Re: [DISCUSS] Distribution guidelines for other platforms

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

Dave I'm a bit surprised at  your -1 given this guidelines have been discussed 
before on several lists (including this one) and you’ve not had any objections 
that I can recall. What is your main concern here?


Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[ANNOUNCE] Apache DataSketches Hive 1.1.0-incubating released!

[leerho]

### Bug Fix for DataSketches-hive Issue #50 ###

Hello All,

1. The Apache DataSketches Hive 1.1.0-incubating has been released!

NOTE 1: This is the Java Hive adaptor component of the DataSketches
library that enables Apache Hive access to the key sketch algorithms in
production-ready packages: Sketches Included: CPC, FrequentItems, HLL, KLL,
Quantiles, Theta and Tuple.

NOTE 2: This release contains a critical fix for a recently discovered
bug identified by DataSketches-hive Issue #50.

Vote Thread Permalink:

https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r82467e59b70c7616357e3d01018ec6bbf57f4ba8ae9d2b7728b78fae%40%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E

There were 3 binding (+1) votes:Liang Chen, Furkan Kamaci, Evans Ye

2. Source repository:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-datasketches-hive

Git Tag for this release:

https://github.com/apache/incubator-datasketches-hive/tree/1.1.0-incubating
on branch 1.1.X-incubating

3. Dist/release:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/datasketches/hive/1.1.0-incubating/

4. Nexus:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/datasketches/datasketches-hive/1.1.0-incubating/

5. Download, build, test and documentation:

https://github.com/apache/incubator-datasketches-hive/blob/master/README.md


Thank you to the IPMC members and community for taking the time to review
and
provide guidance on our release!

On behalf of the Apache DataSketches Community,

Lee
lee...@apache.org


=
*Disclaimer*

Apache DataSketches (incubating) is an effort undergoing incubation at
The Apache Software Foundation (ASF), sponsored by the Apache Incubator
PMC. Incubation is required of all newly accepted projects until a
further review indicates that the infrastructure, communications, and
decision making process have stabilized in a manner consistent with
other successful ASF projects. While incubation status is not
necessarily a reflection of the completeness or stability of the code,
it does indicate that the project has yet to be fully endorsed by the
ASF.

Re: [DISCUSS] Distribution guidelines for other platforms

[Justin Mclean]

HI,

> For clarity, you mean that the dependencies included in a binary fit valid 
> classes of licenses with correct notices.

No, while that might also be the case, what I was saying is that a release must 
be voted on by the IPMC.

>>> Would there be cases where the convenience binaries must be licensed under 
>>> a different but non-Category-x license due to dependencies? If so, what's 
>>> the recommendation?
>> 
>> The dependancies don’t effect the license only what is bundled in the 
>> release does that. If other Category A and Category B items are included in 
>> the release then that is fine as they are compatible with the Apache license 
>> when used in this way. So I can't think of a situation were a distribution 
>> would need to be licensed under a different license. If it was then it 
>> wouldn’t be an Apache release as all release need to be under the Apache 
>> license.
> 
> If there were a huge reason for a category X inclusion then that would 
> require changes in policy which are highly unlikely. One of the strengths of 
> the ASF is that are licensing is considered to be safe.

A " non-Category-x license” was mentioned above so I don’t think this was about 
inclusion of Category X. Given I can’t see a situation were the above situation 
would arise I'm not 100% sure what the question is referring to.

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Distribution guidelines for platforms

[Justin Mclean]

HI,

> This lacks proper reference to existing Apache Policies and instead rewrites 
> it. I think that this is outside the Incubator’s remit.

How do you think it rewrites it? Nothing as far as I can see is added only 
clarified and put into context for different 3rd party platforms. Legal helped 
in making this original draft of this document and had no issues with it.

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Distribution guidelines for platforms

[Dave Fisher]

-1 (binding)

This lacks proper reference to existing Apache Policies and instead rewrites 
it. I think that this is outside the Incubator’s remit.

