Re: Omid and Tephra

[Furkan KAMACI]

Hi,

+1

Kind Regards,
Furkan KAMACI

24 Eki 2019 Per, saat 07:11 tarihinde Jean-Baptiste Onofré 
şunu yazdı:

> +1, good idea.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 23/10/2019 20:16, Alan Gates wrote:
> > Justin and mentors of Omid and Tephra,
> >
> > As Justin noted in his emails to these podlings this month both are very
> > low activity, struggling to even file their reports, and appear to be
> > candidates for retirement.
> >
> > The situation here is somewhat special because Phoenix uses one or both
> of
> > these technologies (they are both transaction managers on top of HBase),
> so
> > they may have an interest in their continued survival.  Tephra briefly
> > discussed this last June[1], though nothing came of it.  My conclusion is
> > there is not enough momentum left for these podlings to vote themselves
> > into Phoenix without an external push.
> >
> > So before we push them into retirement I believe we should involve the
> > Phoenix PMC and see if they want to adopt either or both of these, with
> the
> > knowledge that they will likely be getting minimal contributions from
> > current members of those projects going forward.  If others are ok with
> > this I can contact the Phoenix PMC and see if they wish to take any
> action
> > on this.
> >
> > Alan.
> >
> > 1.
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/87ace080ef8a967b238781979a8d9a0cb9607ac4a195d5937756ec66@%3Cdev.tephra.apache.org%3E
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: Omid and Tephra

[Jean-Baptiste Onofré]

+1, good idea.

Regards
JB

On 23/10/2019 20:16, Alan Gates wrote:

Justin and mentors of Omid and Tephra,

As Justin noted in his emails to these podlings this month both are very
low activity, struggling to even file their reports, and appear to be
candidates for retirement.

The situation here is somewhat special because Phoenix uses one or both of
these technologies (they are both transaction managers on top of HBase), so
they may have an interest in their continued survival.  Tephra briefly
discussed this last June[1], though nothing came of it.  My conclusion is
there is not enough momentum left for these podlings to vote themselves
into Phoenix without an external push.

So before we push them into retirement I believe we should involve the
Phoenix PMC and see if they want to adopt either or both of these, with the
knowledge that they will likely be getting minimal contributions from
current members of those projects going forward.  If others are ok with
this I can contact the Phoenix PMC and see if they wish to take any action
on this.

Alan.

1.
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/87ace080ef8a967b238781979a8d9a0cb9607ac4a195d5937756ec66@%3Cdev.tephra.apache.org%3E



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[IP CLEARANCE] ServiceComb toolkit contribution

[Willem Jiang]

Hi Incubator PMC,

The TLP Apache ServiceComb toolkit[1] has been donated code for
OpenAPI Specific Validator being referred to as
`servicecomb-oas-validator`, old hostsd at [2].

This is the formal request for IP clearance to be checked as per [3].
The donated code can be found at [4] .

Please check the ip-clearance filed here[5] for more information.
The PMC has voted and passed to accept this donation[6].
The ICLA of major contributors,  Daniel Qian has been filed.
The SGA from NewCapec Institute has been filed.

Please vote to approve this contribution.

This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours and as usual lazy
consensus applies.

[1]https://github.com/apache/servicecomb-toolkit
[2]https://github.com/NewCapec-Institute/oas-validator
[3]https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html#form-filling
[4]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-247
[5]https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/servicecomb-oas-validator.html
[6]https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/704967302e2f3c093441bf197bfe83b7aee34c210e0c3bb3898d4170@%3Cdev.servicecomb.apache.org%3E

Willem Jiang

On behalf of ServiceComb PMC.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Omid and Tephra

[James Taylor]

+1. That seems like the best course of action IMHO.

On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 12:54 PM Flavio Junqueira  wrote:

