Incubator PMC Board Report Timeline - November 2017

2017-10-25 Thread John D. Ament 
November 2017 Incubator report timeline:

https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2017

Wed November 01 -- Podling reports due by end of day
Sun November 05 -- Shepherd reviews due by end of day
Sun November 05 -- Summary due by end of day
Tue November 07 -- Mentor signoff due by end of day
Wed November 08 -- Report submitted to Board
Wed November 15 -- Board meeting

Please note - I'm traveling around the time the report is due to the
board.  If I can't submit it, are there any volunteers to post it?

John

Re: svn commit: r1812927 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings.xml

2017-10-25 Thread John D. Ament 
Lewis,

does SDAP plan to report this month?  If so then they should be group 2.
If not, then they should be group 3 and report next month.

John

On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 12:08 PM  wrote:

> Author: lewismc
> Date: Sun Oct 22 16:07:58 2017
> New Revision: 1812927
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1812927=rev
> Log:
> Add SDAP to podlings.xml
>
> Modified:
> incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings.xml
>
> Modified: incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings.xml
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings.xml?rev=1812927=1812926=1812927=diff
>
> ==
> --- incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings.xml [utf-8] (original)
> +++ incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings.xml [utf-8] Sun Oct 22
> 16:07:58 2017
> @@ -2193,6 +2193,16 @@ web faster by rewriting web pages to red
>  Jeremias Maerki
>  
>  
> + sponsor="Incubator" startdate="2017-10-22">
> +SDAP is an integrated data analytic center for Big
> Science problems.
> + monthly="true">November,December,January
> +Lewis John McGibbney
> +
> +Jörn Rottmann
> +Raphael Bircher 
> +Suneel Marthi
> +
> +
>   sponsor="Incubator" startdate="2016-07-13">
>  SensSoft is a software tool usability testing
> platform
>  
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: cvs-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: cvs-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.12.0 release RC0

2017-10-25 Thread Sajeevan Achuthan 
+1

On 25 October 2017 at 20:52, Hen  wrote:

> +1.
>
> Noting that Suneel was +1 in the original thread (ie: you have 3
> mentor/Incubator-PMC  +1s).
>
> Hen
>
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:06 PM, Sebastian 
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Successfully built and validated the RC from source.
> >
> > Best,
> > Sebastian
> >
> >
> > On 25.10.2017 03:38, Meghna Baijal wrote:
> >
> >> Hello All,
> >>
> >> This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.12.0, release
> >> candidate 0.
> >>
> >> Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
> >>
> >> *Vote thread:*
> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/800402860be8a1b4055ede0
> >> 75ab465af48b7f8d041b42217372a63b9@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
> >>
> >> *Result thread:*
> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/83ab3763f0bb84685112692
> >> 66bf0c26bdc786509d2cb38a2aafe30a3@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
> >>
> >>
> >> *The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found
> at:*
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.12.0.rc0/
> >>
> >>
> >> *The release tag can be found here: *
> >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.12.0.rc0
> >>
> >>
> >> *The release hash is 4f2af2d2e5216ab3a1faadcc117709b6836029dc and can
> be
> >> found here:*
> >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/4f2af2d2e52
> >> 16ab3a1faadcc117709b6836029dc
> >>
> >>
> >> *Release artifacts are signed with the following key:*
> >> 69FF E8D6 1051 FFE7 E61B 02C2 80FD 81D7 703D F31B
> >>
> >>
> >> *KEY files are available here:*
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.12.0.rc0/
> >>
> >>
> >> *For information about the contents of this release, see:*
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet+0.
> >> 12.0+Release+Notes
> >>
> >>
> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >>
> >> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.12.0
> >> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Meghna Baijal
> >>
> >>
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.12.0 release RC0

2017-10-25 Thread Hen 
+1.

Noting that Suneel was +1 in the original thread (ie: you have 3
mentor/Incubator-PMC  +1s).

