Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 1.9.0

+1 (binding) overall. Looked through the src tarball. * Checked LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER * Hashes match * Signature matches * Incubator naming, no binary files (other than images) For future releases: the src tarball extracting to the current directory was surprising. The top-level INSTALL file

Re: [VOTE] Heron to enter Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) -C On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Bill Graham wrote: > Hi, > > Based on the discussion on the incubator mailing list[1] I would like to > call a vote to add Heron to the Apache Incubator. > > The full proposal is available below, and is also available on the

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Atlas Project from Incubator

+1 (binding) -C On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Suma Shivaprasad wrote: > Dear Incubator members, > > Following the discussion in Atlas community on graduating Apache Atlas from > incubation to a Top Level Project, starting this voting thread within > the incubator >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 1.8.0 (incubating)

+1 (binding) Verified checksum/signature; LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER look good. -C On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Bolke de Bruin wrote: > Hello Incubator PMC’ers, > > The Apache Airflow community has voted and approved the proposal to release > Apache Airflow 1.8.0

Re: [VOTE] Accept Hivemall into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) -C On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a > VOTE on accepting Hivemall into the Apache Incubator. > > [] +1 Accept Hivemall into the Apache Incubator > [] +0 Abstain. > [] -1 Do not accept

Re: [VOTE] Accept DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) -C On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Sijie Guo wrote: > Hello All, > > Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting > DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator. > > [] +1 Accept DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator > [] +0 Abstain. >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Omid into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) -C On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Daniel Dai wrote: > Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept Omid as > a new Incubator project. > > [ ] +1 Accept Omid into the Incubator > [ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Omid > [ ] -1 Do not accept

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) -C On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > Quickstep proposal was made available for discussion last week > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QuickstepProposal > and the feedback so far seems to be positive. > > Please vote to accept

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

+1 -C On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 7:26 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: > I understand the concern, so let me try to offer some facts and see if we can > make progress from there. > > Omid has been around for some time now, and its initial design appeared in a > couple of research

Re: [VOTE] Accept Joshua as an Apache Incubator Podling

+1 (binding) -C On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > OK the discussion is now completed. Please VOTE to accept Joshua > into the Apache Incubator. I’ll leave the VOTE open for at least > the next 72 hours, with hopes

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Myriad 0.1.0 (incubating)

+1 (binding) - Checksum/signature match (may want to collect these in a project KEYS file) - LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER lgtm May want to bump the Hadoop version in a later release, to pick up bug fixes after 2.7.0 (latest is 2.7.1, 2.7.2 should be released soon). -C On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 11:41

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) -C On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hi all, > > Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like to > call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The proposal is > pasted below and also available on the

Re: [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) -C On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Henry Robinson wrote: > Hi - > > The [DISCUSS] thread has been quiet for a few days, so I think there's been > sufficient opportunity for discussion around our proposal to bring Impala > to the ASF Incubator. > > I'd like to

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

RTC is regulation. That's not a synonym for control when it's conflated with suspicion of people. Regulation is a set of deliberate checks on a system. Good regulation estimates (or reacts to) a system's natural excesses, then attempts to constrain existential threats. It isn't a lack of trust,

Re: [VOTE] Graduate REEF

pache.org> > * Gyewon Lee <gw...@apache.org> > * Taegeon Um <taegeo...@apache.org> > * Joo Seong Jeong <jsja...@apache.org> > * Geon-Woo Kim <gw...@apache.org> > * Mariia Mykhailova <mar...@apache.org> > * Shr

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate REEF

* Mariia Mykhailova <mar...@apache.org> > * Shravan M Narayanamurthy <shra...@apache.org> > * Dongjoon Hyun <dongj...@apache.org> > * Sergiy Matusevych <mo...@apache.org> > * Tyson Condie <tcon...@apache.org> > * Chris

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate REEF

S], then > [VOTE] thread. > > Markus > > On 2015-11-02 13:56, Chris Douglas wrote: >> +1 (binding) -C >> >> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Markus Weimer <mar...@weimo.de> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> the Apache REEF podling has discussed[0

Re: [VOTE] Retire Kalumet (IPMC)

+1 -C On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Greetings, > > The Kalumet community has voted to retire: > > http://s.apache.org/fP > > This is a vote of the IPMC to confirm the decision to retire the podling. > > [ ] +1 to retire Kalumet from the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache REEF 0.13.0-incubating (rc1)

