?????? [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-14 Thread Eason Chen
Hi, Many previous developments took place internally, but from the perspective of contributors, there have been more and more users, at least now oppo, alibaba, etc. users are participating in the contribution. I believe that with the help of the instructor, we have a better understanding of

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-14 Thread Eason Chen
Hi, All code of the project will be donated to ASF. There were some inconsistencies when the project was just open source, but now it is developed based on the github version. Thanks, Eason -- Original -- From:

?????? [CANCEL-VOTE] Accept EventMesh into Apache Incubator

2020-08-14 Thread Eason Chen
Hi, Because there are some issues that have not been clarified, I cancel the voting first, and I will restart the process after all the issues are clarified. Thanks, Eason ---- ??:

Re: [VOTE] Accept EventMesh into Apache Incubator

2020-08-14 Thread hui li
-1 non-binding. yousa Eason Chen 于2020年8月14日周五 下午7:57写道: > Hi, > > > After the discussion of EventMesh proposal (discussion thread is here[1]), > I would like to call a VOTE to accept it into the Apache Incubator. > > > Please cast your vote: > > > [ ] +1, bring EventMesh into Incubator > [

Re: [VOTE] Accept EventMesh into Apache Incubator

2020-08-14 Thread Ming Wen
-1 non-binding. As mentioned in the discussion thread, the proposal should reflect the real situation of the project, and the contributors of the project should make active efforts to develop the community on public channels, such as github. Sheng Wu 于 2020年8月15日周六 上午11:49写道: > -1 binding > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept EventMesh into Apache Incubator

2020-08-14 Thread Sheng Wu
-1 binding My concerns are clear in the discussion thread. The community is not caring for the community/user feedback from what I have seen, such as GitHub issue discussions. ASF and ASF incubator should never a pre-condition of the OSS community is active or not. Sheng Wu 吴晟 Twitter,

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-14 Thread Willem Jiang
We need to build the community around the project once we open source the code. It's quite important for the health of the project. Even the project is accepted as a podling of incubator, you still need to keep building the community. >From the information we got through the Github project, I

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-14 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, > After the project was open sourced, we did not conduct evangelism, and the > internal version iterations were not synchronized in time. Does that mean a different version to what in that GitHub will be donated to ASF? That may complicate things a little as we would need to know who the

?????? [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-14 Thread Eason Chen
Hi, After the project was open sourced, we did not conduct evangelism, and the internal version iterations were not synchronized in time. Many of these issues and prs were raised by many of our partners, and many of them were not reflected on github. Some document changes were also requested

Fwd: [IMPORTANT] - Migration to ci-builds.a.o

2020-08-14 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi - This migration has been completed for the Incubator clutch analysis and site build. It’s crunch time now. Some podlings have managed to move their builds, but others have not. (1) Request a Folder for your project from Infra. We are no longer putting podling builds in the Incubator

Re: svn commit: r1880840 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/superset.xml

2020-08-14 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi - The change made here broke the Incubator clutch analysis and site build. These files are XML and sections are important. I’ve fixed this. > On Aug 13, 2020, at 3:44 PM, maximebeauche...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: maximebeauchemin > Date: Thu Aug 13 22:44:06 2020 > New Revision:

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-14 Thread Sheng Wu
Willem Jiang 于2020年8月14日周五 下午9:38写道: > Hi, > > I just spent some time on the issues of EventMesh[1], it looks like > there are a bunch of people interested about this project, but > unfortunately the recent replied issue is about three weeks ago. > It's quite strange for me that the project

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DolphinScheduler Maven Plugin (Incubating) 1.0.0 (ROUND3)

2020-08-14 Thread JUN GAO
Hello IPMC , We still need 2 binding votes on this release. Can anyone help vote? Thank you very much! GAO JUN 于2020年8月13日 周四12:07写道: > Hello IPMC and DolphinScheduler Community, > > > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache DolphinScheduler Maven Plugin > (Incubating) version 1.0.0. > >

