Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.50-rc2

Hi, > Hop plans to fix these issues in a later incubating release. I hope that > exceptions to release policy can be made for these and similar issues in this > early-stage incubating release. If you have used the work in progress DISCLAIMER and listed the potential issues in that file this

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Ratis as TLP

Hi, I notice you use [1]. Are the conversations there being brought back to the mailing list? There doesn’t seem to be a lot of conversation happening on your mailing list other than GitHub traffic, have you considered moving the GitHub traffic off the dev list? I notice the download links on

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Gobblin (Incubating) as a TLP

Hi, -1 (binding) due to docker and trademark issues, but happy to change my vote to +1 once those are on teh way to bee corrected. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Gobblin (Incubating) as a TLP

Hi, I suggest you run your home page past trademarks. There's a large number of 3rd party logos used without attribution there and I’m not sure how some of those trademark owners would feel about a pacman eating their logos. You also have links on your home page to various commercial entires

Issue with clutch2report

Hi, I just had an issue with clutch2report and for some unknown reason it was trying to use a podling that has graduated (TVM). The podlings.xml file is correct as far as I can see and it doesn’t appear in the current clutch report. I put in a work around, but if someone want to try and fix

[MENTORS] Podling reporting timeline for January

Hi, Here is the time line for the reports for this month. Wed January 06 Podling reports due by end of day Sun January 10 Shepherd reviews due by end of day Sun January 10 Summary due by end of day Tue January 12 Mentor signoff due by end of day Wed January 13 Report submitted to Board Wed

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Gobblin (Incubating) as a TLP

Hi, > I closed the vote after 72 hours of starting the vote (which was after 72 > hours of discussion time). Are you recommending adding more time to the > vote? 72 hours is just a guideline for release votes not for graduation. Generally you want to get consensus from the entire IPMC and your

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Gobblin (Incubating) as a TLP

Hi, You might want to give the IPMC a little more time to have a look at the project and give some more feedback. It would be unfortunate if an issue was found that prevented the project from graduating. Thanks, Justin - To

Re: NOTICE file for binary release

Hi, > Last release we had feedback that the NOTICE file for the binary release > needs to show the licenses of the depdendencies distributed alongside the > code. In general the NOTICE file does not do this, license information goes in the LICENSE file. Please see [1] If some of the code in

Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Re: [incubator] branch master updated: Update incubation.ad

Hi, I have no objections to most of the changes. This has changed the DISCLAIMER text, would we require all podlings to update their DISCLAIMERS to match? Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Trying to become incubator project..

Hi, In order to be accepted as an incubating project you need to put together a proposal. The Incubator PMC would also have to agree that the project is a good fit for the ASF. I would suggest you take a look at this [1] and some other incubator proposals [2] (newer ones are at the top). If

Re: [VOTE] Heron Release 0.20.3-incubating Release Candidate 8

Hi, >> LICENSE is also missing the license for the trykker font and may be missing >> other things. > > Good catch as that file was in the .rat-excludes. This font is Class B and > should not be included. Heron will need to find another Serif Font. > >

Re: [VOTE] Heron Release 0.20.3-incubating Release Candidate 8

HI, -1 (binding) due to license and notice issues I checked: - incubating in name - LICENSE has issues (see below) - NOTICE has wrong year - DISCLAIMER exists (not WIP one) - no unexpected binary files - ASF files have ASF headers I’m a little confused by the LICENSE file. First off it uses

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gobblin 0.15.0 release RC2

Hi, Might be best to close this one and ask people to vote in the other thread for less confusion. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gobblin 0.15.0 release RC2

Hi, Is this the same as the other vote thread? Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gobblin 0.15.0 release RC2

Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - DISCLAIMER exists - No unexpected binary files in release - All files have ASF headers - I was not able to compile at first but managed to get (see below) This is the error I get when building via ./gradlew build:

Re: [DISCUSS] Wayang Proposal

Hi, > Right now, there are 3 people signed up as mentors, however knowing that not > always are all mentors available at every given time, it would be cool if we > could find 1-2 more to help out. In no way reflecting on the mentors who have volunteered and I’m sure they will do a good job

