit.dom.JSObject.call(JSObject.java:115)
>>>at org.netbeans.html.boot.fx.AbstractFXPresenter$JSFn.
>> invokeImpl(
>>> AbstractFXPresenter.java:418)
>>> 
>>> Failed tests:
>>>  KOFx.run:73 » JS netscape.javascript.JSException:
>>> java.lang.NullPointerExcepti...
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Running the build for the forth time made it succee

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

2017-10-21 Thread Mark Struberg 
Hi Geertjan

After the 72h is up you need 3 more (binding) +1 than (binding) -1.

By having 0x -1 and 3x +1 the vote does pass _right now_.
But of course we have to wait till the 72h are over ;)
Looks very promising though.


LieGrue,
strub




> Am 21.10.2017 um 14:55 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga 
> :
> 
> Many thanks -- so, right now, Bertrand, John, and Mark have done binding
> votes -- i.e., two of our mentors and the VP Incubator.
> 
> How many binding votes are needed or is it simply a question of time, i.e.,
> at the time that the vote expires, if there's no -1, and only +1 binding
> votes, then the release of this specific repo that is one of the repose of
> Apache NetBeans is approved?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gj
> 
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Mark Struberg 
> wrote:
> 
>> +1 IPMC binding
>> 
>> LICENSE, NOTICE, rat, dependencies, signing, etc all looks good.
>> 
>> However when building it from the distribution zip on my macbook with
>> java8 144 I sometimes get test errors.
>> All of them in knockout.js, but each time something different:
>> 
>> 
>> Configuring TestNG with: TestNG652Configurator
>> Oct 21, 2017 1:55:53 PM org.glassfish.grizzly.http.server.NetworkListener
>> start
>> INFORMATION: Started listener bound to [0.0.0.0:18572]
>> Oct 21, 2017 1:55:53 PM org.glassfish.grizzly.http.server.HttpServer start
>> INFORMATION: [HttpServer] Started.
>> Tests run: 78, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 6.451 sec
>> <<< FAILURE!
>> displayContentOfComputedArrayOnComputedASubpair(org.netbeans.html.ko4j.KOFx)
>> Time elapsed: 0.03 sec  <<< FAILURE!
>> java.lang.AssertionError: We got callback from 2nd child null expecting:
>> null actual: Last
>>at net.java.html.json.tests.Utils.assertEquals(Utils.java:217)
>>at net.java.html.json.tests.KnockoutTest.
>> displayContentOfComputedArrayOnComputedASubpair(KnockoutTest.java:622)
>>at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>>at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>>at org.netbeans.html.ko4j.KOFx.run(KOFx.java:73)
>> 
>> 
>> Tests run: 78, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 7.772 sec
>> <<< FAILURE!
>> rawObject(org.netbeans.html.ko4j.KOFx)  Time elapsed: 0.067 sec  <<<
>> FAILURE!
>> netscape.javascript.JSException: netscape.javascript.JSException:
>> java.lang.NullPointerException
>>at org.netbeans.html.ko4j.$JsCallbacks$.raw$org_netbeans_
>> html_ko4j_Knockout$setValue$ILjava_lang_Object_2($JsCallbacks$.java:156)
>>at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>>at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>>at sun.reflect.misc.Trampoline.invoke(MethodUtil.java:71)
>>at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor1.invoke(Unknown Source)
>>at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>>at sun.reflect.misc.MethodUtil.invoke(MethodUtil.java:275)
>>at com.sun.webkit.Utilities.lambda$fwkInvokeWithContext$
>> 60(Utilities.java:94)
>>at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
>>at com.sun.webkit.Utilities.fwkInvokeWithContext(
>> Utilities.java:94)
>>at com.sun.webkit.dom.JSObject.callImpl(Native Method)
>>at com.sun.webkit.dom.JSObject.call(JSObject.java:115)
>>at org.netbeans.html.boot.fx.AbstractFXPresenter$JSFn.invokeImpl(
>> AbstractFXPresenter.java:418)
>> 
>> Failed tests:
>>  KOFx.run:73 » JS netscape.javascript.JSException:
>> java.lang.NullPointerExcepti...
>> 
>> 
>> Running the build for the forth time made it succeed.
>> I'd say it's not a blocker for the release, but we might improve the test
>> setup.
>> 
>> 
>> txs for rolling the release!
>> 
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>> 
>> 
>>> Am 21.10.2017 um 14:04 schrieb John D. Ament :
>>> 
>>> Here's my +1 to release.
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 8:43 AM Bertrand Delacretaz <
>>> bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote:
>>> 
 On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Jaroslav Tulach
  wrote:
> ...I'd like to ask you to hold the Incubator
> PMC vote to release:..
 
