RE: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal

2018-12-25 Thread Mohammad Asif Siddiqui 
Looks like an interesting project.  
  
Regards  
Asif

-Original Message-
From: Luciano Resende [mailto:luckbr1...@gmail.com] 
Sent: 22 December 2018 PM 05:06
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal

Very nice, looks like you guys might need one more mentor, feel free to include 
myself.

On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 20:29 Vinoth Chandar 
wrote:

> Hi Justin,
>
> Thanks for the questions. I will try to answer them below .
>
> >>- Use of slack for communication. [1] Has the project thought about 
> >>how
> moving conversations and decision making to a mailing list will affect 
> the community?
> Good point. We use Slack for interactive debugging, critical decisions 
> (approaches, designs, PR) still happens over github issues (which will 
> remain the same anyway).
> I can try running a poll if you are really interested. But moving to 
> mailing list should be fine.
>
> >>- Relatively high bar for committership [1]
> So far we used a tweaked version of the chromium project's guidelines. 
> Open to advice on this going forward inside ASF
>
> >>No mention of non-code contributions at [1],
> Yes, [1] did not recognize that. But we as a project value it 
> definitely, In fact, the last two committers are the list are included 
> with incubation precisely for non-code contributions. They helped get 
> Hudi running on cloud systems.
>
> >>- Why the low number (6) of initial committers?
> No specific reason. We have included folks who have contributed 
> significantly so far to the project, based on the guidelines we set out.
> Once we have neutral/standardized governance in place from ASF, might 
> be easier to absorb more committers.
>
> >>- Of the initial committers mentioned it’s not obvious that all have 
> >>made
> contributions to the project. You mind listing their GitHub names or 
> listing their previous contribution to the project.
> The first four committers would jump out, if you look at the 
> contributions here . 
> (vinothchandar, n3nash, bvaradar, prazanna). prazanna actually has a 
> lot more code ownership, but github is not showing his commits for 
> some reason. You can find it in the raw git log. Already covered the 
> last two committers in the previous answer.
>
> >>- Under relationships with other Apache Products “there are no 
> >>direct
> competing projects with Hudi” is not a concern. The ASF allows 
> directly competing projects.
> Sure. we were just describing positioning of the project in the 
> ecosystem
>
> Thanks
> Vinoth
>
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 2:42 PM Justin Mclean 
> 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Nice proposal and sounds like an interesting project.
> >
> > A couple of things I noticed that may need some further thought or
> > discussion:
> > - Use of slack for communication. [1] Has the project thought about 
> > how moving conversations and decision making to a mailing list will 
> > affect
> the
> > community?
> > - Relatively high bar for committership [1]. While it's up to every
> (P)PMC
> > to set the bar, having a high bar hinders project growth and limits
> people
> > who are unable to work full time of the project.
> > - No mention of non-code contributions at [1], as teh ASF we welcome 
> > all forms of contribution.
> > - Why the low number (6) of initial committers?
> > - Of the initial committers mentioned it’s not obvious that all have 
> > made contributions to the project. You mind listing their GitHub 
> > names or listing their previous contribution to the project.
> > - Under relationships with other Apache Products “there are no 
> > direct competing projects with Hudi” is not a concern. The ASF 
> > allows directly competing projects.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Justin
> >
> > 1. https://uber.github.io/hudi/community.html#becoming-a-committer
> > 
> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
--
Sent from my Mobile device

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 5]

2018-12-25 Thread Ted Dunning 
It is good to provide these checksums in the email so that people can be
sure later that they have the right artifacts.



On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 2:53 PM Penning, H.P. (Henk)  wrote:

> sorry for terseness
> please provide signature and checksum for
> incubator/netbeans/incubating-netbeans/incubating-10.0/nbms/tasks.jar
>
> See : https://checker.apache.org/projs/incubator.html
>
> HPP
>
> 
> Van: James Dwyer 
> Verzonden: dinsdag 25 december 2018 07:31
> Aan: general@incubator.apache.org
> Onderwerp: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 10.0 (incubating)
> [vote candidate 5]
>
> ya how about you and the CREW UNBLOCK DEEZ NUTS
>
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 4:44 PM Laszlo Kishalmi
>  wrote:
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Thank you for your votes, as the voting thread has been open for more
> > than 72 hours and we have collected 3 +1 binding votes, zero 0-s and
> > zero -1, I'm closing the voting thread, with the result of that the
> > Apache NetBeans 10.0 (incubating) vc5 has *passed the voting process*
> > and can be released as Apache NetBeans 10.0 (incubating).
> >
> > Details:
> >
> > +1 IPMC binding votes:
> >
> >   * Ate Douma (http://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=ate) (carried
> > over from the PPMC thread)
> >   * Justin Mclean (http://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=jmclean)
> >   * Mark Struberg (http://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=struberg)
> >
> > There were some non-blocking issues identified. These and other details
> > of this voting process can be found on:
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/10.0-vc5
> >
> > The release announcement emails are going to be sent out during this
> > week, regarding that we are in the beginning of the winter holiday
> > season, so we might need some time to completely sync-up our
> > distribution area, website, wiki etc.,
> >
> > Thank you for everyone for supporting Apache NetBeans 10.0 (incubating)!
> > Happy holidays!
> >
> > Laszlo Kishalmi
> >
> > Volunteer Release Manager of Apache NetBeans 10.0 (incubating)
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 5]

2018-12-25 Thread Laszlo Kishalmi 

Thank you!

