On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote:
Hi,
We are proposing Allura to be admitted to the Apache Incubator, and would
like to request that the IPMC votes on this issue. The requisite 72 hours has
passed since the initial proposal.
The proposal may be found
On Jun 28, 2012 3:26 AM, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Sorry Rich, that extra information in the mailing lists section
cannot be parsed by Clutch. Perhaps move it to the News section.
Also, the tracker is the eventual ASF tracker that is intended.
There
On Jun 28, 2012 9:18 PM, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
Greg Stein wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Also, the tracker is the eventual ASF tracker that is intended.
There is no requirement to run the issue tracker on ASF hardware, so the
link to SF.net is just fine.
Ah
On Jul 2, 2012 11:20 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
wrote:
...
From the SVN history it looks like there are quite a few of those others
who have done work on the code in the past, is there a reason they aren't
on
On Jul 2, 2012 12:45 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
...
I hope that someone can help me understand the current thinking about the
vibrant community aspect that seems to be a requirement for incubation/TLP
admission.
The underlying requirement is an open, inclusive, long-term
+1 (binding)
On Jul 4, 2012 5:19 PM, Roger Schildmeijer schildmei...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The AWF community has voted to retire the project.
Following the retirement guide [1], I now call the Incubator PMC to vote
on confirming this decision. (Will be open for 72 hours).
[ ] +1 Retire
No worries, Simone. Not your issue at all.
The private@incubator.a.o list has recently seen a huge influx of voting
emails. I'm not surprised to see Jukka provide some guidance.
Cheers,
-g
On Jul 10, 2012 9:16 AM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Jukka,
it sounds like a good
Jukka,
Your dates are incorrect. We intend to have a regular Board meeting on the
15th, and an abbreviated in-person meeting on the 28th.
Cheers,
Greg Stein
Director, ASF
On Jul 26, 2012 12:16 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The standard podling report deadline
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
...
We've had a couple of other cases of also other shepherd's missing
their reviews. I've tried to cover up the best I can by reviewing and
at least classifying all reports on which no shepherd feedback is
seen, but
On Aug 6, 2012 7:07 PM, Gary Martin gary.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
...
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours and therefore ends after 11pm
UTC on Thursday 9th August.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0
[ ] +0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Do not release this package (please
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:14 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
...
This looks similar to the Syncope release vote thats also happening
right now in that the source distribution includes things like JQuery
but doesn't mention that in the LICENSE file. I'm a bit surprised
people are
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:38 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
Gosh i'm pretty sure we _don't_ allow things like (L)GPL dependencies
in Incubator releases, we allow them in the source in SVN but i don't
recall
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 2:38 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Gosh i'm pretty sure we _don't_ allow things like (L)GPL dependencies
in Incubator releases, we allow them in the source in SVN but i don't
recall any releases like that.
As I replied to Marvin, Apache Roller had a hard
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 5:54 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
...
You can look at the archives back in 2006 when it was incubating. In
particular, there is one sent to private@incubator that I would refer
you to:
http
Commit the content. Otherwise, we're just hand-waving.
On Aug 8, 2012 5:29 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi,
Like others, I'm not too happy with the current
http://incubator.apache.org/ content.
How about starting a new, minimal set of docs that are more
Just because some other podlings have released binary artifacts does
not mean AOO can base their entire release strategy on binaries.
As Marvin has said: source releases are the primary release mechanism.
Binaries are and should be a distant second.
I would also state that continuing to argue
On Aug 20, 2012 8:33 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
...
I would also state that continuing to argue is symptomatic of a
failure to understand and integrate with the Foundation's thoughts on
the matter
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.com wrote:
I'm sorry, I'm playing catch-up and I'm a bit unclear on the argument -
Marvin said: If the podling believes that ASF-endorsed binaries are a hard
requirement,
then it seems to me that the ASF is not yet ready
Rob: I believe it is rather foolish to argue that Roy is incorrect.