Hen

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:06 PM, Sebastian  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Successfully built and validated the RC from source.
>
> Best,
> Sebastian
>
>
> On 25.10.2017 03:38, Meghna Baijal wrote:
>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.12.0, release
>> candidate 0.
>>
>> Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
>>
>> *Vote thread:*
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/800402860be8a1b4055ede0
>> 75ab465af48b7f8d041b42217372a63b9@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
>>
>> *Result thread:*
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/83ab3763f0bb84685112692
>> 66bf0c26bdc786509d2cb38a2aafe30a3@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
>>
>>
>> *The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:*
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.12.0.rc0/
>>
>>
>> *The release tag can be found here: *
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.12.0.rc0
>>
>>
>> *The release hash is 4f2af2d2e5216ab3a1faadcc117709b6836029dc and can be
>> found here:*
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/4f2af2d2e52
>> 16ab3a1faadcc117709b6836029dc
>>
>>
>> *Release artifacts are signed with the following key:*
>> 69FF E8D6 1051 FFE7 E61B 02C2 80FD 81D7 703D F31B
>>
>>
>> *KEY files are available here:*
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.12.0.rc0/
>>
>>
>> *For information about the contents of this release, see:*
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet+0.
>> 12.0+Release+Notes
>>
>>
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.12.0
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Meghna Baijal
>>
>>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

2017-10-25 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
Yes, it is another great communication for real-time chat, Debo also
mentioned it, so let's create one if desired and we still need to post
major findings and summary on Apache mail list...

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Clebert Suconic  wrote:

> What about IRC.  A lot of projects use it at Apache.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:51 PM Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:
>
> > Yes, I'm working on preparing necessary resources for our workgroup. the
> > progress is
> >
> > 1) Slack channel #Storage-class-memory - created
> > 2) Invite project representatives and active contributors to this Slack
> > channel -  not yet but soon later
> > 3) Request a dedicated mail list for our workgroup - request sent
> > 4) Request typical platform equipped with storage-class memory resource -
> > trying but not guaranteed
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Clebert Suconic <
> > clebert.suco...@gmail.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > I am also waiting the dev list to be created before we can have a
> > > discussion...
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Hitesh Shah 
> wrote:
> > > > Hello Gary,
> > > >
> > > > Would it be better to create a mailing list for this workgroup (I am
> > > > guessing it is too early to be thinking about a new podling for this)
> > > where
> > > > any interested folks could subscribe to?
> > > >
> > > > thanks
> > > > -- Hitesh
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> It is a great idea if we could have a common benchmark and APIs for
> > > >> storage-class memory oriented library/framework/application, please
> go
> > > >> ahead to propose one for discussion in our workgroup. Thanks!
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Debojyoti Dutta 
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Would love to help out in any way including working towards common
> > > >> > benchmarks, APIs etc.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Debo
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Sent from my iPhone
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > On Oct 23, 2017, at 4:06 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
> > > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > There are suggested initial goals for our workgroup
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >   - Sharing idea and good practice
> > > >> > >   - Identifying common opportunities
> > > >> > >   - Promoting storage-class memory application
> > > >> > >   - Delivering solid solution
> > > >> > >   - Avoiding reinvent the wheel
> > > >> > >   - Integrating one another
> > > >> > >   - Coordinating the progress
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> > ga...@apache.org
> > > >
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> Add ORC
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >>   - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda
> > > >> > >>   - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney
> > > >> > >>   - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John
> > > >> > >>   - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi*
> > > >> > >>   - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley*
> > > >> > >>   - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary*
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> With above projects, we could cover Storage-class memory
> oriented
> > > >> > *Distributed
> > > >> > >> Database, KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Distributed
> Data
> > > >> Store,
> > > >> > >> Columnar Storage, **Durable Object Model, Durable Computing
> > Model*
> > > for
> > > >> > >> new generation high-performance applications, e.g. data
> querying,
> > > >> > >> processing, and analytics.
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Owen O'Malley <
> > > >> owen.omal...@gmail.com>
> > > >> > >> wrote:
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >>> I can represent ORC within the group.
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>> .. Owen
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> >  On Oct 19, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> > ga...@apache.org>
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> > 
> > > >> >  Hi all,
> > > >> > 
> > > >> >  We can expect more and more projects will take the huge
> > potential
> > > >> >  advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and
> > > analytics
> > > >> >  because silicon companies are able to produce high capacity
> > > >> > non-volatile
> > > >> >  memory on a large scale, this hardware technology will
> > > fundamentally
> > > >> > >>> change
> > > >> >  the way to construct high performance applications similar to
> > > what
> > > >> > >>> happened
> > > >> >  when replacing tape with disk technology since the 1980s. so
> if
> > > >> > >>> possible, I
> > > >> >  advocate establishing an Apache working group to enhance the
> > > >> > >>> collaboration
> > > >> >  and synergies mentioned by Patrick Stuedi for storage-class
> > > memory
> > > >> >  technology-oriented projects.
> > > >> > 
> > > >> >  Best.
> > > >> >  Gary.
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> >

