Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.5.0-incubating RC1

2020-10-05 Thread Luciano Resende
Please consider this vote thread canceled as we need to adjust to the
newly published "pypi distro guidelines".

On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 4:56 AM John D. Ament  wrote:
>
> Actually seems I spoke too soon, the new policies are available:
> https://incubator.apache.org/guides/distribution.html#pypi
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 7:51 AM John D. Ament  wrote:
>
> > Luciano,
> >
> > I can change my vote to a -1 if you:
> >
> > - Rename the contents of the pypi folder to comply with the expected
> > naming conventions
> > - Or completely remove the files from the release.
> >
> > There's an open ticket that the board is reviewing about how to handle 3rd
> > party distros (like PyPi), so for now I would assume standard policies
> > apply.
> >
> > John
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 1:01 PM Luciano Resende 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> We are still looking for two more votes here, and we have an eager set
> >> of users that want to start using this release to experiment with
> >> Spark 3.0 using Notebooks.
> >>
> >> On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 3:25 PM Luciano Resende 
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Please vote to approve the release of Apache Toree 0.5.0-incubating
> >> > (RC1) which brings support for Spark 3.0.
> >> >
> >> > The podling dev vote thread:
> >> >
> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb45468fbc9a21bdf9668b2aa17bf0a9b0d454b83bdbc788a7b28a970%40%3Cdev.toree.apache.org%3E
> >> >
> >> > And the result:
> >> >
> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r10700652b70ffdab9774fe4c938630b699b0496c9cb17297c99072bd%40%3Cdev.toree.apache.org%3E
> >> >
> >> > Tag: v0.5.0-incubating-rc1 (3825a6c260251f2a9f3684d4d88a328709430406)
> >> >
> >> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/tree/v0.5.0-incubating-rc1
> >> >
> >> > All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> >> found at:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/toree/0.5.0-incubating-rc1/
> >> >
> >> > Staging artifacts can be found at:
> >> >
> >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetoree-1017
> >> >
> >> > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> >> least
> >> > 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
> >> >
> >> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Toree 0.5.0-incubating
> >> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Luciano Resende
> >> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> >> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Luciano Resende
> >> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> >> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >>



-- 
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.5.0-incubating RC1

2020-10-05 Thread John D. Ament
Actually seems I spoke too soon, the new policies are available:
https://incubator.apache.org/guides/distribution.html#pypi

On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 7:51 AM John D. Ament  wrote:

> Luciano,
>
> I can change my vote to a -1 if you:
>
> - Rename the contents of the pypi folder to comply with the expected
> naming conventions
> - Or completely remove the files from the release.
>
> There's an open ticket that the board is reviewing about how to handle 3rd
> party distros (like PyPi), so for now I would assume standard policies
> apply.
>
> John
>
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 1:01 PM Luciano Resende 
> wrote:
>
>> We are still looking for two more votes here, and we have an eager set
>> of users that want to start using this release to experiment with
>> Spark 3.0 using Notebooks.
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 3:25 PM Luciano Resende 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Please vote to approve the release of Apache Toree 0.5.0-incubating
>> > (RC1) which brings support for Spark 3.0.
>> >
>> > The podling dev vote thread:
>> >
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb45468fbc9a21bdf9668b2aa17bf0a9b0d454b83bdbc788a7b28a970%40%3Cdev.toree.apache.org%3E
>> >
>> > And the result:
>> >
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r10700652b70ffdab9774fe4c938630b699b0496c9cb17297c99072bd%40%3Cdev.toree.apache.org%3E
>> >
>> > Tag: v0.5.0-incubating-rc1 (3825a6c260251f2a9f3684d4d88a328709430406)
>> >
>> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/tree/v0.5.0-incubating-rc1
>> >
>> > All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
>> found at:
>> >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/toree/0.5.0-incubating-rc1/
>> >
>> > Staging artifacts can be found at:
>> >
>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetoree-1017
>> >
>> > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
>> least
>> > 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Toree 0.5.0-incubating
>> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>> >
>> > --
>> > Luciano Resende
>> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
>> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Luciano Resende
>> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>


Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.5.0-incubating RC1

2020-10-05 Thread John D. Ament
Luciano,

I can change my vote to a -1 if you:

- Rename the contents of the pypi folder to comply with the expected naming
conventions
- Or completely remove the files from the release.

There's an open ticket that the board is reviewing about how to handle 3rd
party distros (like PyPi), so for now I would assume standard policies
apply.

John

On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 1:01 PM Luciano Resende  wrote:

> We are still looking for two more votes here, and we have an eager set
> of users that want to start using this release to experiment with
> Spark 3.0 using Notebooks.
>
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 3:25 PM Luciano Resende 
> wrote:
> >
> > Please vote to approve the release of Apache Toree 0.5.0-incubating
> > (RC1) which brings support for Spark 3.0.
> >
> > The podling dev vote thread:
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb45468fbc9a21bdf9668b2aa17bf0a9b0d454b83bdbc788a7b28a970%40%3Cdev.toree.apache.org%3E
> >
> > And the result:
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r10700652b70ffdab9774fe4c938630b699b0496c9cb17297c99072bd%40%3Cdev.toree.apache.org%3E
> >
> > Tag: v0.5.0-incubating-rc1 (3825a6c260251f2a9f3684d4d88a328709430406)
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/tree/v0.5.0-incubating-rc1
> >
> > All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> found at:
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/toree/0.5.0-incubating-rc1/
> >
> > Staging artifacts can be found at:
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetoree-1017
> >
> > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least
> > 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Toree 0.5.0-incubating
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>


Re: New distribution guidelines

2020-10-05 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi,

Thanks for the feedback.