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-14 Thread Willem Jiang
Hi, I just spent some time on the issues of EventMesh[1], it looks like there are a bunch of people interested about this project, but unfortunately the recent replied issue is about three weeks ago. It's quite strange for me that the project maintainers are not keen to answer the issues if they

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-14 Thread Sheng Wu
I will leave that up to your mentors. I think my feeling is already very clear for you. Sheng Wu 吴晟 Twitter, wusheng1108 Eason Chen 于2020年8月14日周五 下午7:55写道: > Thanks for your continued attention. > As i mentened before in my first discuss "And I'd like to emphasize that > the community however

Re: Giving our PMs and contributors triage rights on GitHub

2020-08-14 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Few comments, needs of the Apache Airflow project. In short: big +1 on enabling the "triage role". On 2020/08/13 18:43:06, Julian Hyde wrote: > By PM, I presume that you mean either Product Manager or Program Manager. > I’ve worked at a few companies that practiced “commercial open source”,

[VOTE] Accept EventMesh into Apache Incubator

2020-08-14 Thread Eason Chen
Hi, After the discussion of EventMesh proposal (discussion thread is here[1]), I would like to call a VOTE to accept it into the Apache Incubator. Please cast your vote: [ ] +1, bring EventMesh into Incubator [ ] +0, I don't care either way [ ] -1, do not bring EventMesh into Incubator,

?????? [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-14 Thread Eason Chen
Thanks for your continued attention. As i mentened before in my first discuss "And I'd like to emphasize that the community however small it might look so far",if there are seemingly inaccurate descriptions in the proposal, I can modify it as needed.

?????? [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-14 Thread Eason Chen
Thanks Justin, and can not agree more. Thanks everyone for your attention to this project and your valuable comments. If everyone has no problems, i will initiate the voting processs later. Thanks, Eason -- -- ??:

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-14 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, The incubator prefers that a project comes with a community around it but it’s not essential. Not having one may possibly make graduation harder, as long as the project is aware of that I don’t see any issues. Thanks, Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-14 Thread Sheng Wu
Eason Chen 于2020年8月14日周五 下午4:25写道: > Hi, > Maybe a bit misunderstood, what I am trying to explain is that even if the > project is really in its infancy, it does not prevent the building under > apache way. In fact, many apache projects are built from 0. And mentors > also don't think this is a

?????? [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-14 Thread Eason Chen
Hi, Maybe a bit misunderstood, what I am trying to explain is that even if the project is really in its infancy, it does not prevent the building under apache way. In fact, many apache projects are built from 0. And mentors also don't think this is a big problem. Thanks, Eason

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-14 Thread Sheng Wu
Why are you arguing this with me? I am not saying anything about the future, or nothing about whether this project is good or not. The risk and challenges are only things that could happen based on the current status, community-level only. And it is higher than some projects had a larger or more

?????? [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-14 Thread Eason Chen
1. Just open-sourced 3. Community development would be a challenge As mentioned earlier, the project is still in its infancy. I also asked the mentors how to build the community. I believe that with the help of apache way and the mentors, we have reasons and confidence to make products more

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-14 Thread heng du
Thanks for @Duane's reply. Duane Pauls 于2020年8月11日周二 上午12:25写道: > I work for Solace and have consulted internally to confirm that we do not > have any copyright or trademark on the term “Event Mesh”. It’s true it is > something our products are closely aligned with, but it is an industry term >

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-14 Thread Sheng Wu
Eason Chen 于2020年8月14日周五 下午2:43写道: > Our product has actually received a lot of attention from people. We have > conducted communication with many people and collected their opinions. We > plan to abstract eventmesh more independently, make product positioning > clearer, and make it easier for

?????? [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-14 Thread Eason Chen
Our product has actually received a lot of attention from people. We have conducted communication with many people and collected their opinions. We plan to abstract eventmesh more independently, make product positioning clearer, and make it easier for everyone to participate. We will invest