 Here's my +1 repeated from the podling list for
 
 SHA1(incubating-netbeans-html4j-1.5.zip)=
 fd77975f1adbcbc4b926e1cfab6865f47db6df3c
 
 Jaroslav's GPG key is included in
 https://people.apache.org/keys/group/netbeans.asc
 
 -Bertrand
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubat

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

2017-10-21 Thread Wade Chandler 
https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html

https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes

It is technically both with nuances. Time and 3 binding +1s plus a majority
+1s. The 72 hours is a participation enabler. The 3 bindings is the minimum
required, but a majority -1s would be a big deal. Even though there is no
veto vote on releases, if someone raised a valid issue, the group might
postpone a release as well, even after +1s.

Wade



On Oct 21, 2017 08:55, "Geertjan Wielenga" 
wrote:

> Many thanks -- so, right now, Bertrand, John, and Mark have done binding
> votes -- i.e., two of our mentors and the VP Incubator.
>
> How many binding votes are needed or is it simply a question of time, i.e.,
> at the time that the vote expires, if there's no -1, and only +1 binding
> votes, then the release of this specific repo that is one of the repose of
> Apache NetBeans is approved?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gj
>
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Mark Struberg 
> wrote:
>
> > +1 IPMC binding
> >
> > LICENSE, NOTICE, rat, dependencies, signing, etc all looks good.
> >
> > However when building it from the distribution zip on my macbook with
> > java8 144 I sometimes get test errors.
> > All of them in knockout.js, but each time something different:
> >
> >
> > Configuring TestNG with: TestNG652Configurator
> > Oct 21, 2017 1:55:53 PM org.glassfish.grizzly.http.
> server.NetworkListener
> > start
> > INFORMATION: Started listener bound to [0.0.0.0:18572]
> > Oct 21, 2017 1:55:53 PM org.glassfish.grizzly.http.server.HttpServer
> start
> > INFORMATION: [HttpServer] Started.
> > Tests run: 78, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 6.451
> sec
> > <<< FAILURE!
> > displayContentOfComputedArrayOnComputedASubpair(org.
> netbeans.html.ko4j.KOFx)
> > Time elapsed: 0.03 sec  <<< FAILURE!
> > java.lang.AssertionError: We got callback from 2nd child null expecting:
> > null actual: Last
> > at net.java.html.json.tests.Utils.assertEquals(Utils.java:217)
> > at net.java.html.json.tests.KnockoutTest.
> > displayContentOfComputedArrayOnComputedASubpair(KnockoutTest.java:622)
> > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> > NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> > at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> > DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> > at org.netbeans.html.ko4j.KOFx.run(KOFx.java:73)
> >
> >
> > Tests run: 78, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 7.772
> sec
> > <<< FAILURE!
> > rawObject(org.netbeans.html.ko4j.KOFx)  Time elapsed: 0.067 sec  <<<
> > FAILURE!
> > netscape.javascript.JSException: netscape.javascript.JSException:
> > java.lang.NullPointerException
> > at org.netbeans.html.ko4j.$JsCallbacks$.raw$org_netbeans_
> > html_ko4j_Knockout$setValue$ILjava_lang_Object_2($JsCallbacks$.java:156)
> > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> > NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> > at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> > DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> > at sun.reflect.misc.Trampoline.invoke(MethodUtil.java:71)
> > at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor1.invoke(Unknown Source)
> > at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> > DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> > at sun.reflect.misc.MethodUtil.invoke(MethodUtil.java:275)
> > at com.sun.webkit.Utilities.lambda$fwkInvokeWithContext$
> > 60(Utilities.java:94)
> > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
> > at com.sun.webkit.Utilities.fwkInvokeWithContext(
> > Utilities.java:94)
> > at com.sun.webkit.dom.JSObject.callImpl(Native Method)
> > at com.sun.webkit.dom.JSObject.call(JSObject.java:115)
> > at org.netbeans.html.boot.fx.AbstractFXPresenter$JSFn.
> invokeImpl(
> > AbstractFXPresenter.java:418)
> >
> > Failed tests:
> >   KOFx.run:73 » JS netscape.javascript.JSException:
> > java.lang.NullPointerExcepti...
> >
> >
> > Running the build for the forth time made it succeed.
> > I'd say it's not a blocker for the release, but we might improve the test
> > setup.
> >
> >
> > txs for rolling the release!
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> > > Am 21.10.2017 um 14:04 schrieb John D. Ament :
> > >
> > > Here's my +1 to release.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 8:43 AM Bertrand Delacretaz <
> > > bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Jaroslav Tulach
> > >>  wrote:
> > >>> ...I'd like to ask you to hold the Incubator
> > >>> PMC vote to release:..
> > >>
> > >> Here's my +1 repeated from the podling list for
> > >>
> > >> SHA1(incubating-