+1 (binding) Verified checksum, signature, and NOTICE/DISCLAIMER/LICENSE. Built from source, skimmed deps and checked projects I didn't recognize for license compat e.g., Tukaani (public domain). -C On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Mariia Mykhailova wrote: > The Apache

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentor neutrality policy

trick on me today and not > allowing me to see what I type. > > With regards, > Daniel. > > On 10/09/2015 08:03 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: >> What problem does this solve? >> >> This proposal lacks context. It implies that mentors are not neutral, >> and that the

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentor neutrality policy

What problem does this solve? This proposal lacks context. It implies that mentors are not neutral, and that they are motivated by interests not shared by the ASF. But it does not outline the merits of that belief, neither does it specify how this proposal would address them. Instead of allowing

Re: [VOTE] Accept HAWQ into the Apache Incubator

+1 -C On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Following the discussion earlier: >http://s.apache.org/Gaf > > I would like to call a VOTE for accepting HAWQ > as a new incubator project. > > The proposal is available at: >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apex into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) -C On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 7:48 AM, P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@apache.org wrote: Following the discussion thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE for Accepting Apex as a new Apache Incubator project. The proposal is available on the wiki [2] and is also attached below. The VOTE

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache REEF 0.12.0-incubating (rc2)

+1 (binding) Checksum/signature match Checked NOTICE/LICENSE/DISCLAIMER Built package target successfully Checked RAT -C On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 10:34 PM, Brian Cho chobr...@gmail.com wrote: The Apache REEF PPMC has voted to release Apache REEF 0.12.0-incubating based on the release candidate

Re: [DISCUSS] Diversity policy (WAS: Re: [DISCUSSION] Graduate Ignite from the Apache Incubator)

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote: If by this you mean the Incubator has taught the podling what it needs to know, and the podling is following the best practices of the Apache Way, then we are in full agreement. I don't see the need to single me out

Re: [DISCUSSION] Graduate Ignite from the Apache Incubator

Daniel- This has been discussed recently in graduations for Tez [1], Drill [2], and other projects whose continued incubation serves no purpose. They've completed a curriculum that clears their IP and introduces them to the ASF's infrastructure, procedures, and culture. The project must be open,

Re: Podling request: Gerrit

David- In another conversation, you mentioned Crucible [1] as another tool for code reviews. Is that a viable option? Has anyone on the list had any experience using it? -C [1] https://www.atlassian.com/software/crucible/overview/ On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 8:56 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us

Re: Podling request: Gerrit

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: As long as there's a human being in the loop reviewing what's going into the repo I don't think I've got any issues with the process. The ASF needs to establish provenance. It can't do that if a committer pushes code

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Lens 2.2.0-beta-incubating

+1 (binding) Verified checksum, signature on src/bin. Built package target from source. NOTICE/LICENSE/DISCLAIMER present, but I only did a cursory check of the dependencies. The DEPENDENCIES file at the top level of the source tarball is empty. -C On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Jaideep Dhok

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Atlas version 0.5-incubating

+1 (binding) Checksum, signature OK, DISCLAIMER/LICENSE/NOTICE look OK, compile from source works but the package target broke for me. -C On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 6:46 PM, Venkatesh Seetharam venkat...@apache.org wrote: Hello folks, This is a call for a vote on the Apache Atlas 0.5 incubating

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache REEF 0.11.0-incubating

+1 (binding) Verified checksum, signature, DISCLAIMER/LICENSE/NOTICE. Verified the build (on Linux). I also read through the dev@reef list to get a sense of the journey to RC8. Kudos to the REEF community for taking such care with their releases. -C On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Julia Wang

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Lens 2.1.0-beta-incubating

+1 (binding) -C On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 5:05 AM, Amareshwari Sriramdasu amareshw...@apache.org wrote: Hello everyone, This is the call for vote for the following RC to be released as official ApacheLens 2.1.0-beta-incubating release. This is our second release. Apache Lens provides an

Re: [VOTE] Accept Geode into the Apache Incubator

+1 -C On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: Following the discussion earlier in the thread: http://s.apache.org/Oxt I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Geode as a new incubator project. The proposal is available at:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lens 2.0.1-beta-incubating

+1 (binding, reiterated from dev@lens) -C On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Amareshwari Sriramdasu amareshw...@apache.org wrote: Hello everyone, This is the call for vote for the following RC to be released as official Apache Lens 2.0.1-beta-incubating release. This is our first release.