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

2017-10-25 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
Good Apache program name for storage-class memory oriented projects, so
let's propose this program to Apache board if appropriate, Thanks!

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) 
wrote:

> BTW should we name this group “Apache Durable Computing Initiative”?
>
> debo
>
> On 10/24/17, 11:18 AM, "Debo Dutta (dedutta)"  wrote:
>
> Yes, the moment we have the workgroup mailer setup, will send out a
> DISCUSS thread.
>
> debo
>
> On 10/24/17, 10:14 AM, "Gang(Gary) Wang"  wrote:
>
> It is a great idea if we could have a common benchmark and APIs for
> storage-class memory oriented library/framework/application,
> please go
> ahead to propose one for discussion in our workgroup. Thanks!
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Debojyoti Dutta 
> wrote:
>
> > Would love to help out in any way including working towards
> common
> > benchmarks, APIs etc.
> >
> > Debo
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > > On Oct 23, 2017, at 4:06 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > There are suggested initial goals for our workgroup
> > >
> > >   - Sharing idea and good practice
> > >   - Identifying common opportunities
> > >   - Promoting storage-class memory application
> > >   - Delivering solid solution
> > >   - Avoiding reinvent the wheel
> > >   - Integrating one another
> > >   - Coordinating the progress
> > >
> > >
> > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> ga...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Add ORC
> > >>
> > >>   - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda
> > >>   - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney
> > >>   - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John
> > >>   - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi*
> > >>   - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley*
> > >>   - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary*
> > >>
> > >> With above projects, we could cover Storage-class memory
> oriented
> > *Distributed
> > >> Database, KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Distributed
> Data Store,
> > >> Columnar Storage, **Durable Object Model, Durable Computing
> Model* for
> > >> new generation high-performance applications, e.g. data
> querying,
> > >> processing, and analytics.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Owen O'Malley <
> owen.omal...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I can represent ORC within the group.
> > >>>
> > >>> .. Owen
> > >>>
> >  On Oct 19, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> ga...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > 
> >  Hi all,
> > 
> >  We can expect more and more projects will take the huge
> potential
> >  advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and
> analytics
> >  because silicon companies are able to produce high capacity
> > non-volatile
> >  memory on a large scale, this hardware technology will
> fundamentally
> > >>> change
> >  the way to construct high performance applications similar
> to what
> > >>> happened
> >  when replacing tape with disk technology since the 1980s.
> so if
> > >>> possible, I
> >  advocate establishing an Apache working group to enhance the
> > >>> collaboration
> >  and synergies mentioned by Patrick Stuedi for storage-class
> memory
> >  technology-oriented projects.
> > 
> >  Best.
> >  Gary.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> > 
> -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.
> org
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

2017-10-25 Thread Clebert Suconic 
What about IRC.  A lot of projects use it at Apache.