> +1
>
> -Flavio
>
> > On 23 Oct 2019, at 21:08, Terence Yim  wrote:
> >
> > +1 on this
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:36 Dave Fisher  wrote:
> >
> >> +1. That’s a good idea.
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPhone
> >>
> >>> On Oct 23, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Alan Gates  wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Justin and mentors of Omid and Tephra,
> >>>
> >>> As Justin noted in his emails to these podlings this month both are
> very
> >>> low activity, struggling to even file their reports, and appear to be
> >>> candidates for retirement.
> >>>
> >>> The situation here is somewhat special because Phoenix uses one or both
> >> of
> >>> these technologies (they are both transaction managers on top of
> HBase),
> >> so
> >>> they may have an interest in their continued survival.  Tephra briefly
> >>> discussed this last June[1], though nothing came of it.  My conclusion
> is
> >>> there is not enough momentum left for these podlings to vote themselves
> >>> into Phoenix without an external push.
> >>>
> >>> So before we push them into retirement I believe we should involve the
> >>> Phoenix PMC and see if they want to adopt either or both of these, with
> >> the
> >>> knowledge that they will likely be getting minimal contributions from
> >>> current members of those projects going forward.  If others are ok with
> >>> this I can contact the Phoenix PMC and see if they wish to take any
> >> action
> >>> on this.
> >>>
> >>> Alan.
> >>>
> >>> 1.
> >>>
> >>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/87ace080ef8a967b238781979a8d9a0cb9607ac4a195d5937756ec66@%3Cdev.tephra.apache.org%3E
> >>
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.7.0-incubating RC4

[Carl Steinbach]

+1 (binding)

On Tue, Oct 22, 2019, 4:42 PM Julien Le Dem 
wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Downloaded, verified signature, checked licences, ran the build.
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 4:29 PM Jacques Nadeau  wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Downloaded, reviewed licenses. Spot check for bad licenses. Built from
> > source + tests.
> >
> > Nice job on the first release guys!
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 4:05 PM James Taylor 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding).
> > >
> > > Successfully downloaded, verified license, verified checksum, verified
> > > signature, built from source, and ran unit tests.
> > > Minor nit (ok to fix in next release IMHO): Copyright in NOTICE for
> > Iceberg
> > > should read 2017-2019
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 3:21 PM Ryan Blue  wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi everyone,
> > > >
> > > > I propose the following RC to be released as official Apache Iceberg
> > > > 0.7.0-incubating release.
> > > >
> > > > This candidate has passed a PPMC vote. The result thread is here:
> > > > *
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/fe76494f9feab454837bc2dc540cd9e59d55dac3f7e0b5b335de7725@
> > > > 
> > > >
> > > > The commit id is 9c81babac65351f7aa21dd878f01c5c81ae304af
> > > > * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-0.7.0-incubating-rc4
> > > > *
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/tree/apache-iceberg-0.7.0-incubating-rc4
> > > > *
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/tree/9c81babac65351f7aa21dd878f01c5c81ae304af
> > > >
> > > > The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here:
> > > > *
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/iceberg/apache-iceberg-0.7.0-incubating-rc4/
> > > >
> > > > You can find the KEYS file here:
> > > > * https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/iceberg/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > This release includes convenience binary artifacts that are staged in
> > > > Nexus. The Maven repository URL is:
> > > > *
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1004/
> > > >
> > > > The convenience binaries include a Spark runtime Jar with shaded
> > > > dependencies. The LICENSE and NOTICE content for that Jar are
> viewable
> > in
> > > > github as well as in the Jar:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/tree/apache-iceberg-0.7.0-incubating-rc4/runtime
> > > >
> > > > To build and test, run `./gradlew build`. You can also test by adding
> > the
> > > > iceberg-spark-runtime Jar to the jars folder of Spark 2.4.
> > > >
> > > > This is the first Apache Iceberg release.
> > > >
> > > > Please download, verify, and test; then vote in the next 72 hours.
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 0.7.0-incubating
> > > > [ ] +0
> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Ryan Blue
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE} Apache Hudi (incubating) 0.5.0 RC6

[Balaji Varadarajan]

Thanks everyone. We have 3 +1 binding votes now. I will wait till tomorrow 
morning (PST) before I close the vote.

