On 04/16/2018 07:37 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> IMO, it is inappropriate to add project managers to a project as a committer
> just because they are employed by a company that has committers who are paid
> to work on the project.
There are some companies who have a person whose sole duty is manage
On 04/11/2018 06:11 PM, Maxime Beauchemin wrote:
> 3. The mailing list is a bit dated. I'm saying "a bit" here as an attempt ...
> searchable. Something like Google Groups would be a huge step forward here.
I'd suggest Groups.IO over Google Groups, if only because one of its
features is:
On 02/12/2018 11:24 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> (1) PODLINGNAMESEARCH may not be needed.
Sometime in 1995/1996 time frame, "Seattle Storm Woman's Basketball" was
granted a registered trademark.
In 1996, The Seattle Storm Woman's Basketball team had a losing season.
In 1997, The Seattle Storm
On 2 February 2017 4:20:43 pm PST, "John D. Amen wrote:
> I am calling a vote to retire them.
Does retirement mean that source code is no longer available?
One description that I read implied that it was deleted, whilst a set on
instructions implied that it was retained.
> It was confirmed
On 12/11/2016 04:09, Gunnar Tapper wrote:
> For documentation, I couldn't find an easy way to do multi-chapter books,
If AOo is meant, use Master Documents.
There are a couple of use cases (^1 ), where Master Documents don't
work. In those instances, virtually every solution will fail. (^2)
>
On 11/11/2016 07:46, Gunnar Tapper wrote:
> there's a clear preference to use Apache OpenOffice for documentation.
The driving force behind that was Sun's insistence that their own dog
food be eaten.
> Beyond usability (and therefore more willingness to document), it also makes
> translation
On 29/09/2016 04:01, Henry Saputra wrote:
> The project will be forked off the existing Titan code base.
That is a red flag.
jonathon
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands,
Greg wrote:
>Second big example is SourceForge.net hosting the AOO binaries.
If you are going to cite AOo as an example, then
http://templates.services.openoffice.org/ provides an example of how
easily things spin out of control,
when third parties take primary responsibility for distribution of
On 22/09/2016 05:18, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> had a non-trivial amount of commits to then Sun NetBeans between 2002-2008.
> He then drifted away from the
> project but would be interested, potentially, re-engaging.
Is it possible to create a "master list' of everybody who has
contributed, when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20/01/2016 11:18, Henri Yandell wrote:
> 'TM'?
Translation Memory.
jonathon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWn8SIAAoJEKG7hs8nSMR7h8EP/01XxxF896gbhRJBhlv5ng0J
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20/01/2016 03:38, Henri Yandell wrote:
> License-wise, any expectation of problems from the GPL and LGPL depend
encies?
I'd also recommend closely examining the license for any TM libraries
that ship with the program, with a focus on the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15/01/2016 23:24, Nick Kew wrote:
> Would it make sense to append the trademark assignment to a forthcomin
g software grant?
My recommendation would be to do the trademark assignment as one grant,
and the software assignment as a second grant.
On 15/11/2015 18:20, Marko Rodriguez wrote:
> 1. There is no need to have philosophical arguments (not grounded in
> measurables) about what rules a project should follow (bounded by law).
"Healthy" is intrinsically subjective, and as such, unmeasurable,
leading to even more debates as
On 03/09/15 01:51, Ian C wrote:
> I'm not sure on the numbers or the details. It would be a shame to alienate
> them.
The earliest mention of going to the attic on the ODF-Toolkit Users list
was on 21 January 2014.
On 02/09/15 10:25, John D. Ament wrote:
> I'd like to bring to your attention the ODF Toolkit podling.
This project has been torn between going to the attic, or becoming a
sub-project of another project, since at least January 2014.
IMNSHO, it should go to the attic, with Apache Corinthia
On 07/26/2015 04:35 PM, jan i wrote:
unless we don't trust the mentors
It isn't a case of not trusting the mentors, but rather, the ease with
which something can be accidentally overlooked.
Rephrased. The mentor is too close to the project, to see all of the
errors in the project.
jonathon
On 07/04/2015 04:53 PM, Stefan Reich wrote:
How about taking something good that WANTS TO EXIST, and supporting that?
I didn't know that software was sentient.
If you meant software that somebody wants to exist, I can point you to
thousands of projects that got no further than a name, a
On 06/18/2015 04:34 PM, Stefan Reich wrote:
You're not a lawyer, but you let software development be controlled by
lawyers?
Failing to follow the advice of lawyers can have extremely expensive,
and even more unpleasant consequences.
The procedures setup by the Apache Software Foundation are
On 18/05/2015 18:35, Stefan Reich wrote:
All you'd have to do is connect programmers to projects. Simple. Why all the
rules?
Risk Avoidance.
The rules are designed to protect both the programmers, and the
projects. They define/describe what is expected of each party, their
rights, and their
On 4/5/2014 8:08 AM, Rob Vesse wrote:
entirely by myself though obviously Cray holds the copyright.
That little datapoint is not obvious at all.
Whether or not that is the case depends upon the specific wording of
your contract with Cray, your legal jurisdiction, Cray's legal
jurisdiction,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/06/2011 08:02, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
AIUI the TDF uses the LGPL. Like the Apache License (AL), the LGPL
also allows proprietary software to be built on top. So, why would you
break your rule for a TDF project but not an ASF one?
It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/06/2011 19:22, Sam Ruby wrote:
Note: I did not read it that way (I think it is quite plausible and
I read it as a bona fide attempt by IBM to shove the project down the
throat of The Apache Foundation.
I hope we don't need to deliberate for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/06/2011 13:58, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Because Apache will own the brand, we can make access to the brand
contingent on things like non-abuse of our OOo forums, among other
things.
ROTFLMAO
At best, you are incredibly naive. Those policies will
23 matches
Mail list logo