For starters, he wrote the Bylaws, and is well-versed in the intent of this
Foundation. Second, the Foundation policies take precedence over
third-party concepts, so whether you/OSI may define a binary as open source
is wholly
On Aug 20, 2012 5:06 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Aug 20, 2012, at 12:45 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
...
-1
I object to the claim that the AOO binaries are officially part of this
release:
...
I am not surprised at your response, but it is hard and unproductive to
argue
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Thilo Goetz twgo...@gmx.de wrote:
On 21/08/12 13:59, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 21.08.2012 12:52, sebb wrote:
I think the NOTICE problems are serious enough to warrant a respin.
This is an unreasonable request. The IPMC voted on the 3.4.0 release.
The notice file
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Thilo Goetz twgo...@gmx.de wrote:
On 21/08/12 13:59, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 21.08.2012 12:52, sebb wrote:
I think the NOTICE problems are serious enough to warrant a respin
Joe: that is what is being discussed. Blessed binaries.
Go back to Dennis' email for the need for these.
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
WHAT PROBLEM? THERE IS NO PROBLEM HERE,
CURRENT POLICY FULLY COVERS WHAT AOO ACTUALLY
DOES. END OF DISCUSSION.
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
...
Or if someone who cared sufficiently about this policy area took
ownership and proposed a wording of the policy, either as a Board
resolution, or on legal-discuss, and had that policy approved and
recorded via the ordinary
On Aug 25, 2012 9:46 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Of course, a discussion thread started here to solicit the IPMC's
opinion on graduation would be another matter entirely.
If Rob is representative of AOO, then no. They need more time to learn
about the ASF.
-g
On Aug 27, 2012 6:15 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm jumping in late to this discussion after returning from vacation.
To summarize my understanding:
* As Joe says, there's no problem with current OpenOffice releases.
Agreed.
* The project is looking for ways to
On Aug 27, 2012 9:57 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
...
But recall in all this that even when the PMC releases code, it is
signed by the individual RM, and not by the PMC itself.
Apache Subversion releases tend to have a half-dozen signatures. Thus, I'd
say they are signed by the
On Sep 13, 2012 5:58 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Do you have a rough idea of how close you are to graduation in terms
of community diversity and activity? A brief look at list archives and
commit logs shows fairly active discussions (both on the list and on
the issue
I've read this entire thread (whew!), and would actually like to throw out
a contrary position:
No signed keys.
Consider: releases come from the ASF, not a person. The RM builds the
release artifacts and checks them into version control along with hash
checksums. Other PMC members validate the
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Greg Stein wrote on Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 19:44:30 -0400:
I've read this entire thread (whew!), and would actually like to throw out
a contrary position:
No signed keys.
Consider: releases come from the ASF
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Ian Holsman i...@holsman.com.au wrote:
On Oct 11, 2012, at 10:44 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
(assume secure Infrastructure)
That's a pretty big assumption isn't it?
Empirically, we've had break-ins, so we can assume it will happen
again. But now
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Greg Stein wrote on Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 21:14:15 -0400:
...
My point is that our instructions to users don't really incorporoate
the notions of keys, and (thus) provide near-zero utility. For such
So, provide
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
...
1. A number of people think that all mentors should have been signing all
reports all along, so that changing the template as part of clarifying this
is not a big deal.
Sure. The mentors should be part of the
Empirically, Model 1 did not work. That's been tried over the past ten years.
*shrug* ... whatever you want to do. I just wanted to speak up that
you appeared to be conflating the mentor and shepherd roles (as they
had been defined over the past couple months). If you *intend* to
combine them
Lame duck! Lame duck!
... oh, excuse me. ;-)
On Nov 12, 2012 7:47 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not installed yet :-) Jukka?
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net
wrote:
Hi Benson / Jukka -
I'm waiting for my shepherd assignments.
