Re: [DISCUSS] [REVISED] Mentor neutrality policy

> On Oct 11, 2015, at 2:39 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > > The revised edition, as partly suggested by Sam (and echoed by Bertrand) > was: > > - Binding votes on incubation, graduation and/or retirement are only > valid when given by members of the IPMC who are independent

Re: [VOTE] Accept Concerted into the Apache Incubator

I’m not sure this needs to be resolved before the polling can be accepted into the Incubator. Regards, Alan > On Oct 9, 2015, at 2:01 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > I have agreed to be a mentor to Concerted and I think it is an > interesting idea. I am inclined to vote for it

Re: [VOTE] Accept Concerted into the Apache Incubator

+1 - binding Regards, Alan > On Oct 9, 2015, at 8:55 AM, Atri Sharma wrote: > > Hi all, > > Following the discussion about Concerted I would like to call a vote for > accepting Concerted as a new incubator project. > > The proposal text is included below, and available on

Re: Require projects to have solid API docs

Should != Must Regards, Alan > On Oct 11, 2015, at 11:49 AM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > Per [1], "Apache projects should provide sufficient documentation [… so that > … ] users can both make use of our software freely”. > > And: "users of Apache software should be able to find

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentor neutrality policy

> On Oct 9, 2015, at 8:36 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > > Personally I would focus more on better oversight of podling and mentor > activity. The goal is to catch the occasional problem case rather than put > restrictions in place. I'm not sure how to do that though. I

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentor neutrality policy

I’m -1 on on this. The whole premise of the ASF is that it is a meritocracy and that volunteers at various “levels” of the organization have attained their status because they are trustworthy. Without this premise, the ASF falls apart. Finally, it’s not clear to me that this addresses the

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentor neutrality policy

> On Oct 9, 2015, at 11:02 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: >>> ...Furthermore, I would like to see this

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentor neutrality policy

> On Oct 9, 2015, at 12:18 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > > I would imagine no one would object to a policy that says you cannot > have a binding vote if you have a financial interest in graduating a > podling, I would. People on the IPMC and ASF are supposed to be

Re: Require projects to have solid API docs

> On Oct 11, 2015, at 9:20 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <l...@toolazydogs.com> wrote: >> Should != Must > > Yes, I know. But I didn't want to have everyone leap into yet another > long-w

Re: [POLL] Using this list to discuss pTLP proposals, ok?

On Mar 22, 2015, at 9:32 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: My preference would be to ask pTLP advocates which public list they want to use. Creating a new public mailing list is an option, though the low visibility of a new list makes such an option less than ideal and the

Re: [APPROVE] The March MRQL report

Crikey, this went into my junk mail folder. Signed off. Regards, Alan On Mar 7, 2015, at 6:04 AM, Leonidas Fegaras fega...@cse.uta.edu wrote: Dear MRQL mentors, This is a reminder to approve the MRQL report. Please edit it and approve it at: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2015

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Singa as incubator project

+1 Regards, Alan On Mar 10, 2015, at 7:33 AM, Thejas Nair thejas.n...@gmail.com wrote: The Singa Incubator Proposal document has been updated based on feedback in the proposal thread. This vote is proposing the inclusion of Apache Singa as incubator project. The vote will run for at

Re: [VOTE] Accept CommonsRDF into the Apache Incubator

+1 - binding Regards, Alan On Feb 27, 2015, at 11:19 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com wrote: The VOTE is therefore as follows [ ] +1 I am happy with Commons RDF entering incubation [ ] +0/-0 I am neither yay or nay [ ] -1 I am not happy with this proposal

Re: Dudes: save some of your pTLP energy and review this friggin' release!!!!

, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:20 AM Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: Pretty please? :D Regards, Alan On Feb 24, 2015, at 4:42 AM, Leonidas Fegaras fega...@cse.uta.edu wrote: Hello, This vote is open for more than a week and we still need one more IPMC vote. Could somebody help us

Dudes: save some of your pTLP energy and review this friggin' release!!!!

