Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.3.1-incubating-rc1

+1 binding On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 1:00 AM Jia Yu wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a call for vote on Apache Sedona 1.3.1-incubating-rc1. Due to two > critical bugs [1] and [2] , the users who use 1.3.0 have trouble running > Sedona on Java 8 or Scala 2.12. We have to make this new release in a shor

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DevLake (Incubating) v0.15.0-rc2

- incubating in name - signature and hash fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers - LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER 1) is tap-pagerduty required to operate/run? it is in requirements.txt and it has a GPL-v3 license https://github.com/goodeggs/tap-pagerduty/blob/goodeg

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DevLake (Incubating) v0.15.0-rc4

As I understand you can release under the WIP disclaimer On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 12:31 AM Zikuan An wrote: > Thanks for your valuable suggestion. > > I will revisit the whole process and re-open the vote after fixing the > issues you mentioned. > > > Best, > > Zikuan An > > Justin Mclean 于2023

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Uniffle(Incubating) 0.7.0

+1 binding - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 9:24 PM Liu Xun wrote: > +1 (binding) from me, > > I have checked the following items: > - Incuba

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Teaclave (incubating) v0.5.1-rc.2

+1 - incubating in name - signature and hash are fine it looks like there is a conflict between KEYS (file) and keys (directory): $ tar xzf apache-teaclave-0.5.1-rc.2-incubating.tar.gz apache-teaclave-0.5.1-rc.2-incubating/KEYS: Can't replace existing directory with non-directory tar: Error exit

Re: [VOTE] Accept Answer into the Apache Incubator

+1 binding On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 10:24 AM Craig Russell wrote: > +1 binding. > > Good luck! > Craig > > > On Oct 2, 2023, at 17:17, Willem Jiang wrote: > > > > Following up the [DISCUSS] thread on Answer [1] I would like to call a > > VOTE to accept into the Apache Incubator. > > > > Answer is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DevLake (Incubating) v0.19.0-rc2

+1 binding - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers what is this file config-ui/.yarn/releases/yarn-3.4.1.cjs - seems to have code in it (and it does not have a license header

Re: [DISCUSS] OneTable proposal

Interesting. Let me know if I can be of help as mentor On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 1:35 PM Austin Bennett wrote: > Awesome -- OneTable has a great purpose/mission, and can be really > useful! I look forward to helping where I am able. > > > On 2023/12/04 21:23:17 Jesus Camacho Rodriguez wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DevLake (Incubating) v0.19.0-rc3

I see the main comments from rc2 have been addressed. To add though, if possible please add text in LICENSE to point to the relative file path to files under these licenses (remaining comment from the last vote) - You still need to, as required by the license, include the full text of the MIT lice

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Uniffle (Incubating) V0.8.0 RC3

+1 - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 6:36 AM Xianjing Feng wrote: > Hello Incubator Community, > > This is a call for a vote to release Ap

Re: [VOTE] Accept Fury Into the ASF Incubator

+1 binding On Sat, Dec 9, 2023 at 11:05 PM Ayush Saxena wrote: > +1(Binding) > > -Ayush > > > On 10-Dec-2023, at 12:10 PM, zhongyi tan wrote: > > > > +1 （binding） > > > >> On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 7:05 PM tison wrote: > >> > >> Hi Incubator > >> > >> Following the discussion [DISCUSS] Incubatin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DevLake (Incubating) v0.19.0-rc3

e/incubator-devlake/pull/6483 or > https://github.com/apache/incubator-devlake/blob/v0.19.0-rc3/LICENSE > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-devlake/blob/v0.19.0-rc3/LICENSE)> > It's just that it's aggregated instead of listing each one individually. > > Best, > Ziku

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DevLake (Incubating) v0.19.0-rc3

t is a generated binary file > and includes multiple third-party codes, each under its respective license. > [image: image.png] > > Felix Cheung 于2023年12月11日周一 05:46写道： > >> Is it possible to list files? >> > point to the relative file path >> >> >> On Fr

Re: [DISCUSS] Gluten proposal

Very interesting. Let me know if I can help as mentor On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 7:30 AM tison wrote: > Thanks for driving this proposal Shaofeng :D > > +1 to support this project entering the Incuabtor. It's in good shape > to develop an OSS project with a diverse group. Hopefully, the > Incubat

Re: [VOTE] Accept Gluten Into the ASF Incubator

+1 binding On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 10:26 PM vin jake wrote: > +1(non-binding). > > Good luck. > > Best, > kabikabi. > > On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 10:48 AM ShaoFeng Shi > wrote: > > > Hi Incubator, > > > > Following the discussion [DISCUSS] Gluten proposal[1], > > I am starting this official vote fo

