. In the interest
of time, since I know you don't have much more you can spare
on this effort, I suggest you try to just follow them as-is.
And lets keep the initial voting confined to dev@lucy as
Marvin suggests.
- Original Message
From: Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm
Hi Tomaz,
My vote is (binding) as well.
Cheers,
Chris
On May 15, 2011, at 10:42 PM, Tomaz Muraus wrote:
OK, sorry for the confusion, but apparently I need to open a separate voting
thread so here it is.
Here is also a list of people who have already voted +1 in the proposal
thread which
Hi Noel,
SIS should be on there...added it today. Thanks!
Cheers,
Chris
On May 16, 2011, at 12:56 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I will be doing it tonight for Thursday's meeting.
Missing: Bluesky, Celix, Delta Cloud, HCatalog, HISE, LibCloud (up for a TLP
vote, but we still need a report),
+1, great job guys!
(binding)
Cheers,
Chris
On May 14, 2011, at 9:35 AM, Tomaz Muraus wrote:
Hello all,
Apache Libcloud developers and community thinks we are ready to graduate and
become a top level project.
Libcloud (http://incubator.apache.org/libcloud/) has entered the incubator
+1 (binding)
Cheers,
Chris
On May 2, 2011, at 5:32 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
I would like to call a vote to accept Airavata for entry into the Apache
Incubator. The proposal thread can be found at [1] and the proposal text
is at [2]
[ ] +1 Accept Airavata into the incubator
[ ] -1 Do NOT
. There is a lot of
interest from our community in regards to metadata catalogs and OODT is high
on our list to explore integration possibilities.
Looking forward to working with you guys.
Suresh
On Apr 28, 2011, at 3:09 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 23 Apr 2011, at 23:16, Mattmann, Chris
I'd be +1 to mentor and help see that outcome through.
Cheers,
Chris
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 28, 2011, at 1:10 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
On 23 Apr 2011, at 23:16, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Guys,
Looks great and sounds very
+1 (binding).
Awesome!
Cheers,
Chris
On Apr 23, 2011, at 4:57 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Hi all ASF mates,
I'm writing to submit a new incubator proposal, Apache OGNL.
Follows below the proposal; this vote will be open for 72 hours and
will be closed on April 26th (Tue) at 12:00 am CET.
Hi Guys,
Looks great and sounds very complimentary to OODT. Happy that you guys mention
alignment -- might be nice to expose data from an OODT file management+workflow
management+resource management system as a Airavata gateway. Just a quick
thought after skimming the proposal.
Good stuff!
Thanks Stefan!
Cheers,
Chris
On Mar 30, 2011, at 9:13 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2011-03-30, Henry Saputra wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
Signatures and checksums match, svn tag and archive seem to be identical
(except for the line
Thanks Sebb.
Do you see the below as fix in 0.2-incubating or fix now?
To me they are fix in 0.2-incubating, but I'd appreciate your thoughts.
Cheers,
Chris
On Mar 19, 2011, at 6:56 AM, sebb wrote:
On 19 March 2011 03:09, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
The Apache
Hi Noel, and IPMC community,
Apologies as the Champion for Gora for missing the March 2011 report deadline.
Would it be possible to please include the report even though it's late?
I've taken the trouble of adding it to the wiki, pasted below:
Gora
Gora is an ORM framework for column
All, FYI, Apache Gora 0.1-incubating rc3 VOTE is going on...
Cheers,
Chris
Begin forwarded message:
From: Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com
Date: March 10, 2011 9:49:43 PM PST
To: gora-...@incubator.apache.org gora-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache Gora 0.1-incubating
dist is a distribution area - mirrored so that when people download
they usually end up on a mirror site. This spreads the load of people
downloading our software. Projects shouldn't be linking to specific
artifacts in the dist area - they should be linking to a download page
where links
Hi Niall,
[...]
Dist is the active archive. The archive.apache.org is the deep archive.
Both should exist, and both should have a copy of the data.
Dist isn't an archive - its a distribution area archive.apache.org is
the archive.
I respectfully disagree.
Cheers,
Chris
Niall
Hmmm,
I'd like to question this: why would the Incubator ever delete archives of
releases? We have active links on the TLP for e.g., OODT and for e.g., Tika
that point users to our Incubator releases that are still active Incubator
links. I realize that archive.apache.org keeps a copy, but
Hi Sebb,
Hmmm,
I'd like to question this: why would the Incubator ever delete archives of
releases? We have active links on the TLP for e.g., OODT and for e.g., Tika
that point users to our Incubator releases that are still active Incubator
links. I realize that archive.apache.org keeps
.