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.0.0 [RC0]

Hi, +1 (binding) but a lot more needs to be done on the LICENSE and headers I checked: - incubating in name - DISCLAIMER exists - a good start have been made on LICENSE - NOTICE looks fine - No unexpected binary files - More work needs to be done on adding ASF headers I not sure that using key

Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Suitable Name Search Documentation

Hi, I think the issue may be more clarifying and simplifying the original policy language. Perhaps that can be done at the some time? Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Re: svn commit: r1883912 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/shepherd_assignments.json

HI, > Superset and TVM graduated and that’s not reflected in your report > preparation. Sorry I has assumed that the new projects had taken care of that. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[MENTORS] Report timeline

Hi, The time line is as follows: Wed December 02 Podling reports due by end of day Sun December 06 Shepherd reviews due by end of day Sun December 06 Summary due by end of day Tue December 08 Mentor signoff due by end of day Wed December 09 Report submitted to Board Wed December 16 Board

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Weex (Incubating) 0.29.0-RC1

HI, I also see only 1 +1 vote in the thread in your dev list normally you need 3 +1 votes from PPMC members before bring it t the IPMC to vote on. I suggest you ask your mentors and other PPMC to vote on the dev list and cancel this vote here on the incubator list. Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache ECharts as TLP (round 2)

Hi, > The description of [1] is generated from GitHub release, so it will be > updated with our next release, which is expected to happen in a few more days. Good to hear. > The description of [2] is generated from GitHub description. We can update > the GitHub description, adding "Apache

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache DataSketches Project to TLP

Hi, +1 (binding) All the best! Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release the Apache Pegasus 2.1.0

Hi, +1 (binding) but it would be good to see progress on adding all license information / fixing all headers I checked: - incubating in name - DISCLAIMER (WIP) exists - LICENSE is missing some licenses - NOTICE seems OK - Unclear if all ASF source files have ASF headers. It would be best to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ECharts (incubating) 5.0.0 (release candidate 3)

Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - signatures and hashes are fine - incubating in name - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE fine - All source files have ASF headers - No unexpected binary files Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe,

Re: Where to get feedback on a project before formulating a proposal

Hi, > The idea was first brought up over a year ago by a member of the community, > although it's been me dragging my feet. They are actually an ASF member. Being an ASF member that can be a mentor or the champion. Have you asked them if they would be willing to do that? Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache ECharts as TLP (round 2)

Hi, +0 I think a little more attention needs to given to branding and trademarks e.g. [1][2][3][4] The last ones in particular are concerning as they come from Baidu and there seem to be others as well [8] Thanks, Justin 1. https://www.npmjs.com/package/echarts 2.

Re: Missing graduation resolutions

Hi, > The Superset graduation resolution was already submitted to the board. In > fact it made the agenda at the last board meeting but was tabled to give > the board more time for due diligence. Let me know if it needs to be > resubmitted or anything. I’ve resubmitted it so it should be fine

Re: Missing reports from Incubator report

Hi, > There's been some confusion over annotator's reporting schedule. > It seems several team members had a (presumably mistaken?) > recollection of having reported in October. It did report in October, but didn’t get sign off from any of the mentors. Thanks, Justin

Missing reports from Incubator report

Hi, I’ve just submitted the board report [1] and we were missing the follow reports: - Annotator - BlueMarlin - Livy - S2Graph - Toree - Warble Thanks, Justin 1. https://whimsy.apache.org/board/agenda/2020-11-18/Incubator

Missing graduation resolutions

Hi, Several projects have discussed graduation but I’m not seeing any proposals submitted. [1] It best to get them in early so board members can review them in time. I think we should have proposals for: - TVM - Superset - Flagon - ECharts? I’ve added Superset. Thanks, Justin 1.