Re: [VOTE] Have Amoro join the Incubator

+1 binding On Sun, Mar 3, 2024 at 3:56 AM PJ Fanning wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On 2024/03/03 07:08:53 Imba Jin wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Good luck~ > > > > On 2024/03/03 01:44:24 Justin Mclean wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Following on from the discussion of the Amoro proposal [1][2], l

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DevLake (Incubating) v0.21.0-rc1

+1 (binding) - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers did not compile from source On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 5:02 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (binding) > > I checked:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Uniffle (Incubating) 0.9.0 RC2

+1 binding - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER-WIP is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers - Did not compile from source On Sun, Jul 7, 2024 at 5:04 PM PJ Fanning wrote: > +1 (binding) > > I note that Uniffl

Re: [VOTE] Accept Polaris into the ASF Incubator

+1 binding On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 11:44 AM Carl Steinbach wrote: > +1 binding > > On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 11:40 AM PJ Fanning wrote: > > > +1 binding > > > > On Fri, 2 Aug 2024 at 19:34, Robert Stupp wrote: > > > > > > +1 (nb) > > > > > > On 02.08.24 19:26, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > > > H

Re: Podling reports due Wednesday

I don’t mind taking on as a mentor for Spot but it seems the volume of interaction (commits, dev@) has gone down significantly in the last 6-9 months? On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 3:21 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Currently we’re missing only one sign off and that is for: > Spot > > Which, I fo

Re: Incubator policy wording

Hi Justin, two thoughts 1. Should we move disclaimer and release up instead of being the last? Seems like good to be upfront with these 2. About “It MAY consider the termination of a Podling if violations are not corrected.“ Should we put a timeframe on the correction? It seems like violations in

Re: Incubator policy wording

I think rewording the termination spew could help as there has been feedback on incubator coming across as “unwelcoming” etc. Just my 2c On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 2:22 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the feedback. > > > 1. Should we move disclaimer and release up instead of being the

Re: [MENTORS] IPMC Policy change work in progress disclaimer

+1 On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 11:17 PM Paul King wrote: > Kudos for progressing this idea. I really like it. It should allow > improvements from the perspective of both podlings and reviewers. > > Cheers, Paul. > > On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 12:25 PM Justin Mclean > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > The work i

Re: [DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases

(D) will still require 2 more IPMC vote? (E) will be like (B) in that it will need mentors or other IPMC to vote in podling dev@? On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 10:04 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > One of the incubator pain points is the double voting on releases first by > the podling and then by t

Re: [DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases

option (D) combined with (E) And encourage mentors to vote on dev@ makes sense to me On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 3:24 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > (D) will still require 2 more IPMC vote? > > (E) will be like (B) in that it will need mentors or other IPMC to vote > in > > podling dev@? > > Al

Re: [VOTE] Accept DolphinScheduler(was EasyScheduler) into Apache Incubator

+1 On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 8:11 AM ShaoFeng Shi wrote: > +1 (binding) > > I believe the DolphinScheduler project will bring value to ASF. The team is > very open and the community is already very active. Glad to see it to join > the incubator. > > Best regards, > > Shaofeng Shi 史少锋 > Apache Kyli

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPipes into the Apache Incubator

+1 Great project! On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 11:40 AM Christofer Dutz wrote: > A big +1 (binding) from me > > Chris > > Von: Julian Feinauer > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. November 2019 20:19:43 > An: general@incubator.apache.org > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPipe

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.2.0 RC0

+1 Built and ran tests. I’ve been trying to run some tools in the last few days for license header in file, so far the tools are not working out. Oh well. Btw, rat check doesn’t seem to cover all files in the project? On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:35 AM Subbu Subramaniam wrote: > Hi all, > > T

Re: [DISCUSS] YuniKorn Proposal

ependency manager, BSD 2-Clause License > > > > 2.8.2 Cryptography > > YuniKorn does not currently include any cryptography-related code. > > > > 2.9 Required Resources > > > > 2.9.1 Mailing lists: > > - priv...@yunikorn.incubator.apache.org (PMC list) >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Crail 1.2-incubating (rc2)

I will look into later today. On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 11:57 PM Adrian Schuepbach < adrian.schuepb...@gribex.net> wrote: > Hi Felix > > Would you be available to vote on this Apache Crail release? > > Thanks > Adrian > > > > On 12/14/19 00:32, Adrian Schüpbach wrote: > > Dear all > > > > Thanks to