Please take this up with ASF Infrastructure.
This Incubator forum has too narrow scope.
By the way, unrelated to my orginal post,
ASF Infra is currently preparing to talk to all
projects that have too much stuff in their w.a.o/dist/
space.
-David
Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote
+1 from me (binding).
Cheers,
Chris
On Mar 1, 2011, at 5:16 PM, Eric Sammer wrote:
All:
Discussions from the [PROPOSAL] thread seem to have tapered off so I'd like
to call a vote on accepting MRUnit into the incubator. I'm re-pasting the
proposal for simplicity. We'll leave the vote open
Hi Guys,
I don't know, none of those things really sound like justification for
a separate TLP, keeping something like this nearby to Hadoop MapReduce
seems like it would help give it a better chance of long term survival
to me. Wouldn't simply moving mrunit out from
Hi Ant,
On Feb 28, 2011, at 7:18 AM, ant elder wrote:
You're right about the entry criteria, there's a very low bar to
becoming an Incubator poddling so if you all really want to I'm pretty
sure you'll be able to make it happen. But this is a proposal
discussion thread which asks for
Hey Bertrand,
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
My point was that the technical reasons listed in this thread don't
seem to warrant forking MRUnit into its own project,
Meh, arguably they do. One of the big issues is release
Hi Troy,
I think it would be good to send the below to trademarks@ and to start there.
HTH,
Chris
On Feb 18, 2011, at 3:13 AM, Troy Howard wrote:
Ok, I guess by recently done by Apache CouchDB I meant, done in
2007, before it was an Apache product, and it wasn't so much a contest
but a
+1, nice Nick!
Cheers,
Chris
On Feb 17, 2011, at 8:12 AM, David Crossley wrote:
Author: nick
Date: Thu Feb 17 13:30:58 2011
New Revision: 1071607
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1071607view=rev
Log:
Chemistry has graduated. So, update the Chemistry status page, the project
list,
+1 from me. (binding)
Congrats guys!
Cheers,
Chris
On Feb 11, 2011, at 3:53 AM, Nick Burch wrote:
Hi All
The Chemistry podling has been in the incubator since early 2009. In the
last 6 months, the podling has had two sucessful Java releases, and now
its first sucessful non-Java release
Hi Karl,
+1 from me (binding).
Signatures check out:
[chipotle:~/tmp/apache-manifoldcf-0.1-incubating] mattmann% gpg --import *.KEYS
gpg: key 03824582: Karl David Wright (CODE SIGNING KEY) kwri...@apache.org
not changed
gpg: key FE045966: Grant Ingersoll (CODE SIGNING KEY) gsing...@apache.org
+1 from me (binding).
Cheers,
Chris
On Jan 24, 2011, at 9:14 AM, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be sponsored by
the Ant PMC for a new EasyAnt podling.
The proposal is available on the wiki at and included below:
(apologies for the cross posting)
*** PLEASE NOTE - the deadline for submitting papers has been extended by 1
week to 1/28/2011! ***
Please consider submitting a paper to the ICSE 2011 Software Engineering for
Cloud Computing (SECLOUD) Workshop to be held Sunday, May 22, 2011, at the
Hilton
Hi Karl,
For consistency and for the purposes of VOTE'ing on the bits at your RC URL
that will actually get copied to Apache's distribution servers, I'd like to see
you create another RC directory. You don't have to respin the RC code, just
copy the current contents into a new directory with a
, I'm
wondering if it's just best to create another tag or branch in SVN and re-spin
the release for consistency.
Cheers,
Chris
On Jan 8, 2011, at 1:24 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Hi Karl,
For consistency and for the purposes of VOTE'ing on the bits at your RC URL
that will actually
Thanks very much Karl. Great work!
Cheers,
Chris
On Jan 8, 2011, at 1:32 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
I'd be happy to provide it.
Thanks,
Karl
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
One other note:
We probably should also see an SVN
Hi Karl,
Great job. +1 from me.
SIGS check out:
[chipotle:~/tmp/apache-manifoldcf-0.1-incubating] mattmann% gpg --verify
apache-manifoldcf-0.1-incubating.tar.gz.asc
gpg: Signature made Fri Jan 7 02:44:17 2011 PST using RSA key ID 03824582
gpg: Good signature from Karl David Wright (CODE
Hi Grant,
Is this a source or binary release? How are you guys making the release? Using
Ant or Maven?