On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:51 PM Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:

> Yes, I'm working on preparing necessary resources for our workgroup. the
> progress is
>
> 1) Slack channel #Storage-class-memory - created
> 2) Invite project representatives and active contributors to this Slack
> channel -  not yet but soon later
> 3) Request a dedicated mail list for our workgroup - request sent
> 4) Request typical platform equipped with storage-class memory resource -
> trying but not guaranteed
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Clebert Suconic <
> clebert.suco...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > I am also waiting the dev list to be created before we can have a
> > discussion...
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Hitesh Shah  wrote:
> > > Hello Gary,
> > >
> > > Would it be better to create a mailing list for this workgroup (I am
> > > guessing it is too early to be thinking about a new podling for this)
> > where
> > > any interested folks could subscribe to?
> > >
> > > thanks
> > > -- Hitesh
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> It is a great idea if we could have a common benchmark and APIs for
> > >> storage-class memory oriented library/framework/application, please go
> > >> ahead to propose one for discussion in our workgroup. Thanks!
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Debojyoti Dutta 
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Would love to help out in any way including working towards common
> > >> > benchmarks, APIs etc.
> > >> >
> > >> > Debo
> > >> >
> > >> > Sent from my iPhone
> > >> >
> > >> > > On Oct 23, 2017, at 4:06 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang 
> > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > There are suggested initial goals for our workgroup
> > >> > >
> > >> > >   - Sharing idea and good practice
> > >> > >   - Identifying common opportunities
> > >> > >   - Promoting storage-class memory application
> > >> > >   - Delivering solid solution
> > >> > >   - Avoiding reinvent the wheel
> > >> > >   - Integrating one another
> > >> > >   - Coordinating the progress
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> ga...@apache.org
> > >
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Add ORC
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >>   - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda
> > >> > >>   - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney
> > >> > >>   - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John
> > >> > >>   - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi*
> > >> > >>   - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley*
> > >> > >>   - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary*
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> With above projects, we could cover Storage-class memory oriented
> > >> > *Distributed
> > >> > >> Database, KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Distributed Data
> > >> Store,
> > >> > >> Columnar Storage, **Durable Object Model, Durable Computing
> Model*
> > for
> > >> > >> new generation high-performance applications, e.g. data querying,
> > >> > >> processing, and analytics.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Owen O'Malley <
> > >> owen.omal...@gmail.com>
> > >> > >> wrote:
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >>> I can represent ORC within the group.
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> .. Owen
> > >> > >>>
> > >> >  On Oct 19, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> ga...@apache.org>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > 
> > >> >  Hi all,
> > >> > 
> > >> >  We can expect more and more projects will take the huge
> potential
> > >> >  advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and
> > analytics
> > >> >  because silicon companies are able to produce high capacity
> > >> > non-volatile
> > >> >  memory on a large scale, this hardware technology will
> > fundamentally
> > >> > >>> change
> > >> >  the way to construct high performance applications similar to
> > what
> > >> > >>> happened
> > >> >  when replacing tape with disk technology since the 1980s. so if
> > >> > >>> possible, I
> > >> >  advocate establishing an Apache working group to enhance the
> > >> > >>> collaboration
> > >> >  and synergies mentioned by Patrick Stuedi for storage-class
> > memory
> > >> >  technology-oriented projects.
> > >> > 
> > >> >  Best.
> > >> >  Gary.
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> -
> > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Clebert Suconic
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
-- 
Clebert Suconic

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

2017-10-25 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
Add *ActiveMQ and Geode*

   - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda
   - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney
   - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John
   - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi*
   - *Hive/LLAP *represented by *Gopal Vijayaraghavan*
   - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley*
   - *RocketMQ  *represented by *Von Gosling*
   - *ActiveMQ *represented by *Clebert Suconic*
   - *Geode *represented by *Swapnil Bawaskar*
   - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary*

With above projects, we could cover Storage-class memory oriented *Distributed
Database, KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Distributed Data Store,
Columnar Storage, **Live Long And Process, Distributed Messaging and
Streaming, High Performance Data Management, **Durable Object Model,
Durable Computing Model* for new generation high-performance applications,
e.g. data querying, processing, and analytics.

