Re: [VOTE] Recommend Apache Iceberg graduation to top-level project resolution to the board

+1 (binding) On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 5:40 PM Ryan Blue wrote: > Hi everyone, > > With the support of our mentors (as well as helpful ASF members), the > Apache Iceberg community has voted to graduate to a top-level project. > > I propose a vote to recommend graduation for the Iceberg community

Re: Omid and Tephra

+1. That seems like the best course of action IMHO. On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 12:54 PM Flavio Junqueira wrote: > +1 > > -Flavio > > > On 23 Oct 2019, at 21:08, Terence Yim wrote: > > > > +1 on this > > > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:36 Dave Fisher wrote: > > > >> +1. That’s a good idea. > >> >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.7.0-incubating RC4

+1 (binding). Successfully downloaded, verified license, verified checksum, verified signature, built from source, and ran unit tests. Minor nit (ok to fix in next release IMHO): Copyright in NOTICE for Iceberg should read 2017-2019 On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 3:21 PM Ryan Blue wrote: > Hi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Omid 1.0.1 (incubating)

Transferring my +1 from the dev list vote. FYI, the correct pointer the the PPMC vote is here: https://s.apache.org/8q5z Thanks, James On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 7:43 AM James Taylor wrote: > Thanks, Justin. I've fixed the roster for Omid. > > On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 3:47 PM Just

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Omid 1.0.1 (incubating)

Thanks, Justin. I've fixed the roster for Omid. On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 3:47 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > > 4 binding (IPMC member) +1 votes > > I only count 2 IPMC votes (from your mentors) have I miscounted? > > Can you also please fix up your roster [1] as it currently shows no PPMC >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Omid 1.0.0 (incubating)

Transferring my +1 from the dev vote. On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 11:45 PM Ohad Shacham wrote: > Hi, > > > The Apache Omid community has voted on and approved a proposal > to release Apache Omid 1.0.0-incubating. > > PPMC Vote Call: >

Re: [VOTE] Accept the Iceberg project for incubation

+1 (binding) On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 4:15 PM Willem Jiang wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Willem Jiang > > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 1:07 AM Ryan Blue wrote: > > > > The discuss thread seems to have reached consensus, so I propose > accepting > > the Iceberg

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Tephra-0.15.0-incubating released

Hi All, The Apache Tephra team is excited to announce the latest release of Apache Tephra-0.15.0-incubating. This is the eighth release of Apache Tephra. Apache Tephra is a transaction engine for distributed data stores like Apache HBase. It provides ACID semantics for concurrent data operations

[RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.15.0-incubating [rc1]

The vote is now closed and passes with 3 +1s and no +0 or -1s. Thanks to those who voted. James On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 7:36 AM James Taylor wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Built from scratch > Successfully ran all unit tests > > On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 12:55 AM Justin Mclean

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.15.0-incubating [rc1]

+1 (binding) Built from scratch Successfully ran all unit tests On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 12:55 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 (binding) > > I checked: > - incubating in name > - signatures and hashes good > - LICENSE and NOTICE good (binary NOTICE year needs updating) > - No unexpected

Re: [VOTE] Accept Zipkin into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 8:41 PM Greg Trasuk wrote: > +1 Accept Zipkin (binding). > > Greg Trasuk. > > > On Aug 26, 2018, at 11:14 PM, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > > > After a brief discussion¹ I would like to call a VOTE to accept Zipkin > into the Apache Incubator. > > The full

Re: [PROPOSAL] Zipkin for Apache Incubator

+1 On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 3:11 AM wrote: > Very excited about the proposal and looking forward to the Apache journey. > > Bas van Beek > > On 2018/08/17 09:29:47, Adrian Cole wrote: > > I would like to propose Zipkin as an Apache Incubator project.> > > > > The text of the proposal can be

[VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.15.0-incubating [rc1]

Hi all, This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.15.0-incubating, release candidate 1. This is the eighth release of Tephra. The Tephra dev community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Tephra 0.15.0-incubating, release candidate 1. PPMC Vote Call:

[RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.14.0-incubating [rc1]

