Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Marmotta 3.1.0-incubating

2013-10-04 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi,

while the release artifacts look good to me, I had no luck with
compiling the sources. I first tried with Java 1.6 and was informed
that I would need Java 1.7. So I tried with 1.7 but now I am getting
failures in some tests, namely in the Kiwi triplestore reasoner. I
made a few trials, cleaned the Maven repo etc. but still no luck. I am
building on a Linux Ubuntu based machine using the JDKs from
Sun/Oracle.

What are the system requirements for Marmotta to build fine?

Best,
 - Fabian

2013/10/2 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org:
 +1 sources build fine.

 --
 Olivier
 On Sep 30, 2013 8:17 PM, Sebastian Schaffert sschaff...@apache.org
 wrote:

 Dear all,

 After several months of work since the last incubating release
 (3.0.0-incubating) in April, we are now ready to release version
 3.1.0-incubating. We fixed all the remaining issues that have been
 discussed in April (see thread [1]) plus many more technical issues. We
 have already held a vote that was open for more than 72 hours on the Apache
 Marmotta developer mailinglist [2]. The vote concluded [3] with 7 positive
 votes, of which 2 have been binding from IPMC members (Andy and Nandana)
 and the remaining 5 from the Apache Marmotta developers.

 I'd therefore like to ask the general incubator to check our release
 candidate. The release notes are available at the Jira Issue Tracker [4].
 The vote form is included at the bottom of this mail.

 Greetings,

 Sebastian


 [1] http://apache.markmail.org/message/5tieelmeevi2j6xb
 [2] http://apache.markmail.org/message/lk3hc3jutoaxp6dr
 [3] http://apache.markmail.org/message/fvytzho2pnhasw2c
 [4]

 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314321version=12324026

 ===
 A candidate for the Marmotta 3.1.0-incubating release is available at:

 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/marmotta/3.1.0-incubating/

 The release candidate is based on the sources tagged with 3.1.0-incubating
 in:

 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-marmotta.git

 The release candidate consists of the following source distribution
 archives:
 - apache-marmotta-3.1.0-
 incubating-src.[zip|tar.gz]
   SHA1 of ZIP: 763c39dc9d7eb1c7d8fad83742b08f44b6fa5527
   SHA1 of TGZ: 0f7f3395f22aeeaa4a402f1b08048c84899d9729

 In addition, the following supplementary binary distributions are provided:
 - apache-marmotta-3.1.0-incubating-installer.[zip|tar.gz]
   SHA1 of ZIP: d7417a711a7f80eb29eb93ec75744a314fcf2edd
   SHA1 of TGZ: 4606fe743f607215dd4f3f39d8506852f529b617
 - apache-marmotta-3.1.0-incubating-ldpath.[zip|tar.gz]
   SHA1 of ZIP: 4f4db937e0064a4393039b6fb8277be166a971ab
   SHA1 of TGZ: 5d63f972df2306afec96aa1a8931c4d0dabb2f75
 - apache-marmotta-3.1.0-incubating-webapp.[zip|tar.gz]
   SHA1 of ZIP: e8e168a29e398cda9220a793958b825a906a3142
   SHA1 of TGZ: 80d022d316e727b5f011069eec6dc9793b174838

 A staged Maven repository is available for review at:

 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemarmotta-092/

 Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Marmotta 3.1.0-incubating.
 The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
 least three +1 Marmotta PMC votes are cast.

 [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Marmotta 3.1.0-incubating
 [ ]  0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
 [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...

 ===

 Release Notes - Marmotta - Version 3.1-incubating

 ** Sub-task
 * [MARMOTTA-216] - Implement JOIN improvements
 * [MARMOTTA-217] - Implement FILTER improvements
 * [MARMOTTA-218] - Integrate in marmotta-sparql


 ** Bug
 * [MARMOTTA-28] - Implement tests for core that take into account
 triple store changes
 * [MARMOTTA-63] - Triplestore: garbage collector for nodes currently
 not working properly
 * [MARMOTTA-66] - Rework sesame-commons ResourceUtils
 * [MARMOTTA-143] - unable to import big files
 * [MARMOTTA-150] - BNodes are a dead end in the Linked Data Explorer
 * [MARMOTTA-154] - Youtube video provider doesn't fetch the keywords
 * [MARMOTTA-155] - 3-char lang-tags are not accepted
 * [MARMOTTA-156] - Add Logback configuration to all tests to
 enable/disable debug logging
 * [MARMOTTA-170] - file-store (meta) for ldcache-backend-file contains
 wrong comments
 * [MARMOTTA-171] - remove legacy subdirs from src/main/webapp in
 marmotta-webapp
 * [MARMOTTA-186] - LDPath parser fails on local names that contain '.'
 * [MARMOTTA-187] - ldpath extension for CM does not recognize local
 names with '.' or '-'
 * [MARMOTTA-191] - SPARQL graph results fails under some circunstances
 * [MARMOTTA-197] - ldpath is loosing brackets on re-serialisation
 * [MARMOTTA-204] - Update to Sesame 2.7.1
 * [MARMOTTA-205] - Turtle-Exports do not contain any language tags
 * [MARMOTTA-206] - Strictly follow the standard formatting on 

Re: binary release artifacts

2013-09-25 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi Luciano,

2013/9/24 Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com:
 Is there any written policy that states that ? I have never heard that the
 ASF can't have binary artifacts as official releases ?

