Re: [Question] LimitedInputStream license issue in Spark source.

May I ask why do you thinkn in that way? Could you elaborate a little more about your concerns if you mean it from a legal perspective? > The ASF header states "Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more contributor license agreements.” > I ‘m not sure this is true with

Re: [Question] LimitedInputStream license issue in Spark source.

Hi, The issue is not the original header it is the addition of the ASF header. The ASF header states "Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more contributor license agreements.” I ‘m not sure this is true with this file even though both Spark and this file are under the

Re: [Question] LimitedInputStream license issue in Spark source.

+CC @Justin Mclean, and @Willem Jiang since you left the concerns It looks like Spark may have incorrectly added that header. You could ask > them why it was added perhaps or just leave it as is. > Kind Regards, > Justin > I have the same question as Justin asked, do we need to add the ASF

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Celeborn(incubating) 0.2.0-rc5

Hello Incubator Community, The vote to release Apache Celeborn(incubating) 0.2.0-rc5 has passed with 5 +1 and no +0 or -1 votes. (* = binding) +1: - Justin Mclean* - Kent Yao - Yu Li* - Willem Jiang* - Gang Li* The voting thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/q8hchs4n2twhjl0qf3rn0ln0hyrvrnnp

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Celeborn(Incubating) 0.2.0-incubating-rc5

Thanks everyone for suggestions and feedback, I will close this vote thread and announce the results soon since 72 hours have passed. Ethan Feng. keyong zhou 于2023年3月1日周三 11:48写道： > > Hi Gang, > > Thanks for you feedback! > > We do keep contents of the original NOTICE file of

Re: Seeking ASF Champion for a New ASF “podling”

Hi, For top level project the ASF requires a minimum of 3 PMC member to provide oversight. is there someone else you think can help in providing oversight and manage the direction of the project? Kind Regards, Justin - To

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Celeborn(Incubating) 0.2.0-incubating-rc5

Hi Gang, Thanks for you feedback! We do keep contents of the original NOTICE file of `log4j-core-2.17.2.jar` without [1], but separate [2] and [3] for alphabetical ordering. We will put [2] and [3] together in future releases. Thanks, Keyong Zhou [1] `This product includes software developed

RE: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for Paimon

Hi all! This is a great project idea and proposal. I have been following this within the Flink project and like the vision a lot. If another mentor would be needed, I can step in. I also mentioned previously to the team members that this might just as well go TLP directly, but would respect

Re: Seeking ASF Champion for a New ASF “podling”

On Tue Feb 28, 2023 at 2:58 AM CET, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Trying to incubate a project and grow a community at the same time can be > difficult. We tend to prefer projects with an existing community, but that > doesn’t rule out the project becoming an incubating project. Is there some

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Celeborn(Incubating) 0.2.0-incubating-rc5

Thanks for the PR link [1].It explained the content [2] is copied from the NOTICE of `log4j-core-2.17.2.jar`,It's right to keep it in the NOTICE file. BTW,I suggest keep the original NOTICE file of `log4j-core-2.17.2.jar`,of course can remove the content [3]. It might be easier to see which

[DISCUSS] Status of modpagespeed

Hello, PageSpeed has been in the Incubator since 2017: https://incubator.apache.org/projects/pagespeed.html It has little activity: https://github.com/apache/incubator-pagespeed-mod The last release was in 2020: https://www.modpagespeed.com/doc/download No matter where I look in the email