The vote is now closed and passes with 7 +1 votes and no +0 or -1 votes. Thanks to everyone who voted. James On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 4:03 PM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 (transferred from my dev vote) > > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 6:49 AM, larry mccay <

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.14.0-incubating [rc1]

> > maven repo don't contain LICENSE and NOTICE files. I'm not sure how this > > happened, since these files are typically added by default when projects > > use the ASF parent pom. > > > > Billie > > > > On 5/21/18 6:51 PM, James Taylor wrote: > > &

[VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.14.0-incubating [rc1]

Hi all, This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.14.0-incubating, release candidate 1. This is the seventh release of Tephra. The Tephra dev community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Tephra 0.14.0-incubating, release candidate 1. PPMC Vote Call:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Omid 0.9.0.0 (incubating)

+1 (transferring my vote over from dev list vote) On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Ohad Shacham wrote: > Hi, > > > The Apache Omid community has voted on and approved a proposal > to release Apache Omid 0.9.0.0-incubating. > > PPMC Vote

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Omid 0.9.0.0 (incubating)

@Justin - thanks for taking the time to review. Really appreciate it. Looks like there's some confusion, though. Prior to starting this vote, you approved the change on the JIRA here[1], but now you've -1'ed the release. At this point, we're trying to get clarification on OMID-44 so that when we

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Omid 0.9.0.0 (incubating)

Forwarding my +1 from the dev list. James On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 8:31 AM Henk P. Penning wrote: > On Thu, 22 Mar 2018, Ohad Shacham wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 13:29:55 +0100 > > From: Ohad Shacham > > To: general@incubator.apache.org > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Druid into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 2:55 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 11:03 AM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > After some discussion on the Druid proposal[1], I'd like to > > start a vote on accepting

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc2]

John - there appears to be some confusion. Would you mind clearing up whether you voted or not? Sorry for bugging you. Thanks, James On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 1:30 PM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org> wrote: > I thought John already changed his vote to +1 based on thi

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc2]

I thought John already changed his vote to +1 based on this comment, no? > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 7:56 PM, John D. Ament > > wrote: > > > >> I'm fine with giving a +1 assuming the NOTICE issue is fixed for next > >> release. Please feel free to ping me if you want a

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc2]

John - thanks for the review. If things look acceptable now, would you be willing to cast a vote? Anyone else? Thanks, James On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:58 AM Gokul Gunasekaran wrote: > Thanks, John! Is there anything else that we can do to address > concerns/issues regarding

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Mnemonic project from Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Luke Han wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > Best Regards! > - > > Luke Han > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > On Sep

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc2]

+1. Transferring my vote over from the dev list vote. On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Andreas Neumann wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating, > release candidate 2. This is the sixth release of Tephra. > > The Apache Tephra

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.12.0-incubating [rc1]

+1. The RC passes all Phoenix unit tests. On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Alan Gates wrote: > Forwarding my +1 from the dev list. > > Alan. > > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Gokul Gunasekaran > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > This is a call for a vote

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.11.0-incubating [rc2]

Forwarding my +1 from dev list too. On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 8:53 AM Alan Gates wrote: > Forwarding my +1 from the dev list. > > Alan. > > > On Mar 10, 2017, at 5:18 PM, Gokul Gunasekaran wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > This is a call for a vote on

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.11.0-incubating [rc1]

ing this release go through by marking TEPHRA-223 as a known > issue. We can do a 0.11.1 release immediately after fixing TEPHRA-223. > > Thanks, > Poorna. > > > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 2:37 PM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Looks l

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.11.0-incubating [rc1]

gt; > On Feb 17, 2017, at 11:52 AM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > Transferring my +1 from the dev list vote over here. > > > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Gokul Gunasekaran <go...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > &g

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.11.0-incubating [rc1]

Transferring my +1 from the dev list vote over here. On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Gokul Gunasekaran wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.11.0-incubating, > release candidate 1. This is the fourth release of Tephra. > > Apache Tephra

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.9.0-incubating [rc1]

Transferring my +1 from dev vote here. On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Poorna Chandra wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.9.0-incubating, > release candidate 1. This is the second release of Tephra. > > Apache Tephra community has