+1 to release (IPMC, binding)
[ apologies for the extreme delay :-( ]
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Joachim Dreimann
joachim.dreim...@wandisco.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to request the beginning of the vote for the second release of
Apache Bloodhound in the incubator following the
Oh. Forgot one item: so the below is conditional on resolving: the
.md5 does not match the .tar.gz. (I did not examine the signature
(.asc) to see if it matches the .tar.gz)
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 to release (IPMC, binding)
[ apologies
On Nov 14, 2012 2:13 PM, Alexander Broekhuis a.broekh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
2012/11/14 Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com
Oh. Forgot one item: so the below is conditional on resolving: the
.md5 does not match the .tar.gz. (I did not examine the signature
(.asc) to see if it matches
I've confirmed this discrepancy is the same as what Alexander
Broekhuis posted about, as noted in INFRA-5445.
So 0.2 is all good to go!!
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh. Forgot one item: so the below is conditional on resolving: the
.md5 does not match
Well aware, thank you.
On Dec 1, 2012 12:39 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Hyrum and Greg,
The bloodhound project is trying to make a release. You gents are
listed as mentors. Could you please find the time to check out and
vote appropriately on their release?
--benson
Nobody should **EVER** revert another's commit.
That is a truly horrible suggestion. The original committer should
revise/revert. Nobody else.
-g
(sorry; tablet; abbreviated)
On Dec 21, 2012 8:12 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
My belief is that the policy changed a long
Looks good.
btw: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2013
On Dec 29, 2012 6:42 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com
On Jan 13, 2013 11:46 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Next down are the 'vice-chairs', currently known as the shepherds.
Each of these people is responsible for a group of projects, dispersed
across the reporting cycle. The shepherd, at least, tunes into the
reports, but
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Ryan Ollos ryan.ol...@wandisco.com wrote:
...
Please vote:
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bloodhound 0.4
[ ] +0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Do not release this package (please explain)
+1 (binding; Mentor)
For argument's sake, let's say two. That is the specified/recommended
minimum. Thus, the IPMC must contribute an additional +1. Thus, it can
totally block podling releases thru its laziness and inactivity.
Sounds broken.
-g
On Jan 23, 2013 5:22 PM, Dave Fisher w...@apache.org wrote:
How many
On Jan 24, 2013 2:53 AM, Federico Strati fede.str...@gmail.com wrote:
...
The proposed idea is in its very early stage of conception, so any
discussion,
even if completely against it (but with good reasons), will be appreciated
as well as any pointer to related on going efforts in any project.
On Jan 24, 2013 5:41 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Federico Strati fede.str...@gmail.com
wrote:
...Maybe you may suggest me the appropriate forum as well
As you don't seem to have code or a community yet, and there was
Or... take the initiative.
At the Board level, the shepherds are the default liaison between the Board
and the PMC. But all Directors review all reports.
There is nothing which limits IPMC Members to review only the reports
assigned to them as shepherds.
Just start reviewing. Don't wait for
I will note, as Vice Chairman, I've performed shepherd assignments when
Doug was buried. (we have a handy script that I wrote long ago, after
starting the shepherd process; makes it easy to share the task)
Point is: maybe somebody who is familiar with the IPMC shepherd process
could step in and
On Feb 13, 2013 3:39 PM, Matt Franklin m.ben.frank...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone feel inclined to communicate anything to the board except
'here's the usual podling-by-podling report'
Do any of the directors
to be in good shape the
actual
line by line podling reports are unimportant other than being the
outputs
of the incubator project.
Sent from a mobile device, please excuse mistakes and brevity
On 13 Feb 2013 23:40, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 13, 2013 3:39 PM, Matt
My concern is that we're looking at two new committers, rather than
a Curator community. Following normal Incubator work, Curator would
build a community for itself. But then we'd have a community
*distinct* from that of Zookeeper. And it really looks like this
should be part of Zookeeper itself
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Andrei Savu as...@apache.org wrote:
...
### Mailing lists
* provisionr-private
* provisionr-dev
* provisionr-user
A user list is not recommended for a new community. That only serves
to divide a limited number of people. Your users should be involved on
the
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:23 AM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com
wrote:
So isnt this similar to HCatalog which relying on Hive metadata service
that ends up as sub project of Apache Hive?
