Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (Incubating) 0.6.2

2020-07-22 Thread Nikita Ivanov
Will be removed in the next release (0.7.0) [1], as well as adding MIT to LICENSE file [2]. Thank you, 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NLPCRAFT-98 2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NLPCRAFT-97 -- Nikita Ivanov On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 5:12 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > >

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 9.1.0

2020-07-22 Thread Brennan Ashton
Hi all, The vote to release Apache NuttX (incubating) 9.1.0-rc2 is now closed. Thanks to those that took the time to review and vote. The release has passed with 5 +1 (binding) votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Binding: +1 Justin Mclean +1 Duo Zhang +1 Junping +1 ShaoFeng Shi +1 Tianqi Chen

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (Incubating) 0.6.2

2020-07-22 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, And the binary files? Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (Incubating) 0.6.2

2020-07-22 Thread Nikita Ivanov
No, those files were created completely from scratch without any borrowing from any CC-based sources (thus they are very minimal and serve more of documentation purpose on how to extend them). All content of the files shipped in the release is 100% ASL2.0 licensed. Thanks, -- Nikita Ivanov On

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (Incubating) 0.6.2

2020-07-22 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Justin - I think you misread the comments. These comments specifically > address *externally* available pre-packaged configuration that is NOT > included in the release. Here's the full comment in question: Those files still contain data, which I’m guessing is a subset of full set? If so

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.4.0-incubating (RC1)

2020-07-22 Thread Luciano Resende
Carry on my +1 (binding) from the dev vote thread. On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 10:22 AM Luciano Resende wrote: > > Please vote to approve the release of Apache Toree 0.4.0-incubating (RC1). > > The podling dev vote thread: > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@toree.incubator.apache.org/msg02117.html >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (Incubating) 0.6.2

2020-07-22 Thread Nikita Ivanov
Justin - I think you misread the comments. These comments specifically address *externally* available pre-packaged configuration that is NOT included in the release. Here's the full comment in question: # # This is the default configuration. Feel free to add to and extend it. # # You can also

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 9.1.0 [RC2]

2020-07-22 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 (binding) but more work in needed on headers and licensing I checked: - incubating in name - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE are OK but not complete. The restrictions of use conditions will need to be addressed at some point. - File are missing ASF headers - No unexpected binaries

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.4.0-incubating (RC1)

2020-07-22 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes are fine - LICENSE and NOTICE all good - No unexpected binary files - All ASF headers have correct headers - Can compile from source Thanks, Justin - To

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (Incubating) 0.6.2

2020-07-22 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, Sorry but it’s -1 (binding) due to license and binary issues I checked: - Incubating in name - signatures and hashes are fine - DISCLAIMER exists - NOTICE include lists MIT licensed file this should be in LICENSE. This was brought up last release. - LICENSE is missing above MIT license -

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.8-rc01

2020-07-22 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, -1 (binding) as incubating is not in the name. I suggest you rename and carry on the vote. If you do that treat my vote as +1 (binding). I checked: - incubating in not in name - signatures and hashes are fine - DISCLAIMER exists (WIP) - LICENSE and NOTICE need more work - didn’t compile