Thanks,
Balaji.V


On 2019/10/23 08:46:56, Suneel Marthi  wrote: 
> +1 binding
> 
> On 2019/10/19 22:04:19, vbal...@apache.org wrote: 
> > Dear IPMC,
> > 
> > Apache Hudi (incubating) (pronounced Hoodie) stands for Hadoop Upserts anD 
> > Incrementals. Apache Hudi (incubating) manages storage of large analytical 
> > datasets on DFS (Cloud stores, HDFS or any Hadoop FileSystem compatible 
> > storage) and provide ability to query them.
> > 
> > The previous source release candidate 0.5.0-incubating-rc5 had licensing 
> > concerns (Please see 
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/02d40e3dbababc069c5210928aa4dd335c41ab1837d5a894954f5c9f@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E)
> >  .
> > 
> > We have addressed them in the new source release candidate (RC#6). The 
> > Apache Hudi (incubating) community has voted on this new release candidate 
> > and approved. The new source release candidate version is 
> > 0.5.0-incubating-rc6
> > 
> > Results: 4 binding +1 votes
> > 
> > Here is the voting thread:  
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/617cad3116308821f845d3be5d71e135fdcbb82b4533c53941a0fda8@%3Cdev.hudi.apache.org%3E
> > Here is the voting result email:  
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/1587f3d766f6b3536d32630f89ba53b86cb09178d744fce05ae93a03@%3Cdev.hudi.apache.org%3E
> > 
> > The Apache Hudi community had verified the following aspects of release:
> > - verified checksums and signatures [SUCCESS]
> > - license header check [SUCCESS]
> > - No binaries in source release [SUCCESS]
> > - verified RAT check [SUCCESS]
> > - built from source release (mvn clean install -DskipTests) [SUCCESS]
> > - mvn test from source release [SUCCESS]
> > 
> > I'd like to call a vote in general to approve the first release of Apache 
> > Hudi (incubating). Please review and vote on the release candidate #5 for 
> > the version 0.5.0, as follows:
> > [ ] +1,  Approve the release
> > [ ]  0,  I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> > [ ] -1,  Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> > 
> > 
> > The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
> > 
> >   - JIRA release notes [1]
> >   - The official Apache source release and binary convenience releases to 
> > be deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with 
> > fingerprint AF9BAF79D311A3D3288E583F24A499037262AAA4  [3],
> >   - all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4]
> >   - source code tag "release-0.5.0-incubating-rc6" [5]
> > 
> >   [1]  
> > https://jira.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12322822&version=12346087
> >   [2]  
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/hudi/hudi-0.5.0-incubating-rc6/
> >   [3]  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/hudi/KEYS
> >   [4]  
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehudi-1006/
> >   [5]  
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-hudi/tree/release-0.5.0-incubating-rc6
> > 
> > A release validation script is available in master for running usual 
> > checks. To run this
> > 
> >   - git clone g...@github.com:apache/incubator-hudi.git
> >   - cd incubator-hudi/scripts
> >   - ./release/validate_staged_release.sh --release=0.5.0 --rc_num=6
> > 
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. The vote will pass if a 
> > majority of at least three +1 IPMC votes are cast
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Balaji.V
> > (on behalf of Apache Hudi PPMC)
> > 
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > 
> > 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Omid and Tephra

[Flavio Junqueira]

+1

-Flavio

> On 23 Oct 2019, at 21:08, Terence Yim  wrote:
> 
> +1 on this
> 
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:36 Dave Fisher  wrote:
> 
>> +1. That’s a good idea.
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On Oct 23, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Alan Gates  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Justin and mentors of Omid and Tephra,
>>> 
>>> As Justin noted in his emails to these podlings this month both are very
>>> low activity, struggling to even file their reports, and appear to be
>>> candidates for retirement.
>>> 
>>> The situation here is somewhat special because Phoenix uses one or both
>> of
>>> these technologies (they are both transaction managers on top of HBase),
>> so
>>> they may have an interest in their continued survival.  Tephra briefly
>>> discussed this last June[1], though nothing came of it.  My conclusion is
>>> there is not enough momentum left for these podlings to vote themselves
>>> into Phoenix without an external push.
>>> 
>>> So before we push them into retirement I believe we should involve the
>>> Phoenix PMC and see if they want to adopt either or both of these, with
>> the
>>> knowledge that they will likely be getting minimal contributions from
>>> current members of those projects going forward.  If others are ok with
>>> this I can contact the Phoenix PMC and see if they wish to take any
>> action
>>> on this.
>>> 
>>> Alan.
>>> 
>>> 1.
>>> 
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/87ace080ef8a967b238781979a8d9a0cb9607ac4a195d5937756ec66@%3Cdev.tephra.apache.org%3E
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> 
>> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Omid and Tephra

[Terence Yim]

+1 on this

On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:36 Dave Fisher  wrote:

> +1. That’s a good idea.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Oct 23, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Alan Gates  wrote:
> >
> > Justin and mentors of Omid and Tephra,
> >
> > As Justin noted in his emails to these podlings this month both are very
> > low activity, struggling to even file their reports, and appear to be
> > candidates for retirement.
> >
> > The situation here is somewhat special because Phoenix uses one or both
> of
> > these technologies (they are both transaction managers on top of HBase),
> so
> > they may have an interest in their continued survival.  Tephra briefly
> > discussed this last June[1], though nothing came of it.  My conclusion is
> > there is not enough momentum left for these podlings to vote themselves
> > into Phoenix without an external push.
> >
> > So before we push them into retirement I believe we should involve the
> > Phoenix PMC and see if they want to adopt either or both of these, with
> the
> > knowledge that they will likely be getting minimal contributions from
> > current members of those projects going forward.  If others are ok with
> > this I can contact the Phoenix PMC and see if they wish to take any
> action
> > on this.
> >
> > Alan.
> >
> > 1.
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/87ace080ef8a967b238781979a8d9a0cb9607ac4a195d5937756ec66@%3Cdev.tephra.apache.org%3E
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: Omid and Tephra

[Dave Fisher]

+1. That’s a good idea.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 23, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Alan Gates  wrote:
> 
> Justin and mentors of Omid and Tephra,
> 
> As Justin noted in his emails to these podlings this month both are very
> low activity, struggling to even file their reports, and appear to be
> candidates for retirement.
> 
> The situation here is somewhat special because Phoenix uses one or both of
> these technologies (they are both transaction managers on top of HBase), so
> they may have an interest in their continued survival.  Tephra briefly
> discussed this last June[1], though nothing came of it.  My conclusion is
> there is not enough momentum left for these podlings to vote themselves
> into Phoenix without an external push.
> 
> So before we push them into retirement I believe we should involve the
> Phoenix PMC and see if they want to adopt either or both of these, with the
> knowledge that they will likely be getting minimal contributions from
> current members of those projects going forward.  If others are ok with
> this I can contact the Phoenix PMC and see if they wish to take any action
> on this.
> 
> Alan.
> 
> 1.
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/87ace080ef8a967b238781979a8d9a0cb9607ac4a195d5937756ec66@%3Cdev.tephra.apache.org%3E


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Omid and Tephra

[Alan Gates]

Justin and mentors of Omid and Tephra,

As Justin noted in his emails to these podlings this month both are very
low activity, struggling to even file their reports, and appear to be
candidates for retirement.

The situation here is somewhat special because Phoenix uses one or both of
these technologies (they are both transaction managers on top of HBase), so
they may have an interest in their continued survival.  Tephra briefly
discussed this last June[1], though nothing came of it.  My conclusion is
there is not enough momentum left for these podlings to vote themselves
into Phoenix without an external push.

So before we push them into retirement I believe we should involve the
Phoenix PMC and see if they want to adopt either or both of these, with the
knowledge that they will likely be getting minimal contributions from
current members of those projects going forward.  If others are ok with
this I can contact the Phoenix PMC and see if they wish to take any action
on this.

Alan.

1.
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/87ace080ef8a967b238781979a8d9a0cb9607ac4a195d5937756ec66@%3Cdev.tephra.apache.org%3E

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Doris 0.11.0-incubating-rc01

[Dave Fisher]

Carrying over my +1 (binding)

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 23, 2019, at 2:11 AM, Zhao Chun  wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Please review and vote on Apache Doris 0.11.0-incubating-rc01 release.
> 
> Apache Doris is an MPP-based interactive SQL data warehousing for reporting
> and analysis.
> 
> The Apache Doris community has voted on and approved this release:
> 
> RESULT:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/1fbfe58e58bbcb3a6013cf8f70f3cd75195b244f63fe89248794a975@%3Cdev.doris.apache.org%3E
> 
> VOTE:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/dc98ca7c4336838e08e6c83b19647ff29113d5e71190f72dadaeae16@%3Cdev.doris.apache.org%3E
> and
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/fc5b28708736fda3a3fa15f2b86f3702b29585fb2b51ff661c760cc7@%3Cdev.doris.apache.org%3E
> 
> The release candidate has been tagged in GitHub as 0.11.0-rc01, available
> here:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/releases/tag/0.11.0-rc01
> 
> Release Notes are here:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/issues/1891
> 
> Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.
> 
> The artifacts (source, signature and checksum) corresponding to this release
> candidate can be found here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/doris/0.11.0-rc1/
> 
> This has been signed with PGP key 983C9560, corresponding to
> zh...@apache.org.
> 
> KEYS file is available here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/doris/KEYS
> It is also listed here:
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/zhaoc.asc
> 
> To verify and build, you can refer to following wiki:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/wiki/How-to-verify-Apache-Release
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorReleaseChecklist
> 
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> From the PPMC Vote we cary over 1 binding IPMC Votes:
> 
> +1 from Dave Fisher
> 
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] +0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> 
> Thanks,
> Zhao Chun
> 
> 
> DISCLAIMER:
> Apache Doris(incubating) is an effort undergoing incubation at The Apache
> Software Foundation (ASF), sponsored by the Apache Incubator. Incubation is
> required of all newly accepted projects until a further review indicates
> that
> the infrastructure, communications, and decision making process have
> stabilized
> in a manner consistent with other successful ASF projects. While incubation
> status is not necessarily a reflection of the completeness or stability of
> the
> code, it does indicate that the project has yet to be fully endorsed by the
> ASF.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[VOTE] Release Apache Doris 0.11.0-incubating-rc01