Pretty please? :D Regards, Alan On Feb 24, 2015, at 4:42 AM, Leonidas Fegaras fega...@cse.uta.edu wrote: Hello, This vote is open for more than a week and we still need one more IPMC vote. Could somebody help us her? Thanks Leonidas Fegaras On 02/22/2015 01:00 PM, Alan D. Cabrera

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache MRQL 0.9.4 incubating (RC2)

Ping :) Regards, Alan On Feb 18, 2015, at 7:22 PM, Leonidas Fegaras fega...@cse.uta.edu wrote: Hello, This release still needs one more IPMC vote. (We got +1 IPMC votes from Alan Cabrera and Justin Mclean). It would be greatly appreciated If someone could take a look at our release and

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache AsterixDB in to the Incubator

+1 binding Regards, Alan On Feb 19, 2015, at 9:38 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: That said, I would like to propose Apache AsterixDB as an Incubator project. I am now calling a VOTE to accept AsterixDB into the Apache Incubator. This VOTE will run for

Re: [VOTE] Accept Myriad into the Apache Incubator

+1 binding Regards, Alan On Feb 21, 2015, at 9:34 PM, Adam Bordelon a...@mesosphere.io wrote: Hello friends, After receiving a positive response on the discussion thread, and even a new Mentor (Luciano), I would like to call a VOTE to accept Myriad into the Apache Incubator. I will end

Re: my pTLP view

On Jan 27, 2015, at 6:58 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: In short, the pTLP designation is a bit too opaque So you mean all TLPs should have status labels? Might be useful

Re: [DISCUSS] Solicitation for IPMC Chair nomination

On Jan 26, 2015, at 10:45 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: Hi! after making sure that there's still an Incubator to be managed for the next 6-12 months, I'd like to open up a discussion thread on soliciting nominations for the next IPMC Chair. Feel free to self-nominate or

Re: [DISCUSS] Solicitation for IPMC Chair nomination

On Jan 26, 2015, at 10:57 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: Things to keep in mind while thinking about nominating yourself or others: 1. This is a 6-12 months commitment that, based on my

Re: my pTLP view

TL;DR I think this is a good idea. I thought long and hard about this during the weekend and I’ve changed my mind about this; I’ll spare you my handwringing thought processes. Some things that I personally would like to see: - do away w/ the pTLP name, just make it a regular TLP - ComDev

Re: Next steps for various proposals (mentor re-boot, pTLP, etc.)

On Jan 21, 2015, at 3:39 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 4:03 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Chris Douglas cdoug...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:57 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz

Re: Next steps for various proposals (mentor re-boot, pTLP, etc.)

On Jan 19, 2015, at 11:57 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:37 AM, Chris Douglas cdoug...@apache.org wrote: ...So make a list of the IPMC members you believe should judge the other 90%, and submit a proposal to the board to start a new

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache AsterixDB Incubator

Should be fine. Regards, Alan On Jan 19, 2015, at 8:27 PM, Till Westmann t...@westmann.org wrote: Thank you. So for we’ve added 3 slots for mentors on the proposal - I hope that’ll be sufficient even for the relatively large number of new committers. Till On Jan 19, 2015, at 8:17

Re: Next steps for various proposals (mentor re-boot, pTLP, etc.)

Can you add your concerns to the end each of the wiki pages? I intend to update my proposal to clear up the apprehensions that you seem to have. You can then remove/amend your concerns from the wiki proposal. I will quickly state that “naughty lists” are not part of the mentor-reboot

Is there a place I can programmatically pull in PPMC members?

Is there a place I can programmatically pull in PPMC members? Regards, Alan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Is there a place I can programmatically pull in PPMC members?

) The part you looking for produces https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/committee/incubator Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc. A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation -Original Message- From: Alan D. Cabrera [mailto:l...@toolazydogs.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 10:58 AM

Re: Is there a place I can programmatically pull in PPMC members?

of Microsoft Corporation -Original Message- From: Alan D. Cabrera [mailto:a...@toolazydogs.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 11:17 AM To: infrastructure-...@apache.org Cc: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Is there a place I can programmatically pull in PPMC members? This seems

Re: Next steps for various proposals (mentor re-boot, pTLP, etc.)

On Jan 16, 2015, at 3:04 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote: Or we could just do it We debated plenty. Three proposals came out of it (two if you look at mine as the strawman it was intended to be). Those proposals are not mutually exclusive. I say

Re: Final draft of IPMC report for January 2015

On Jan 14, 2015, at 11:37 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: With that said, I do agree that a board report is not the appropriate venue for the Weegee paddy wagon parade. What would be more useful and more easily digested is a general top level opaque metric, e.g. 55

Re: Final draft of IPMC report for January 2015

On Jan 14, 2015, at 10:56 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote: What does it mean to didn't sign-off does it mean they refused to sign-off or that they simply didn't tick a box? Does it mean they didn't even read the report or that they didn't tick a box?

