Re: [VOTE] Accept Druid into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Thks, Amol E:a...@datatorrent.com | M: 510-449-2606 | Twitter: @*amolhkekre* www.datatorrent.com On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Chris Mattmann wrote: > +1 binding. > > Thanks, > Chris > > > > On 2/22/18, 11:04 AM, "Julian Hyde"

Re: [DISCUSS] Druid incubation proposal

+1. Great to see Druid joining ASF. Thks, Amol E:a...@datatorrent.com | M: 510-449-2606 | Twitter: @*amolhkekre* www.datatorrent.com On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 8:57 AM, Brian McCallister wrote: > +1 - glad to see Druid finally (hopefully) landing here! > > On Wed, Feb 21,

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Thks Amol On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) wrote: > +1 non binding > > > > > On 11/10/16, 10:07 AM, "Myrle Krantz" wrote: > > >+1 non binding > > > >-Myrle > > > >> On 10 Nov 2016, at 19:04, John D. Ament

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

+1 Thks Amol On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Nitin Lamba wrote: > +1! > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Niall Pemberton > > wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno > wrote: > > > > > I was looking at

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Twill as Top Level Project

+1 (non-binding) Thks Amol On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:27 PM, James Taylor wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Thursday, June 2, 2016, Andrew Purtell wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Henry Saputra >

Re: [DICSUSS] Graduation of Apache Twill as Top Level Project

+1 (non-binding) Thks, Amol On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > +1 binding > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Henry Saputra > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > The Apache Twill PPMCs and the community had discussed and voted to > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept CarbonData into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Thks Amol On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 5:53 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Thx for the feedback... > > I change my vote to +1 (binding) > > On May 27, 2016, at 1:46 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > > Hi Jim, > > > > good point. Let me try to

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Thks Amol On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 6:35 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Daniel Gruno wrote on 5/24/16 1:56 AM: > > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > > accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in

Re: [VOTE] Accept Gossip into the Apache Incubator

+1 Thks, Amol On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Josh Elser wrote: > +1 (binding) > > P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > >> Following the discussion thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to >> accept Gossip into the Apache Incubator. >> >> The Gossip proposal can be found here [2]

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Johnzon from the Incubator

+1 Thks Amol On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 4:10 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 3:49 PM Hendrik Dev wrote: > > > The Apache Johnzon community has discussed and voted on graduation to > > a top level project. The vote passed

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apex from the Incubator

ng such office to > > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair > > of the Apache Apex Project, and to have primary responsibility > > for management of the projects within the scope of > > responsibility of the Apache Apex Project; and be it further > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Omid into the Apache Incubator

+1 Thks Amol On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > +1 (binding) -C > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Daniel Dai wrote: > > Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept Omid as > > a new Incubator project. > > > > [

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quarks into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non binding) Thks Amol On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:28 AM, Bhupesh Chawda wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks. > -Bhupesh > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Sandeep Deshmukh > > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Regards, > > Sandeep >

Re: [VOTE] Accept the iota project into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Thks Amol On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Naresh Agarwal wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks > Naresh Agarwal > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Bruno Mahé wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On 01/16/2016 12:12 PM, Hadrian

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Amol On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 8:02 AM, Ryan Merriman wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > > On 12/4/15, 10:00 AM, "james sirota" > wrote: > > >+1 (non-binding) > > From: Billie Rinaldi > > To:

Re: [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Amol On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 12:44 AM, Tom White wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Tom > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Henry Robinson > wrote: > > Hi - > > > > The [DISCUSS] thread has been quiet for a few days, so I think there's > been

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Amol On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 3:19 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like > to > > call a VOTE on

Re: [VOTE] Apache Apex Malhar Release 3.2.0-incubating (RC2)

+1 (non-binding) I too am carrying over vote from dev. Did my testing too. Thks Amol On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 (binding) > > Carry over vote from dev list, didi all of the usual checks. > > Thanks, > Justin > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Apex Core Release 3.2.0-incubating (RC2)

+1 (binding) // already voted on PPMC Thks Amol On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Thomas Weise wrote: > Hi, > > Please vote on the following Apache Apex Core 3.2.0-incubating release > candidate. This is the first release after incubation. This is a source > release. > > The

Re: [IP Clearance] Alibaba JStorm

+1 (non-binding) Amol On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 1:13 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > Apache Storm has received a code donation for Alibaba JStorm: > > http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/storm-jstorm.html > > The source code can be found at

Re: [VOTE] Accept Concerted into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Amol On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Atri Sharma wrote: > Hi all, > > Following the discussion about Concerted I would like to call a vote for > accepting Concerted as a new incubator project. > > The proposal text is included below, and available on the

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Calcite from the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Thks Amol On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Seetharam Venkatesh < venkat...@innerzeal.com> wrote: > +1. > > Thanks, > Venkatesh > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 2:16 PM Henry Saputra > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Good job guys > > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at