Re: [RESULT] WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept Science Data Analytics Platform (SDAP) into Apache Incubator WAS Re: [DISCUSS] Accept Science Data Analytics Platform (SDAP) into Apache Incubator

2017-10-21 Thread Tom Barber 
great stuff!

On 21 Oct 2017 12:27 am, "Raphael Bircher"  wrote:

> Hi all
>
> well... let's start then. But I have no Idea how ;-) The docu is a "bit"
> outdate. Maybe someone can tell me how it works, and what is still done
> manual and what is done within whimsy.
>
> Regards, Raphael
>
> Am .10.2017, 23:21 Uhr, schrieb lewis john mcgibbney :
>
> Hi general@,
>> 72 hours has now elapsed since this VOTE was opened...
>> The RESULT is as follows
>>
>> [6] +1 Accept Science Data Analytics Platform (SDAP) into Apache Incubator
>> Lewis John McGibbney*
>> Madhawa Kasun Gunasekara
>> Tom Barber*
>> Julian Hyde*
>> Chris Mattmann*
>> Raphael Bircher*
>>
>> [0] +/-0 ... just because
>> [0] -1 Do NOT Accept Science Data Analytics Platform (SDAP) into Apache
>> Incubator... because
>>
>> * IPMC Binding
>>
>> I would like to thank everyone from the Incubator community who was able
>> to
>> review, DISCUSS and VOTE. Also like to thank Thomas Huang for his patience
>> and vision to bring SDAP to Apache.
>> Best
>> Lewis
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 2:04 PM, lewis john mcgibbney > >
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Folks,
>>> Having secured a mentorship team consisting of the following IPMC
>>> Members,
>>> I am happy to open a formal VOTE thread on accepting the Science Data
>>> Analytics Platform (SDAP) into Apache Incubator.
>>>
>>>- Lewis John McGibbney (lewi...@apache.org)
>>>- Raphael Bircher (bircher at apace dot org)
>>>- Suneel Marthi (smarthi at apache dot org)
>>>
>>> Thank you to both Raphael and Suneel for coming forward. :)
>>> The VOTE will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Accept Science Data Analytics Platform (SDAP) into Apache
>>> Incubator
>>> [ ] +/-0 ... just because
>>> [ ] -1 Do NOT Accept Science Data Analytics Platform (SDAP) into Apache
>>> Incubator... because
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance to all participants.
>>> Lewis
>>>
>>> P.S. Here is a binding +1 from me
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:22 AM, lewis john mcgibbney <
>>> lewi...@apache.org
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Folks,
 I would like to open a DISCUSS thread on the topic of accepting the
 Science Data Analytics Platform (SDAP)  Project into the Incubator.
 I am CC'ing Thomas Huang from NASA JPL who I have been working with to
 build community around a kick-ass set of software projects under the
 SDAP
 umbrella.
 At this stage we would very much appreciate critical feedback from
 general@ community. We are also open to mentors who may have an
 interest
 in the project proposal.
 The proposal is pasted below.
 Thanks in advance,
 Lewis

 = Abstract =
 The Science Data Analytics Platform (SDAP) establishes an integrated
 data
 analytic center for Big Science problems. It focuses on technology
 integration, advancement and maturity.

 = Proposal =
 SDAP currently represents a collaboration between NASA Jet Propulsion
 Laboratory (JPL), Florida State University (FSU), the National Center
 for
 Atmospheric Research (NCAR), and George Mason University (GMU). SDAP
 brings
 together a number of big data technologies including a NASA funded
 OceanXtremes (Anomaly detection and ocean science), NEXUS (Deep data
 analytic platform), DOMS (Distributed in-situ to satellite matchup),
 MUDROD
 (Search relevancy and discovery) and VQSS (Virtualized Quality Screening
 Service) under a single umbrella. Within the original Incubator
 proposal,
 VQSS will not be included however it is anticipated that a future source
 code donation will cover VQSS.