It's because Apache releases open source and ONLY open source. [1]
to quote Roy.

[1] http://markmail.org/message/yzetzkhfahrlv5um

Best,
 - Fabian

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: LICENSE/NOTICE revisited (was Release Apache Marmotta 3.0.0-incubating (RC8))

2013-04-24 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi,

and thanks Marvin for all the valuable information. This is really helpful!

2013/4/24 Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com:
 We'll probably
 need to open an individual LEGAL Jira issues for each license, e.g.

 Does bundling a dependency under the Python Software Foundation license
 require any additions to the ALv2 NOTICE file?

 http://opensource.org/licenses/PythonSoftFoundation.php

+1

And making such information from legal issues available in a
processible form that could be re-used by (new) tools, e.g. in Apache
Creadur, would be a huge step forward. I guess that legal issues are
always hard to be precisely handled by tools but having (more) tools
that at least provide analysis and give pointers would already help.

Best,
 - Fabian (Marmotta Mentor)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Marmotta 3.0.0-incubating (RC8)

2013-04-24 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi,

apparently my first release vote did not made to the general list.
Therefore, I will resent my original mail from April 17th, 2013 using
my a.o. address.

-- Original mail

Hi,

checked signature and digest of

./apache-marmotta-3.0.0-incubating-ldpath.zip
gpg:  GOOD
sha1 : GOOD (3dab792c935bf0380c98fb2767ea75653df3b9b1)
./apache-marmotta-3.0.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
gpg:  GOOD
sha1 : GOOD (e176b0b7816e5c334a3d8dccb960cda0b64d4b4c)
./apache-marmotta-3.0.0-incubating-installer.zip
gpg:  GOOD
sha1 : GOOD (4e5bf3e5c59e04bea3776d76c37990fa1efd6995)
./apache-marmotta-3.0.0-incubating-webapp.zip
gpg:  GOOD
sha1 : GOOD (7784ee71b665782f1011a8d1333524c825b90c6d)
./apache-marmotta-3.0.0-incubating-installer.tar.gz
gpg:  GOOD
sha1 : GOOD (a8736dd1700c7993762dea0446a23c2d314e03ec)
./apache-marmotta-3.0.0-incubating-webapp.tar.gz
gpg:  GOOD
sha1 : GOOD (217e17709e6e84ffe755841ac69f850538e867f7)
./apache-marmotta-3.0.0-incubating-ldpath.tar.gz
gpg:  GOOD
sha1 : GOOD (237040387801aa6538fd07e3c75265b06e3d4ce3)
./apache-marmotta-3.0.0-incubating-src.zip
gpg:  GOOD
sha1 : GOOD (ac0cc9aa641a37fea96adaf128e44b0d6a06cc8f)

Source release:

./apache-marmotta-3.0.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
NOTICE: OK
LICENSE: OK
DISCLAIMER: OK
Build: OK
RAT Check: OK

Tag matches release: YES

Binary releases:

./apache-marmotta-3.0.0-incubating-webapp.tar.gz
NOTICE: OK
LICENSE: OK
DISCLAIMER: OK

./apache-marmotta-3.0.0-incubating-ldpath.tar.gz
NOTICE: OK
LICENSE: OK
DISCLAIMER: OK

./apache-marmotta-3.0.0-incubating-installer.tar.gz
NOTICE: OK
LICENSE: OK
DISCLAIMER: OK

 On 15/04/13 15:40, Sebastian Schaffert wrote:
 Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Marmotta 3.0.0-incubating.

+1 (binding)

Congrats to the Marmotta team for a very clean and well prepared first release!

Best,
 - Fabian

2013/4/15 Sebastian Schaffert sschaff...@apache.org:
 Dear all,

 Apache Marmotta is an implementation of the Linked Data Platform and
 accompanying services. In the last months, we have migrated our old source
 code to the Apache infrastructure and tried to adapt the Apache policies in
 all parts of the project. In particular, we have fixed all remaining
 licensing issues and spent much time on developing the appropriate NOTICE
 and LICENSE files.

 We have executed 8 voting cycles on release candidates throughout the last
 weeks and we think we are now (finally) ready to really do the release.

 The vote on release candidate RC8 has been open for more than 72 hours on
 the developer mailinglist [1]. After closing the vote, we have the
 following voting results:
 - 2 binding votes (from the mentors Andy Seaborne and Nandana
 Mihindukulasooriya)
 - 6 non-binding votes (the remaining developers)

 I'd therefore like to ask now the general incubator to check our release
 candidate. Since this is our first release, please check thoroughly, I'd
 like to be sure we did not miss anything. The release notes (fixed issues)
 are available at the Jira Issue Tracker [2].