Re: [VOTE] Accept Myriad into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) -C On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Adam Bordelon a...@mesosphere.io wrote: Hello friends, After receiving a positive response on the discussion thread, and even a new Mentor (Luciano), I would like to call a VOTE to accept Myriad into the Apache Incubator. I will end the vote

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache AsterixDB in to the Incubator

+1 (binding) -C On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: Hi Everyone, OK, discussion has died down on this thread. I was originally suggesting that the pTLP option may be best for this community, but after some discussions with the

Re: IPMC/Incubator/Metors reform: where do we go from here

+1; this is a pragmatic proposal. -C On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: Hi! I think it would be fair to say that in the past month or so we've had a healthy amount of discussion around where to go next with IPMC/Incubator/Metors reform. A diverse set

Next steps for various proposals (mentor re-boot, pTLP, etc.)

On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:57 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org javascript:; wrote: How is that different from pruning the current IPMC membership by removing inactive members? Doing *that* would be straightforward. Take the set of mentors on currently incubating projects, add the

Re: Next steps for various proposals (mentor re-boot, pTLP, etc.)

I agree with Andrew. Creating a sub-board of the most vocal members of the IPMC distills its dysfunction. But this doesn't require consensus. The proposals focus on identifying the true members of the IPMC; clearly, the authors believe themselves to be among the elect. So make a list of the IPMC

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache REEF 0.10.0-incubating

+1 Checksum and signature match, RAT OK, source tarball builds cleanly. LICENSE/NOTICE lgtm, and I agree with Marvin w.r.t. the missing DISCLAIMER (can be fixed in subsequent releases). -C On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Byung-Gon Chun bgc...@gmail.com wrote: The Apache REEF PPMC has voted to

Re: Incubator report sign-off

+1 for Chris's proposal. Without diminishing the creativity applied to solving problems with the incubator, perhaps the better solution is to trade those problems for tractable ones. -C On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: And how could

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Samza from the Incubator

, Roman, Garry, Chris Douglas Non-binding +1s x 7: Claudio, TJ, Robert, Roger, Danny, Jon, Yi Links to votes and discussions: http://s.apache.org/samzaGradResult http://s.apache.org/samzaGradDiscuss Samza has been incubating for a bit more than a year. In that time the community has

Re: [VOTE] Release Samza version 0.8-incubating

+1 (binding) Verified signature and checksum, DISCLAIMER, NOTICE, and LICENSE look good (specifically, checked licensing for deps: jquery, bootstrap, glyphicons, and fontawesome). Minor nits: - the gradlew script and wrapper jar are missing from the top level (referenced in docs; not sure

Re: [VOTE] accept NiFi into the incubator

+1 -C On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful and positive conversation, so I offer this vote. Vote will be open for the usual 72 hours ... Here is my [+1]

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Falcon from the Incubator

+1 (binding) -C On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 5:48 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote: Hi all, We wrapped up the vote on the Apache Falcon dev list in which the community expressed its desire to graduate to a top-level project. The vote has passed with: 13 binding +1 votes 8

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Drill from the Incubator

I haven't tracked Drill during its incubation, so I read through some of the dev list, poked through the review board and JIRA, read from the wiki, and brought up the sample through its 10 minute tutorial. Drill seems to be a very approachable project. It has good docs (particularly for

Re: [VOTE] Accept Lens into the Apache Incubator (earlier called Grill)

+1 (binding) -C On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Sharad Agarwal sha...@apache.org wrote: Following the discussion earlier in the thread https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg45208.html I would like to call a Vote for accepting Lens as a new incubator project. The

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Falcon 0.5-incubating - RC6

+1 (binding) -C On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Srikanth Sundarrajan srik...@hotmail.com wrote: Have generated a new release candidate for Apache Falcon 0.5 post feedback from IPMC (Refer:

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Falcon 0.5-incubating - RC5

On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote: Sorry but it's -1 (binding) from me. Everything is good except that the jQuery has had an Apache license header added to it. (in ./html5-ui/js/jquery-1.11.0.min.js) If other incubator members think this isn't a

Re: Tooling friendly incubator report

On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: Would it be too much to ask to have YAML report *in addition* with the regular wiki? Let's stick with one report. When the new format is ready, we can ask podlings to learn it. We should be absolutely clear that it

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Storm to a TLP

+1 (binding) -C On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 2:02 PM, P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@apache.org wrote: Apache Storm has been incubating since September 2014. Since then we have added 3 additional committers (with another 2 approved and pending account creation), and performed two releases. The Storm