Re: Next steps for various proposals (mentor re-boot, pTLP, etc.)

On Jan 14, 2015, at 8:48 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: Hi! at this point we have had a few lively threads discussing three somewhat different proposals: #1 mentor re-boot https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MentorRebootProposal

Re: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] Accept OpenAz (Access Control Tools) into the Apache Incubator

+1 binding Regards, Alan On Jan 5, 2015, at 10:15 AM, Hal Lockhart hal.lockh...@oracle.com wrote: I call a vote to accept OpenAz as a new Incubator project. The proposal can be found here: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenAZProposal and is included below in this email.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache REEF 0.10.0-incubating

On Jan 10, 2015, at 7:14 PM, Byung-Gon Chun bgc...@gmail.com wrote: The Apache REEF PPMC has voted to release Apache REEF 0.10.0-incubating based on the release candidate described below. Now it is the IPMC's turn to vote. Here's the PPMC voting result (five binding +1 votes):

Re: [VOTE][Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework [RE-SUBMISSION]

+1 binding Regards, Alan On Jan 9, 2015, at 8:58 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea hzbar...@gmail.com wrote: +1 From the conversation with Marko, he intended to submit this as a formal vote, but didn't use the regular voting template. Voting will remain open until at least January 15, 2015 18:00

Re: proposal: mentor re-boot

On Jan 8, 2015, at 10:06 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote: +1 All we care about is that the podling has an active mentor who knows when to ask for support and gets that support when they need it. Following that statement to a logical conclusion, all

Re: proposal: mentor re-boot

On Jan 7, 2015, at 8:18 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: What has changed in the last year and a half is that we no longer ignore it when podlings fail to report -- we put them into monthly and review the situation month to month. Between that and requiring Mentor

Re: proposal: mentor re-boot

On Jan 7, 2015, at 12:13 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MentorRebootProposal From that page: People who wish to become mentors that are not in the IPMC

Re: proposal: mentor re-boot

On Jan 7, 2015, at 11:35 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote: On Wed, Jan 7, 2015, at 06:46 PM, jan i wrote: On 7 January 2015 at 19:32, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: On Jan 7, 2015, at 10:13 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote: On 07.01.2015 18:42, Alan D

Re: proposal: mentor re-boot

On Jan 7, 2015, at 12:54 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: The Incubator has made important progress. I want to quickly acknowledge that we have made immense, immense, progress thanks in no small part to our IPMC chairs over the years. A lot of hard work was done

Re: proposal: mentor re-boot

On Jan 7, 2015, at 1:45 PM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote: One wording that could confuse people: after which they are removed from the PMC unless they are committers. If someone already a PMC, he or she is also a committer. In ASF a committer is someone who can commit code

Re: proposal: mentor re-boot

On Jan 7, 2015, at 10:13 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote: On 07.01.2015 18:42, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: I’ve written up a more comprehensive proposal that would not only hold mentors accountable but also give them a fair bit of autonomous authority during releases. https

proposal: mentor re-boot

I’ve written up a more comprehensive proposal that would not only hold mentors accountable but also give them a fair bit of autonomous authority during releases. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MentorRebootProposal https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MentorRebootProposal What we would gain is

Re: Incubator report sign-off

On Dec 29, 2014, at 6:40 AM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: 3. patch the current process with starting to drop the mentors from the project who don't sign off. This will essentially serve as a heartbeat for mentors (now, in my opinion it'll quickly

Re: pTLP, concretely

On Jan 5, 2015, at 4:20 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: For your reading and wrangling pleasure, I offer: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorV2. The goal of this exercise is to turn the idea of the pTLP into a practical alternative. By 'practical', I mean:

Re: Incubator report sign-off

On Dec 22, 2014, at 8:42 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: 1. get rid of IPMC altogether and move to the pTLP model This is effectively an IPMC reboot. I don’t really see anything substantially different. 2. make this a poddling issue: if a poddling fails to hunt down

Re: Incubator report sign-off

On Dec 19, 2014, at 9:10 AM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: I noted in my comments on the recent Incubator board report that I am concerned, month after month, at the number of podlings that have no mentor sign-off at all, as well as the ones where a minority of the mentors

Re: Volunteer to Shepherd

On Dec 18, 2014, at 9:32 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 7:33 PM, P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@apache.org wrote: I’d like to volunteer to help out as a shepherd. Super!

