Re: [DISCUSS] Daffodil Incubation Proposal

2017-08-02 Thread Steve Lawrence
the Mentors. Once there are at least two more we > can push forward. > > Regards, > Dave > >> On Aug 1, 2017, at 5:09 AM, Steve Lawrence <stephen.d.lawre...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Discussions have died down, and I think the consensus from the responses >

Re: [DISCUSS] Daffodil Incubation Proposal

2017-08-02 Thread Steve Lawrence
Thanks John! On 08/02/2017 03:23 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > You can also count me in as a mentor. > > John > > On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 3:14 PM Steve Lawrence <stephen.d.lawre...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Understood. Thanks for the interest! >> >> - St

[VOTE] Daffodil into the Apache Incubator

2017-08-10 Thread Steve Lawrence
git://git.apache.org/incubator-daffodil.git === Issue Tracking === JIRA Daffodil (DFDL) === Initial Committers === * Beth Finnegan * Dave Thompson * Josh Adams * Mike Beckerle * Steve Lawrence * Taylor Wise === Affiliations === * Beth Finnegan (Tresys Technology) * Dave Thompson (Tr

[DISCUSS] Daffodil Incubation Proposal

2017-07-24 Thread Steve Lawrence
odil.incubator.apache.org * u...@daffodil.incubator.apache.org === Source Control === git://git.apache.org/incubator-daffodil.git === Issue Tracking === JIRA Daffodil (DFDL) === Initial Committers === * Beth Finnegan * Dave Thompson * Josh Adams * Mike Beckerle * Steve Lawrence * Taylor Wise

Re: [DISCUSS] Daffodil Incubation Proposal

2017-07-24 Thread Steve Lawrence
to Tika, but may be useful to other technologies such as filtering or data fuzzing technologies. - Steve On 07/24/2017 10:59 AM, Mike Drob wrote: > What is the relationship between Daffodil and something like Apache Tika's > extraction engine? > > On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 9:53 AM, St

Re: [DISCUSS] Daffodil Incubation Proposal

2017-07-24 Thread Steve Lawrence
John > > On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 11:30 AM Steve Lawrence < > stephen.d.lawre...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'll preface this saying that I don't have a ton of experience with >> Apache Tika. But based on my understanding, Tika and Daffodil do have >> somewhat simila

Edit access to wiki for proposal

2017-07-24 Thread Steve Lawrence
I would like to request edit access to the incubator wiki so that I can create a new proposal. My wiki username is: SteveLawrence Thanks, - Steve - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Re: [DISCUSS] Daffodil Incubation Proposal

2017-08-01 Thread Steve Lawrence
> represented within a file. > > Kenton McHenry, Ph.D. > Principal Research Scientist, Adjunct Assistant Professor of Computer > Science > Deputy Director of the Scientific Software & Applications Division > National Center for Supercomputing Applicatio

Re: [DISCUSS] Daffodil Incubation Proposal

2017-08-09 Thread Steve Lawrence
he discussion and call for a vote. >> While ideally we want 3 mentors, we can get started with 2 and see how >> things progress. >> >> John >> >>> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 3:55 PM Steve Lawrence >>> <stephen.d.lawre...@gmail.com> wrote: >>&g

[RESULT][VOTE] Daffodil into the Apache Incubator

2017-08-27 Thread Steve Lawrence
Thank you for all that participated in the VOTE. The vote for entering Daffodil into the Apache Incubator is now closed. The vote has passed with: - three binding "+1" votes, and one non-binding "+1" votes - no "0" votes - no "-1" votes The votes were: +1, John D. Ament (binding) +1, Bertrand

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.1.0

2018-05-14 Thread Steve Lawrence
I am pleased to announce that the Incubator PMC has approved the release of Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.1.0. The vote has passed with 4 binding +1 votes and no other votes. The votes were: +1 Matt Sicker (binding) +1 Justin Mclean (binding) +1 Dave Fisher (binding) +1 John D. Ament (binding)

Apache Daffodil (incubating) in need of mentors

2018-05-10 Thread Steve Lawrence
All, The Daffodil project has had a VOTE open for over a month [1], receiving two votes so far. We would greatly appreciate it if others could review the release so that can we get our first release out as an Apache incubator. That said, although our mentors have been incredibly helpful in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.1.0-rc3

2018-05-11 Thread Steve Lawrence
e Cat-X >> - These were supposed to be relicensed, but doesn't sound like that happened >> >> Or was it corrected that these two files are UoI NCSA licensed? If these >> files are Cat-X I would also vote a -1 since we cannot release with clear >> Cat-X contents (we can