Regards,
Dave

> On Jul 5, 2020, at 6:16 PM, Justin Mclean  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This vote is to make this official [1] and move the guidelines to the 
> website. The guidelines will be placed under the podling guides menu and 
> linked to from the release section in the Incubator policy page [2]
> 
> The last sentence in that section will be changed to say this (where "here" 
> links to the web version of the guidelines):
> 
> "Also, the Podling MAY choose to distribute approved releases through other 
> channels by following the guidelines here."
> 
> This vote will be open for 72 hours or as long as is needed and IPMC votes 
> are binding.
> 
> Please vote:
> +1 [ ] Let's make this official
> +0 [ ] Not sure this is needed
> -1 [ ] No way because...
> 
> Thanks,
> Justin
> 
> 1. 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Distribution+Guidelines
> 2. https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html#releases
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] Distribution guidelines for other platforms

[Dave Fisher]

Hi -

Big observation. I’m uncomfortable with the Incubator making Apache Policy 
beyond adding DISCLAIMERs. Other Board and Operations VPs have been delegated 
policy making. Yes, that is hard and unclear. Perhaps this proposal could 
inform those discussions.

More inline.

> On Jul 5, 2020, at 7:30 PM, Justin Mclean  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> Does the convenience binaries include nightlys? Or CI test builds?
> 
> In general they do not not, as wording states “approved releases” i.e. that 
> means that the IPMC must vote on the release artefact. Also note that only 
> approved code can be in a convenance binary, which again means it only 
> includes code voted on by the IPMC in a release.

For clarity, you mean that the dependencies included in a binary fit valid 
classes of licenses with correct notices.

> However, it would be expected that these other types of builds follow these 
> guidelines, but as there are not based on an offical releases there might be 
> some differences. The main issue with these sort of releases would be 
> distribution to end users, which is not allowed, so it needs to be made very 
> clear that this is for development and testing use only and that end users 
> are not using these in production or elsewhere. A large number of downloads 
> from these platforms would suggest that the platform is being used by end 
> users and steps may need to be taken to prohibit that.
> 
>> If yes, what's the recommendation if a project needs to test category X 
>> optional dependencies?
> 
> This is not covered and it would be good to have a seperate discussion about 
> this. IMO It probably should be discussed on a case by case basis. In general 
> these could not be called Apache releases or distributed on ASF platforms, 
> and would be treated as 3rd party releases with different branding and 
> trademark requirements. Currently permission from legal and/or infra and/or 
> the IPMC is likely to be needed to do this.

I think there is current discuss in legal about this. Please check the 
legal-discuss@ archive.


> 
>>> Where possible it should be pointed out that Apache project make source 
>>> releases and convenience binaries are just a convenience for end user.
>> 
>> What's the reason for requiring this statement? Can a project choose to vote 
>> on a binary release under ALv2 to make it official?
> 
> Currently with ASF policy, no binary releases are “official” as we make 
> source releases only. This may change in the near future. However, binary 
> releases are expected to comply with ASF policy on licensing, branding, 
> trademarks, releases and distribution just like source releases.

Again discussion about this notion should be brought to legal-discuss@

>> What does this mean to the PPMCs? Would it be more helpful if this includes 
>> reference to the branding policies that the PPMCs should adhere to and 
>> protect? (e.g. [1][2][3])
> 
> This is already linked to in the Incubator policy / guidelines.

Note that http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/downstream.html 
 is a draft policy and 
represents the VP, Brands best understanding of current practices. PPMCs should 
consider their project’s downstream and see if that fits this policy. If not 
then it should be discussed at trademarks@

>> Would there be cases where the convenience binaries must be licensed under a 
>> different but non-Category-x license due to dependencies? If so, what's the 
>> recommendation?
> 
> The dependancies don’t effect the license only what is bundled in the release 
> does that. If other Category A and Category B items are included in the 
> release then that is fine as they are compatible with the Apache license when 
> used in this way. So I can't think of a situation were a distribution would 
> need to be licensed under a different license. If it was then it wouldn’t be 
> an Apache release as all release need to be under the Apache license.

If there were a huge reason for a category X inclusion then that would require 
changes in policy which are highly unlikely. One of the strengths of the ASF is 
that are licensing is considered to be safe.

Regards,
Dave

> 
> Thanks,
> Justin
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 

[VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.7.0-rc2

[Mike Beckerle]

The Apache Daffodil community has voted and approved the proposed
release of Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.7.0-rc2.

We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
incubator release.