Re: pTLP, concretely

On Jan 5, 2015, at 6:15 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: On Jan 5, 2015, at 5:38 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: On Jan 5, 2015, at 4:20 AM, Benson Margulies

Re: [DISCUSS] Rolling shepherds?

On Dec 9, 2014, at 6:30 PM, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org wrote: The following shepherds either did not provide, or did provide but saw no issues to comment on within their podlings: - Alan Cabrera I am committed to reviewing the podlings for which I am a mentor. For other

Re: Incubator report sign-off

On Jan 5, 2015, at 8:22 AM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 5:05 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: On Dec 22, 2014, at 8:42 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: 1. get rid of IPMC altogether and move to the pTLP model

Re: Reflections from the outgoing Chair

On Dec 31, 2014, at 5:26 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: when a honor of the IPMC chair was bestowed on me beginning of 2014 it was crucial that the position remains to be rotated among IPMC members. As an aside: while Marvin felt that the ideal rotation period was 6 month my

Re: Podlings should be in charge of their mentors (was: Incubator report sign-off)

On Jan 5, 2015, at 9:21 AM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: The tracking part is easy, though. What's difficult is the part that would require us to do something with poddlings put on hold. Unless we come up with clear exit criteria for this new state -- I don't think we're

Re: Podlings should be in charge of their mentors (was: Incubator report sign-off)

On Jan 5, 2015, at 9:14 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I'm resending Alan's proposal with a new subject as I think it deserves more attention. On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: ...Podlings would be required to have

Re: Podlings should be in charge of their mentors (was: Incubator report sign-off)

On Jan 5, 2015, at 10:22 AM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: On Jan 5, 2015, at 9:21 AM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: The tracking part is easy, though. What's difficult is the part

Re: Podlings should be in charge of their mentors (was: Incubator report sign-off)

On Jan 5, 2015, at 10:26 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: On Monday, January 5, 2015, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','l...@toolazydogs.com'); wrote: On Jan 5, 2015, at 9:21 AM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: The tracking part is easy

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Samza from the Incubator

+1 binding Regards, Alan On Dec 12, 2014, at 3:54 PM, Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote: [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Samza from the Incubator. [ ] +0 Don't care. [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Samza from the Incubator because ...

Re: [VOTE] accept SAMOA into incubator

+1 binding Regards, Alan On Dec 11, 2014, at 10:02 AM, Daniel Dai dai...@gmail.com wrote: Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept SAMOA as a new Incubator project. [ ] +1 Accept SAMOA into the Incubator [ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of SAMOA [ ] -1 Do not

Re: Mail command to allow marvin emails

On Nov 25, 2014, at 3:03 AM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote: On 24/11/14 17:39, John D. Ament wrote: On Mon Nov 24 2014 at 10:29:02 AM Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote: On 24/11/14 14:35, John D. Ament wrote: Does anyone know the mail command to send out to allow marvin

Roman or IPMC members who are VPs...

Only Roman or IPMC members who are VPs can run the commands outlined in http://wiki.apache.org/general/Jenkins#How_do_I_get_an_account Regards, Alan On Nov 24, 2014, at 4:11 PM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote: Mentors, if incubator project can use the Jenkins, Please add

Re: Access to incubator wiki.

Ahh! Same here. The odd thing is that it seems to remember my “old” userid and so I’m able to edit the Incubator wiki pages. Regards, Alan On Nov 25, 2014, at 10:10 AM, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org wrote: Hmmm that happened to you too? I found that my account was missing from the

Re: SVN Access Rights question

I suspect that only Roman and other VPs can do this. Regards, Alan On Nov 25, 2014, at 10:23 AM, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org wrote: Hi, Does anyone know what access rights are required to be able to add a podling to SVN here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ I tried

Re: Mail command to allow marvin emails

It’s too bad that this can’t be automated when a podling is added. I have a ticket waiting in INFRA to add a REST API to Hermes to allow such a thing. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8006 Maybe people can up-vote it? :) Regards, Alan On Nov 24, 2014, at 7:28 AM, Tim Ellison

Re: Incubator website guide

On Nov 24, 2014, at 1:49 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: Following http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html, I ran 'ant' (and also build.sh) after adding nifi to podlings.xml and added the nifi.xml fille. It didn't produce any changed files to commit. Is the guide

Re: Proposals - wiki required?