 [1]
 http://markmail.org/message/uncutapltb3mopgy?q=list:org%2Eapache%2Emarmotta%2Edev
 [2]
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314321version=12323952


 Please find attached below the concrete details on the release and on the
 vote.

 Greetings,

 Sebastian


 ===
 A candidate for the Marmotta 3.0.0-incubating release is available at:

 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/marmotta/3.0.0-incubating/

 The release candidate is based on the sources tagged with 3.0.0-incubating
 in:

 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-marmotta.git

 The release candidate consists of the following source distribution
 archives:
 - apache-marmotta-3.0.0-incubating-src.[zip|tar.gz]
   SHA1 of ZIP: ac0cc9aa641a37fea96adaf128e44b0d6a06cc8f
   SHA1 of TGZ: e176b0b7816e5c334a3d8dccb960cda0b64d4b4c

 In addition, the following supplementary binary distributions are provided:
 - apache-marmotta-3.0.0-incubating-installer.[zip|tar.gz]
   SHA1 of ZIP: 4e5bf3e5c59e04bea3776d76c37990fa1efd6995
   SHA1 of TGZ: a8736dd1700c7993762dea0446a23c2d314e03ec
 - apache-marmotta-3.0.0-incubating-ldpath.[zip|tar.gz]
   SHA1 of ZIP: 3dab792c935bf0380c98fb2767ea75653df3b9b1
   SHA1 of TGZ: 237040387801aa6538fd07e3c75265b06e3d4ce3
 - apache-marmotta-3.0.0-incubating-webapp.[zip|tar.gz]
   SHA1 of ZIP: 7784ee71b665782f1011a8d1333524c825b90c6d
   SHA1 of TGZ: 217e17709e6e84ffe755841ac69f850538e867f7

 A staged Maven repository is available for review at:

 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemarmotta-093/

 Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Marmotta 3.0.0-incubating.
 The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
 least three +1 Marmotta PMC votes are cast.

 [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Marmotta 3.0.0-incubating
 [ ]  0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
 [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...


Re: [VOTE] - Apache Clerezza Graduation Resolution

2013-01-18 Thread Fabian Christ
+1

2013/1/18 Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org:
 On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Tommaso Teofili
 tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote:
...I'm opening the vote
 for the below Apache Clerezza TLP graduation resolution...

 +1

 -Bertrand (Clerezza mentor)

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org




-- 
Fabian
http://twitter.com/fctwitt

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: Clean up users who are members of the incubator group and no other?

2013-01-10 Thread Fabian Christ
2013/1/10 Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org

 ... people listed at
 http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html with just incubator in
 the SVN projects field ...


Just wondering what is the use case for people having no entry in SVN
projects field? Maybe some of these fall in the same category as people
having only incubator in the list.

-- 
Fabian
http://twitter.com/fctwitt


Re: [VOTE] Apache Kalumet 0.6-incubating release (2nd try)

2013-01-10 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi,

to verify the release:

- What is the source release artifact that we are voting on? What is its
checksum?
- Where can I find the KEYS used to sign the release?
- Is there a RAT report or similar available to see that all files have the
appropriate license headers and were checked?

Best,
 - Fabian


2013/1/10 Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net

 Hi Seb,

 thanks again for the update.

 Is it OK for you if I release Kalumet with the current NOTICE file and I
 fix the content for the next incubator release ?

 Can we have your +1 or do you consider the NOTICE file as blocker for this
 first release ?

 Thanks !

 Regards
 JB


 On 01/07/2013 10:13 PM, sebb wrote:

 On 20 December 2012 13:23, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote:

 Hi all,

 This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
 Kalumet 0.6-incubating (2nd try). This will be our first release. A vote
 was
 held on the developer mailing list and passed with 6 +1s:

 +1 (binding): Andreas Pieber, Ioannis Canellos, Jamie Goodyear, Achim
 Nierbeck

 +1 (mentor/IPMC): Jean-Baptiste Onofré, Olivier Lamy

 We need an additional IPMC vote.

 Release Notes:
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/incubator/kalumet/tags/**
 kalumet-0.6-incubating/**RELEASE-NOTEShttp://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/kalumet/tags/kalumet-0.6-incubating/RELEASE-NOTES

 Staging repository:
 https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/**
 orgapachekalumet-021/https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachekalumet-021/


 The NOTICE file is non-standard.

 It must only contain required notices; in particular



 I. Included Software

 

 and similar additions must be removed from the file, which should start:



  Apache Kalumet
 Copyright 2012 The Apache Software Foundation

 This product includes software developed at
 The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
 

 The above is a minimal NOTICE file, and should be followed by required
 notices only.

 It looks as though Terracotta (quartz) does not require a mention in
 the NOTICE file.

 Not sure about the other two, but the NOTICE is not generally the
 place to document the license; the wording usually looks something
 like:


  This product includes classworlds 
 (http://classworlds.codehaus.**org/http://classworlds.codehaus.org/
 ).
 Copyright 2002 (C) The Codehaus. All Rights Reserved.
 

