Re: [DISCUSS] Move Apache DataSketches Proposal Draft to Wiki

I can read but I cannot make a few formatting changes. Also, in the sorted list of Project Proposals the entry for DataSketchesProposal is misspelled. On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 7:37 PM Kenneth Knowles wrote: > Sounds good to me. I read it one more time. My comments should not be seen > as

Re: [DISCUSS] Responsibilities and Improvements (was: Re: Whimsy general@ subs check (was: .... introduce "[DISCUSS]" threads for podling ... release candidates))

Hi, > I agree that it's not ideal but it is not a symptom of a big problem either. > We have inactive IPMC members who might become active again later if a > community wants to join the incubator but it's a hassle to leave and then > join again. Some context, over 300 projects have gone

Re: [DISCUSS] Move Apache DataSketches Proposal Draft to Wiki

Sounds good to me. I read it one more time. My comments should not be seen as blocking comments, but just commentary and curiosity. Do you have a Wiki account? https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ProjectProposals Kenn On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 4:58 PM lee...@gmail.com wrote: > This draft proposal

[DISCUSS] Move Apache DataSketches Proposal Draft to Wiki

This draft proposal has been available as a Google Doc (https://s.apache.org/datasketches-proposal-draft) since Monday, Feb 25th and has been stable with no new comments since Wednesday, Feb 27th. I would like to propose we move the document to the Wiki and hold a vote soon. If there are no

Re: [DISCUSS] Responsibilities and Improvements (was: Re: Whimsy general@ subs check (was: .... introduce "[DISCUSS]" threads for podling ... release candidates))

Lots to distill here... > On Mar 1, 2019, at 2:15 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks for taking to time to distill this. > >> Many PMCs contain what could be called inactive PMC members. The concern is >> if that makes any difference or impedes the active IPMC members. I’m not >>

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

Perfect, thank you. > On Mar 1, 2019, at 3:17 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Antoine Toulme wrote on Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 15:09:39 -0800: >> I am happy to mention that you mentioned this term on list. > > Thanks. > >> What language should I use? > > The public part of PNS tickets should be

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

Antoine Toulme wrote on Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 15:09:39 -0800: > I am happy to mention that you mentioned this term on list. Thanks. > What language should I use? The public part of PNS tickets should be factual, so I'd say: . "In the _Star Wars_ universe there exists a character named

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

Hello Daniel, I am happy to mention that you mentioned this term on list. Are you inferring something? What language should I use? > On Mar 1, 2019, at 3:06 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Antoine Toulme wrote on Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 09:10:08 -0800: >> I’ll open a pooling name search ticket for

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

Antoine Toulme wrote on Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 09:10:08 -0800: > I’ll open a pooling name search ticket for Obiwarn and will test the waters > over there. When you create a PNS ticket, please note on it the existence of . Cheers, Daniel P.S.

Re: [DISCUSS] Responsibilities and Improvements (was: Re: Whimsy general@ subs check (was: .... introduce "[DISCUSS]" threads for podling ... release candidates))

Hi, Thanks for taking to time to distill this. > Many PMCs contain what could be called inactive PMC members. The concern is > if that makes any difference or impedes the active IPMC members. I’m not sure > how inactive IPMC members are impacting the functioning of the IPMC. I also don’t

[DISCUSS] Responsibilities and Improvements (was: Re: Whimsy general@ subs check (was: .... introduce "[DISCUSS]" threads for podling ... release candidates))

Hi - > On Mar 1, 2019, at 7:23 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > > On 3/1/2019 5:12 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: >>> The Board isn't gonna worry about something like that. >> I wasn’t expecting the board to say anything re that, but the IPMC could of. Many PMCs contain what could be called inactive

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

Thanks Jim. Hat tip to Jonny who joined the list just to make this contribution. Jonny is a committer on the project and will participate a new initial committer to the project at Apache. It’s his first involvement with Apache, please welcome him to the fray! How about this: I’ll open a pooling

Re: Apache OpenWhisk Composer 0.10.0 (incubating) Released

Dave, Thanks for all your work to achieve this and congratulations! Kind regards, Matt From: "David P Grove" To: "OpenWhisk Dev" Cc: general Date: 02/28/2019 08:38 AM Subject:Apache OpenWhisk Composer 0.10.0 (incubating) Released The Apache OpenWhisk project is

Re: Whimsy general@ subs check (was: [DISCUSS] introduce "[DISCUSS]" threads for podling non-ASF release candidates)