Can you guys provide a KEYS and CHANGES.txt file as part of the release
artifacts?
Cheers,
Chris
On Jan 6, 2011, at 5:12 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Hi,
The Apache ManifoldCF community
.
Cheers,
Chris
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Grant,
Is this a source or binary release? How are you guys making the release?
Using Ant or Maven?
Can you guys provide a KEYS and CHANGES.txt file as part of the release
Hi Karl,
On Jan 6, 2011, at 10:49 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
The whole question of ease-of-use is what drove this packaging
arrangement. I was told it was unacceptable to not have a working
example out of the box that could be executed in a single line. Build
and execution Instructions which
Hi Karl,
It's all the same license. The dependent jars are copied into the
appropriate target locations by the build process. So without the
build, you have one copy of each dependent jar.
Cool, thanks.
It's a huge issue everywhere. Your release will be mirrored around the world
using
(apologies for the cross posting)
Please consider submitting a paper to the ICSE 2011 Software Engineering for
Cloud Computing (SECLOUD) Workshop to be held Sunday, May 22, 2011, at the
Hilton Hawaiian Village Resort in Waikiki, Honolulu, HI.
This workshop focuses on identifying the grand
Hi Benson,
2 things IMO:
1. update the board's meeting agenda for their Jan meeting in SVN (might not
exist yet) and add the approved River resolution
2. (probably optional but good form) send the approved River resolution to
board@
Then follow these steps in Incubator-ville (assuming the
Hi Benson,
Probably hasn't been generated by Doug yet (there's some magic script I think
that takes care of it)...
Cheers,
Chris
On Dec 21, 2010, at 4:56 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Oy. Where does the board agenda live in svn?
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J
Hi Benson,
Not sure that it's a strict rule, but seeing the board resolution is what I'd
like to see as an IPMC member if I'm VOTE'ing on something.
Cheers,
Chris
On Dec 15, 2010, at 1:52 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Hello Incubator PMC,
The River mentors and River community have a
Incubator PMC are hereafter
discharged.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Benson,
Not sure that it's a strict rule, but seeing the board resolution is what
I'd like to see as an IPMC member if I'm VOTE'ing on something
Hi Owen,
It's my understanding that Apache software can depend on other software that
falls within the guidelines here [1]. ASF Podlings, by definition are software
(released or not) that fall under the confines of Category A from [1], so it's
fine to depend on them (again, *released* or not).
On Dec 1, 2010, at 8:04 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov
To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wed, December 1, 2010 10:57:48 AM
Subject: Re: Basing Apache releases on releases
Hi Thilo,
The difference is that the incubator code comes from
Apache, with all the ASF IP due diligence. If we use
a third-party library that's under the AL, we mention
that it's not from Apache. Our customers can then
decide for themselves how much they trust that other
source. My
Hey Joe,
Hrm, umm, so what's the difference between this, and oh I don't know,
some other library I pick up as a TLP off Google code who claims their
source is ASLv2 licensed? I have no guarantee over there that the license
issues are resolved either, yet we do that all the time over
Hi Bertrand,
The difference is that the incubator code comes from
Apache, with all the ASF IP due diligence. If we use
a third-party library that's under the AL, we mention
that it's not from Apache. Our customers can then
decide for themselves how much they trust that other
source. My
Hi Thilo,
I hear ya, and I believe you have way more experience in this particular
area than I do. I'm just saying that it would be nice if we could eat our
own dog food in this particular accord, otherwise, what's the Incubator
other than an Apache-branded area of code that's subject to
Hey Joe,
But OTOH, it would be nice if we could reward Incubator podlings for
choosing to do it the Apache Way to begin with by making some sort
of easier mechanism for their code to be included in other Apache projects,
right? After all the discussion about making it easier on
Hey Thilo,
Is it just me, or have we come full circle ;-)
LOL, yep!
We're doing a code grant, ICLAs from all current
and previous contributors, etc etc, the whole nine yards. The
fact that the code is already under the Apache license makes hardly
any difference.
Yep I've had
Hi Joe,
than going to some other OSS provider and then coming here
later.
You're confused about the whole point of releases at Apache.
They aren't necessarily meant to offer any promises about
stability or suitability for a given purpose, they are simply
meant as a means of getting the
the email spam!
I'm putting my head back down to work for the rest of the day! :)
Cheers,
Chris
On Dec 1, 2010, at 10:24 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov
To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
+1 (binding).