 [1] 
 http://www.apache.org/legal/**src-headers.htmlhttp://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html

  Please vote to approve this release:

 [ ] +1 Approve the release
 [ ] -1 Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)

 This vote will be open for 72 hours.

 Thanks,
 Regards
 JB
 --
 Jean-Baptiste Onofré
 jbono...@apache.org
 http://blog.nanthrax.net
 Talend - http://www.talend.com


 --**--**
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
 general-unsubscribe@incubator.**apache.orggeneral-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: 
 general-help@incubator.apache.**orggeneral-h...@incubator.apache.org


 --**--**-
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
 general-unsubscribe@incubator.**apache.orggeneral-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: 
 general-help@incubator.apache.**orggeneral-h...@incubator.apache.org


 --
 Jean-Baptiste Onofré
 jbono...@apache.org
 http://blog.nanthrax.net
 Talend - http://www.talend.com

 --**--**-
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
 general-unsubscribe@incubator.**apache.orggeneral-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: 
 general-help@incubator.apache.**orggeneral-h...@incubator.apache.org




-- 
Fabian
http://twitter.com/fctwitt


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Onami parent 1-incubating

2012-12-19 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi,

just had a look and I can only find the pom.xml file in Nexus. Is there a
source release ZIP somewhere? The problem is that with the POM only, the
DISCLAIMER is missing and there is no LICENSE file attached. IIRC all
Apache incubating releases should contain such files. You need to create a
release package that represents the official release and contains all
required information.

Best,
 - Fabian


2012/12/19 Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com

 +1 (binding)


 On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Christian Grobmeier
 grobme...@gmail.comwrote:

  I voted on the dev list, but here is my +1 as IPMC
 
  On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Simone Tripodi
  simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
   Hi all,
  
   This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as
   Apache Onami parent 1-incubating. This will be our first release.
  
   the Apache Onami PPMC has voted[1] the release of the parent-1,
   collecting 2 IPMC binding votes.
  
   We need an additional IPMC vote.
  
   Artifacts are on Nexus:
   https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheonami-006/
  
   SVN Tag:
  
 
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/onami/tags/parent-1-incubating/
  
   The vote is open for 72 at least hours and is closing ~ on December
   19th, 8:00pm GMT
  
   Please cast your votes:
  
   [ ] +1 release it
   [ ] +0 go ahead, but ...
   [ ] -0 uhm...
   [ ] -1 don't release it, because...
  
   Many thanks in advance for reviewing, all the best!
   -Simo
  
   [1] http://s.apache.org/pVu
  
   http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
   http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
   http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
   http://www.99soft.org/
  
   -
   To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
   For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
  
 
 
 
  --
  http://www.grobmeier.de
  https://www.timeandbill.de
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
 
 


 --
 Thanks
 - Mohammad Nour
 
 Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving
 - Albert Einstein




-- 
Fabian
http://twitter.com/fctwitt


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Onami parent 1-incubating

2012-12-19 Thread Fabian Christ
2012/12/19 Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com

 Disclaimer and License is available in the source tag:
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/onami/tags/parent-1-incubating/

 I do not see a chance to put these files to Nexus. Or do you have an idea?


The problem is that we do not vote on SVN tags. We vote on released source
packages.

Just create a ZIP file that contains everything needed. This can be
automated using the apache-release profile when using Maven. This ZIP
file can be uploaded in Nexus or placed somewhere in the /dist/dev area.

I do not have enough experience to tell if this is a blocker for now or
something that could be fixed with the next release.

-- 
Fabian
http://twitter.com/fctwitt


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Onami parent 1-incubating

2012-12-19 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi,

in Stanbol we use this parent POM configuration. When running 'mvn clean
install -Papache-release' it will create the required ZIP.

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/stanbol/trunk/parent/pom.xml

If you want to include the DISCLAIMER automatically you have to change the
config of the maven-remote-resources-plugin:

  !-- Add license and disclaimer to artifacts --
  plugin
groupIdorg.apache.maven.plugins/groupId
artifactIdmaven-remote-resources-plugin/artifactId
executions
  execution
configuration
  resourceBundles

resourceBundleorg.apache:apache-incubator-disclaimer-resource-bundle:1.1/resourceBundle

resourceBundleorg.apache:apache-jar-resource-bundle:1.4/resourceBundle
  /resourceBundles
/configuration
  /execution
/executions
  /plugin


2012/12/19 Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com

 Check out the maven project's own 'pom-only' releases. We include a
 zip artifact with all those goodies.


 http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails%7Corg.apache.maven%7Cmaven-parent%7C22%7Cpom



 On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Christian Grobmeier
 grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi Fabian,
 
  On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Fabian Christ
  christ.fab...@googlemail.com wrote:
  just had a look and I can only find the pom.xml file in Nexus. Is there
 a
  source release ZIP somewhere?
 