Missing checksums and signatures have been provided.

On 12/25/18 2:53 PM, Penning, H.P. (Henk) wrote:

sorry for terseness
please provide signature and checksum for
incubator/netbeans/incubating-netbeans/incubating-10.0/nbms/tasks.jar

See : https://checker.apache.org/projs/incubator.html

HPP


Van: James Dwyer 
Verzonden: dinsdag 25 december 2018 07:31
Aan: general@incubator.apache.org
Onderwerp: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote 
candidate 5]

ya how about you and the CREW UNBLOCK DEEZ NUTS

On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 4:44 PM Laszlo Kishalmi
 wrote:

Dear all,

Thank you for your votes, as the voting thread has been open for more
than 72 hours and we have collected 3 +1 binding votes, zero 0-s and
zero -1, I'm closing the voting thread, with the result of that the
Apache NetBeans 10.0 (incubating) vc5 has *passed the voting process*
and can be released as Apache NetBeans 10.0 (incubating).

Details:

+1 IPMC binding votes:

   * Ate Douma (http://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=ate) (carried
 over from the PPMC thread)
   * Justin Mclean (http://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=jmclean)
   * Mark Struberg (http://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=struberg)

There were some non-blocking issues identified. These and other details
of this voting process can be found on:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/10.0-vc5

The release announcement emails are going to be sent out during this
week, regarding that we are in the beginning of the winter holiday
season, so we might need some time to completely sync-up our
distribution area, website, wiki etc.,

Thank you for everyone for supporting Apache NetBeans 10.0 (incubating)!
Happy holidays!

Laszlo Kishalmi

Volunteer Release Manager of Apache NetBeans 10.0 (incubating)


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 5]

2018-12-25 Thread Penning, H.P. (Henk) 
sorry for terseness
please provide signature and checksum for
incubator/netbeans/incubating-netbeans/incubating-10.0/nbms/tasks.jar

See : https://checker.apache.org/projs/incubator.html

HPP


Van: James Dwyer 
Verzonden: dinsdag 25 december 2018 07:31
Aan: general@incubator.apache.org
Onderwerp: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote 
candidate 5]

ya how about you and the CREW UNBLOCK DEEZ NUTS

On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 4:44 PM Laszlo Kishalmi
 wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> Thank you for your votes, as the voting thread has been open for more
> than 72 hours and we have collected 3 +1 binding votes, zero 0-s and
> zero -1, I'm closing the voting thread, with the result of that the
> Apache NetBeans 10.0 (incubating) vc5 has *passed the voting process*
> and can be released as Apache NetBeans 10.0 (incubating).
>
> Details:
>
> +1 IPMC binding votes:
>
>   * Ate Douma (http://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=ate) (carried
> over from the PPMC thread)
>   * Justin Mclean (http://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=jmclean)
>   * Mark Struberg (http://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=struberg)
>
> There were some non-blocking issues identified. These and other details
> of this voting process can be found on:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/10.0-vc5
>
> The release announcement emails are going to be sent out during this
> week, regarding that we are in the beginning of the winter holiday
> season, so we might need some time to completely sync-up our
> distribution area, website, wiki etc.,
>
> Thank you for everyone for supporting Apache NetBeans 10.0 (incubating)!
> Happy holidays!
>
> Laszlo Kishalmi
>
> Volunteer Release Manager of Apache NetBeans 10.0 (incubating)
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[ANNOUNCE] Release Apache SkyWalking (incubating) version 6.0.0-beta

2018-12-25 Thread Hongtao Gao 
Hi all,

Apache SkyWalking (incubating) Team is glad to announce the first release
of Apache SkyWalking Incubating 6.0.0-beta.

SkyWalking: APM (application performance monitor) tool for distributed
systems,
especially designed for microservices, cloud native and container-based
(Docker, Kubernetes, Mesos) architectures.
Underlying technology is a distributed tracing system.

Vote Thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2081e251414869adeb8d394edbd0c9013dde82bf397e7b9bff1282ac@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E

Download Links : http://skywalking.apache.org/downloads/

Release Notes :
https://github.com/apache/incubator-skywalking/blob/v6.0.0-beta/CHANGES.md


Website: http://skywalking.apache.org/

SkyWalking Resources:
- Issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-skywalking/issues
- Mailing list: d...@skywalkiing.incubator.apache.org
- Documents:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-skywalking/blob/v6.0.0-beta/docs/README.md



- Apache SkyWalking (incubating) Team

=
*Disclaimer*

Apache SkyWalking (incubating) is an effort undergoing incubation at The
Apache Software Foundation (ASF), sponsored by the name of Apache
Incubator PMC. Incubation is required of all newly accepted
projects until a further review indicates that the
infrastructure, communications, and decision making process have
stabilized in a manner consistent with other successful ASF
projects. While incubation status is not necessarily a reflection
of the completeness or stability of the code, it does indicate
that the project has yet to be fully endorsed by the ASF.