Re: [VOTE] Accept HAWQ into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Amol On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > +1 (binding) > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [DISCUSS] Apex Incubation Proposal

Niall, Thanks for following up and resolving the ask. We will remove '_' from the keys. Thks, Amol On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 3:55 AM, Amol Kekre a...@datatorrent.com wrote: Niall, Thanks for catching. I

Re: [DISCUSS] Apex Incubation Proposal

, 2015, at 4:49 PM, Amol Kekre a...@datatorrent.com wrote: Niall, Thanks for following up and resolving the ask. We will remove '_' from the keys. Thks, Amol On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 3:55 AM

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apex into the Apache Incubator

at datatorrent dot com) * Sandesh Hegde (sandesh at datatorrent dot com) * Siyuan Hua ( siyuan at datatorrent dot com) * Ajith Joseph (ajoseph at silverspring dot com) * Amol Kekre ( amol at datatorrent dot com) * Chinmay Kolhatkar ( chinmay at datatorrent dot com) * Pramod Immaneni

Re: [DISCUSS] Apex Incubation Proposal

/11/15, 8:23 AM, Amol Kekre a...@datatorrent.com wrote: Ted, I agree that repo is more critical than jira instance. I am taking up your suggesstion with folks and should get back soon. Thks Amol On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 3:48 AM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: I personally

Re: [DISCUSS] Apex Incubation Proposal

Bertrand, Good point. I will take it up with folks and get back soon. Thks Amol On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 2:32 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 5:04 AM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: ...With such tight integration why ask for

Re: [DISCUSS] Apex Incubation Proposal

Ted, I agree that repo is more critical than jira instance. I am taking up your suggesstion with folks and should get back soon. Thks Amol On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 3:48 AM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: I personally see far less reason for separate JIRA instances than git repos.

Re: [DISCUSS] Apex Incubation Proposal

name in another reply. Thks, Amol On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Amol Kekre a...@datatorrent.com wrote: Bertrand, Good point. I will take it up with folks and get back soon. Thks Amol On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 2:32 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Aug 11

Re: [DISCUSS] Apex Incubation Proposal

- and malhar- to differentiate. Based on that, I have a slight preference for separate JIRA projects. However, I don't object to using a single unified JIRA project if others feel strongly about it. --Chris Nauroth On 8/11/15, 8:23 AM, Amol Kekre a...@datatorrent.com wrote: Ted, I agree

Re: [DISCUSS] Apex Incubation Proposal

, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Hitesh Shah hit...@apache.org wrote: If there isn’t a char limit on project names in JIRA, wouldn’t it just be better to use “APEX-CORE” and “APEX-MALHAR” to match the actual project names, repos, etc? thanks — Hitesh On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:25 PM, Amol Kekre

Re: [DISCUSS] Apex Incubation Proposal

Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Amol Kekre a...@datatorrent.com wrote: oh! We preferred that during our discussion. Somehow we thought there was a limit. I have changed it to full names (APEX-CORE, APEX-MALHAR). If there is a limit we can reduce

Re: [DISCUSS] Apex Incubation Proposal

Roman, Malhar has much faster release frequency. We have so far managed the discrepancy in release frequency with two repos. Malhar depends on a stable Apex branch. Operationally we found two repos to be very efficient. Same folks worked on both, so the coding roles are not separated. There may be

Re: [DISCUSS] Apex Incubation Proposal

and expressed interest in helping the community. Thks, Amol On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 7:12 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: Hi, On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:23 AM, Amol Kekre a...@datatorrent.com wrote: ...I would like to start a discussion on DataTorrent's core engine and its

Re: [DISCUSS] Apex Incubation Proposal

Bertrand Agreed. In incubator we will strive to achieve diversity, and inculcate habits to reflect and do discussions on apache dev list. Thks, Amol On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: Hi, On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Amol Kekre

Re: [DISCUSS] Apex Incubation Proposal

sense to treat them as a single project, not two. Thanks, Roman. On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Amol Kekre a...@datatorrent.com wrote: I would like to start a discussion on DataTorrent's core engine and its operators joining the ASF as an incubating project under the name Apex

[DISCUSS] Apex Incubation Proposal

) * Ajith Joseph (ajoseph at silverspring dot com) * Amol Kekre ( amol at datatorrent dot com) * Chinmay Kolhatkar ( chinmay at datatorrent dot com) * Pramod Immaneni ( pramod at datatorrent dot com) * Anuj Lal ( anuj dot lal at ge dot com) * Dongsu Lee (dlee3 at directv dot com

Need to be able to edit a page on wiki.apache.org

I want to create a wiki page for a proposal to incubate Apex with ASF. Can someone give me edit access for the following page? http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ApexProposal For those unfamiliar with Apex; it is an unified batch and stream processing compute platform native to Yarn that was open