Re: [MENTORS] Incubator report timeline for November 2020

Hi, > How can I edit the following page? I am the owner of Blue Marlin project and > would like to submit my report. > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/November2020 > he permissions for your PPMC had

Re: Proposed Resolution: Establish Apache Flagon TLP

Hi, Everything looks fine to me. Only thing I see is that two proposed of the PMC members are not signed up to the private list: * Laura Mariano * Steve York And i would be nice to have you logo here [1] Thanks, Justin 1. https://apache.org/logos/?#flagon

Re: [VOTE] Apache StreamPipes 0.67.0 (incubating) release

Hi, +1 (binding) This is an easy release to check I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes are fine - LICENS and NOTICE are fine - no binary files - all source files have ASF headers It not immediately clear have you can compile from the instructions included within the release

[MENTORS] Incubator report timeline for November 2020

Hi, Here’s the reporting timeline. Report as usual can be entered on the Wiki [1] Wed November 4th Podling reports due by end of day Sun November 8th Shepherd reviews due by end of day Sun November 8th Summary due by end of day Tue November 10th Mentor signoff due by end of day Wed November

Re: [VOTE] Release the Apache Pegasus 2.1.0

Hi, +1 (binding) Both the issues of the missing header and licensing is mentioned in the DISCLAIMER so I think that’s OK, but progress will need to be made on these in the next release. I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes are fine - DISCLAIMER_WIP exists and contains what

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc1

HI, > Thanks, Justin. After removing stale issues and adding the statement on GPU > license, assuming we address any other license issue in the next rc, should > we name it as simply DISCLAIMER instead of DISCLAIMER-WIP? When all issue have been resolved then I would name it DISCLAIMER,

Podling termination by the IPMC

Hi, As requested by Dave. IMO This is going to happen infrequently and possibly never. I can only think of a couple of occasions when this has been discussed in the last five years. Things generally work out one way or another before this step needs to be taken. The current IPMC policy[1]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc1

Hi, > Let’s discuss outside the immediate context of MxNet reasons for the IPMC to > suspend a podling. Sure, it would be best to start a seperate thread for that. I think however it would be so infrequent and each situation different that it would be hard to come up with some that would work

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc1

Hi, > If NVIDIA changes the license then it must be very soon. If so then the issue > is gone. And the issue may not be gone unless the license change is retroactive. Currently the project has maven artefacts in the Apache repo that contain category X code. [1] Thanks, Justin 1.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc1

HI, > Don’t make a noncompliant binary release. The project is (sadly) already doing this [1], they are hoping the licensing issue can be sorted, but its taken more than 5 months and little visible progress on that seems to have been done. NVIDIA is considering changing, but to what we don’t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc1

HI, Is there anything from the known issues in [1] that needs to be added? Justin 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-253 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc1

Hi, Re the licensed files missing from LICENSE here are some examples[1][2][3][4], but I haven’t done a full check so there are probably more. Thanks, Justin 1. ./3rdparty/onnx-tensorrt/third_party/onnx/third_party/pybind11/tests/test_gil_scoped.cpp 2.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc1

Hi, > Thanks for the vote. It looks like we forgot to remove the mentions of the > resolved issues in the DISCLAIMER-WIP. Checking the linked issues, all of > them have been resolved in 1.8. Is this still a blocking issue if the actual > issues that the DISCLAIMER-WIP links to are addressed?

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Superset (incubating) as a Top Level Project

Hi, The resolution was put on the board agenda, but given it was received less than 24 hours before the board meeting it was decided to postpone it till next month, to give board members time to properly consider the proposal. Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc1

Hi, -1 (binding) Please see [1] and note which sort of issues need to be fixed before making a new release. While it does include the WIP declaimers, it includes several knows issues that have been outstanding for several releases. It also fails to mention teh issue with Nvidia licensing and

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Superset (incubating) as a Top Level Project

HI, +1 (binding) Thanks for addressing everything I brought up here and on your private list. There's still a little more to do, but it’s being dealt with, so I’m all good with you graduating. Do keep an eye on how you are handling those synchronous meetings and try to make sure everyone can

Re: Is there a check list for podling renames?