Daffodil is an open source implementation of the DFDL specification that
uses DFDL schemas to parse fixed format data into an infoset, which is most
commonly represented as either XML or JSON. This allows the use of
well-established XML or JSON technologies and libraries to consume,
inspect, and manipulate fixed format data in existing solutions. Daffodil
is also capable of the reverse by serializing or "unparsing" an XML or JSON
infoset back to the original data format.

Vote thread:

https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/daffodil-dev/202007.mbox/%3CEEA6E9860DFB8449AA9F0E561E1B75AAA9709778%40ALPMBAPA07.e2k.ad.ge.com%3E

Result thread:

https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/daffodil-dev/202007.mbox/%3CCAM5OWnjr88hP-DVqFh2hKFBMMXepKu39YEt-_E-8Agx2%3DHBOcA%40mail.gmail.com%3E

All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
found at:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/daffodil/2.7.0-rc2/

Staging artifacts can be found at:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1018/

This release has been signed with PGP key 13A680AF, corresponding
to mbecke...@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS file here:

https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/daffodil/KEYS

The release candidate has been tagged in git with v2.7.0-rc2.

For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 2.7.0:

https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-2.7.0

For a summary of the changes in this release, see:

https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/2.7.0/

Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
(ends on Thursday July 9 at 12 noon US.EDT = UTC-4)

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

[VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.7.0-rc2

[Mike Beckerle]

The Apache Daffodil community has voted and approved the proposed release
of Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.0.0-rc1.

We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
incubator release.

Daffodil is an open source implementation of the DFDL specification that
uses DFDL schemas to parse fixed format data into an infoset, which is most
commonly represented as either XML or JSON. This allows the use of
well-established XML or JSON technologies and libraries to consume,
inspect, and manipulate fixed format data in existing solutions. Daffodil
is also capable of the reverse by serializing or "unparsing" an XML or JSON
infoset back to the original data format.

Vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1743d580ace1aeea36a757787e9872481f23676ac2663f7a297ddca2%40%3Cdev.daffodil.apache.org%3E

Result thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/re1491938ca6a0c23ca384219e22c22c70e9f3752e088c4fc79fab58a%40%3Cdev.daffodil.apache.org%3E

All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
found at:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/daffodil/2.7.0-rc2/

Staging artifacts can be found at:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1018/

This release has been signed with PGP key 13A680AF, corresponding
to mbecke...@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS file here:

https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/daffodil/KEYS

The release candidate has been tagged in git with v2.7.0-rc2.

For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 2.7.0:

https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-2.7.0

For a summary of the changes in this release, see:

https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/2.7.0/

Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
(ends on Thursday 12 noon US.EDT = UTC-4)

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TVM (incubating) v0.6.1.rc1

[Furkan KAMACI]

Hi,

+1 from me (binding, carrying over my vote).

I checked:

- Incubating in name
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
- No unexpected binary files
- Checked PGP signatures
- Checked Checksums
- Code compiles and tests successfully run

Kind Regards,
Furkan KAMACI

On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 2:34 AM Byung-Gon Chun  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> - I checked the signature and hash.
> - DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and NOTICE look good
> - No unexpected binary files
> - The code compiles and runs
>
> Thanks.
> -Gon
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 3:28 PM YiZhi Liu  wrote:
>
> > Dear community,
> >
> > This is a call for a vote to release Apache TVM (incubating) version
> > 0.6.1. This is a maintenance release incorporating important bug
> > fixes. All users of Apache TVM (incubating) 0.6.0 are advised to
> > upgrade.
> >
> > Apache TVM (incubating) community has voted and approved the release,
> > with four +1 votes from IPMC members (Tianqi Chen, Markus Weimer,
> > Henry Saputra, and Furkan KAMACI).
> >
> > Vote thread:
> >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r4aaf1e5eb82c2706b82657eddfd9a7d753272a91066a1ee0ae1af60c%40%3Cdev.tvm.apache.org%3E
> >
> > Result thread:
> >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r341a8a77638a0c216d8ace5f401ad1c19dcc572e5a84bc6dcb6f92c5%40%3Cdev.tvm.apache.org%3E
> >
> > 1) Link to release notes:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/releases/tag/v0.6.1.rc1
> >
> > 2) Link to release candidate:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tvm/tvm-v0.6.1-rc1
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > +1 = approve
> > +0 = no opinion
> > -1 = disapprove (provide reason)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > --
> > Yizhi Liu
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> --
> Byung-Gon Chun
>