Cheers,
Chris
On Nov 29, 2010, at 10:52 PM, Dan Peterson wrote:
Hi everyone,
Please vote on the acceptance of Wave into the Apache incubator.
The proposal is available at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WaveProposal
(for your convenience, a snapshot is also copied below)
Oops, thanks David.
Will update later tonight...
Cheers,
Chris
On Nov 23, 2010, at 2:10 PM, David Crossley wrote:
Please don't just remove the entry. It needs to
move down to the Graduated section.
-David
Author: mattmann
Date: Tue Nov 23 17:49:40 2010
New Revision: 1038225
URL:
FYI Ross, I also +1'ed this.
Cheers,
Chris
On Nov 23, 2010, at 1:28 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
The result of this vote is:
10 binding +1
7 non-binding +1
Full summary of the votes are below.
I'll start getting things set up - thanks for you support folks.
Votes cast:
Binding +1s
+1 (binding). Congrats!
Cheers,
Chris
On Nov 22, 2010, at 3:51 AM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
Hi IPMCers and Incubator community,
The Aries community has been discussing graduation and we feel we are
ready to graduate to a new TLP [1]. We subsequently voted [2]. As a
commnunity we were
Hi Ross,
+1 from me (binding).
Cheers,
Chris
On Nov 17, 2010, at 5:10 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
Please vote on the acceptance of JENA into the incubator. The proposal
can be found at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/JenaProposal and is
copied below.
[ ] +1 Accept Jena for incubation
[ ]
Hey Noel,
It's my understanding that Lucy isn't on this reporting cycle and was included
on the wiki by mistake.
Cheers,
Chris
On 11/15/10 12:03 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
All of these reports are missing and need to be posted IMMEDIATELY!
Hi Folks,
This VOTE has passed with the following tallies:
+1:
IPMC (binding):
Chris Mattmann
Justin Erenkrantz
Niall Pemberton
Bertrand Delacretaz
Stefan Bodewig
Niclas Hedhman
PPMC (non-binding)
David Woollard
Brian Foster
Paul Ramirez
Cameron Goodale
Community (non-binding)
Paul
Hi Folks,
This VOTE has passed with the following tallies:
+1:
IPMC:
Chris Mattmann
Ant Elder
Kevan Miller
Greg Reddin
PPMC:
Patrick O'Leary
Paul Ramirez
Sean McCleese
Nga Chung
I'll go ahead and push the release out to the mirrors and send an announce
to gene...@.
Thanks for VOTE'ing!
(...apologies for the cross posting...)
The Apache SIS project is pleased to announce the release of Apache SIS
0.1-incubating. The release contents have been pushed out to the main Apache
release site so the releases should be available as soon as the mirrors get
the syncs.
Apache SIS is a
+1 from me...
Cheers,
Chris
On 11/12/10 12:20 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to propose that the process for Incubator poddlings to make
someone a new committer is simplified so that all that is needed are
votes from poddling committers and that there is no longer any need
+1...binding.
Cheers,
Chris
On 11/12/10 9:01 AM, Sander W G van der Waal
sander.vanderw...@oucs.ox.ac.uk wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
Sander
From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:bdelacre...@apache.org]
Sent: 10 November 2010 15:11
To: Incubator General
Subject: [VOTE] Accept Stanbol for
Hi IPMC'ers and the rest of the Incubator community,
The OODT community has been discussing graduation to TLP [1]. There is
overwhelming consensus in the community (all +1 VOTEs including those from
our mentors) that we've achieved what's required here in the Incubator, and
so we'd like to put
Ooops, forgot to include [1]. Here you go guys.
[1] http://s.apache.org/iX6
On 11/11/10 7:18 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov
wrote:
Hi IPMC'ers and the rest of the Incubator community,
The OODT community has been discussing graduation to TLP [1
mentors)?
Cheers,
Chris
On 11 November 2010 15:18, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi IPMC'ers and the rest of the Incubator community,
The OODT community has been discussing graduation to TLP [1]. There is
overwhelming consensus in the community (all +1 VOTEs
Hi Folks,
I have posted a 3rd candidate for the Apache SIS 0.1-incubating release. The
source code is at:
http://people.apache.org/~mattmann/apache-sis-0.1-incubating/rc3/
This release addresses the following comments from IPMC members during the
RC #2 VOTE:
From Ant Elder:
In NOTICE file
Hi Kevan,
Thanks. I'll re-roll another release candidate. Thanks for the enthusiasm so
far. I hope for the same on RC #2! :)
Cheers,
Chris
On 11/10/10 7:25 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 10, 2010, at 7:14 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
just figured that Apache SIS !=
Hi Folks,
I have posted a 2nd candidate for the Apache SIS 0.1-incubating release. The
source code is at:
http://people.apache.org/~mattmann/apache-sis-0.1-incubating/rc2/
This release addresses the following comments from IPMC members during the
RC #1 VOTE:
- add Incubator disclaimer per
Hi Patrick,
+1 from me.