Hi, > I could not find one; seems to me it would be useful to document > everything that has to be done by the podling and what is done by > Infra. There is not one that I know of. Hopefully they are rare, as they cause a bit of work for Infra. Thanks, Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Superset (incubating) as a TLP

Hi, > I’ve stuck to the basic directions in [2] of sending a “friendly” email (AND > Slack message, in our case), in private, to the community member. That is certainly the best first step with dealing with something like this. Thanks, Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Superset (incubating) as a TLP

Hi, > I hope that everyone is now subscribed after the last round of nagging, but I > still have no way to confirm who’s not on the list. Daniel Gaspar is still not subscribed, but all others have, I don’t see that as a blocker to graduation. > After taking this up with our mentors, we’ve

Re: Some instructions are misleading on mentor page

Hi, I agree this could be clearer: "Mentors MUST be on the IPMC. This should be checked prior to beginning incubation. Any prospective Mentors who are not yet on the IPMC should ask to be added (by election). Email the application to priv...@incubator.apache.org.” How about this: "Mentors

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Superset (incubating) as a TLP

Hi, > (1) PPMC members not subscribed to the private list. > > I have no way to see who is or isn’t on the list Whimsey should show that to PMC member with a * next to their name. Currnly still not subscribed are: Aaron Suddjian Bogdan Kyryliuk Chris Williams Daniel Gaspar Serena Jiang There

Re: BlueMarlin Slow Bootstrap into Incubator

HI, > It is out of date and COMPLETELY misses DNS requests! I believe it’s up to date, but as always PRs welcome. It's mentioned under Resources: "The first resources to be created are LDAP and DNS. These should be requested via Apache Infra JIRA → New Podling Parent Request” The podlings.xml

Re: BlueMarlin Slow Bootstrap into Incubator

Hi, As I said it’s looks to be a DNS issue, bluemarlin.incubator.apache.org resolves but bluemarlin.apache.org doesn’t. So depending on which domain you use it you get different results. This hasn’t been fixed yet.

Re: BlueMarlin Slow Bootstrap into Incubator

Hi, > This project needs to have the incubator/their mentors guide them through the > podling creation process. They need to submit a dns creation infra ticket and > perform other needed actions to establish the podling. The mailing list have been created and I’ve been able to send email to

[MENTORS] Sign off podling reports due Tuesday 13th

Hi, Report sign offs are due on Tuesday 13th and all reports should be submitted by now. We are still missing: Livy Pegasus S2Graph SDAP Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Flagon (incubating) as a Top Level Project

Hi, Thanks for your answers. Re the logo URL I though that redirected but doesn’t they https://apache.org/logos/ The points were (and were repeated for 4 reports): 1. Grow the Flagon Committer/Contributor/Community Base 2. Refine release processes for core analytic product (Distill) 3.

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Flagon (incubating) as a Top Level Project

Hi, > Only UserALE.js has been released under SensSoft (Incubating) and Flagon > (Incubating) names. No other products have been released so this is a > non-topic in my opinion. So assuming 2 of the products are no longer maintained but it looks like the other 2 without releases are. Are

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Flagon (incubating) as a Top Level Project

Hi, > I have absolutely no idea what this is. It is not referenced from the > Incubator Website navigation. Can you please provide a link? See [1]. However it is not required to be filled in for a project to graduate. Thanks, Justin 1.

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Superset (incubating) as a TLP

Hi, These change all look fine. So it seem the only outstanding things (unless any IPMC member brings up something else) are: - PPMC member not subscribe to the private list - How to deal with the synchronous meetings - Links to other companies on your front page. Have one of your mentors (or

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Flagon (incubating) as a Top Level Project

HI, > I don’t care which products you have as long as the most recent for each is a > proper Apache release. I could be mistaken (given the name change) but there only seems to be only Apache releases for UserALE.js, although two of the products may be no longer used and have been dropped.

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Flagon (incubating) as a Top Level Project

Hi, I didi my usual check and most things look good, but I can see a couple of minor things. Hopefully the mentors can comment on the following: - Logo is missing form logos.apache.org - A few of the proposed PMC are not subscribed to the private list (Alex, Laura, Steve) - It’s been a long

Re: New distribution guidelines

Hi, Thanks for the feedback. > There's some spurious text at the start of the page. I’ll remove this. > Also, what does the acronym IP mean? IP = Intellectual property > - "Releases must be placed in the Apache mirror system." > Which releases are being referred to here? Source and binaries,

New distribution guidelines

Hi PPMC members, New distribution guidelines, that we have been working on for some time, have been published here: https://incubator.apache.org/guides/distribution.html They contain information on distributing releases on 3rd party platforms including Maven, GitHub, Docker, NPM and PiPy.