I was against having
I concur with Chris, and want to strengthen/meta the point. The Incubator
should not be used for projects which are intended to become part of an
existing TLP. The Incubator *creates* Apache-style communities. But... Stop.
For these, we don't want a separate/new community. They are supposed to be
On Mar 1, 2013 8:33 PM, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
I concur with Chris, and want to strengthen/meta the point. The
Incubator
should not be used for projects which are intended to become part
Ollos rjol...@apache.org
* Mark Poole mpo...@apache.org
* Greg Stein gst...@apache.org
* Hyrum K. Wright hwri...@apache.org
* Jure Žitnik j...@apache.org
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Gary Martin
be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Bloodhound, to
serve
On Mar 9, 2013 9:06 PM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote:
On 10.03.2013 03:31, Greg Stein wrote:
I didn't sign it because I expected changes regarding graduation...
Well, given that the end of the graduation vote and the report deadline
coincide, I decided to just leave the report
%3E-
if so, just linking to the discussion is fine.
Kalle
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Joachim Dreimann jdreim...@apache.org
wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
- Joe
On 10 March 2013 02:30, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 (binding)
On Mar 9, 2013 6:32 PM, Gary Martin
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
...
I don't believe we should force an announce@ list on anybody. But I do
think it might be a good idea to mention a few of the standard lists that
projects might consider requesting.
No strong opinion. Generally, I don't
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:26 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Apr 3, 2013, at 1:20 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
...Chris proposes that this
committee recommend its own demise to the board, to be
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Ant is reflecting a real dilemma here. At Apache, we try to be
egalitarian, and we try to work by consensus. The natural conclusion
is that the many people needed to vote on releases are also part of
the
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
On 31 March 2013 17:08, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Why is it so hard to see that the board is already watching those 22
nascent projects in the same manner they watch the 137
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
As I see it, the incubator as we have it is a mechanism for coping
with the lack of mentor commitment. As Ross often writes, it's easy to
say that Mentors *should* make this commitment, but mentors are
volunteers,
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
On 4 April 2013 09:06, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
On 31 March 2013 17:08, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm
It is not your job. You are one of many of the IPMC.
You also happen to be the liaison to the Board.
On Apr 9, 2013 9:39 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
I assume that you will take that role for this thread.
Some people might claim that this is my job in general. However, my
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
...
It all seemed very rushed. Perhaps we need a clearer schedule in advance.
A series of reminders go out via Marvin long in advance. And
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 4:40 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
...
On the other hand, since we're a volunteer organization, a better
message here would be that people *can* take responsibility, not that
they *should* do so. If there aren't enough people with enough free
cycles
with the request-response nature of the
HTTP protocol. will really help. The web *is* request/response.
Whatever. ETIMEOUT.
-0 (binding)
Cheers,
-g
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
voted -0 based on the information I was pointed
out, which (as you said) is not a very good comparison point.
*shrug*
Cheers,
-g
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
actually *get* those votes, rather than people being
quiet, too afraid to counter the majority.
Cheers,
-g
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
themselves together to produce a release. I've seen long-time Apache
folks who know what's going on still have difficulty pulling the
community together.
Food for thought...
Cheers,
-g
On 10/19/06, Greg Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Without question, Harmony knows how to manage its legal bits
burrell donkin wrote:
On 10/18/06, Greg Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You said that you have run Tomcat on top of Harmony. Why can't you
produce a release such that I can throw the Tomcat jar at it, too?
Sure, it is a developer release, but it let's non-Harmony folks play
with your project
that would be busy work
with no utility. Fair answer, but I will note that nobody has made a
clear statement like that. Talked around the issue, but never directly
answered.
Cheers,
-g
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org
, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
not interested in... this is a volunteer system. I'm
participating in the Incubator, not Harmony. Sure, Harmony is part of
it, but trying to say that I must now participate in harmony-dev to
have a say? Bull.
The binding voters are on *this* list, or on our private list.
-g
--
Greg Stein, http
On 10/21/06, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Projects have included their start date and one line description at the
Board's request. Please note that this has always been available at
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/.