1. Build succeeds, unit tests pass:
[INFO]
[INFO] Reactor Summary:
[INFO]
[INFO] Whirr
Hi Guys,
I'm not seeing our OODT release hit the mirrors as quick as it normally
does. For example, going here:
http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/incubator/oodt
Yields many 404s. There are one or 2 that don't, but most do. It's been
quite a few days since the tarballs were copied to
Thanks Joe!
Cheers,
Chris
On 11/10/10 1:31 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Fixed.
- Original Message
From: Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov
To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wed, November 10, 2010 1:20:54 PM
on each page didn't yield any 404s for me.
Maybe you have a problem your end, or with a proxy or something?
Cheers,
Chris
On 10 November 2010 18:20, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Guys,
I'm not seeing our OODT release hit the mirrors as quick as it normally
Note:
I now see http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/oodt/
Just fine though.
Thanks Joe!
Cheers,
Chris
On 11/10/10 4:14 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov
wrote:
Weird.
Well the first few don't work for me at all, in fact most of them don't.
Case in point:
http
:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Folks,
I have posted a 2nd candidate for the Apache SIS 0.1-incubating release. The
source code is at:
http://people.apache.org/~mattmann/apache-sis-0.1-incubating/rc2/
This release addresses
On Nov 10, 2010, at 2:12 PM, ant elder wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Ant,
Thanks. Do you see any of the below as a blocker to the first release? What
extra stuff, specifically, do you see that wasn't present
Hi Folks,
I have posted a candidate for the Apache SIS 0.1-incubating release. The
source code is at:
http://people.apache.org/~mattmann/apache-sis-0.1-incubating/rc1/
See the included CHANGES.txt file for details on release contents and latest
changes. The release was made using the Maven2
Wow! Jena is proposing to come to Apache??! Sweet! We've used it in OODT since
2003...looking forward to it!
Cheers,
Chris
On 11/8/10 7:04 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
As champion for Jena I agree in principle. I can't speak for the Jena team if
course, but representatives are
Big +1 from me.
Cheers,
Chris
On 11/8/10 6:36 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
I am pleased to offer, for your consideration, the following proposal to
accept Jena, a semantic web framework into the incubator. The text of
the proposal is copied here for your convenience and can be
OK, all, by my accounts, this VOTE has passed, as of Wed @ 5:29PM PST this
past week.
The tallies are:
+1
(binding, IPMC)
Chris Mattmann
Justin Erenekrantz
Jukka Zitting
Alan D. Cabrera
Ian Holsman
(non-binding, PPMC)
David Woollard
Sean Kelly
Paul Ramirez
Brian Foster
Cameron Goodale
I'll
Hi Dave,
+1!
Signature checks out:
[chipotle:~/tmp/oodtrc4] mattmann% gpg --verify
apache-oodt-0.1-incubating-src.tar.gz.asc
gpg: Signature made Sun Oct 31 14:07:08 2010 PDT using RSA key ID FF5B0BD5
gpg: Good signature from David Woollard (CODE SIGNING KEY)
wooll...@apache.org
gpg: WARNING:
Yeah the intention is to tag it from the branch we're VOTE'ing on after the
VOTE is approved per our release process [1].
Thanks for VOTE'ing guys!
Cheers,
Chris
[1] http://bit.ly/d5ugid
On 11/1/10 2:19 PM, Justin Erenkrantz jus...@erenkrantz.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Alan
/1/10 3:03 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Yeah the intention is to tag it from the branch we're VOTE'ing on
after the VOTE is approved per our release process [1].
Why wait
Hi Alan,
Thanks for looking at our release. Did you run mvn -Paudit to discover those
RAT failures? Can you attach a log so that we could better track them down?
