[VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.1 release RC0

Hi all, This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.1, release candidate RC0. Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release. Vote thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/52a6487bc1389d8865ccc0e42ade49

Re: Committer/PPMC votes

>From what I remember reading, the only votes that really seem to require consensus are kicking people out. On 22 June 2018 at 04:03, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 2:20 AM Hen wrote: > > ...My assumption is that the rules for voting for an Apache member are > the

[ANNOUNCE] Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis (Incubating) version 1.0.0-m2 Released

Hello All, Apache ServiceComb (incubating) Team is glad to announce the release of Apache ServiceComb Incubating Java-Chassis 1.0.0-m2. Apache ServiceComb (incubating) Java Chassis(https://github.com/apache/incubator-servicecomb-java-chassis) is a Software Development Kit (SDK) for

[ANNOUNCE] Apache ServiceComb Service-Center (incubating) version 1.0.0-m2 Released

Hello All, Apache ServiceComb (incubating) Team is glad to announce the release of Apache ServiceComb Incubating Service-Center 1.0.0-m2. Apache ServiceComb (incubating) Service-Center(https://github.com/apache/incubator-servicecomb-service-center) is a Restful based service-registry

[ANNOUNCE] Apache ServiceComb Saga (incubating) version 0.2.0 Released

Hello All, Apache ServiceComb (incubating) Team is glad to announce the release of Apache ServiceComb Incubating Saga 0.2.0. Apache ServiceComb (incubating) Saga (https://github.com/apache/incubator-servicecomb-saga) is an eventual data consistency technology, which provides a

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache SINGA (incubating) 1.2.0 released

On 21 June 2018 at 11:34, Moaz Reyad wrote: > Dear Craig and sebb, > > Thank you. The download page is fixed now. I'm afraid there are still issues. Download pages must only link to formal releases, so must not include links to GitHub. Such links belong on developer-facing pages. Links to

Re: Committer/PPMC votes

Hi, On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 2:20 AM Hen wrote: > ...My assumption is that the rules for voting for an Apache member are the > same as for voting for a PMC member or a committer. Ideally there are no > -1s, but at the end of the day it’s a majority vote That's my understanding: there are no

Re: Committer/PPMC votes

Roy said a while ago that for (P)PMC votes, a -1 is a veto. It is basically saying, "I cannot work with this person". And corollary, "I should not have to". Cheers, -g On Thu, Jun 21, 2018, 20:54 Hen wrote: > Interesting. > > Foundation-wise, all our votes are Majority Voting (new member