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.1.0-rc3

2018-05-11 Thread Steve Lawrence
ar > Cat-X contents (we can release with Cat-X dependencies, but the contents > can't be Cat-X). > > Thanks, > > John > > On 2018/04/30 11:52:22, Steve Lawrence <slawre...@apache.org> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> We are still need at least one more

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.1.0-rc3

2018-04-30 Thread Steve Lawrence
Hi all, We are still need at least one more +1. We'd really appreciate if if you could take a look. Thanks, - Steve On 04/09/2018 07:24 PM, Steve Lawrence wrote: > The Apache Daffodil community has voted and approved the proposed > release of Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.1.0-rc3. >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.2.0-rc2

2018-09-04 Thread Steve Lawrence
Thanks for the votes. I've gone ahead and removed the sha1 checksums. I've also created tickets for the issues that Dave mentioned to be fixed in the next release. Regarding the last two copyright lines in the LICENSE file, those come from the "Full Copyright Notice" from the DFDL specification,

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc2

2018-03-06 Thread Steve Lawrence
information Vote thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/1bc33636ec76ae80d390a0ac988d8e96f37190a3d1bc02f9668f78c1@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E We will prepare another release candidate to resolve the issues raised during this vote. Thanks, - Steve On 03/02/2018 02:50 PM, Steve Lawrence wrote

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.1.0-rc3

2018-04-11 Thread Steve Lawrence
ere's no KEYS file! This should be at > https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/daffodil/KEYS > > Please add the KEYS file to dist.a.o. > > On 9 April 2018 at 18:24, Steve Lawrence <slawre...@apache.org> wrote: > >> The Apache Daffodil community has voted and app

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.1.0-rc3

2018-04-11 Thread Steve Lawrence
On 04/11/2018 02:51 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 13:49, Steve Lawrence <slawre...@apache.org > <mailto:slawre...@apache.org>> wrote: > > The KEYS file was in dist/dev. I've moved it to dist/release, now > available here: >

[VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.1.0-rc3

2018-04-09 Thread Steve Lawrence
The Apache Daffodil community has voted and approved the proposed release of Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.1.0-rc3. We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release. Daffodil is an open source implementation of the DFDL specification that uses DFDL

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.1.0-rc3

2018-04-17 Thread Steve Lawrence
-daffodil-2.1.0-incubating-bin.tgz.asc $ wget https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/daffodil/KEYS $ gpg --import KEYS gpg: key 033AE661: public key "Steve Lawrence <slawre...@apache.org>" imported gpg: Total number processed: 1 gpg: imported: 1 (RSA: 1) $ gpg

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.1.0-rc3

2018-04-16 Thread Steve Lawrence
Hi all, We are still in need of a couple more +1's. I'd appreciate it if you could find some time to take a look at our release. Thanks, - Steve On 04/09/2018 07:24 PM, Steve Lawrence wrote: > The Apache Daffodil community has voted and approved the proposed > release of Apache Da

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.1.0-rc3

2018-04-19 Thread Steve Lawrence
On 04/19/2018 12:29 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > >> I cannot reproduce the gpg failure. On a fresh CentOS install, I ran the >> following. > > I’ve double check again and it all checks out. Sorry about that must of been > something at my end. > >> The original license of these files was

[VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc2

2018-03-02 Thread Steve Lawrence
The Apache Daffodil community has voted and approved the proposed release of Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc2. We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release. Daffodil is an open source implementation of the DFDL specification that uses DFDL

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.3.0-rc1

2019-02-26 Thread Steve Lawrence
; Haven't tested the binary distributions though ... however with some help of > the community I have successfully updated my PLC4X dynamic drivers that > greatly utilize Daffodil to the maven artifacts of 2.3.0 > > Chris > > > Am 23.02.19, 17:11 schrieb "Steve Lawrenc

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.3.0-rc1

2019-02-26 Thread Steve Lawrence
Hi all, Thanks to everyone that participated. The vote to release Apache Daffodil 2.3.0-rc1 is now closed. It has passed with 3 +1 (binding) votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Binding: +1 Dave Fisher +1 Christofer Dutz +1 Sheng Wu Vote thread:

[VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.3.0-rc1

2019-02-19 Thread Steve Lawrence
Hi all, The Apache Daffodil community has voted and approved the proposed release of Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.3.0-rc1. We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release. Daffodil is an open source implementation of the DFDL specification that uses

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.3.0-rc1

2019-02-23 Thread Steve Lawrence
That's for all the response from everyone so far. We'll make sure to fix the KEYS issue for the next release. DAFFODIL-2070 [1] was created to track that issue, and we plan to fix it in the next release. Other comments inline. On 2/22/19 3:45 PM, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Hi all, > > I have