  No, there is just the pom.xml. It is only the parent pom for the other
  components. We need it to be able to release others. We do not plan to
  provide a download of it, it's maven only.
 
  The problem is that with the POM only, the
  DISCLAIMER is missing and there is no LICENSE file attached. IIRC all
  Apache incubating releases should contain such files. You need to
 create a
  release package that represents the official release and contains all
  required information.
 
  Disclaimer and License is available in the source tag:
 
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/onami/tags/parent-1-incubating/
 
  I do not see a chance to put these files to Nexus. Or do you have an
 idea?
 
  Cheers
  Christian
 
  Best,
   - Fabian
 
 
  2012/12/19 Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com
 
  +1 (binding)
 
 
  On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Christian Grobmeier
  grobme...@gmail.comwrote:
 
   I voted on the dev list, but here is my +1 as IPMC
  
   On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Simone Tripodi
   simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
   
This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as
Apache Onami parent 1-incubating. This will be our first release.
   
the Apache Onami PPMC has voted[1] the release of the parent-1,
collecting 2 IPMC binding votes.
   
We need an additional IPMC vote.
   
Artifacts are on Nexus:
   
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheonami-006/
   
SVN Tag:
   
  
 
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/onami/tags/parent-1-incubating/
   
The vote is open for 72 at least hours and is closing ~ on December
19th, 8:00pm GMT
   
Please cast your votes:
   
[ ] +1 release it
[ ] +0 go ahead, but ...
[ ] -0 uhm...
[ ] -1 don't release it, because...
   
Many thanks in advance for reviewing, all the best!
-Simo
   
[1] http://s.apache.org/pVu
   
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
   
   
 -
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
   
  
  
  
   --
   http://www.grobmeier.de
   https://www.timeandbill.de
  
   -
   To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
   For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
  
  
 
 
  --
  Thanks
  - Mohammad Nour
  
  Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep
 moving
  - Albert Einstein
 
 
 
 
  --
  Fabian
  http://twitter.com/fctwitt
 
 
 
  --
  http://www.grobmeier.de
  https://www.timeandbill.de
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
 

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org




-- 
Fabian
http://twitter.com/fctwitt


Re: [VOTE] Accept Marmotta into the incubator

2012-11-29 Thread Fabian Christ
 the initial list of committers is not the best
  for a long, it exists a strong commitment to spread the project creating
 a
  much more diverse development team. Part of the reason to enter the
 Apache
  incubation process is to open up the development to more interested
  participants.
 
  == Reliance on Salaried Developers
 
  Right now most or all of that work is salaried, but the developers are
  identifying themselves very much with the project. When opening up the
  development using Apache as a platform, we expect that the future
  development will occur on both salaried and volunteer time, particularly
 by
  participants from the Linked Data community.
 
  == Relationships with Other Apache Projects
 
  Although current RDF/SPARQL support in LMF is build on top of OpenRDF
  Sesame API, Marmotta is closely related to many Apache projects, such as
  Stanbol, Jena and Any23. See “Alignment” above.
 
  == An Excessive Fascination with the Apache Brand
 
  While we expect the Apache brand may help attract more contributors, our
  interests in starting this project is based on the factors mentioned in
 the
  Rationale section.
 
  == Documentation
 
  Documentation for the current project can be found at:
 
  http://lmf.googlecode.com
 
  http://doc.lmf.googlecode.com/**hg/api/index.html
 http://doc.lmf.googlecode.com/hg/api/index.html
 
  http://doc.lmf.googlecode.com/**hg/rest/index.html
 http://doc.lmf.googlecode.com/hg/rest/index.html
 
  http://doc.lmf.googlecode.com/**hg/client/index.html
 http://doc.lmf.googlecode.com/hg/client/index.html
 
  == Initial Source
 
  LMF (formerly KiWi) has been developed since 2008. It is important to say
  that the whole LMF will not be contributed to Marmotta, actually only
 those
  parts that make up the Linked Data Platform functionality (Linked Data
  Server, RDF Store, SPARQL, LDCache, Versioning, Reasoner and LDPath) .
 The
  idea is to focus Marmotta much more in the core needs, keeping all
  surrounding functionalities (Media-related modules and Semantic Search,
  basically) out of the initial scope. Although the community will be who
  ultimately decides what are the relevant modules. Since LMF is a very
  modular software artifact it will be pretty easy to make such
 partitioning
  to kick-off Marmotta.
 
  The current source code can be found at Google Code:
  http://lmf.googlecode.com
 
  == Source and Intellectual Property Submission Plan
 
  Salzburg Research Forschungsgesellschaft mbH is the sole copyright owner
  of the initial code to be contributed, so should not be any problem with
  the standard IP clearance process. Current licence is already Apache
  Software License 2.0.
 
  == External Dependencies
 
  Most of current dependencies should have Apache compatible licenses,
  including BSD, CDDL, CPL, MPL and MIT licensed dependencies. We are aware
  of some incompatible licenses right now, but we will work to solve this
  issue. See Appendix A for a detailed list of dependencies.
 
  == Cryptography
 
  Does Not Apply.
 
  == Required Resources
 
  Mailing lists
 
  marmotta-dev
  marmotta-commits
  marmotta-users
 
  Repository
 
  git://git.apache.org/marmotta.**git
 http://git.apache.org/marmotta.git
 
  Issue Tracking
 
  Jira: MARMOTTA (Kanban board enabled at GreenHopper)
 
  Other Resources
 
  Jenkins/Hudson for builds and test running.
  Wiki for internal documentation purposes
  Blog to improve the project dissemination
 
  == Initial Committers
 
  Sebastian Schaffert
 (sebastian dot schafftert at salzburgresearch dot at)
  Thomas Kurz
 (thomas dot kurz at salzburgresearch dot at)
  Jakob Frank
 (jakob dot frank at salzburgresearch dot at)
  Dietmar Glachs
 (dietmar dot glachs at salzburgresearch dot at)
  Sergio Fernández
 (sergio dot fernandez at salzburgresearch dot at)
  Rupert Westenthaler
 (rwesten at apache dot org)
 
  == Affiliations
 
  All initial committers are currently affiliated to Salzburg Research
  Forschungsgesellschaft mbH.
 
  == Sponsors
 
  = Champion
 
  Andy Seaborne (andy at apache dot org)
 
  = Nominated Mentors
 
  Fabian Christ (fchrist at apache dot org)
  Nandana Mihindukulasooriya (nandana at apache dot org)
  Andy Seaborne (andy at apache dot org)
 
  = Sponsoring Entity
 
  Apache Incubator PMC
 
  --**--**-
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.**apache.org
 general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.**org
 general-h...@incubator.apache.org
 
 


 --
 Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
 Programme Leader (Open Development)
 OpenDirective http://opendirective.com




-- 
Fabian
http://twitter.com/fctwitt


Re: How to handle non-OS jars in repository

2012-10-01 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi,

just wanted to add what I have learned during Stanbol incubation:

The ASF releases source code, only. The repo should contain only the
sources - and no binary code (JARs) at all. This is fundamental to the
idea of open source. Once you start hosting binaries the users can not
be sure what they get.

If your build needs additional JARs that are not available at places
like Maven Central, then you should create a -deps package that
contains the needed JARs. You can put this -deps package for download
in your dist section and mark it as a download for convenience (i.e.
be clear that it is not an officially released artifact). Do not host
such JARs in your repo. And the JARs need to have a license that is
compatible with the AL20 license.

Best,
 - Fabian

2012/10/1 Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk:
 Here's my take:

 As I see it, anything that goes into SVN we need to be sure we have the
 _legal_ right to redistribute, regardless of any compatibility or
 otherwise with the Apache License (e.g. GPL in our repo is not a
 disaster).

 It is a _policy_ decision of the ASF that anything that goes into ASF
 releases is compatible with, and sublicensable under the Apache License.

 So long as it is legal to redistribute them, it is okay to have them in
 SVN. If it is not legal to redistribute, we should certainly delete
 immediately from HEAD, and whether we do more than that would, I guess,
 be up to the copyright holder (assuming they knew it was there at all).

 Upayavira

 On Sun, Sep 30, 2012, at 11:14 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
 If you've not released it and you've deleted it from HEAD of all
 branches, I think you're fine.

 Noah Slater wrote on Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 23:09:45 +0100:
  Okay cool.
 
  My root concern was that we have non-OS data in our repository. But if you
  think that's an academic concern (i.e. we've not released it, so it doesn't
  matter) then okay.
 
  On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Daniel Shahaf 
  d...@daniel.shahaf.namewrote:
 
   Noah Slater wrote on Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 22:50:48 +0100:
In relation to the non-OS jars, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
   
I am currently downloading them from the repository history.
   
  
   If it's just one developer who does it in his own personal builds of
   HEAD, builds which don't leave his personal dev environment, I don't see
   the problem.
  
   
Presumably he is doing this because he knew of their existence before
   they
were removed (they were part of the original import from Citrix), and
   finds
it convenient to snag them each time he's preparing a build.
   
   
   http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201209.mbox/%3ccc78b251.2ea43%25chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com%3E
   
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:46 PM, Daniel Shahaf 
d...@daniel.shahaf.name
   wrote:
   
 To clarify, are you saying that people download jars directly from
 version control history?  Where do they find the references to their
 existence there?

 Noah Slater wrote on Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 22:41:53 +0100:
  Hey,
 
  It came up on the CloudStack list that we have non-OS (I don't know
   the
  specific license, but I can find out if it's important) jars in the
  repository, and some people (at least one) is downloading them from
   that
  location for convenience.
 
  Obviously, we're not going to ship them, and we can certainly 
  delete
 them.
  (This may've happened already.) But what I wanted to know was: do 
  we
   have
  to do anything about the fact that they exist in the repository
   history?
 
  Thanks,
 
  --
  NS

   
   
   
--
NS
  
 
 
 
  --
  NS

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org




-- 
Fabian
http://twitter.com/fctwitt

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



[RESULT] Stanbol to graduate from the incubator

2012-09-10 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi,

and thanks for your votes!