Re: [VOTE] Accept REEF into the Apache Incubator

* University of California: * Josh Rosen (Berkeley) * Tyson Condie (LA) * University of Washington: * Brandon Myers * Seoul National University: * Yunseong Lee * Taegeon Um * Youngseok Yang * Brian Cho * Byung-Gon Chun # Sponsors ## Champions Chris Douglas cdoug

Re: [VOTE] Argus as a new incubator project

+1 -C On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Owen O'Malley omal...@apache.org wrote: Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept Argus as a new Incubator project. The proposal draft is available at: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ArgusProposal, and is also included below.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Argus Proposal

On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Owen O'Malley omal...@apache.org wrote: Chris, I know you are pretty overloaded at the moment with podlings, but would you be willing to be a mentor for Argus? I don't have many cycles for this, but if it's a blocker for incubation then I'll make time. -C

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Argus Proposal

On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote: If an objective of a podding is to build a diversified community then perhaps it should be an explicitly defined graduation criteria? In fact, earlier I have raised exactly the same question about Tez but I don't

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubator exit criteria

On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: Again, why would code lose users? Remember we're talking about a situation of no releases here. Presumably those users who are comfortable building from the repo would just keep doing so. And since there was no release,

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Tez from Apache Incubator to TLP

IPMC votes from our mentors: - Alan Gates - Arun C. Murthy - Chris Mattman - Chris Douglas - Jakob Homan Now, I would like to ask the IPMC to vote for the graduation of Apache Tez. Please VOTE to indicate if Apache Tez is ready to graduate as a Top

Re: Tez graduation [Was: Request for mentor assessment]

I'll detail why I think Tez is ready to graduate. Nobody is concerned about its activity, relevance, or ability to produce releases. So I won't belabor those points. Let's focus on whether the Tez project is approachable as a project and as a community. Posting project plans and discussing them

Re: Request for mentor assessment

Tez is ready to graduate. Cos, if you can help us manage that process, it'd certainly be appreciated. -C On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote: I share the sentiment with NPanday - doesn't seem like anything is happening there really. If it of an interest

Re: [VOTE] Accept Optiq into the incubator

+1 -C On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Ashutosh Chauhan hashut...@apache.org wrote: Based on the results of the discussion thread ( http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201404.mbox/%3CCA%2BFBdFQA4TghLRdh9GgDKaMtKLQHxE_QZV%3DoZ7HfiDSA_jyqwg%40mail.gmail.com%3E ), I would

Re: [PROPOSAL] Optiq

On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote: If not part of the initial proposal, then at least making a good case as a criteria for graduation, and writing up related work and how the new project differentiates could be an initial task done on JIRA after

Re: [PROPOSAL] Optiq

steward of my community development. The devil is in the details, which takes me back to the point made in the above paragraph. On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Chris Douglas cdoug...@apache.org wrote: On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote: If not part

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator

+1 -C On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia matei.zaha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi folks, The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator (vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread: http://s.apache.org/aEQ). I'm now calling an official IPMC

Re: [VOTE] Accept DataFu into the Incubator

+1 (binding) -C On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote: Incubator- Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept DataFu as a new Incubator project. The proposal draft is available at: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DataFuProposal, and is

Re: [VOTE] Accept Samza into the Incubator

) Sriram Subramanian (LinkedIn) Sponsors Champion Jakob Homan (Apache Member) Nominated Mentors Arun C Murthy acmurthy at apache dot org Chris Douglas cdouglas at apache dot org Roman Shaposhnik rvs at apache dot org Sponsoring Entity We are requesting the Incubator to sponsor this project

Re: A lot of reports missing these period

Falcon and Tez reported in April. -C On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: Folks, its reporting time and at the wiki are a lot of them missing! http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/May2013 Ambari Blur DeltaSpike (hasn't it graduated?) Droids Falcon

Re: A lot of reports missing these period

On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: My guess is that since the wiki was down these slipped. I know that I plan on producing reports by end of week and getting them up there ASAP for my podlings. Ah, right; those were added after the

Re: Vote on personal matters: majority vote vs consensus

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: Your position is that the IPMC fails to supervise. The consensus of the IPMC is that this is not true. Otherwise, someone would be reading the monthly report and objecting to the failure to report 'failure' to the

Re: [VOTE] Accept Falcon into the Apache Incubator (was originally named Ivory)

=== * Alan Gates (gates AT apache DOT org) * Chris Douglas (cdouglas AT apache DOT org) * Devaraj Das (ddas AT apache DOT org) * Owen O’Malley (omalley AT apache DOT org) === Sponsoring Entity === Incubator PMC