Re: [VOTE] Apache Crail 1.2-incubating (rc2)

dist.apache.org is having some issue. Let me check back On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 11:57 PM Adrian Schuepbach < adrian.schuepb...@gribex.net> wrote: > Hi Felix > > Would you be available to vote on this Apache Crail release? > > Thanks > Adrian > > > > On 12/14/19 00:32, Adrian Schüpbach wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Crail 1.2-incubating (rc2)

+1 binding Checked Name Disclaimer Signature License Header Compile from source On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:52 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 (binding) > > I checked: > - incubating in name > - signatures and hashes good > - DISCLAIMER exists > - LICENSE is fine > - NOTICE has incorrect ye

Re: [VOTE] Accept YuniKorn into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 9:54 AM David Lyle wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > -David... > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 12:47 PM Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli < > vino...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to call a vote on accepting YuniKorn into the Apache Incubator. > > > > Pleas

Re: [VOTE] Accept NLPCraft into Apache Incubator

+1 On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 1:58 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 1:54 PM Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > > > Hello. > > > > As the discussion of NLPCraft proposal [1] has been wrapped up [2] I > would like > > to call a VOTE to accept this project into the Apache Incubator. > >

Re: Mentors wanted for projects

Can we call out projects that might be at risk in some way (community growth, list traffic, low change count) It might help to bring attention to those needing help or should rather retire. On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 1:47 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > It generally seen that the right amount o

Re: [VOTE] Project proposal - Apache AgensGraph Extension

+1 (binding) I can offer to mentor this project, if needed (have done graph and Postgres work in the past) On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 11:18 AM Kevin Ratnasekera wrote: > +1 ( binding ) > > Regards > Kevin > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 11:26 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > On Apr

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache YuniKorn (Incubating) 0.8.0

+1 (binding) Carry over my vote On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 9:05 PM Weiwei Yang wrote: > Hello IPMC > > The Apache YuniKorn community has voted and approved the release Apache > YuniKorn (incubating) 0.8.0. We now kindly request the IPMC members review > and vote in this release. > > YuniKorn is a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.4.0 RC2

+1 But a couple of things to follow up: mailing list link at the bottom of the web site seems to be broken - binary files are in the source package ./kubernetes/helm/pinot-0.2.0.tgz ./kubernetes/helm/pinot/charts/zookeeper-2.1.3.tgz ./kubernetes/helm/presto-0.2.0.tgz - ASF license header is not

[DISCUSS] project proposal - Apache Sedona

Hi, We would like to propose Apache Sedona, currently known in its community as GeoSpark, as a new project under the Apache Incubator. Sedona is a big geospatial data processing engine. The system provides an easy to use Scala, SQL, and Python APIs for spatial data scientists to manage, wrangle,

Re: [DISCUSS] project proposal - Apache Sedona

Any questions or concerns? If not, I can kick off the VOTE thread shortly. On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 6:12 AM Felix Cheung wrote: > Hi, > > We would like to propose Apache Sedona, currently known in its community > as GeoSpark, as a new project under the Apache Incubator. > &g

Re: [DISCUSS] project proposal - Apache Sedona

iayuasu> > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 12:46 PM Dave Fisher >> wrote: >> >>> Hi - >>> >>> You note over 30 contributors to GeoSpark, but there are only 8 initial >>> committers. Has the move to the Apache Incubator been thoroughly discussed >&

Re: [DISCUSS] project proposal - Apache Sedona

Noted below. I will leave others to add anything I’ve missed. On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 8:15 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Currently PiPy is not an ASF supported platform and you may have some > difficulty in complying with ASF policies. Are you aware of the trademark, > branding and other AS

Re: [DISCUSS] project proposal - Apache Sedona

u are > interested. > > Best Regards, > Von Gosling > > > On Jul 9, 2020, at 9:12 PM, Felix Cheung wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > We would like to propose Apache Sedona, currently known in its community > as > > GeoSpark, as a new project under the Apa

Re: [DISCUSS] project proposal - Apache Sedona

it! > > > > Jia Yu > > Ph.D. in Computer Science > > Arizona State University <http://www.asu.edu/> > > Reach me via: Homepage <http://jiayuasu.github.io/> | GitHub > <https://github.com/jiayuasu> > &

[VOTE] Accept Sedona into the Apache Incubator

Hi, As we discussed the Sedona proposal [1], I would like to call for a vote to accept Sedona into the Apache Incubator. Sedona is a big geospatial data processing engine. The system provides an easy to use Scala, SQL, and Python APIs for spatial data scientists to manage, wrangle, and process ge