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Twill as Top Level Project

+1 (binding) On Thursday, June 2, 2016, Andrew Purtell wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Henry Saputra > > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > Following the DISCUSS thread about Apache Twill graduating as TLP, I >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 7:48 AM, Billie Rinaldi wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Daniel Gruno > wrote: > > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > > accepting Pony Mail into the

Re: [VOTE] Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator

nio > > > > Documentation > > > > https://predictionio.incubator.apache.org/docs/ > > > > JIRA instance > > > > PredictionIO currently uses the GitHub issue tracking system associated > > with its repository: > https://github.com/PredictionIO/P

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.8.0-incubating [rc1]

r (open source) > licenses that we would need to include? > I realize this may sound like nit-picking. But it is an important aspect > of the incubation time. > > I have to vote -1 . > > -- Lars > > From: James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org> > To: "g

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.8.0-incubating [rc1]

order? > > > > On May 21, 2016, at 8:08 AM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > Thanks for the testing, John. It builds on my MacBook Pro: > > > >OS X Version 10.11.4 > >java version 1.7.0_80 > &g

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.8.0-incubating [rc1]

Thanks for the testing, John. It builds on my MacBook Pro: OS X Version 10.11.4 java version 1.7.0_80 What's your system look like? On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 6:53 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > Hi, > > I'm +0 for right now unless there's a way to make the code build

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.8.0-incubating [rc1]

Thanks for the reviews. There are a few files with a package of co.cask.tephra in order to maintain backward compatibility with pre Apache-based releases. These will be removed in a follow on release. James On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:55 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.8.0-incubating [rc1]

+1. Transferring my vote over from the previous vote thread. On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Poorna Chandra wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.8.0-incubating, > release candidate 1. This > is the first release of Tephra. > > Apache

Re: [VOTE] Accept Fluo into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Billie Rinaldi > wrote: > > Since discussion has died down, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting > > Fluo into the Apache Incubator. > > > >

Re: Final draft of the Incubator Board Report - April 2016

Me too - my bad. So sorry. I'm embarrassed to admit I can't find an email for it. On Tuesday, April 12, 2016, Henry Saputra wrote: > No need to be curious too much, mea culpa from me for missing signing off > the report :) > > I had the impression I did sign off the

Re: [VOTE] Accept Omid into the Apache Incubator

al dependencies that are not Apache projects are > >all Apache licenses or other compatible Licenses: > > > > > >Maven & Maven plugins (http://maven.apache.org/) [Apache 2.0] > >JDK7 or OpenJDK 7 (http://java.com/) [Oracle or Openjdk JDK License] > >Google Guava

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

ctions > (server > > > > side.) They’re also used in order to coordinate the master and backup > > > > replicas in high availability scenarios. > > > > > > > > > > > > An Excessive Fascination with the Apache Brand

Re: [VOTE] Accept Tephra into the Apache Incubator

will benefit by close proximity to them. > > > > = Known Risks = > > > > == Orphaned Products == > > > > There is very little risk of Tephra being orphaned, as it is a key part > of > > Cask Data’s products. The core Tephra developers plan to conti

Re: [VOTE] Accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > Greetings, > > The discussion of the Gearpump proposal has concluded. Please vote to > accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator. I will leave this vote open for > at least the next 72 hours and will aim

Re: [VOTE] Accept Mnemonic into the Apache Incubator

will be transitioned via the Software Grant Agreement onto ASF > > > infrastructure and in turn made available under the Apache License, > > > version 2.0. > > > > > > === External Depend

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quarks into the Apache Incubator

+1 On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Regards, > Arvind > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Katherine Marsden > wrote: > > > The Quarks proposal has been discussed on the incubator list. The > > discussion

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 6:28 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > The complete discussion thread is available here: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept the iota project into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding). Interesting proposal and I love the name. On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Seetharam Venkatesh < venkat...@innerzeal.com> wrote: > +1 (binding). > > Thanks! > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:49 AM Julian Hyde wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Julian > > > > > On Jan

interested in joining the IPMC

Hello, I'm the PMC Chair for Apache Phoenix and a PMC member of Apache Calcite, both top level project and both of which I went through the incubation process. Recently several projects interested in going through incubation approached me to be a mentor, hence my interest in joining - so that I