Re: [VOTE] Accept Tajo into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) -C On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Hyunsik Choi hyun...@apache.org wrote: Hi Folks, I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of Tajo into the Apache incubator. The vote will close on Mar 7 at 6:00 PM (PST). [] +1 Accept Tajo into the Apache incubator [] +0 Don't care. [] -1

Re: [VOTE] Accept Tez into Incubator

experienced in the Apache Hadoop ecosystem: * Alan Gates gates at apache dot org * Arun C Murthy acmurthy at apache dot org * Ashutosh Chauhan hashutosh at apache dot org * Bikas Saha bikas at apache dot org * Chris Douglas cdouglas at apache dot org * Daryn Sharp daryn at apache dot org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Knox Hadoop Gateway Project into the Incubator

) Larry McCay (Hortonworks) John Speidel (Hortonworks) Tom Beerbower (Hortonworks) Sumit Mohanty (Hortonworks) Venkatesh Seetharm (Hortonworks) Owen O'Malley (Hortonworks) Mahadev Konar (Hortonworks) Alan Gates (Hortonworks) Devaraj Das (Hortwonrks) Chris Douglas (Microsoft) Chris Mattmann

Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC7 release

Checksum and signature match, NOTICE, LICENSE, DISCLAIMER look in order. +1 (binding), aside from a quick check: there are a few jars included in the source tarball: apache-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-src/ctakes-assertion/lib/med-facts-i2b2-1.2-SNAPSHOT.jar

Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] HCatalog to Graduate and become part of Apache Hive

-0 on graduation into Hive. From the [DISCUSS] thread: http://s.apache.org/as9 , this sounds like a compromise with members of the Hive PMC who see HCatalog as a set of wrapper APIs that make Hive's metastore and serdes accessible to Pig and MR, so they question whether members of that community

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Open Climate Workbench into the Incubator

of Apache. As stated above this includes 6 ASF members. Of the mentorship list, we have included Chris Douglas, a PMC member from Hadoop and ASF member to help guide the community. Chris M. and Chris D. have guided a number of projects through the Incubator over the years. The other mentor includes

Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release

-Masanz.James=mayo@incubator.apache.org [mailto:general-return-39351-Masanz.James=mayo@incubator.apache.org] On Behalf Of Chris Douglas Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 3:45 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: ctakes-...@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0

Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release

On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Masanz, James J. masanz.ja...@mayo.edu wrote: Another question about the convenience binary -- can it include the models for which the training data cannot be shared with the community? My guess would be no, but it sounds like the OpenNLP community studied this

Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release

On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Jörn Kottmann kottm...@gmail.com wrote: No, the OpenNLP did not have any discussion about it with legal. We just came to the conclusion that its not worth spending time on these issues, when we can instead produce our own training data which is compatible

Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release

Infra asks for a heads up for large artifacts: http://s.apache.org/5vz While these aren't over the limit, it might be worth pinging them. To be clear, these models were trained on external data, so they can't be regenerated? Are they packaged here for convenience, or is this the primary mechanism

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Hadoop Development Tools

dot Lammerts at sara dot nl) * Simone Gianni (simoneg at apache dot org) == Affiliations == * Adam Berry - Yahoo! * Jeffrey Zemerick - Mountain Fog * Evert Lammerts - SARA * Simone Gianni - n/a == Sponsors == === Champion === * Roman Shaposhnik === Nominated Mentors === * Chris

Re: Anticipating my reign of terror -- new idea for December

+1; this matches my understanding. -C On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: My understanding of mentor sign off is that all active mentors sign off, not just one. Lack of sign off means the mentor has been busy elsewhere for that quarter and feels

[RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Kafka from the incubator

The vote (http://s.apache.org/Rgw) started on 2012-10-26 has ended. Results: +1 Jakob Homan (IPMC) +1 Alan Cabrera (IPMC) +1 Chris Douglas (IPMC) +1 Jukka Zitting (IPMC) +1 Bertrand Delacretazn (IPMC) With five +1 votes and no other votes, the motion passes. The IPMC has approved this proposal

Proposed resolution: Establish Kafka TLP

Members of the Apache Board- The Apache Incubator IPMC has determined that the Kafka Project is ready for graduation and requests its establishment as a TLP. Please consider the following draft resolution at your next meeting. Home: https://incubator.apache.org/kafka/ Vote by project:

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Kafka podling from Incubator

+1 -C On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote: This is a call for a vote to graduate the Kafka podling from Apache Incubator. Kafka entered the Incubator in July of 2011. Since then it has added three new committers, encouraged a number of new contributors, and