Re: [VOTE] Accept Sedona into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 6:19 AM Willem Jiang wrote: > +1 （binding) > > Willem Jiang > > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 11:49 AM Felix Cheung > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > As we discussed the S

[RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Sedona into the Apache Incubator

Hi, With 6 binding +1 votes, and no -1, to vote to accept Sedona into the Apache Incubator CLOSED and the vote has PASSED. [6] +1 Binding votes: - Jean-Baptiste Onofre - Dave Fisher - Kevin Ratnasekera - Furkan KAMACI - Willem Jiang - Felix Cheung [ 0 ] +0 Binding votes [ 0 ] -1 Binding votes

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.37.0

(Carry my vote, as stated already) +1 On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 10:20 AM Ville Brofeldt wrote: > Hello IPMC, > > The Apache Superset (incubating) community has voted on and approved a > proposal to > release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.37.0. > The voting thread can be found here: > http

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.37.0

Furkan, can you help? On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 11:54 AM Ville Brofeldt wrote: > Justin and Felix, > > > > warm thanks for taking the time to vote! The minimum 72h voting time is > now complete, and it would be great to get that last missing vote from the > IPMC to be able to release this highly an

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.37.0

One more vote please! On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 10:59 AM Maxime Beauchemin < maximebeauche...@gmail.com> wrote: > We need one more vote please, we're anxious to publish this release! > > > > On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 11:17 AM Felix Cheung > wrote: > > > > &

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.37.0

Moon is now on IPMC. On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 7:26 AM Ville Brofeldt wrote: > Thanks Dave, > > > > That's great news! I look forward to releasing in 5 hours then! > > > > Ville > > > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020, 16:49 Dave Fisher wrote: > > > > > Moon’s vote will become binding in 5 hours when 72 ho

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache YuniKorn (Incubating) 0.9.0

+1 (binding) - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers - didn't try - compile from source On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 9:12 PM Wilfred Spiegelenburg wrote: > Hello IPMC > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache YuniKorn (Incubating) 0.9.0

I see jlowe is a binding IPMC vote that can carry forward from dev@ vote. We just need 1 more binding vote. On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 11:06 PM Felix Cheung wrote: > +1 (binding) > > - incubating in name > - signature and hash fine > - DISCLAIMER is fine > - LICENSE and NOTI

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ECharts (incubating) 4.9.0 (release candidate 1)

+1 binding - incubating in name - signature and hash are fine - tarball (see note) the file unpacks into the current and not a subdirectory, is a bit strange - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers - build from source

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache TVM as TLP

+1 (binding) On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 10:02 AM Tianqi Chen wrote: > Dear Incubator: > > > > Following a heated discussion with great support from our mentors, > > committers and community members. > > The Apache(incubating) TVM community has formally voted for graduation and > > bring the case t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.5.0 RC1 (Please ignore the earlier email sent under non apache Email)

It’s a bit strange under node_modules. - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - Unexpected binary files Several strange files are in the source tarball /pinot-controller/src/main/resources/node_modules/fsevents/build/Release/obj.target/fs

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.5.0 RC2

+1 Thanks for the update. - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files find (some test .gz are there) - Source files have ASF headers (except tests & config) - Did not try compile from source On Fri, Sep 4, 2020

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.37.1

+1 - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 8:37 AM Ville Brofeldt wrote: > Hello IPMC, > > The Apache Superset (incubating) community has voted on a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.37.2

+1 (binding) - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers - did not compile On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:31 PM Furkan KAMACI wrote: > Hi, > > > > +1 (binding, carrying over my vo

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Superset (incubating) as a Top Level Project

+1 ;) On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 2:31 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > HI, > > +1 (binding) > > Thanks for addressing everything I brought up here and on your private > list. There's still a little more to do, but it’s being dealt with, so I’m > all good with you graduating. Do keep an eye on how you are

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache TVM as TLP

+1 binding On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 7:21 AM Timothy Chen wrote: > +1 binding as well > > Tim > > Sent via Superhuman iOS > > > On Wed, Oct 21 2020 at 08:18, Sebastian Schelter wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > On 2020/10/19 17:29:23, Tianqi Chen wrote: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.6.0 RC1

+1 but it was discussed before, but thirdeye is not included in the source release https://github.com/apache/incubator-pinot/blob/master/pinot-distribution/pinot-source-assembly.xml#L39 - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpect

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.6.0 RC1

so > that the next POC will pick it up. > > Thanks, > Jack > > On 2020/11/11 04:05:49, Felix Cheung wrote: > > +1 but > > > > it was discussed before, but thirdeye is not included in the source > release > > > https://github.com/apache/

<    1   2