 = Background and Rationale =
 SDAP is a technology software solution currently geared to better enable
 scientists involved in advancing the study of the Earth's physical
 oceanography. With increasing global temperature, warming of the ocean,
 and
 melting ice sheets and glaciers, the impacts can be observed from
 changes
 in anomalous ocean temperature and circulation patterns, to increasing
 extreme weather events and stronger/more frequent hurricanes, sea level
 rise and storm surges affecting coastlines, and may involve drastic
 changes
 and shifts in marine ecosystems. Ocean science communities are relying
 on
 data distributed through data centers such as the JPL's Physical
 Oceanographic Data Active Archive Center (PO.DAAC) to conduct their
 research. In typical investigations, oceanographers follow a traditional
 workflow for using datasets: search, evaluate, download, and apply tools
 and algorithms to look for trends. While this workflow has been working
 very well historically for the oceanographic community, it cannot scale
 if
 the research involves massive amount of data. NASA's Surface Water and
 Ocean Topography (SWOT) mission, scheduled to launch in April of 2021,
 is
 expected to generate over

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

2017-10-21 Thread Wade Chandler 
+1

On Oct 21, 2017 08:07, "Mark Struberg"  wrote:

> +1 IPMC binding
>
> LICENSE, NOTICE, rat, dependencies, signing, etc all looks good.
>
> However when building it from the distribution zip on my macbook with
> java8 144 I sometimes get test errors.
> All of them in knockout.js, but each time something different:
>
>
> Configuring TestNG with: TestNG652Configurator
> Oct 21, 2017 1:55:53 PM org.glassfish.grizzly.http.server.NetworkListener
> start
> INFORMATION: Started listener bound to [0.0.0.0:18572]
> Oct 21, 2017 1:55:53 PM org.glassfish.grizzly.http.server.HttpServer start
> INFORMATION: [HttpServer] Started.
> Tests run: 78, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 6.451 sec
> <<< FAILURE!
> displayContentOfComputedArrayOnComputedASubpair(org.netbeans.html.ko4j.KOFx)
> Time elapsed: 0.03 sec  <<< FAILURE!
> java.lang.AssertionError: We got callback from 2nd child null expecting:
> null actual: Last
> at net.java.html.json.tests.Utils.assertEquals(Utils.java:217)
> at net.java.html.json.tests.KnockoutTest.
> displayContentOfComputedArrayOnComputedASubpair(KnockoutTest.java:622)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> at org.netbeans.html.ko4j.KOFx.run(KOFx.java:73)
>
>
> Tests run: 78, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 7.772 sec
> <<< FAILURE!
> rawObject(org.netbeans.html.ko4j.KOFx)  Time elapsed: 0.067 sec  <<<
> FAILURE!
> netscape.javascript.JSException: netscape.javascript.JSException:
> java.lang.NullPointerException
> at org.netbeans.html.ko4j.$JsCallbacks$.raw$org_netbeans_
> html_ko4j_Knockout$setValue$ILjava_lang_Object_2($JsCallbacks$.java:156)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> at sun.reflect.misc.Trampoline.invoke(MethodUtil.java:71)
> at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor1.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> at sun.reflect.misc.MethodUtil.invoke(MethodUtil.java:275)
> at com.sun.webkit.Utilities.lambda$fwkInvokeWithContext$
> 60(Utilities.java:94)
> at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
> at com.sun.webkit.Utilities.fwkInvokeWithContext(
> Utilities.java:94)
> at com.sun.webkit.dom.JSObject.callImpl(Native Method)
> at com.sun.webkit.dom.JSObject.call(JSObject.java:115)
> at org.netbeans.html.boot.fx.AbstractFXPresenter$JSFn.invokeImpl(
> AbstractFXPresenter.java:418)
>
> Failed tests:
>   KOFx.run:73 » JS netscape.javascript.JSException:
> java.lang.NullPointerExcepti...
>
>
> Running the build for the forth time made it succeed.
> I'd say it's not a blocker for the release, but we might improve the test
> setup.
>
>
> txs for rolling the release!
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 21.10.2017 um 14:04 schrieb John D. Ament :
> >
> > Here's my +1 to release.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 8:43 AM Bertrand Delacretaz <
> > bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Jaroslav Tulach
> >>  wrote:
> >>> ...I'd like to ask you to hold the Incubator
> >>> PMC vote to release:..
> >>
> >> Here's my +1 repeated from the podling list for
> >>
> >> SHA1(incubating-netbeans-html4j-1.5.zip)=
> >> fd77975f1adbcbc4b926e1cfab6865f47db6df3c
> >>
> >> Jaroslav's GPG key is included in
> >> https://people.apache.org/keys/group/netbeans.asc
> >>
> >> -Bertrand
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