[VOTE][RESULT] Distribution guidelines for platforms

HI, So this passes with 6 +1 vest and one -0 vote. Thanks to everyone who taken part in this conversation and others over the last couple of years to make this happen. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Superset (incubating) as a TLP

Hi, > I’m not too surprised to hear that one or more people haven’t sent emails to > the list… most of the engagement happens on the GitHub repo and on Slack. > With help from our mentor, I’ve already reached out to folks who were > erroneously not on the private list (for varied reasons), and

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Superset (incubating) as a TLP

Hi, > Thanks for bringing up your concern here. The synchronous meeting you > describe does have an agenda with meeting minutes/notes [1], which are open > to the public, and was previously shared on the dev list [2] I note those in attendance are listed by company affiliation, contributors

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Superset (incubating) as a TLP

Hi, I know at one point this project was have bi-weekly synchronous meetings. Is this still happened? My concern is that I don’t see any information of what happens at these meetings being brought back to the mailing list. Thanks, Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Superset (incubating) as a TLP

Hi, With your proposed PMC list I can see a number of the people mentioned don’t seem to be active and a number are not signed up to the project private mailing list. A quick check found at least one who looks to have not sent a single email to the mailing list during the entire incubation

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Superset (incubating) as a TLP

Hi, I think there's a couple of minor thing that need some minor fixes/clarification. I was looking at your website and can’t see where I can download the released versions form the Apache mirrors [1]. (This relates to CD10 in the maturity model and the distribution part.) I assume the

Re: Logo

Hi, Your might want to ask apache central services you help you with a logo. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Distribution guidelines for platforms

Hi Dave, Much appreciated. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Distribution guidelines for platforms

Hi Dave, Just wondered if you have reconsider you -1 vote after the discussion here and elsewhere? What more would you required in order to vote +1 on this? Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[Mentors] Timeline for Octobers Report due Wednesday October 7th

Hi, The report can be found here [1] Timeline for October report: Wed October 7th Podling reports due by end of day Sun October 11thShepherd reviews due by end of day Sun October 11thSummary due by end of day Tue October 13thMentor signoff due by end of day Wed October

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache IoTDB as TLP

Hi, The project has become a TLP so there no need to vote any more :-) Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache TVM Graduation

Hi, > Thanks Justin. As mentioned in the last email. We are following the > previous naming convention of similar conferences like "Kafka Summit" and > "Spark + AI Summit”. I believe are slightly different sort of events as they are not run by the project but by another 3rd party / commercial

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache TVM Graduation

Hi, > The TVM PPMC would certainly be more than happy to follow trademarks > suggestions on event brandings and make sure the event is compliant. > To follow up the naming compliance. Notably, in the main page the project > name "Apache (incubating) TVM" is used in the first and most prominent >

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache TVM Graduation

Hi, The conference hasn’t yet been approved by trademarks, but a request to use that domain has been asked [1]. I don’t think this is an issue unless trademarks says otherwise. My guess is that they may want a little more information to see if it complies with event branding policy [2]. It btw

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache TVM Graduation

Hi, Sorry my mistake, I meant to say tvm.ai not tvm.io, but as I said subdomains on tvm.ai are not redirecting. For instance discuss.tvm.ai stays as it is. Other sub-domains include ci.tvm.ai , tracking.tvm.ai and docs.tvm.ai that I’ve found. There might be others, of those four, only docs

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache TVM Graduation

Hi, Thanks for the response. I think the docker issue is resolved. I still have concerns about use of tvm.io. I have discovered several other subdomains (six in total) that do not redirect to the Apache site, there might be others. It's still unclear who has control of this domain name. The

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache TVM Graduation

Hi, The "install from source” page should probably point people to the source releases rather than the latest code in GitHub. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache TVM Graduation