On Nov 22, 2014, at 6:16 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote: All, The current way the proposal page is written, the wiki for proposals is optional. I don't think this is the case any longer, since it looks like we request that all proposals get put there first. Other IPMC

Re: Proposals - wiki required?

Nov 23 2014 at 9:42:28 AM Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: On Nov 22, 2014, at 6:16 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote: All, The current way the proposal page is written, the wiki for proposals is optional. I don't think this is the case any longer, since it looks

How do reporting groups get assigned?

How do reporting groups get assigned to podlings? Regards, Alan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Report Timeline Report Manager for December

On Nov 22, 2014, at 7:16 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote: I know this is a few days early, but considering we have a few holidays popping up I wanted to send it earlier than later. If we get any new podlings in the next few days we can add them to the report. I'm wondering

Re: [VOTE] accept NiFi into the incubator

+1 - binding On Nov 21, 2014, at 10:55 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful and positive conversation, so I offer this vote. Vote will be open for the usual 72 hours ... Here is my [+1]

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kylin into the Apache Incubator

+1 binding Regards, Alan On Nov 20, 2014, at 2:31 PM, Luke Han luke...@gmail.com wrote: Following the discussion earlier in the thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201411.mbox/%3ccakmqrob22+n+r++date33f3pcpyujhfoeaqrms3t-udjwk6...@mail.gmail.com%3e I would

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache MetaModel from the Incubator

+1 - binding On Nov 13, 2014, at 9:39 PM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, The Apache MetaModel community has wrapped up the VOTE to propose for graduation from Apache incubator. The VOTE passed with result: 9 binding +1s zero 0s zero -1s (http://bit.ly/1u8n8eo)

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tamaya for Incubation

+1 Regards, Alan On Nov 10, 2014, at 4:19 PM, Anatole Tresch atsti...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Thanks for the feedback thus far on the Tamaya proposal. Based on prior discussion, I'd like to start the vote for Tamaya to be accepted as a new incubator project. The proposal can be

Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Nov 2014 ([ppmc])

On Oct 29, 2014, at 9:21 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: On Oct 29, 2014, at 9:08 AM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote: On 27/10/14 14:15, Marvin wrote: Dear podling, This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator PMC

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.7.0-incubating

This doesn’t seem to exist. Does that matter? Regards, Alan On Oct 22, 2014, at 12:29 AM, Robert Metzger rmetz...@apache.org wrote: The staging repository for this release can be found at: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1016

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.7.0-incubating

I ran rat and found that there are a number of Markdown, HTML, Scala archetype files that don’t seem to have the proper license header. Regards, Alan On Oct 22, 2014, at 12:29 AM, Robert Metzger rmetz...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, This is our second try to release Flink 0.7.0-incubating.

Re: [VOTE] Accept Taverna into the Apache Incubator

+1 - binding I assume that you mean Taverna instead of Lens. Regards, Alan On Oct 16, 2014, at 8:54 AM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote: Following the discussion earlier in the thread: https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg45241.html I would like to call a

Re: [VOTE] Accept Lens into the Apache Incubator (earlier called Grill)

+1 - binding Regards, Alan On Oct 6, 2014, at 4:51 AM, Sharad Agarwal sha...@apache.org wrote: Following the discussion earlier in the thread https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg45208.html I would like to call a Vote for accepting Lens as a new incubator project.

Re: October reporting

I'm happy to do it again. Regards, Alan On Oct 4, 2014, at 2:15 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: Hi! I am just wondering if this month I'll be as lucky as the previous few and could rely on excellent work of report manager volunteers to fill out the October report. As

76 character widths for board reports?