2017-10-21 Thread Geertjan Wielenga 
Many thanks -- so, right now, Bertrand, John, and Mark have done binding
votes -- i.e., two of our mentors and the VP Incubator.

How many binding votes are needed or is it simply a question of time, i.e.,
at the time that the vote expires, if there's no -1, and only +1 binding
votes, then the release of this specific repo that is one of the repose of
Apache NetBeans is approved?

Thanks,

Gj

On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Mark Struberg 
wrote:

> +1 IPMC binding
>
> LICENSE, NOTICE, rat, dependencies, signing, etc all looks good.
>
> However when building it from the distribution zip on my macbook with
> java8 144 I sometimes get test errors.
> All of them in knockout.js, but each time something different:
>
>
> Configuring TestNG with: TestNG652Configurator
> Oct 21, 2017 1:55:53 PM org.glassfish.grizzly.http.server.NetworkListener
> start
> INFORMATION: Started listener bound to [0.0.0.0:18572]
> Oct 21, 2017 1:55:53 PM org.glassfish.grizzly.http.server.HttpServer start
> INFORMATION: [HttpServer] Started.
> Tests run: 78, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 6.451 sec
> <<< FAILURE!
> displayContentOfComputedArrayOnComputedASubpair(org.netbeans.html.ko4j.KOFx)
> Time elapsed: 0.03 sec  <<< FAILURE!
> java.lang.AssertionError: We got callback from 2nd child null expecting:
> null actual: Last
> at net.java.html.json.tests.Utils.assertEquals(Utils.java:217)
> at net.java.html.json.tests.KnockoutTest.
> displayContentOfComputedArrayOnComputedASubpair(KnockoutTest.java:622)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> at org.netbeans.html.ko4j.KOFx.run(KOFx.java:73)
>
>
> Tests run: 78, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 7.772 sec
> <<< FAILURE!
> rawObject(org.netbeans.html.ko4j.KOFx)  Time elapsed: 0.067 sec  <<<
> FAILURE!
> netscape.javascript.JSException: netscape.javascript.JSException:
> java.lang.NullPointerException
> at org.netbeans.html.ko4j.$JsCallbacks$.raw$org_netbeans_
> html_ko4j_Knockout$setValue$ILjava_lang_Object_2($JsCallbacks$.java:156)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> at sun.reflect.misc.Trampoline.invoke(MethodUtil.java:71)
> at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor1.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> at sun.reflect.misc.MethodUtil.invoke(MethodUtil.java:275)
> at com.sun.webkit.Utilities.lambda$fwkInvokeWithContext$
> 60(Utilities.java:94)
> at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
> at com.sun.webkit.Utilities.fwkInvokeWithContext(
> Utilities.java:94)
> at com.sun.webkit.dom.JSObject.callImpl(Native Method)
> at com.sun.webkit.dom.JSObject.call(JSObject.java:115)
> at org.netbeans.html.boot.fx.AbstractFXPresenter$JSFn.invokeImpl(
> AbstractFXPresenter.java:418)
>
> Failed tests:
>   KOFx.run:73 » JS netscape.javascript.JSException:
> java.lang.NullPointerExcepti...
>
>
> Running the build for the forth time made it succeed.
> I'd say it's not a blocker for the release, but we might improve the test
> setup.
>
>
> txs for rolling the release!
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 21.10.2017 um 14:04 schrieb John D. Ament :
> >
> > Here's my +1 to release.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 8:43 AM Bertrand Delacretaz <
> > bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Jaroslav Tulach
> >>  wrote:
> >>> ...I'd like to ask you to hold the Incubator
> >>> PMC vote to release:..
> >>
> >> Here's my +1 repeated from the podling list for
> >>
> >> SHA1(incubating-netbeans-html4j-1.5.zip)=
> >> fd77975f1adbcbc4b926e1cfab6865f47db6df3c
> >>
> >> Jaroslav's GPG key is included in
> >> https://people.apache.org/keys/group/netbeans.asc
> >>
> >> -Bertrand
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

2017-10-21 Thread Mark Struberg 
+1 IPMC binding

LICENSE, NOTICE, rat, dependencies, signing, etc all looks good. 