Re: interested in joining the IPMC

My apologies, Marvin, and thanks for clarifying the procedure. I'll follow up on the private list. James On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 11:04 AM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org> > wrote:

Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Jun 2014 ([ppmc])

FYI, Phoenix has graduated as reported last month. Thanks, James On Wednesday, May 28, 2014, Marvin no-re...@apache.org wrote: Dear podling, This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare

Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Jun 2014 ([ppmc])

[1]: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#unincubate On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 1:41 PM, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote: FYI, Phoenix has graduated as reported last month. Thanks, James On Wednesday, May 28, 2014, Marvin no-re...@apache.org wrote

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Phoenix from the Incubator

+1 On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Enis Söztutar e...@apache.org wrote: +1 (binding) Enis On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Devaraj Das d...@hortonworks.com wrote: +1 On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:44 PM, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote: Hi everyone, The Apache

[RESULT][VOTE] Graduation of Apache Phoenix from the Incubator

Hello everyone, I'm pleased to report that this VOTE has passed with the 9 +1 votes (7 binding): +1 Eli Levine Steven Noels* Michael Stack* Andrew Purtell* Roman Shaposhnik* Lars Hofhansl* Devaraj Das* Enis Söztutar* James Taylor * - indicates IPMC I will add the resolution to the board agenda

[VOTE] Graduation of Apache Phoenix from the Incubator

Hi everyone, The Apache Phoenix podling has has discussed and voted to graduate from the incubator with 22 +1 votes, 5 of which were IPMC vote [1]. We've made three releases, increased our contributor and committer list [2], and have an active, thriving community. Please VOTE below on the

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Phoenix 4.0.0-incubating released

Hello everyone, The Apache Phoenix team is pleased to announce the release of version 4.0.0-incubating from the Apache Incubator. Phoenix is a SQL query engine for Apache HBase, a NoSQL data store. It is accessed as a JDBC driver and enables querying and managing HBase tables using SQL. This is

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Phoenix 3.0.0-incubating released

Hello everyone, The Apache Phoenix team is pleased to announce the release of version 3.0.0-incubating from the Apache Incubator. Phoenix is a SQL query engine for Apache HBase, a NoSQL data store. It is accessed as a JDBC driver and enables querying and managing HBase tables using SQL. Major

[RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC3

Noels stev...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Mar 31, 2014, at 10:40 PM, James Taylor wrote: Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Please vote: [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) +1 (binding) Doing great, Phoenix team! Steven

[RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.0.0 incubating RC3

Voting is now closed. This vote passes with 4 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Thank you to everyone who voted. Totals: +1: Michael Stack* Steven Noels* Enis Söztutar* Devaraj Das* * = IPMC I'll send out an announcement and we'll push the release out once HBase 0.98.1 is released. Thanks, James

[VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC3

Hi everyone, This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC3. Phoenix is a SQL query engine for Apache HBase, a NoSQL data store. It is accessed as a JDBC driver and enables querying and managing HBase tables using SQL. This is the next major release of Phoenix compatible with the

[VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.0.0 incubating RC3

Hi everyone, This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 4.0.0 incubating RC3. Phoenix is a SQL query engine for Apache HBase, a NoSQL data store. It is accessed as a JDBC driver and enables querying and managing HBase tables using SQL. This is the next major release of Phoenix compatible with the

Re: [DISCUSS] Where does copyright information go for a binary distribution?

Hi Justin, Yes, our source and binary releases have different NOTICE/LICENSE files. The source ones are simple, as we have no dependencies. It's the binary one I'm trying to get clarity on. Thanks, James On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.comwrote: Hi, I

Re: [DISCUSS] Where does copyright information go for a binary distribution?