Is this really necessary? Speaking as one who actually coded on punched cards on an octal based computer, I feel indignant that you young whippersnappers don't appreciate the hard won freedoms us older coders have brought to the younger generations. Regards, Alan

Re: September report

Busy night last night. Hoping to do it this morning. Regards, Alan On Sep 7, 2014, at 10:33 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: Also, if there's anybody planning on creating a summary -- please let me

Re: September report

Filled in a fair bit. I can’t get back to fill in the rest of the bits until later this afternoon. Regards, Alan On Sep 8, 2014, at 5:45 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: Busy night last night. Hoping to do it this morning. Regards, Alan On Sep 7, 2014, at 10:33 PM

Re: Tooling friendly incubator report

for incubator as we are for board reports, etc. Just a thought, Upayavira On Wed, Sep 3, 2014, at 10:33 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: On Sep 3, 2014, at 2:11 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: So how about

Re: Tooling friendly incubator report

On Sep 2, 2014, at 5:49 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: On Aug 24, 2014, at 2:16 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l

Re: Tooling friendly incubator report

On Sep 3, 2014, at 2:11 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: So how about creating the web form but having it generate text which can be inserted into the wiki template? That would allow us to tune the

September 2014 Incubator report timeline

September 2014 Incubator report timeline: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/September2014 Wed September 03 -- Podling reports due by end of day Sun September 07 -- Shepherd reviews due by end of day Sun September 07 -- Summary due by end of day Tue September 09 -- Mentor signoff

Re: Tooling friendly incubator report

On Aug 24, 2014, at 2:16 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: but its just my opinion, and if incubator is used to work differently, I will not be the one to propose big changes. This is pretty much

Re: Tooling friendly incubator report

On Aug 24, 2014, at 2:35 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: Here's a first sketch of a YAML based incubator report I suggest that those who wish to refactor how the Incubator report is done first

Re: Tooling friendly incubator report

there? - Brett On 25 Aug 2014, at 5:47 am, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: Here's a first sketch of a YAML based incubator report https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportFormat I'm writing some tooling for editing and report generating in: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf

Re: Mentors heartbeat

On Aug 24, 2014, at 9:06 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: I am a programmer and like formats like JSON, but it is true that the world does not only consist of programmers, so I suggest we make 2 webpages: - one page that create/modify the report and update svn with the JSON

Re: Mentors heartbeat

On Aug 24, 2014, at 10:51 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: I am not so sure if its worth while with the board report. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. Having the board report in machine readable formats provides the same advantages as that afforded

Tooling friendly incubator report

Here's a first sketch of a YAML based incubator report https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportFormat I'm writing some tooling for editing and report generating in: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/labs/panopticon This is by no means the only way we can modify this file. The idea is to be

Re: Tooling friendly incubator report

On Aug 24, 2014, at 12:54 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: On 24 August 2014 21:47, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: Here's a first sketch of a YAML based incubator report https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportFormat looks good, but 2 questions arise after a brief look

How many podlings are being incubated?

Lookse like we need to update podling.xml. The August report states 31. My tooling states 33: Argus Aurora BatchEE Blur Brooklyn Celix DataFu DeviceMap Drill Droids Falcon Fleece Flink Hadoop Development Tools Kalumet log4cxx2 MetaModel MRQL NPanday ODF Toolkit Optiq Parquet REEF Ripple Samza

Re: Tooling friendly incubator report

On Aug 24, 2014, at 1:26 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: On 24 August 2014 22:00, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: On Aug 24, 2014, at 12:54 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: On 24 August 2014 21:47, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: Here's a first sketch

Re: Tooling friendly incubator report

On Aug 24, 2014, at 2:35 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: Here's a first sketch of a YAML based incubator report I suggest that those who wish to refactor how the Incubator report is done first

Re: Tooling friendly incubator report

On Aug 24, 2014, at 2:16 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: but its just my opinion, and if incubator is used to work differently, I will not be the one to propose big changes. This is pretty much

Re: Mentors heartbeat

This is pretty cool but I think it underscores the need to get off of free form files that need to be scraped. I think that maybe for future reports we can have a JSON file in svn that people can update. We could then have our report automatically generated from the JSON file for the board

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Storm to a TLP

+1 binding Regards, Alan On Aug 18, 2014, at 2:02 PM, P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@apache.org wrote: Apache Storm has been incubating since September 2014. Since then we have added 3 additional committers (with another 2 approved and pending account creation), and performed two releases. The

Re: [VOTE] Accept REEF into the Apache Incubator

+1 binding Regards, Alan On Aug 8, 2014, at 10:40 PM, Byung-Gon Chun bgc...@gmail.com wrote: Let's keep this vote open for three business days, closing the voting on August 11, 11:59PM (PDT). [] +1 Accept REEF into the Incubator [] 0 Don't care [] -1 Don't accept REEF because...

  1   2   3   4   5   >