[Zhao Chun]

Hi all,

Please review and vote on Apache Doris 0.11.0-incubating-rc01 release.

Apache Doris is an MPP-based interactive SQL data warehousing for reporting
and analysis.

The Apache Doris community has voted on and approved this release:

RESULT:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/1fbfe58e58bbcb3a6013cf8f70f3cd75195b244f63fe89248794a975@%3Cdev.doris.apache.org%3E

VOTE:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/dc98ca7c4336838e08e6c83b19647ff29113d5e71190f72dadaeae16@%3Cdev.doris.apache.org%3E
and
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/fc5b28708736fda3a3fa15f2b86f3702b29585fb2b51ff661c760cc7@%3Cdev.doris.apache.org%3E

The release candidate has been tagged in GitHub as 0.11.0-rc01, available
here:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/releases/tag/0.11.0-rc01

Release Notes are here:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/issues/1891

Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.

The artifacts (source, signature and checksum) corresponding to this release
candidate can be found here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/doris/0.11.0-rc1/

This has been signed with PGP key 983C9560, corresponding to
zh...@apache.org.

KEYS file is available here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/doris/KEYS
It is also listed here:
https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/zhaoc.asc

To verify and build, you can refer to following wiki:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/wiki/How-to-verify-Apache-Release
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorReleaseChecklist

The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.

>From the PPMC Vote we cary over 1 binding IPMC Votes:

+1 from Dave Fisher

[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] +0 No opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...

Thanks,
Zhao Chun


DISCLAIMER:
Apache Doris(incubating) is an effort undergoing incubation at The Apache
Software Foundation (ASF), sponsored by the Apache Incubator. Incubation is
required of all newly accepted projects until a further review indicates
that
the infrastructure, communications, and decision making process have
stabilized
in a manner consistent with other successful ASF projects. While incubation
status is not necessarily a reflection of the completeness or stability of
the
code, it does indicate that the project has yet to be fully endorsed by the
ASF.

Re: [VOTE} Apache Hudi (incubating) 0.5.0 RC6

[Suneel Marthi]