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Swapnil Bawaskar <
swapnil.bawas...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I would be happy to represent Apache Geode.
>
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 12:00 AM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) 
> wrote:
>
> > BTW should we name this group “Apache Durable Computing Initiative”?
> >
> > debo
> >
> > On 10/24/17, 11:18 AM, "Debo Dutta (dedutta)"  wrote:
> >
> > Yes, the moment we have the workgroup mailer setup, will send out a
> > DISCUSS thread.
> >
> > debo
> >
> > On 10/24/17, 10:14 AM, "Gang(Gary) Wang"  wrote:
> >
> > It is a great idea if we could have a common benchmark and APIs
> for
> > storage-class memory oriented library/framework/application,
> > please go
> > ahead to propose one for discussion in our workgroup. Thanks!
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Debojyoti Dutta <
> ddu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Would love to help out in any way including working towards
> > common
> > > benchmarks, APIs etc.
> > >
> > > Debo
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone
> > >
> > > > On Oct 23, 2017, at 4:06 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> ga...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > There are suggested initial goals for our workgroup
> > > >
> > > >   - Sharing idea and good practice
> > > >   - Identifying common opportunities
> > > >   - Promoting storage-class memory application
> > > >   - Delivering solid solution
> > > >   - Avoiding reinvent the wheel
> > > >   - Integrating one another
> > > >   - Coordinating the progress
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> > ga...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Add ORC
> > > >>
> > > >>   - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda
> > > >>   - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney
> > > >>   - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John
> > > >>   - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi*
> > > >>   - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley*
> > > >>   - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary*
> > > >>
> > > >> With above projects, we could cover Storage-class memory
> > oriented
> > > *Distributed
> > > >> Database, KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Distributed
> > Data Store,
> > > >> Columnar Storage, **Durable Object Model, Durable Computing
> > Model* for
> > > >> new generation high-performance applications, e.g. data
> > querying,
> > > >> processing, and analytics.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Owen O'Malley <
> > owen.omal...@gmail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> I can represent ORC within the group.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> .. Owen
> > > >>>
> > >  On Oct 19, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> > ga...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > >  Hi all,
> > > 
> > >  We can expect more and more projects will take the huge
> > potential
> > >  advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and
> > analytics
> > >  because silicon companies are able to produce high
> capacity
> > > non-volatile
> > >  memory on a large scale, this hardware technology will
> > fundamentally
> > > >>> change
> > >  the way to construct high performance applications similar
> > to what
> > > >>> happened
> > >  when replacing tape with disk technology since the 1980s.
> > so if
> > > >>> possible, I
> > >  advocate establishing an Apache working group to enhance
> the
> > > >>> collaboration
> > >  and synergies mentioned by Patrick Stuedi for
> storage-class
> > memory
> > >  technology-oriented projects.
> > > 
> > >  Best.
> > >  Gary.

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.12.0 release RC0

2017-10-25 Thread Sebastian 

+1 (binding)

Successfully built and validated the RC from source.

Best,
Sebastian

On 25.10.2017 03:38, Meghna Baijal wrote:

Hello All,

This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.12.0, release
candidate 0.

Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.

*Vote thread:*
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/800402860be8a1b4055ede075ab465af48b7f8d041b42217372a63b9@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E

*Result thread:*
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/83ab3763f0bb8468511269266bf0c26bdc786509d2cb38a2aafe30a3@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E


*The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:*
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.12.0.rc0/


*The release tag can be found here: *
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.12.0.rc0


*The release hash is 4f2af2d2e5216ab3a1faadcc117709b6836029dc and can be
found here:*
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/4f2af2d2e5216ab3a1faadcc117709b6836029dc


*Release artifacts are signed with the following key:*
69FF E8D6 1051 FFE7 E61B 02C2 80FD 81D7 703D F31B


*KEY files are available here:*
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.12.0.rc0/


*For information about the contents of this release, see:*
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet+0.12.0+Release+Notes


The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.

[ ] +1 Release this package as 0.12.0
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...

Thanks,
Meghna Baijal



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org