We've gone through a lot of trouble to make sure that RAT is integrated (e.g.,
see [1]) and I would like to know specifics of where
Hi Dave,
Awesome job:
GPG sigs check out:
[chipotle:~/tmp/oodtrc3] mattmann% gpg --verify
apache-oodt-0.1-incubating-src.tar.gz.asc
gpg: Signature made Mon Oct 25 22:04:06 2010 PDT using RSA key ID FF5B0BD5
gpg: Good signature from David Woollard (CODE SIGNING KEY)
wooll...@apache.org
gpg:
FYI, OOTE 0.1-incubating, rc2 VOTE going on oodt-...@incubator.a.o.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Chris
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
FYI I'm a dingus and can't spell OODT. Sigh.
You can all VOTE -1 on the OOTE VOTE. I hear it won't pass :) But if you VOTE
+1 on the OODT one, that would be super.
Cheers,
Chris
On 10/21/10 11:26 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
FYI, OOTE 0.1-incubating, rc2
Hi,
Can someone with the necessary karma please add Enis Soztutar to the
Incubator UNIX group so that he can deploy our Gora website?
Thanks,
Chris
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Thanks Craig!
On 10/15/10 2:15 PM, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote:
Done.
modify_unix_group.pl incubator --add=enis
LDAP Password (^D aborts):
Done!
Notification sent to r...@apache.org.
Craig
On Oct 15, 2010, at 12:24 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Hi,
Can someone
Hi Bryan,
My +1. You've done a fantastic job and I wish you guys the best.
One thing to note: you'll probably want to update your board resolution below
to include everyone's Apache emails rather than their company affiliated ones -
that would match what I've seen with many of the other
Hi Guys,
As the project's champion I'll work with the rest of the mentors and PPMC
members to make sure we are moving forward in the Apache Way.
Cheers,
Chris
On 10/1/10 2:23 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Enis Soztutar
26, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Folks,
This VOTE has passed with the following tallies:
IPMC (binding)
+1
Chris Mattmann
Owen O'Malley
Nick Burch
Mark Struberg
Bertrand Delacreatz
Noel J. Bergman
Stefan Seelmann
Alan D. Cabrera
Hi Folks,
This VOTE has passed with the following tallies:
IPMC (binding)
+1
Chris Mattmann
Owen O'Malley
Nick Burch
Mark Struberg
Bertrand Delacreatz
Noel J. Bergman
Stefan Seelmann
Alan D. Cabrera
Tom White
Craig L Russell
Non-binding:
+1
David Woollard
Tommaso Teofilli
Henry Saputra
Hi Folks,
Over the past week or so we've been discussing the Gora project and bringing
it into the Apache Incubator [1]. It's time to call a VOTE thread on the
issue. Please VOTE below:
[ ] +1 Accept Gora into the Apache Incubator.
[ ] +0 Don't care.
[ ] -1 Don't accept Gora into the Apache
Hi Enis,
Thanks. Let’s leave the VOTE open until Friday evening Pacific time to give
folks time to look at the proposal. Technically we didn’t do a VOTE thread on
this yet though and I saw that some folks just asked Kitty to explicitly post a
[VOTE] thread, so we may want to do that here.
at 4:43 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Enis,
Thanks. Let’s leave the VOTE open until Friday evening Pacific time to give
folks time to look at the proposal. Technically we didn’t do a VOTE thread
on this yet though and I saw that some folks just asked Kitty
Hey Andrew,
Great! Please add yourself to the wiki page as a commuter and we'd love a
helping hand!
Cheers,
Chris
Sent from my iPad
On Sep 14, 2010, at 9:59 AM, Andrew Hart ah...@apache.org wrote:
+1 (not binding)
This really strikes a chord with me and I would love to help out with
Lol s/commuter/committer
Sent from my iPad
On Sep 14, 2010, at 10:22 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hey Andrew,
Great! Please add yourself to the wiki page as a commuter and we'd love a
helping hand!
Cheers,
Chris
Sent from my iPad
On Sep 14
Hi Folks,
FYI, if any mentors out there have free cycles and are interested, we are
looking for 1 more mentor to fulfill the Incubator mentor requirements.
Thanks,
Chris
On 9/13/10 6:10 AM, Enis Soztutar enis.soz.nu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
We would like to announce the Proposal for
. Anyway, +1 to the proposal,
and happy to help out if you still need a mentor.
Cheers,
Tom
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Folks,
FYI, if any mentors out there have free cycles and are interested, we are
looking for 1 more
Hi Stefan,
Any mentor is very welcome! Please, join up!
Cheers,
Chris
On 9/14/10 3:03 PM, Stefan Seelmann seelm...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
FYI, if any mentors out there have free cycles
301 - 400 of 461 matches
Mail list logo