...@rectangular.comwrote: On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 6:06 PM, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote: The copyright for the bits we're bundling. See the LICENSE file I included at the end of my email. For example: Guava, version 12.0.1, http://code.google.com/p/guava-libraries/ Copyright 2008 Google

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

Thanks for all the feedback. We'll spin up another RC shortly for our 3.0 and 4.0 release with the corrections to our NOTICE and LICENSE files, along with ensuring that our source release matches the source bundle exactly. One question: given that we'll indicate the bundled products and their

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

Below is our updated NOTICE (which includes the copyright for the bundled bits) and LICENSE (minus the standard Apache 2.0 part). Would appreciate a review. Thanks, James * NOTICE ** Apache Phoenix (Incubating) Copyright 2014 The Apache Software

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

Thanks, Marvin. So remove the copyrights from NOTICE. Are they required anywhere then, as their not in the LICENSE file? On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.comwrote: On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:59 PM, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote: Below is our

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.orgwrote: Thanks, Marvin. So remove the copyrights from NOTICE. Are they required anywhere then, as their not in the LICENSE file? On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.comwrote: On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:59 PM, James Taylor

[DISCUSS] Where does copyright information go for a binary distribution?

Hello, I'm getting a release ready for Apache Phoenix (incubating) and have a question about where copyright information should go for our binary distribution. It seems that there's quite a bit of variation, as all projects are different. So I'll describe our binary distribution, and perhaps

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

-q3mNMRQqC2vTA%40mail.gmail.com%3E On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 5:38 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 26 March 2014 19:59, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote: Below is our updated NOTICE (which includes the copyright for the bundled bits) and LICENSE (minus the standard Apache 2.0 part

Re: [DISCUSS] Where does copyright information go for a binary distribution?

Where does the copyright information go in our case? On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 5:48 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 26 March 2014 23:55, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote: Hello, I'm getting a release ready for Apache Phoenix (incubating) and have a question about where

Re: [DISCUSS] Where does copyright information go for a binary distribution?

know if something is a required attributions? On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 6:02 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 27 March 2014 00:52, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote: Where does the copyright information go in our case? What copyright information? Where was it originally? On Wed

[VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

Hi everyone, This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1. Phoenix is a SQL query engine for Apache HBase, a NoSQL data store. It is accessed as a JDBC driver and enables querying and managing HBase tables using SQL. This is the next major release of Phoenix compatible with the

[VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.0.0 incubating RC1

Hi everyone, This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 4.0.0 incubating RC1. Phoenix is a SQL query engine for Apache HBase, a NoSQL data store. It is accessed as a JDBC driver and enables querying and managing HBase tables using SQL. This is the next major release of Phoenix compatible with the

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

be traced back to the source code control system. On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 2:59 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 25 March 2014 21:56, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:54 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 25 March 2014 16:39, James Taylor

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.0.0 incubating RC1

and 4.0.0) at the same time? Or maybe my gmail thread history is messed up. - Henry On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:46 AM, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote: Hi everyone, This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 4.0.0 incubating RC1. Phoenix is a SQL query engine for Apache HBase

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

the guidelines listed here[1]. Thanks, James [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 3:48 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 25 March 2014 22:27, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote: Thanks for the detailed review, Sebb. We really appreciate you spending your

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

that be correct? For our HBase dependencies, we have many places in the source that call HBase APIs. Do we just list one of them? On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:25 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 25 March 2014 23:06, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote: Our binary distribution bundles

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

(sorry, meant instead of listing these in our NOTICE file) On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:48 PM, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.orgwrote: Ah, I see. Thanks, Sebb. So we should modify our LICENSE file as indicated in http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps instead

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:07 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: HBase is ASF code surely? So why does it need mentioning? - unless its NOTICE file has some attributions that relate to what you are bundling Yes, HBase is ASF code. The other stuff we've listed are the transitive dependencies of

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:28 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 26 March 2014 00:23, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote: I think I was confused by the http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#deps-of-depsinstructions. What is confusing about that? If it is not clear, how

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:25 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, we bundle ANTLR in our binary distribution. Most of the other items are pulled in based on the transitive dependencies of other jars we've

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Phoenix 2.2.3-incubating released

Hello, The Apache Phoenix team is pleased to announce the release of version 2.2.3-incubating from the Apache Incubator. Phoenix is a SQL query engine for Apache HBase, a NoSQL data store. It is accessed as a JDBC driver and enables querying and managing HBase tables using SQL. The source and

[RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating RC4

artifacts. - Checked sigs - Checked CRCs - Built the src artifacts If the DISCLAIMER file will not sink the RC, lets go ahead with releasing this. Otherwise we would need a new RC. Enis On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:11 AM, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org javascript:; wrote

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating RC4

: Please do file the ticket to address the Disclaimer file for the release. On Thursday, March 13, 2014, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote: Voting is now closed. This vote passes with 4 binding +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Thank you to everyone who voted. Totals: +1: Michael

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating RC4

Would it be possible for an IPMC member to clarify if you're waiting on us for something and if so what? Thanks, James On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:11 AM, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.orgwrote: Thanks, Marvin. We'll update this in our next release too, as we'd like to follow the preferred

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating RC4

: On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:33 PM, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote: Thanks for the review, David. We do have a NOTICE.txt in both the source and binary tar ball (in the phoenix-2.2.3-incubating directory). Is that the correct way to do it? We'll add the missing license headers

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating RC4

at 9:18 AM, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote: Also, should we drop the .txt extension on the NOTICE and LICENSE files for our next release? http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#license-file-name Can the LICENSE and NOTICE files be called LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating RC4

, James On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:18 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:43 PM, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote: Hello Everyone, This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating RC4. Phoenix is a SQL query engine for Apache HBase, a NoSQL data

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating

Cancelling this vote due to mistakes in the LICENSE and NOTICE files. Will start a new vote shortly. Thanks, James On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:08 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 1:43 PM, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote: Thanks so much, David

[VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating RC4

Hello Everyone, This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating RC4. Phoenix is a SQL query engine for Apache HBase, a NoSQL data store. It is accessed as a JDBC driver and enables querying and managing HBase tables using SQL. This will be our first release in the incubator. The

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating

, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote: Hello everyone, This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating. Phoenix is a SQL query engine for Apache HBase, a NoSQL data store. It is accessed as a JDBC driver and enables querying and managing HBase tables using SQL

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating

I'll cancel this vote and start a vote on a new RC shortly. There was a pretty serious bug that was found in this one anyway. Is it best practice to have a separate source-only tar bar and not include the source in the binary tar ball? Or should it be included in both? Thanks, James On Mon,

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating

This vote is being cancelled because the RC did not include a source-only tar ball. A new vote thread will be started with one that does. Regards, James On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 5:12 PM, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.orgwrote: Hello everyone, This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix

[VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating

Hello everyone, This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating. Phoenix is a SQL query engine for Apache HBase, a NoSQL data store. It is accessed as a JDBC driver and enables querying and managing HBase tables using SQL. This will be our first release in the incubator. The RC is

[VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating

Hello everyone, This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating. Phoenix is a SQL query engine for Apache HBase, a NoSQL data store. It is accessed as a JDBC driver and enables querying and managing HBase tables using SQL. This will be our first release in the incubator. The RC is

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator

FYI, we have an on-going thread for the git/github discussion here: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201402.mbox/%3CCAEWfVJ%3D_wtDRTNEz4ojvUBf50_VdLDUhiQ15q5rfvFi5eh76uw%40mail.gmail.com%3E For Phoenix, we'll likely mimic what JClouds is doing, but I live Lar's ideas as

best development methodology for Apache git?

The Phoenix project has recently come into incubation from it's former life as a Github project. I believe other projects have made this same transition, so I'm looking to get some advice from them. What's the best development methodology folks have found for collaborative development when your

Re: transferring Github issues to JIRA?

://marketplace.atlassian.com/plugins/com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-importers-github-plugin On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 6:55 PM, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote: Hello, Anyone out there know of an automated way of transferring over Github issues to JIRA? We're in the process

transferring Github issues to JIRA?

Hello, Anyone out there know of an automated way of transferring over Github issues to JIRA? We're in the process of transferring over our existing Phoenix Github-based open source project to our Apache incubator project and automating the seeding of the initial JIRAs would be very helpful.

  1   2   >