FWIW (not much) Michael Martin’s statements match my understanding. What he
says is stated from a different point of view or with different emphasis than
most posts here, but doesn’t differ AFAICT. The only point that remains
unclear to me is the end date of Verizon’s explicitly asserted
Hi,
> Fixed in master. However, there are still questions on hoThw NOTICE file
> should look like for binary releases.
Generally the way that is handles is too have seperate NOTICE (and LICENSE)
files one for teh source release and one for the binary convienance.
> These are the model files
Hi,
> I find no record of Verizon Media or its predecessors (including Yahoo and
> Oath) having assigned copyright to Apache, either with respect to the code
> that existed at the time the project joined the incubator or with respect
> to the authorized contributions made by Lee and others since
Justin,
Thank you for noticing this. See below...
--
Aaron Radzinski
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 11:01 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> HI,
>
> I know the vote has all ready passed but I can see a couple of issues
> here:
> - LICENSE is missing the appendix
>
Fixed in master.
- As noted the NOTICE is
Hello all:
I'm joining this chain to help address a question that was raised regarding
copyright ownership in the context of the accuracy of the NOTICE file.
My understanding is that when Datasketches joined the incubator, Verizon
Media granted an irrevocable license to its copyright in the
Thanks, Justin. Can you be more specific about what you think isn't correct
in the NOTICE file? Our practice is to copy the entire notice of
third-party projects, if they exist. We don't do this for the boiler-plate
ASF NOTICE, but any ASF notice that contains other text will be copied in
(like
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 12:51 AM Justin Mclean wrote:
> 72 hours in a minimum not a maximum. I suggest you ask and encourage your
> other mentors to vote.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
Agreed. Please, if we could get our other mentors, Flavio, Junping,
and Mohammad, to check out our release artifacts and
Hi,
Thanks you all for your feedback.
We will change the project name to something less common.
Regards,
Lior
--
Sent from: http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Yes, 72 hours is the minimum, you are free to wait a bit longer, especially
if you haven't gotten enough binding votes yet.
Let me take a look at the release artifacts.
Justin Mclean 于2020年5月4日周一 下午12:51写道：
> Hi,
>
> > We are about at the 72hr mark, but only one person from the IPMC has
> >
Thanks for reviewing and voting for Apache PageSpeed (Incubating) 1.14.36.1
release. I am happy to announce the release voting has passed with 4 +1
binding votes, no +0 or -1 votes.
The voting thread is:
Folks,
I tried to use the name Rainbow for a project before.
Here is the whole trademark research and the feedback from VP brand:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/PODLINGNAMESEARCH/issues/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-164?filter=allissues
Hi, Aviem,
I did a quick in trademarkia[1], and found a lot of trademarks about
`rainbow`.
[1] https://www.trademarkia.com/trademarks-search.aspx?tn=rainbow
Thanks,
Ming Wen, Apache APISIX & Apache SkyWalking
Twitter: _WenMing
Aviem Zur 于2020年5月4日周一 下午1:41写道：
> Not sure what legally needs
12 matches
Mail list logo