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.4.0-rc1

2019-07-11 Thread Steve Lawrence
Hi, The vote to release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.4.0-rc1 is now closed. Thanks to those that took the time to review and vote. It has passed with 3 +1 (binding) votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Binding: +1 Dave Fisher +1 Justin Mclean +1 Dave Meikle Vote thread:

Re: Showcase your project at ApacheCON at a Podling's Shark Tank

2019-08-15 Thread Steve Lawrence
Daffodil is interested! We have a couple developers attending ApacheCON NA that are happy to take part. Thanks, - Steve On 8/15/19 10:05 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > Hello Roman, > > The Tuweni podling is interested. I am attending ApacheCon EU and would like > a chance to present. > > Cheers,

[VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.4.0-rc1

2019-07-08 Thread Steve Lawrence
The Apache Daffodil community has voted and approved the proposed release of Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.4.0-rc1. We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release. Daffodil is an open source implementation of the DFDL specification that uses DFDL

Re: [MENTORS] Podling reports due today

2019-12-04 Thread Steve Lawrence
Sorry for the delay. Daffodil's report has been added. - Steve On 12/4/19 1:57 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > HI, > > We’re currently missing the following reports: > - Daffodil > - Marvin-AI > - Warble > > The following podlings have not answered all questions: > - DolphinScheduler > - MesaTEE >

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.5.0-rc2

2020-01-12 Thread Steve Lawrence
Hi all, The vote to release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.5.0-rc2 is now closed. Thanks to those that took the time to review and vote. The release has passed with 4 +1 (binding) votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Binding: +1 David Meikle +1 Furkan Kamaci +1 Jean-Baptiste Onofré +1 Justin Mclean

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.5.0-rc2

2020-01-10 Thread Steve Lawrence
Thanks for the vote Justin. To other IPMC members, I know both of our Daffodil mentors are pretty busy right now--if anyone else could find some spare cycles to take a look at this release, the Daffodil devs would be very appreciative. Thanks, - Steve On 1/7/20 8:21 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: >

[VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.5.0-rc2

2020-01-06 Thread Steve Lawrence
Hi all, The Apache Daffodil community has voted and approved the proposed release of Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.5.0-rc2. We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release. Daffodil is an open source implementation of the DFDL specification that uses

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.6.0-rc2

2020-04-20 Thread Steve Lawrence
Thanks for the vote! One mentor voted a +0 for rc1. We chose to fix those issues which led to the rc2 vote. Neither mentor has voted for the rc2 release yet. - Steve On 4/17/20 8:12 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 (binding) > > Did any of your mentor votes on this release? > > I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 3.0.0-rc1

2020-11-10 Thread Steve Lawrence
Remdiner to please take a look at this vote if you get a chance. We only have two mentors so we will need at least one vote from another IPMC member. Thanks! On 2020/11/04 16:30:28, Steve Lawrence wrote: > > The Apache Daffodil community has voted and approved the proposed >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 3.0.0-rc1

2020-11-16 Thread Steve Lawrence
Still looking for 2 more votes. Reminder to please take a look if you get a chance. Thanks, - Steve On 11/10/20 7:51 AM, Steve Lawrence wrote: > Remdiner to please take a look at this vote if you get a chance. We only have > two mentors so we will need at least one vote from anothe

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 3.0.0-rc1

2020-11-20 Thread Steve Lawrence
The VOTE to release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 3.0.0-rc1 is now closed. The vote passes with 3 +1 (binding) votes and no 0 or -1 votes. The VOTE thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbdbc0144c43038ddf0d5b7983e00ffb4ccf013b6121c99a74b0a762c%40%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E +1's

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 3.0.0-rc1

2020-11-18 Thread Steve Lawrence
as identical as possible. RPM is missing the BAT file as > expected. Did not check the MSI as I don’t have Windows. > >> On Nov 4, 2020, at 8:30 AM, Steve Lawrence wrote: >> >> >> The Apache Daffodil community has voted and approved the proposed >> release of A

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 3.0.0-rc1

2020-11-12 Thread Steve Lawrence
minent location (I like to put these > license texts in a "licenses" directory in the root of the project and inside > I add to the end which files in the repo it applies to) > - It appears you manually added LICENSE and NOTICE files to every artifact in > the repo (this mea

[VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 3.0.0-rc1

2020-11-04 Thread Steve Lawrence
The Apache Daffodil community has voted and approved the proposed release of Apache Daffodil (incubating) 3.0.0-rc1. We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release. Daffodil is an open source implementation of the DFDL specification that uses DFDL