Hello Community,
The Apache OpenWhisk (incubating) team is pleased to announce the source
release of 13 language runtimes version 1.13.0. These language runtimes
allow Apache OpenWhisk (incubating) to run serverless function in
JavaScript, Python, Go, Ruby, Dotnet, Swift, PHP, Java, and Docker
This email is to notify general@i.a.o that a graduation community
[VOTE] is in progress for Apache OpenWhisk (incubating).
-r
-- Forwarded message -
From: Rodric Rabbah
Date: Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 5:25 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Apache OpenWhisk graduation to Top Level Project
To:
Hi
>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>> checklist below:
>
> What checklist is being verified?
All of these are verified:
[ ] Download links are valid.
[ ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
[ ] DISCLAIMER is included.
[ ] Source code artifacts have
Hi Justin, thanks for your email.
I have looked at the contributor distributions as follows:
- 91 individuals with 1 commit.
- 24 individuals with 2 commits.
- 9 individuals with 3 commits.
- 16 individuals with 4 commits.
- 30 individuals with 5 or more commits (and fewer than 10).
- 22
The PMC has individuals from 6 unrelated companies. I think committers add
another 2 unrelated companies/entities. We expect to welcome new committers
after graduation.
-r
> On Jun 7, 2019, at 8:25 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> I have looked at the contributor distributions as
>> Instead of having to actually DO releases, at least Release Candidates
>> should be created ... this would prove the general ability to do a release,
>> but not actually DO it. Of course if these RCs contain bad things, they
>> should not pass.
>
> I suspect in some cases there are repos
This is the link to signup to slack for this project
http://openwhisk.apache.org/slack.html
-r
> On Jun 16, 2019, at 6:38 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> There's a bit of discussion that can happen (and sometimes does) on
>> the issue trackers which provide a bit more interactive yet
The link to slack contains the content I wrote in the issue. We digest the
slack conversations every night and email them to the dev list so that I could
have used a ponymail permalink instead.
Anyone can self signup for slack there are no approvals or prohibitions on who
can sign up. We
Thanks for these links. I went through many of the links you provided and
conducted my own search as well. I conclude that all are left over from
before the project entered the Apache Incubator and the period of
transition that followed. We addressed the use of IBM OpenWhisk and Bluemix
OpenWhisk
> > We've also discussed the use of "short licenses" [5] and we document our
> use of the short licenses
>
> Which I see was some time ago but this keeps happening in your releases.
>
You are correct that we have an outstanding item to tighten our automated
checks inline with the project's
For several of the issues you noted, I opened github defects [1-4] against the
relevant repos so that we will address them before the next release of the
corresponding artifacts. We've also discussed the use of "short licenses" [5]
and we document our use of the short licenses and license
> I also note that you’ve been given feedback on several releases that have
> had mirror issue, but the issues don’t seem to have been fixed. Is there a
> plan to do so before graduation? e.g
>
On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 7:13 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> > This is the link to signup to slack for this project
> http://openwhisk.apache.org/slack.html
> Yep I noted that in my email, but they would need to search for it. It
> would be good if the slack login page linked to that.
>
I don't see
> like a google.com for example.
I meant gmail.com but slack rejects this and others like it (yahoo, hotmail
...).
-r
Dear IPMC Members,
The Apache OpenWhisk community has voted to release version
1.13.0-incubating of the Apache OpenWhisk Runtimes which comprise the
following 9 project modules with artifacts built from the Git repositories
and commit IDs listed below.
Two binding +1 votes from mentors Matt
Thank you Justin for the feedback. I opened several defects to address all the
points you've raised.
For reference:
- https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-runtime-go/issues/87
- https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-runtime-go/issues/86
-
The voting is now closed. The vote has passed.
3 (+1 binding) from Bertrand Delacretaz, Justin Mclean, Matt Sicker
0 (-1 binding)
The vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/3bc8d6be4a9c4c7bce6538846a956d379e12a412647cf357521c6f8d@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
Many thanks to
I created a pull request to update the license compliance [1] to replace
MINI with FULL. As already noted we have replaced all the mini licenses
with the full license across the relevant repos.
[1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/pull/288
On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 9:48 PM
As you found/noted in another email, gradle[w.bat] are Apache 2 licensed.
For posterity, we discussed these files [1] and [2] as examples (and they
are listed under the exclusions here [3]). Note that this is the first time
anyone on this list has raised a licensing issue wrt gradle. Since the
We concluded it's not worth asking legal for an opinion on this matter and
we opted instead to change the mini to full licenses. We updated the repos
that have releases or are subject to upcoming releases. There are repos we
will not be releasing and will archive/retire pending discussion on our
For future reference,
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/4545 will address
updating the gradlew[.bat] scripts with licenses.
-r
On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 10:27 PM Rodric Rabbah wrote:
> As you found/noted in another email, gradle[w.bat] are Apache 2 licensed.
> For posteri
We’ll sort it out I opened an issue to deal with it. We’re not the only Apache
project that uses gradle.
I missed you raising gradle issue before, my bad.
-r
> On Jul 5, 2019, at 11:13 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> (and they are listed under the exclusions here [3]).
>
> I note
Thanks Justin.
We should cut new releases of the main repo and runtimes. I've started a
discussion thread for the main repo.
On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 3:57 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It looks like you have some old incubator releases here:
>
23 matches
Mail list logo