However when building it from the distribution zip on my macbook with java8 144 
I sometimes get test errors.
All of them in knockout.js, but each time something different:


Configuring TestNG with: TestNG652Configurator
Oct 21, 2017 1:55:53 PM org.glassfish.grizzly.http.server.NetworkListener start
INFORMATION: Started listener bound to [0.0.0.0:18572]
Oct 21, 2017 1:55:53 PM org.glassfish.grizzly.http.server.HttpServer start
INFORMATION: [HttpServer] Started.
Tests run: 78, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 6.451 sec <<< 
FAILURE!
displayContentOfComputedArrayOnComputedASubpair(org.netbeans.html.ko4j.KOFx)  
Time elapsed: 0.03 sec  <<< FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError: We got callback from 2nd child null expecting: null 
actual: Last
at net.java.html.json.tests.Utils.assertEquals(Utils.java:217)
at 
net.java.html.json.tests.KnockoutTest.displayContentOfComputedArrayOnComputedASubpair(KnockoutTest.java:622)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at org.netbeans.html.ko4j.KOFx.run(KOFx.java:73)


Tests run: 78, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 7.772 sec <<< 
FAILURE!
rawObject(org.netbeans.html.ko4j.KOFx)  Time elapsed: 0.067 sec  <<< FAILURE!
netscape.javascript.JSException: netscape.javascript.JSException: 
java.lang.NullPointerException
at 
org.netbeans.html.ko4j.$JsCallbacks$.raw$org_netbeans_html_ko4j_Knockout$setValue$ILjava_lang_Object_2($JsCallbacks$.java:156)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at sun.reflect.misc.Trampoline.invoke(MethodUtil.java:71)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor1.invoke(Unknown Source)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at sun.reflect.misc.MethodUtil.invoke(MethodUtil.java:275)
at 
com.sun.webkit.Utilities.lambda$fwkInvokeWithContext$60(Utilities.java:94)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at com.sun.webkit.Utilities.fwkInvokeWithContext(Utilities.java:94)
at com.sun.webkit.dom.JSObject.callImpl(Native Method)
at com.sun.webkit.dom.JSObject.call(JSObject.java:115)
at 
org.netbeans.html.boot.fx.AbstractFXPresenter$JSFn.invokeImpl(AbstractFXPresenter.java:418)

Failed tests:
  KOFx.run:73 » JS netscape.javascript.JSException: 
java.lang.NullPointerExcepti...


Running the build for the forth time made it succeed.
I'd say it's not a blocker for the release, but we might improve the test setup.


txs for rolling the release!

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 21.10.2017 um 14:04 schrieb John D. Ament :
> 
> Here's my +1 to release.
> 
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 8:43 AM Bertrand Delacretaz <
> bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Jaroslav Tulach
>>  wrote:
>>> ...I'd like to ask you to hold the Incubator
>>> PMC vote to release:..
>> 
>> Here's my +1 repeated from the podling list for
>> 
>> SHA1(incubating-netbeans-html4j-1.5.zip)=
>> fd77975f1adbcbc4b926e1cfab6865f47db6df3c
>> 
>> Jaroslav's GPG key is included in
>> https://people.apache.org/keys/group/netbeans.asc
>> 
>> -Bertrand
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> 
>> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

2017-10-21 Thread John D. Ament 
Here's my +1 to release.

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 8:43 AM Bertrand Delacretaz <
bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Jaroslav Tulach
>  wrote:
> > ...I'd like to ask you to hold the Incubator
> > PMC vote to release:..
>
> Here's my +1 repeated from the podling list for
>
> SHA1(incubating-netbeans-html4j-1.5.zip)=
> fd77975f1adbcbc4b926e1cfab6865f47db6df3c
>
> Jaroslav's GPG key is included in
> https://people.apache.org/keys/group/netbeans.asc
>
> -Bertrand
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>