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Hadoop Development Tools

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote: This seems like it might be more at home at apache-extras. That may ultimately be its fate, but building a community around these tools is worthy of an attempt. This also shares many goals with MRUnit. Collaboration or even

Re: [VOTE] Accept Helix into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) -C On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:37 AM, kishore g g.kish...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I would like to call a vote for accepting Helix for incubation in the Apache Incubator. I have pasted the full proposal below. Please cast your vote: [ ] +1, bring Helix into Incubator [ ] +0, I

Re: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.2-incubating (Candidate 5)

+1 (binding) -C On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Joe Stein crypt...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Kafka Incubator has passed the vote for 0.7.2 RC5 http://www.mail-archive.com/kafka-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg04980.html I would like to call a vote now from the IPMC. This is the fifth candidate

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Oozie podling from Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) -C On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur t...@cloudera.com wrote: This is a call for vote to graduate Oozie podling from Apache Incubator. Oozie entered the Incubator in July of 2011. Since then it has added two new committers and made two significant releases

Re: [PROPOSAL] Drill for the Apache Incubator

+1 -C On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: This is a duplicated attempt at sending this message, please ignore the previous message if it eventually arrives. There appears to be a hangup sending email from my apache email address via gmail. Abstract

Re: [VOTE] Accept Drill into the Apache Incubator

+1 -C (sorry, wrong thread) On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: I would like to call a vote for accepting Drill for incubation in the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below. Discussion over the last few days has been quite positive.

Re: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.1-incubating (Candidate 3)

Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote: On Jun 22, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: Kevan- Hi Chris, Thanks for elaborating. Please appreciate that there is universal agreement that (1) listing and maintaining all transitive dependencies and licenses is a sound service It's more than

Re: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.1-incubating (Candidate 3)

if that will be a problem. Regards, Alan On Jun 21, 2012, at 12:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: Not sure. It's simple enough to check the email archives for my last plea. With that said, I was hoping we could kill two birds with one stone. Regards, Alan On Jun 21, 2012, at 11:32 AM, Chris Douglas

Re: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.1-incubating (Candidate 3)

Did these dependencies change between 0.7.0 and 0.7.1? -C On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: On Jun 20, 2012, at 9:19 AM, Joe Stein wrote: Hello, This is the third candidate for the second incubator release for Apache Kafka, version

Re: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.1-incubating (Candidate 3)

update and is Apache License 2.0 http://code.google.com/p/snappy-java/ 2) ZooKeeper client jar upgraded from 3.3.3 to 3.3.4 On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Chris Douglas cdoug...@apache.org wrote: Did these dependencies change between 0.7.0 and 0.7.1? -C On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Alan D

Re: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.1-incubating (Candidate 3)

that Kafka should go further, but the release violates no policy. -C On Thursday, June 21, 2012, Kevan Miller wrote: On Jun 21, 2012, at 4:36 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: Great. We're not distributing the Snappy codec, so- according to the reasoning of board@, legal@, and the IPMC on the 0.7.0

Re: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.1-incubating (Candidate 2)

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: Obeying dependency license provisions is not an ASF policy, it's a legal requirement.  Fairness is immaterial. If you bundle the bits, you must deal with the licensing and you must get it right. Sure, but that's

Re: [VOTE] Release Giraph 0.1-incubator (RC0)

+1 Checksum and signature match. Ran RAT, checked LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER; all good. Unit tests passed. -C On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote: Howdy- The Giraph project is excited to ask incubator for a vote on our first release. The vote passed within

Re: [DISCUSS] eliminate vetoes on personnel votes

+1 -C On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: +1 from me. Sent from my iPhone On Jan 30, 2012, at 4:07 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote: It is clear that with all the turmoil of late and people lightly tossing around -1's

Re: [VOTE] Chukwa 0.5.0 Release Candidate 3

to review the release. Result Summary for this List: +1   [1] 0    [1] -1    [0] With the one IPMC member vote from mentors on the dev list and two +1 from general@incubator, the vote succeeds. IPMC member voting record: Chris Douglas:    +1 Ralph Goers:      +1 Ant Elder:           +1 I

Re: [VOTE] Chukwa 0.5.0 Release Candidate 3

+1 (binding) Checksum and signature match, verifications from previous RCs hold b/c only NOTICE and LICENSE have changed. -C On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Eric Yang eric...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release.  This will be the first incubator release for Chukwa.

  1   2   >