+1 binding

On 2019/10/19 22:04:19, vbal...@apache.org wrote: 
> Dear IPMC,
> 
> Apache Hudi (incubating) (pronounced Hoodie) stands for Hadoop Upserts anD 
> Incrementals. Apache Hudi (incubating) manages storage of large analytical 
> datasets on DFS (Cloud stores, HDFS or any Hadoop FileSystem compatible 
> storage) and provide ability to query them.
> 
> The previous source release candidate 0.5.0-incubating-rc5 had licensing 
> concerns (Please see 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/02d40e3dbababc069c5210928aa4dd335c41ab1837d5a894954f5c9f@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E)
>  .
> 
> We have addressed them in the new source release candidate (RC#6). The Apache 
> Hudi (incubating) community has voted on this new release candidate and 
> approved. The new source release candidate version is 0.5.0-incubating-rc6
> 
> Results: 4 binding +1 votes
> 
> Here is the voting thread:  
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/617cad3116308821f845d3be5d71e135fdcbb82b4533c53941a0fda8@%3Cdev.hudi.apache.org%3E
> Here is the voting result email:  
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/1587f3d766f6b3536d32630f89ba53b86cb09178d744fce05ae93a03@%3Cdev.hudi.apache.org%3E
> 
> The Apache Hudi community had verified the following aspects of release:
> - verified checksums and signatures [SUCCESS]
> - license header check [SUCCESS]
> - No binaries in source release [SUCCESS]
> - verified RAT check [SUCCESS]
> - built from source release (mvn clean install -DskipTests) [SUCCESS]
> - mvn test from source release [SUCCESS]
> 
> I'd like to call a vote in general to approve the first release of Apache 
> Hudi (incubating). Please review and vote on the release candidate #5 for the 
> version 0.5.0, as follows:
> [ ] +1,  Approve the release
> [ ]  0,  I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> [ ] -1,  Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> 
> 
> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
> 
>   - JIRA release notes [1]
>   - The official Apache source release and binary convenience releases to be 
> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with 
> fingerprint AF9BAF79D311A3D3288E583F24A499037262AAA4  [3],
>   - all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4]
>   - source code tag "release-0.5.0-incubating-rc6" [5]
> 
>   [1]  
> https://jira.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12322822&version=12346087
>   [2]  
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/hudi/hudi-0.5.0-incubating-rc6/
>   [3]  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/hudi/KEYS
>   [4]  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehudi-1006/
>   [5]  
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-hudi/tree/release-0.5.0-incubating-rc6
> 
> A release validation script is available in master for running usual checks. 
> To run this
> 
>   - git clone g...@github.com:apache/incubator-hudi.git
>   - cd incubator-hudi/scripts
>   - ./release/validate_staged_release.sh --release=0.5.0 --rc_num=6
> 
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. The vote will pass if a majority 
> of at least three +1 IPMC votes are cast
> 
> Thanks,
> Balaji.V
> (on behalf of Apache Hudi PPMC)
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Dubbo python-dubbo project contribution

[Ian Luo]

Hi,

With no -1 votes being cast, this IP clearance vote passes by lazy
consensus. I'll update the IP clearance page form [1] to include the result.

Regards,
-Ian.

1. https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/dubbo-python.html

On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 5:23 PM Ian Luo  wrote:

> Hi Incubator PMC,
>
> The Apache Dubbo has been donated code for python-dubbo[1] being referred
> to as `python-dubbo`.
>
> This is the formal request for IP clearance to be checked as per [2]. The
> donated code can be found at [3] .
>
> Please check the ip-clearance filed here[4] for more information. The PMC
> has voted and passed to accept this donation[5]. The ICLA of contributors
> have been filed. Secretary has confirmed that SGA is received[6].
>
> Please vote to approve this contribution.
>
> This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours and as usual lazy
> consensus applies.
>
> [1] https://github.com/RitterHou/python-dubbo
> [2]
> https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html#form-filling
> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-246
> [4] https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/dubbo-python.html
> [5]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8796b5a9f63b4798334def975686b23fc66bd3974fe9b2f82c2576b4@%3Cdev.dubbo.apache.org%3E
> [6]
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/af6cf16232911f7adfa41f4ed3a860a00a3b2ff9456cd0a68bf1463d@%3Cprivate.dubbo.apache.org%3E
>
>
> Best Regards！
> -Ian.
>

[VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating

[Anatole Tresch]

Hi,

The Tamaya team was running the needed tasks to get the 0.4-incubating
release of Tamaya out.
The artifacts available via the Apache distribution repository [1] and
also via Apache's Nexus [2].

The tag for this release candidate is available at [3] and [4]. It will be
renamed
once the vote passed.

The mail thread of the vote can be found at [5].

Please take a look at the artifacts and vote!

Please note:
This vote is a "majority approval" with a minimum of three +1 votes (see
[6]).
Hereby we already have one binding +1 vote carrying over from our PPMC vote
by our mentor Julian Feinauer [7]


[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and
why ...


Thanks,
Anatole Tresch

[1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tamaya/0.4-incubating/

[2] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetamaya-1040
[3]
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tamaya.git;a=commit;h=0ad439201f16ba1ddcc6b5c9ffb65e0a8a067301
[4]
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tamaya-extensions.git;a=commit;h=a397bf7cf08ec57830aabe7b66099e70390a5006

[5]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7f52e8bcac7f8d60205179b632416ff24cadd64b5f45c38f42f87e38@%3Cdev.tamaya.apache.org%3E

[6] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
[7]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c56ada758367709f0b9a86712ebc3cea62b799e4c44a057ee87d7761@%3Cdev.tamaya.apache.org%3E

-- 
*Anatole Tresch*
PPMC Member Apache Tamaya
JCP Star Spec Lead
*Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1*
*maketechsimple.wordpress.com  *
*Twitter:  @atsticks, @tamayaconf*