Hi, > I am sure there are many other binary packaging out there that use Apache > project names, for example this one for Apache Spark: > https://hub.docker.com/r/bitnami/spark/ What other Apache projects do (Spark in particular for various reasons) are not always good examples to follow. But

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache TVM Graduation

Hi, On that installation pages it does says "We provide docker utility scripts to help developers to setup development environment. They are also helpful run through TVM demo and tutorials.” and "You can find some un-official prebuilt images in https://hub.docker.com/r/tvmai/.” IMO this

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache TVM Graduation

Hi, > Then why do they have 40K+ downloads? It also doesn’t explain the version > numbers. Sorry 4K I misread that, but even that seem high for something that is used for testing. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache TVM Graduation

Hi, > - As you can see that the domain redirects to https://tvm.apache.org/. > So hopefully there is no confusion here. In some cases it does not. e.g. discuss.tvm.ai IMO this is a graduation blocker. > P2: releases > - The PPMC has a well documented release process[1] > that anyone can go

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache TVM Graduation

Hi, I’m also concerned that the person who seems responsible for these docker images seems to be the proposed chair of the project. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache TVM Graduation

Hi, I also have several concerns. 1. Use of the tvm.ai domain - has permission been obtained from trademark to use this domain? Who has control of it? 2. With only 2 releases with 1 release manager I don’t think the project is mature enough to graduate, 3. Branding/trademarks on these

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache TVM as TLP

HI, I’m -1 (binding), please see the discussion thread for my concerns. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[MENTORS] Podling reports due 2nd September

Hi, Reporting timeline for September is as follows .The reports can be entered here [1] Wed September 02 - Podling reports due by end of day Sun September 06 - Shepherd reviews due by end of day Sun September 06 - Summary due by end of day Tue September 08 - Mentor signoff due by end of day Wed

Re: Giving our PMs and contributors triage rights on GitHub

Hi, > Last thought: I don't have data on this, but I think the ASF could be doing > better at diversity (see the ApacheCon picture > as anecdotal evidence). Being inclusive of a wider range of roles and > offering diverse paths to "committerhood" could really help

Re: Giving our PMs and contributors triage rights on GitHub

Hi, If you trust someone access that allows issue and pull request admin, why would you not trust them with commit access to the codebase? Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Release Apache IoTDB 0.10.1

Hi, > I checked many projects on [1], few projects put the readme file > separated with the source-release file. It not a requirement but many project do it so they can link to it from their download page. People often want to look at the README before downloading and installing the software.

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache ECharts (incubating) as a top level project

Hi, From a quick search there also seem to be a few branding issues to sort out. For instance this page which I think you recently wrote? [1] There's not a single mention there that it’s an Apache project, although it does link to echarts.apache.org. It would be nice if this page [2] was

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache ECharts (incubating) as a top level project

Hi, > But unfortunately we missed the theme builder page. > All other pages (like https://echarts.baidu.com/option.html ) have been > fixed. > We will solve the theme builder page soon and double check other pages. IMO the domain echarts.baidu.com probably should not exist as it implies

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache ECharts (incubating) as a top level project

Hi, Has the issue with the multiple domain names been resolved? e.g https://echarts.baidu.com/theme-builder/en/index.html Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

HI, > After the project was open sourced, we did not conduct evangelism, and the > internal version iterations were not synchronized in time. Does that mean a different version to what in that GitHub will be donated to ASF? That may complicate things a little as we would need to know who the

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

Hi, The incubator prefers that a project comes with a community around it but it’s not essential. Not having one may possibly make graduation harder, as long as the project is aware of that I don’t see any issues. Thanks, Justin

[jira] [Comment Edited] (INCUBATOR-253) Issues with MXNet releases and their distribution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17173644#comment-17173644 ] Justin Mclean edited comment on INCUBATOR-253 at 8/8/20, 12:34 PM

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-253) Issues with MXNet releases and their distribution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17173644#comment-17173644 ] Justin Mclean commented on INCUBATOR-253: - That information doesn't belong

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >