Re: Champions and Mentors for New Project Proposals

[Eya Badal Abdisho]

On 2020/01/23 23:10:34, Justin Mclean  wrote: 
> HI,
> 
> > Thank you so much for your reply. My username is eya.abdisho. 
> 
> You now has access.
> 
> Thanks,
> Justin
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 
> Thank you so much, Justin. 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DataSketches-java 1.2.0-incubating-RC2

[leerho]

Hello IPMC,
This is a gentle reminder that we need one more IPMC member to vote on this
thread.  We have one more day to go :)

Thanks,
Lee.

On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 2:15 AM Furkan KAMACI 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> +1 from me (binding, carrying over my vote).
>
> I checked:
>
> - Incubating in name
> - DISCLAIMER-WIP exists
> - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
> - No unexpected binary files
> - Checked PGP signatures
> - Checked Checksums
> - Code compiles and tests successfully run
>
> Kind Regards,
> Furkan KAMACI
>
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 5:29 AM Justin Mclean 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > I checked:
> > - incubating in name
> > - signatures and hashes are fine
> > - DISCLAIMER exists
> > - LICENSE fine
> > - NOTICE need year updating
> > - No unpacked binary files
> > - All source files have ASF headers
> > - Can compile from source
> >
> > There's a couple of very minor things I noticed (links to old / non
> Apache
> > sites, author tags) but they have ben covered in previous releases.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Justin
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Hooray! DataSketches website is now completely moved!

[leerho]

Folks,

Many thanks to Joonsuk Bae and Drew Foulks of the Infra team, our website
 is now completely moved and being
dynamically updated!  This was the last major piece of the move to Apache!

   - incubator-datasketches-website
    *master*
   branch is the source, which is mostly Markdown files.  Pushes to this
   branch will almost immediately be rendered to the *asf-site* branch as
   html where it will be served publicly.
   - datasketches.github.io
   , which was the
   old site, has been fitted with redirects so that in most cases, users going
   to that site will be automatically redirected to datasketches.apache.org.
   (This was fairly simple once we figured out the best way to do this, but it
   took a long time to figure this piece out.  (I am thinking of writing this
   up to help other podlings that may be struggling with this same issue)
   - I carefully scanned the new site for references to *github.io
   * and converted them to apache.org where appropriate.
   - I have also added the required Apache links, trademark notices and
   disclaimers to every web page to satisfy Apache requirements.
   - The only thing missing, which we are working on, is to place our logo
   image in SVG form on the website.

Thank you all for your patience!

Cheers!
Lee.

Re: [VOTE] Myriad retirement

[Woonsan Ko]

+1

Thanks for your efforts!

Woonsan

On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 10:14 AM Javi Roman  wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, despite an effort to reboot the project about more than one
> year, we weren't successful in keeping the existing committers active. At
> this point, a decision to retire the podling was taken, and a vote was done
> on the PPMC:
>
> Discussion:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ea7567bede20e2c0fc9d0c3ea2713e2b2a7442897ceafdeb1aa95b05%40%3Cdev.myriad.apache.org%3E
>
> Result:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r5d8a123ad051f748379904066cde17b93974ed2628593ebd69dee028%40%3Cdev.myriad.apache.org%3E
>
> According to https://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html I'm
> starting a vote on the incubator mailing list to be ratified the retirement.
>
>
> [ ] +1   : retire Myriad
> [ ] +/-0 : No opinion
> [ ] -1   : Don't retire Myriad.
>
>
> Many thanks.
>
> --
> Javi Roman
>
> Twitter: @javiromanrh
> GitHub: github.com/javiroman
> Linkedin: es.linkedin.com/in/javiroman
> Big Data Blog: dataintensive.info
> Apache Id: javiroman

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Myriad retirement

[Dave Meikle]

+1 (binding)

On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 at 15:14, Javi Roman  wrote:

> Unfortunately, despite an effort to reboot the project about more than one
> year, we weren't successful in keeping the existing committers active. At
> this point, a decision to retire the podling was taken, and a vote was done
> on the PPMC:
>
> Discussion:
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ea7567bede20e2c0fc9d0c3ea2713e2b2a7442897ceafdeb1aa95b05%40%3Cdev.myriad.apache.org%3E
>
> Result:
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r5d8a123ad051f748379904066cde17b93974ed2628593ebd69dee028%40%3Cdev.myriad.apache.org%3E
>
> According to https://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html I'm
> starting a vote on the incubator mailing list to be ratified the
> retirement.
>
>
> [ ] +1   : retire Myriad
> [ ] +/-0 : No opinion
> [ ] -1   : Don't retire Myriad.
>
>
> Many thanks.
>
> --
> Javi Roman
>
> Twitter: @javiromanrh
> GitHub: github.com/javiroman
> Linkedin: es.linkedin.com/in/javiroman
> Big Data Blog: dataintensive.info
> Apache Id: javiroman
>

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Maven Wrapper

[Robert Scholte]

Although there wasn't an explicit -1, I noticed some concerns.
I would like to complete the process properly so would like to see from John 
and Justin if we can continue?
If not, what do you expect before finishing this process?

regards,
Robert

On 10-1-2020 16:03:16, Robert Scholte  wrote:
I don't want to split these IP clearances. It doesn't make sense to adopt one 
without the other.

Let me try to get in contact with Walmart Labs to get an SGA for the Takari 
Maven Wrapper.

thanks.
Robert

On 2020/01/06 23:17:33, "John D. Ament" wrote:
> Dropping private list for previously mentioned reason.
>
> In order for us to accept the Takari Maven Plugin, it's currently EPL v1.
> We allow these to be distributed in binary form. For us to accept the
> plugin, I would expect an SGA from Takari allowing the relicensing.
>
> The Maven Wrapper i think is much clearer. Most of the code was actually
> written by individuals with ICLAs on file with the ASF. It's already
> Apache Licensed. It has no declared NOTICES either.
>
> To simplify things, perhaps it would be easier to have two IP clearances,
> one for the wrapper and one for the plugin. They should have different
> needs.
>
> John
>
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 4:30 PM Robert Scholte wrote:
>
> >
> > On 6-1-2020 22:24:09, Justin Mclean wrote:
> > HI,
> >
> > Confirmed IP Clearance from all active committers:
> >
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7c8fc7fa0fc677c24504d948d7d71e6cdebdb952c9ca0a2183460726%40%3Cprivate.maven.apache.org%3E
> >
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/bd38cce5904d805b8526593996fcfec17ba4c8b6d8a18d66261d072c%40%3Cprivate.maven.apache.org%3E
> >
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/00102361655d35ea939d44e522d9dd1fb4894af20ac418a1ef5973be%40%3Cprivate.maven.apache.org%3E
> >
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7459ee80b46bef0c2f4640700a3ee4bad46ae64bb3dad54f8c7896a3%40%3Cprivate.maven.apache.org%3E
> >
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0a9e690562ffe25ede5b601600e6b7edd5f1c70a2aaffddabbf5f85f%40%3Cprivate.maven.apache.org%3E
> > with this we have secured all IP for both repositories.
> >
> >
> > Github list 35 contributors for [1], and 7 contributors for [2] without an
> > SGA I think you would require ICLAs from all significant contributors, not
> > just current ones.
> >
> > *Robert Scholte:*
> > I did an analysis of all the commits. The 5 mentioned are the only
> > significant contributors.
> > Attached (if accepted) an excel sheet with all the details.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Robert
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Justin
> >
> > 1. https://github.com/takari/maven-wrapper/graphs/contributors
> > 2. https://github.com/takari/takari-maven-plugin
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Inquiry about researching ASF Incubator

[Seth Frey]

Justin,

It turns out the text of the letter is minimal: we've been advised to keep it 
as spare and cookie cutter as possible, with any specifics better placed in the 
proposal than the latter.

"""
If the proposal submitted by Dr. Filkov entitled "GCR: Collaborative Research: 
Jumpstarting Successful OSS Projects With Evidence Based Rules and Structures" 
is selected for funding by NSF, it is my intent to collaborate and/or commit 
resources as detailed in the Project Description or the Facilities, Equipment 
and Other Resources section of the proposal.

Sincerely,
XXX
"""

And here is the corresponding blurb on ASF's role that we'll be putting in the 
main proposal text (point #2):
"""
To extend our relevance, reach, and impact, we will leverage in this project 
data, knowhow, and network connections from the academic and OSS communities 
relevant to this proposal. In particular, (1) the personnel of NSF RCN grant 
#1917908, on the subject of coordinating efforts for rules/policy extractions 
from online sources, has agreed on supporting us in our efforts of automating 
rule/policy extractions, with their knowhow and data; (2) leaders from the ASF 
Incubator have agreed to support us through introductions and networking with 
their member projects as we pursue interviews and surveys with them; (3) 
members from the OSGeo foundation have agreed to support us through 
introductions and networking with their member projects as we pursue interviews 
and surveys with them; (4) personnel from the NSF Medium grant #1901311, on the 
subject of understanding sustainability in OSS projects, has agreed on mutual 
data exchange with our project. Submitted with this proposal are letters of 
collaboration from each of them.
"""
By the same advice that informed the choice to go boilerplate, you'll see that 
we now do commit you to providing some manner of concrete assistance.  Let us 
know if you have a better idea for that phrasing.

I don't know what you prefer for word processing and/or letterhead.  If the 
most straightforward route for you is to copy and paste the text of the letter 
into a more formal format, go ahead. If you'd like me to resend it in the form 
of a collaborative doc or file via some preferred platform format (I imagine 
that .docx and Google Docs are formally or culturally discouraged), let me 
know, so I can minimize the inconvenience to you for supporting us.


best,
seth.

Seth Frey
Assistant Professor
Communication, UC Davis
https://enfascination.com/research

recently:
http://doi.org/gdzpj6 — Poker experts encrypt their reasoning with their cards
http://doi.org/cwbz — The dynamics of emotional influence (and self-influence)
http://doi.org/cwb2 — Flocking in what-you-think-I-think-you-think reasoning

> On Jan 22, 2020, at 16:06, Justin Mclean  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>>> I as the V.P Incubator would be willing to sign that.
>> 
>> I've drafted a note.  I'm still learning the culture: shall I send it to the 
>> list or directly to you?
> 
> The list generally drops attachments, just send it directly to me, or better 
> still send an email to the list with a link to download it.
> 
> Kind Regards,
> Justin
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>