[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.1.rc1
Hi all, Thanks a lot for taking the time out to vote and for your suggestions. The vote is passed with 4 +1s (binding). Binding +1: Sergio Sebastian Jean-Baptiste Jim I will proceed with the next steps for the release. Thanks, Anirudh
Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.1 release RC1
+1 (binding) > On Jul 12, 2018, at 11:17 PM, Anirudh Subramanian > wrote: > > Hi all, > > This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.1, release > candidate RC1. > > Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release. > > Vote thread: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6a0459a54dd0b13fc89f653af91306810aa83d5d1a578a2abbac89fe@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E > > Results thread: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/94dfdc2cee82664a63a47d7ce0a011629903c5fca8ae96057974526f@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E > > Explanation for RC1: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/891c902c28251b0dbb90a64de086c8c5f02c22e070e58d55c923285d@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests etc. can be found at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.2.1.rc1/ > > The release tag can be found here: > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.2.1.rc1 > > The release hash is 106391a1f0ee012b1ea38764d711e76774ce77e1 and can be > found here: > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/106391a1f0ee012b1ea38764d711e76774ce77e1 > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key: > > 0D04 3D0F 92CA 7333 22A8 D131 9067 CC8E AF55 CD6D > > KEYS file available: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/KEYS > > The vote will end at Monday July 16th, 8:10 PDT. > > [ ] +1 Release this package as 1.2.1 > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > Thanks, > > Anirudh - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache OpenWhisk (Incubating): main module 0.9.0 [RC2]
+1 (binding) (if not too late :) ) > On Jul 11, 2018, at 10:38 AM, Vincent S Hou wrote: > > Dear IPMC members, > > This is a call for vote to release Apache OpenWhisk (Incubating): main module > version 0.9.0. > > The Apache OpenWhisk community has voted on and approved a proposal to > release Apache OpenWhisk (Incubating): main module version 0.9.0. > > We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members to review and vote on this > incubator release. > > Apache OpenWhisk (incubating) is a serverless, open source cloud platform > that executes functions in response to events at any scale. > > OpenWhisk main module vote thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/3d4952420a38936cbc6caeddf1979270f77469928e6092df84299ca1@%3Cdev.openwhisk.apache.org%3E > > OpenWhisk main module vote result thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a825791284657c9860e0f63ec68f08d085da818e93cc14a6756273dc@%3Cdev.openwhisk.apache.org%3E > > This release comprises of source code distribution only. There is one module > within this release. The artifact was built from the following Git commit ID: > * openwhisk: b1476b9, add until for all ansible retries (#3806), > https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/commit/b1476b9992bab90c077ac2f1fbdc67d10d9d2c39 > It will be tagged with the version. > > The source code artifacts can be found at: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/openwhisk/apache-openwhisk-0.9.0-incubating-rc2/openwhisk-0.9.0-incubating-sources.tar.gz > > The SHA-512 checksum for each artifact can be found at: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/openwhisk/apache-openwhisk-0.9.0-incubating-rc2/openwhisk-0.9.0-incubating-sources.tar.gz.sha512 > > The signature of this artifact can be found at: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/openwhisk/apache-openwhisk-0.9.0-incubating-rc2/openwhisk-0.9.0-incubating-sources.tar.gz.asc > > KEYS file is available here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/openwhisk/KEYS > This key has been validated here: > http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=houshengbo&op=index > > This is the first time that Apache OpenWhisk: main module requests for a > release, so there is no file of CHANGELOG. > > The documentation can be found at: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/blob/master/releases/0.9.0-incubating/INSTALL.md > or > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/openwhisk/apache-openwhisk-0.9.0-incubating-rc2/doc/INSTALL.md > > We are currently using the tool called > openwhisk-release(https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release) to > release all the modules of OpenWhisk. The instruction for release managers > can be found at: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/blob/master/docs/release_instructions.md. > This tool > supports both manual and automated modes to package the source code, sign the > artifacts and upload the artifacts into Apache SVN repositories. > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of > votes are reached. > > Please vote accordingly: > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > Best wishes. > Vincent Hou > > Apache OpenWhisk team > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Policy for podling committers on graduation
On 16 July 2018 at 02:08, Hen wrote: > +1 to automatically carried forward which I suspect is how it’s been > handled up to now. Before LDAP was used for podlings, committers were not distinguished from PPMC members. Only those in the TLP resolution were added to the PMC and committer LDAP groups that were created as part of graduation. It was up to the new PMC to request additional ids to be added to the committer group. This was a way of dropping people who would not be contributing to the PMC (e.g. mentors may wish to drop out) When podlings were defined in LDAP, this changed, as there was no longer any need to create the LDAP groups on graduation. > On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 4:15 AM sebb wrote: > >> When a podling graduates, all the people listed on the board >> resolution become both PMC members and committers. >> >> What is the policy for podling committers? >> >> Are they all automatically carried forward as committers? >> >> Or does the podling need to specifically need to re-appoint the >> committers that are not mentioned in the graduation resolution? >> >> S. >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: What is the right procedure of making all mentor to be PPMC
Hi Agree with Ted Dunning points. Generally speaking, as PPMCs, it is easier for mentors to help incubation project, so I suggest adding it. Regards Liang 吴晟 Sheng Wu wrote > Hi, > SkyWalking community wants our all mentors to be project PPMCs. Is > this default or need a procedure to do so? > > > Thanks > > > > Sheng Wu > Apache SkyWalking > > From Wu Sheng 's phone. -- Sent from: http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Unomi 1.3.0-incubating release
Ok I see it it's only in the report. Is there a way to make the build fail if an unwanted archive is detected? Sorry to bother you with this but I don't find much doc about the Apache Rat Plugin (maybe I'm not looking in the right place http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/usage.html ?) Thanks for the help. cheers, Serge... On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 10:36 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > > Yes I was wondering if RAT could help catch that because it is in > > place on the project but I wasn't sure if it performed those types of > > checks. > > > It helps a little it will flag the zip file as a binary file but it won’t > look in it’s contents. > > Thanks, > Justin > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Unomi 1.3.0-incubating release
Hi, > Yes I was wondering if RAT could help catch that because it is in > place on the project but I wasn't sure if it performed those types of > checks. It helps a little it will flag the zip file as a binary file but it won’t look in it’s contents. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Unomi 1.3.0-incubating release
Yes I was wondering if RAT could help catch that because it is in place on the project but I wasn't sure if it performed those types of checks. cheers, Serge... On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 3:17 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > > HI, > > > Thanks Justin for the review and catching that, somehow I missed this sorry > > about that. > > No issue. You might want to check that your rat exclusions haven’t been set a > little too wide, it happens reasonably frequently, even with some TLP > projects. > > Thanks, > Justin > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