Thanks!
And yes... we knew about that, but we felt
On 10/24/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greg Stein wrote:
The Incubator is about verification, not participation. I think Geir
is wrong in trying to lever IPMC members into more project
involvement. We are here as volunteers to oversee the process, not
participate
. It isn't that formal. We all know what's going on. A vote
happens here, a resolution passes there. 'nuf said.
...
Please send in your +1/0/-1 to approve/abstain/disapprove.
+1
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
-
To unsubscribe
again, it can change again.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org
The name would be Apache Cayenne Project. Please fix before
submitting to the Board.
There is some stupid virus of a template showing these as Apache Foo
PMC which has to stop.
People should really look at actual resolutions that the Board
approves, not what gets sent in. We sometimes tweak
the board minutes:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2005/
board_minutes_2005_05_18.txt
Anybody can point to a better template?
Thanks
Andrus
On Dec 2, 2006, at 4:51 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
The name would be Apache Cayenne Project. Please fix before
submitting to the Board
to the carpet and demand an explanation. If he
had a good one, then alright. That's how it works.
Cheers,
-g
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
comfortable with it
being added, I will defer to your judgement.
I just did my reviews and it wasn't in there, so +1 for not accepting.
-- justin
Having already reviewed it while it lived at incubator, I'm giving Greg
my 100% backing to accept or not, his call.
--
Greg Stein, http
I don't find the name provocative either, but the connotations are a
bit weird :-P
On Sep 24, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Doug Cutting wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
a) The name Pig is somewhat provocative (not kosher/halal) and I
would like to hear the
+1
I'll make the edits.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently on http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html, we have:
---
Vote on the podling's private (PPMC) list, with notice posted to the
Incubator private list. The notice is a separate
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 23:15, Curt Arnoldcarn...@apache.org wrote:
Noah Slater | 9 Aug 12:42 wrote:
I think this is a poor summary. Your thread was taken seriously, and
people responded, but as far as I knew, discussion was still ongoing. The
way you've worded it could lead people into
steps/guides/paperwork.
Cheers,
-g
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for me to deal with properly [in this
context].
Cheers,
-g
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 02:01:26PM -0400, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
So what in this ensures this will be a community-developed project and not
just an Apache branded extension of BEA? I really would like to see you
guys involved in Apache, but not in a way the compromises Apache.
We are safe in
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 04:22:10PM -0400, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
...
1. Top level project - IMHO this isn't big enough and you don't have the
open source experience or robust community to pull that off (not intended to
be a criticism)
There is no size minimum for a TLP, but I believe the
week, if anyone would like to discuss any
issues further.
I'll be there tomorrow afternoon thru the end of the week...
Cheers,
-g
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
binding vote is -1 until we see the dependency made available. After
that, +1 assuming that the WS PMC votes to actually accept the thing
post-incubation.
I'm also a -1 on the apparent process on how this arrived at the
Incubator.
Cheers,
-g
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 11:55:13AM -0400, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Greg Stein wrote:
...
I'm also a -1 on the apparent process on how this arrived at the
Incubator.
miscommunication, is all. i assumed from what i was told that
everything was done and the actual incubation inception
that it arrived with a note saying the WS PMC
had accepted the project, when they hadn't even heard of the thing.
Cheers,
-g
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 11:55:13AM -0400, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Greg Stein wrote:
...
I'm also a -1 on the apparent process on how this arrived at the
Incubator.
miscommunication, is all. i assumed from what i was told that
everything was done and the actual incubation inception
this project or if you would like to become involved,
please send email to the incubator mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On behalf of the Apache Geronimo Team,
Greg Stein,
Chairman of the Apache Software Foundation
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ... ASF Chairman ... http://www.apache.org
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 10:48:53AM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 03:48 AM, James Strachan wrote:
So to avoid drowning out other general-incubator discussions and to
help keep the noise down for folks who only want to keep track of
geronimo I'd like to
301 - 400 of 842 matches
Mail list logo
