The Apache MXNet community is happy to announce Apache MXNet version 0.11.0! We
hit some major milestones with this release!
This is our first official release as an incubating Apache project. The project
has now fully migrated its codebase and website to Apache.
This release includes code
Hi all
This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0, release
candidate 3.
Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
Vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
t 1:04 PM, Meghna Baijal <meghnabaijal2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0, release
> candidate 3.
>
> Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
>
> Vote thread:
&g
;
>>>>>> Also, Henri, didn't you mention that there was an SGA for this
>> project?
>>>>>> Sorry if I don't recollect the exact details on the SGA bit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dom
>>>>>>
>>>>>
, the goal is to have MXNet version 1.0.0 release ready before the
NIPS conference that starts on 04-Dec, 2017 and it would be helpful if you
would be ok to change your vote to a positive one considering these points.
We will definitely fix any pending issues immediately after the release.
Thanks,
Meghna
/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/8876/
It would be helpful if you could review these changes.
Thanks,
Meghna Baijal
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Justin Mclean <justinmcl...@me.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >> - A number of source file are missing license headers e.g. [15][16] [1
but
there were comments during the general voting process for 0.11.0 to remove
these.
These comments are tracked in this Github issue -
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/7748.
According to me the NOTICE file is ok, but do you think you could help us
review it ?
Thanks,
Meghna Baijal
+0.12.1+Release+Notes
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
[ ] +1 Release this package as 0.12.1
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
Thanks,
Meghna Baijal
Hello Justin,
Thank you for your vote.
I have created a Github issue to track all your comments here -
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/8913
I will make sure all these issues are fixed soon after the 1.0.0 release.
Thanks,
Meghna Baijal
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 11:59 PM
Henri,
I added your comments related to notice and licensing to the same issue
here - https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/8913
and created a separate issue to track the submodules here -
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/8920.
Thanks,
Meghna Baijal
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
[ ] +1 Release this package as 0.12.0
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
Thanks,
Meghna Baijal
.
Thanks,
Meghna Baijal
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 6:33 PM, Haibin Lin <haibin.lin@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you for the comments. The license issue should be fixed in the next
> RC then.
>
> Other than that, is moving submodules like dmlc-core/nnvm/ps-lite etc. to
>
Thanks Justin,
We did remove that jar before creating this RC0 but thanks for answering
the question.
Meghna
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Please let me know if anyone sees any other major issues in this file.
>
> Thanks - that's
4. Reviewed the Apache Policy and confirmed to the best of my understanding
the LICENSE file complies with the guidelines.
Please let me know if anyone sees any other major issues in this file.
Thanks,
Meghna Baijal
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 9:19 PM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com>
wro
this is a blocker for this release?
Thanks,
Meghna Baijal
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 9:25 PM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry but -1 binding for me due to LICENSE issues but happy to discuss and
> change my vote depending on what other IPMC members
15 matches
Mail list logo