> There's some spurious text at the start of the page.

I’ll remove this.

> Also, what does the acronym IP mean?

IP = Intellectual property

> - "Releases must be placed in the Apache mirror system."
> Which releases are being referred to here? Source and binaries, or just 
> sources?

The intention was source releases (but both can be placed there), I’ll update 
it to say that.

> - "Source releases and convenience binaries need to be made from IPMC
> and PPMC approved ASF releases."
> As it stands, the sentence appears to be recursive.

It means you can’t make a release from a random point in version control. 
Releases distributed on other platforms need to come from what was contained in 
a voted releases. Can you suggest some better wording? Perhaps simplifying to 
“Convenience binaries need to be made from IPMC approved ASF releases” is 
better?

> - "Where possible it should be pointed out that Apache project make
> source releases and convenience binaries are just a convenience for
> end user."
> Does not read well.

I agree how about "Apache projects make source releases but can if needed 
provide convenience binaries to end users.”?

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: New distribution guidelines

2020-10-05 Thread sebb
There's some spurious text at the start of the page:

"Skip to end of metadata Created by ASF Infrabot, last modified by
Justin Mclean on Jul 14, 2020 Go to start of metadata"

Also, what does the acronym IP mean?

I think there are some ambiguities:

- "Releases must be placed in the Apache mirror system."
Which releases are being referred to here? Source and binaries, or just sources?

- "Source releases and convenience binaries need to be made from IPMC
and PPMC approved ASF releases."
As it stands, the sentence appears to be recursive.

- "Where possible it should be pointed out that Apache project make
source releases and convenience binaries are just a convenience for
end user."
Does not read well.
I don't understand "source releases ... are just a convenience for end user.".
Does not make sense to me.

On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 05:26, Justin Mclean  wrote:
>
> Hi PPMC members,
>
> New distribution guidelines, that we have been working on for some time, have 
> been published here:
> https://incubator.apache.org/guides/distribution.html
>
> They contain information on distributing releases on 3rd party platforms 
> including Maven, GitHub, Docker, NPM and PiPy.
>
> Note that these are good suggestions on best practice and incubating projects 
> can do things differently, but if you follow these guidelines, you are less 
> likely to have issues on graduation.
>
> If you have any questions or feedback on these guidelines, please do so on 
> the Incubator general list.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: Apache Training (incubating) granted all Apache committers commit rights

2020-10-05 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi,

On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 12:59 PM Christofer Dutz
 wrote:
> ...We're opening up commit access to all Apache committers...

Great! It would be nice to mention this at http://training.apache.org/
, in the "Getting involved" section maybe?

-Bertrand

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (incubating) 0.7.0

2020-10-05 Thread Furkan KAMACI
Hi,

+1 from me (binding, carrying over my vote).

I checked:

- Incubating in name
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
- No unexpected binary files
- Checked PGP signatures
- Checked checksums
- Code compiles

Kind Regards,
Furkan KAMACI

On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 1:18 AM Paul King  wrote:

> +1, carrying my vote over from dev list
>
> <
> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=webmail
> >
> Virus-free.
> www.avast.com
> <
> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=webmail
> >
> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 5:34 AM Aaron Radzinski 
> wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> > This is a call for a vote to release Apache NLPCraft (incubating) version
> > 0.7.0. Apache NLPCraft is a library for adding a natural language
> interface
> > to any application.
> >
> > The Apache NLPCraft community has voted on and approved a proposal to
> > release Apache NLPCraft (Incubating) version 0.7.0. We would like to
> > request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator
> > release.
> >
> > Release information:
> > 1. PPMC vote result thread:
> >
> >
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/nlpcraft-dev/202009.mbox/%3ccacwejt8ova52cxczs74ri3ascqskz3gcduh+acd3i2mczyk...@mail.gmail.com%3E
> > 2. Release location:
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nlpcraft/nlpcraft/0.7.0/
> > 3. Git tag: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nlpcraft/tree/v0.7.0
> > 4. JIRA issues fixed in release:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NLPCRAFT/versions/12347776
> > 5. KEYS file:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/nlpcraft/KEYS
> >
> > NOTES:
> > - Please re-import KEYS file before checking signatures.
> > - Remove local ${USER_HOME}/.nlpcraft file before running 'mvn verify' if
> > you had previous NLPCraft installation.
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary number
> of
> > votes are reached.
> >
> > Please vote accordingly:
> > +1 approve
> > +0 no opinion
> > -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> > Thank you,
> > --
> > Aaron Radzinski
> > On behalf of NLPCraft community
> >
>