Greg, thank you for taking the time to elaborate. I'm afraid I still don't understand. I understand that this is how it's currently set up. But these are our rules, we can change them. There's no law involved here, right? The way I see it: One problem we're trying to solve is too many people in

Re: Whimsy general@ subs check (was: [DISCUSS] introduce "[DISCUSS]" threads for podling non-ASF release candidates)

On 3/1/2019 5:12 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: >> The Board isn't gonna worry about something like that. > I wasn’t expecting the board to say anything re that, but the IPMC could of. I personally don't know the impact of that statement either.  Sometimes opinion in a report and a call to action is

Re: Whimsy general@ subs check (was: [DISCUSS] introduce "[DISCUSS]" threads for podling non-ASF release candidates)

On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 9:04 AM Lars Francke wrote: > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 3:05 PM Greg Stein wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 7:00 AM Lars Francke > > wrote: > > >... > > > > > As far as I know every member can become IPMC member. So if we change > the > > > rules that every member vote

Re: Whimsy general@ subs check (was: [DISCUSS] introduce "[DISCUSS]" threads for podling non-ASF release candidates)

On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 3:05 PM Greg Stein wrote: > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 7:00 AM Lars Francke > wrote: > >... > > > As far as I know every member can become IPMC member. So if we change the > > rules that every member vote is binding (whether or not they are in the > > IPMC) people wouldn't

Re: Whimsy general@ subs check (was: [DISCUSS] introduce "[DISCUSS]" threads for podling non-ASF release candidates)

On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 7:00 AM Lars Francke wrote: >... > As far as I know every member can become IPMC member. So if we change the > rules that every member vote is binding (whether or not they are in the > IPMC) people wouldn't need to join the club. > The legal structure passes through the

Re: Whimsy general@ subs check (was: [DISCUSS] introduce "[DISCUSS]" threads for podling non-ASF release candidates)

If only some people are like me they joined to support a specific podling by giving their +1 on a vote. I did the same, then went silent for a year or so and am only now starting to get interested in the Incubator workings again. Maybe if we could change the requirements on binding votes for

Re: Whimsy general@ subs check (was: [DISCUSS] introduce "[DISCUSS]" threads for podling non-ASF release candidates)

On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 12:33 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > > And most probably do not participate. Would asking for those 100 odd > people to be removed come across as friendly? > I'd be +1 on removing them. a.) While kindness towards our fellow PMC members is important, the role of the Incubator

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

either works for me. > On Feb 28, 2019, at 6:07 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > I’ll change my vote. > > +1 to Obiwarn. > >> On Feb 28, 2019, at 3:04 PM, jonathan.r...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> -1 to Bava >> How about Obiwarn. it is an anagram for rainbow and it sounds cool. >> >> On 2019/02/28

Re: Whimsy general@ subs check (was: [DISCUSS] introduce "[DISCUSS]" threads for podling non-ASF release candidates)

Hi, > The Board isn't gonna worry about something like that. I wasn’t expecting the board to say anything re that, but the IPMC could of. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For

Re: Whimsy general@ subs check (was: [DISCUSS] introduce "[DISCUSS]" threads for podling non-ASF release candidates)

On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 3:30 AM Justin Mclean wrote: >... > When it was mentioned in the board report it got no comments. [1] > > "A large number (100+) of IPMC members are not signed up to the private > mail > list, each was sent emails asking them to sign up. A couple asked to be > removed from

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache TVM into the incubator

Hi, +1 (non-binding) Welcome! On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 12:44 PM Markus Weimer wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > we've discussed the proposal for the TVM project in [1]. The proposal itself > can > be found on the wiki [2]. > > According to the Incubator rules[3] I'd like to call a vote to accept the

Re: Whimsy general@ subs check (was: [DISCUSS] introduce "[DISCUSS]" threads for podling non-ASF release candidates)

Hi, > And haven't we *just* been talking about have too many cooks in the > kitchen? Too much drive-by and bikeshedding? I would guess that none participate in either lists but I guess we’ll find out. > ... I see zero problem trimming a hundred people out of the IPMC. The very > concept of

Re: Whimsy general@ subs check (was: [DISCUSS] introduce "[DISCUSS]" threads for podling non-ASF release candidates)

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 5:33 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Ask the Board to remove them. To participate on the IPMC, you should be > subscribed to private@ > > At first glance you would be asking to remove yourself btw :-) > hahaha... look, rather than glance :-) ... I've been subscribed