We have 12 binding +1 votes and 1 non-binding +1 vote. There was no
vote with 0 or -1.

Therefore, the resolution has passed the vote and I will submit it to
the board for their next meeting.

For completeness, here is the final resolution:

X. Establish the Apache Stanbol Project

   WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
   interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
   Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
   Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
   open-source software related to a set of resuable components
   for semantic content management for distribution
   at no charge to the public.

   NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
   Committee (PMC), to be known as the Apache Stanbol Project,
   be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
   Foundation; and be it further

   RESOLVED, that the Apache Stanbol Project be and hereby is
   responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
   related to a set of resuable components for semantic
   content management; and be it further

   RESOLVED, that the office of Vice President, Apache Stanbol be
   and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
   serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
   of the Apache Stanbol Project, and to have primary responsibility
   for management of the projects within the scope of
   responsibility of the Apache Stanbol Project; and be it further

   RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
   hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
   Apache Stanbol Project:

 * Alessandro Adamoualex...@apache.org
 * Ali Anil Sinaci  sin...@apache.org
 * Andrea Nuzzolese anuzzol...@apache.org
 * Andreas Gruber   agru...@apache.org
 * Andreas Kuckartz a...@apache.org
 * Benjamin Nagel   bna...@apache.org
 * Bertrand Delacretaz  bdelacre...@apache.org
 * Cihan Cimen  ci...@apache.org
 * Concetto Bonafedeconcel...@apache.org
 * Enrico Daga  enrid...@apache.org
 * Fabian Christfchr...@apache.org
 * Florent Andréflor...@apache.org
 * Olivier Grisel   ogri...@apache.org
 * Ozgur Kilic  oz...@apache.org
 * Reto Bachmann-Gmür   r...@apache.org
 * Rupert Westenthaler  rup...@apache.org
 * Suat Gonul   s...@apache.org
 * Tommaso Teofili  tomm...@apache.org
 * Valentina Presutti   v...@apache.org
 * Walter Kasperwkas...@apache.org

   NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Fabian Christ
   be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Stanbol, to
   serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
   Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
   death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
   or until a successor is appointed; and be it further

   RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Stanbol PMC be and hereby is
   tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
   encourage open development and increased participation in the
   Apache Stanbol Project; and be it further

   RESOLVED, that the Apache Stanbol Project be and hereby
   is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
   Incubator Stanbol podling; and be it further

   RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
   Incubator Stanbol podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
   Project are hereafter discharged.

Also available at http://incubator.apache.org/stanbol/graduation-resolution.html

Thanks,
 - Fabian

2012/9/9 Andreas Kuckartz a.kucka...@ping.de:
 +1 (non-binding)

 This vote started on 2012-09-05. How long will it be open? Normal time
 seems to be 72 hours.

 Cheers,
 Andreas
 ---

 Fabian Christ:
 Hi,

 the Stanbol podling has discussed [1] that we are ready for
 graduation. The project has created two releases during incubation and
 created an active community around the topic of semantic content
 management. The PPMC internal vote for a resolution to establish the
 project got positive feedback [2].

 We are now asking the IPMC to vote on the resolution to establish
 Stanbol and to recommend the resolution to the board. The resolution
 to vote on is also available online [3].

 [1] http://markmail.org/thread/6shesliws7naqgit
 [2] http://markmail.org/thread/ml3pfnz3ttmmpe5g
 [3] http://incubator.apache.org/stanbol/graduation-resolution.html

 ===

 X. Establish the Apache Stanbol Project

WHEREAS

Re: [VOTE] Stanbol to graduate from the incubator

2012-09-06 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi,

thanks for noticing! Andreas is right that Anil was omitted by mistake
because the team page was not updated correctly.

Ali Anil Sinaci should definitely be part of the PMC. I have updated
the resolution at [1].

[1] http://incubator.apache.org/stanbol/graduation-resolution.html

The other two, namely Wernher and Stefane are more observers of the
project. They have contributed but seem to have no direct interest in
becoming part of the PMC.

Here is the corrected resolution:

X. Establish the Apache Stanbol Project

   WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
   interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
   Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
   Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
   open-source software related to a set of resuable components
   for semantic content management for distribution
   at no charge to the public.

   NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
   Committee (PMC), to be known as the Apache Stanbol Project,
   be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
   Foundation; and be it further

   RESOLVED, that the Apache Stanbol Project be and hereby is
   responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
   related to a set of resuable components for semantic
   content management; and be it further

   RESOLVED, that the office of Vice President, Apache Stanbol be
   and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
   serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
   of the Apache Stanbol Project, and to have primary responsibility
   for management of the projects within the scope of
   responsibility of the Apache Stanbol Project; and be it further

   RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
   hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
   Apache Stanbol Project:

 * Alessandro Adamoualex...@apache.org
 * Ali Anil Sinaci  sin...@apache.org
 * Andrea Nuzzolese anuzzol...@apache.org
 * Andreas Gruber   agru...@apache.org
 * Andreas Kuckartz a...@apache.org
 * Benjamin Nagel   bna...@apache.org
 * Bertrand Delacretaz  bdelacre...@apache.org
 * Cihan Cimen  ci...@apache.org
 * Concetto Bonafedeconcel...@apache.org
 * Enrico Daga  enrid...@apache.org
 * Fabian Christfchr...@apache.org
 * Florent Andréflor...@apache.org
 * Olivier Grisel   ogri...@apache.org
 * Ozgur Kilic  oz...@apache.org
 * Reto Bachmann-Gmür   r...@apache.org
 * Rupert Westenthaler  rup...@apache.org
 * Suat Gonul   s...@apache.org
 * Tommaso Teofili  tomm...@apache.org
 * Valentina Presutti   v...@apache.org
 * Walter Kasperwkas...@apache.org

   NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Fabian Christ
   be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Stanbol, to
   serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
   Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
   death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
   or until a successor is appointed; and be it further

   RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Stanbol PMC be and hereby is
   tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
   encourage open development and increased participation in the
   Apache Stanbol Project; and be it further

   RESOLVED, that the Apache Stanbol Project be and hereby
   is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
   Incubator Stanbol podling; and be it further

   RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
   Incubator Stanbol podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
   Project are hereafter discharged.

Best,
 - Fabian

2012/9/6 Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com:
 I see from the discussion threads that you decided to remove people
 who had never been active - but were the following people omitted from
 the resolution by mistake or on purpose?

 Ali Anil Sinaci (70 commits, last in May  voted on graduation  resolution):
 http://stanbol.markmail.org/search/?q=from%3Asinaci

 Wernher Behrendt (3 commits, all in June)
 http://stanbol.markmail.org/search/?q=from%3Awernher

 Stefane Fermigier
 http://stanbol.markmail.org/search/?q=from%3Afermigier

 Niall

 On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Fabian Christ
 christ.fab...@googlemail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 the Stanbol podling has discussed [1] that we are ready for
 graduation. The project has created two releases during incubation and
 created an active community around

[VOTE] Stanbol to graduate from the incubator

2012-09-05 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi,

the Stanbol podling has discussed [1] that we are ready for
graduation. The project has created two releases during incubation and
created an active community around the topic of semantic content
management. The PPMC internal vote for a resolution to establish the
project got positive feedback [2].

We are now asking the IPMC to vote on the resolution to establish
Stanbol and to recommend the resolution to the board. The resolution
to vote on is also available online [3].

[1] http://markmail.org/thread/6shesliws7naqgit
[2] http://markmail.org/thread/ml3pfnz3ttmmpe5g
[3] http://incubator.apache.org/stanbol/graduation-resolution.html

===

X. Establish the Apache Stanbol Project

   WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
   interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
   Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
   Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
   open-source software related to a set of reusable components
   for semantic content management for distribution
   at no charge to the public.

   NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
   Committee (PMC), to be known as the Apache Stanbol Project,
   be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
   Foundation; and be it further

   RESOLVED, that the Apache Stanbol Project be and hereby is
   responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
   related to a set of reusable components for semantic
   content management; and be it further

   RESOLVED, that the office of Vice President, Apache Stanbol be
   and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
   serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
   of the Apache Stanbol Project, and to have primary responsibility
   for management of the projects within the scope of
   responsibility of the Apache Stanbol Project; and be it further

   RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
   hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
   Apache Stanbol Project:

 * Alessandro Adamoualex...@apache.org
 * Andrea Nuzzolese anuzzol...@apache.org
 * Andreas Gruber   agru...@apache.org
 * Andreas Kuckartz a...@apache.org
 * Benjamin Nagel   bna...@apache.org
 * Bertrand Delacretaz  bdelacre...@apache.org
 * Cihan Cimen  ci...@apache.org
 * Concetto Bonafedeconcel...@apache.org
 * Enrico Daga  enrid...@apache.org
 * Fabian Christfchr...@apache.org
 * Florent Andréflor...@apache.org
 * Olivier Grisel   ogri...@apache.org
 * Ozgur Kilic  oz...@apache.org
 * Reto Bachmann-Gmür   r...@apache.org
 * Rupert Westenthaler  rup...@apache.org
 * Suat Gonul   s...@apache.org
 * Szaby Grünwald   sza...@apache.org
 * Tommaso Teofili  tomm...@apache.org
 * Valentina Presutti   v...@apache.org
 * Walter Kasperwkas...@apache.org

   NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Fabian Christ
   be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Stanbol, to
   serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
   Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
   death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
   or until a successor is appointed; and be it further

   RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Stanbol PMC be and hereby is
   tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
   encourage open development and increased participation in the
   Apache Stanbol Project; and be it further

   RESOLVED, that the Apache Stanbol Project be and hereby
   is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
   Incubator Stanbol podling; and be it further

   RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
   Incubator Stanbol podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
   Project are hereafter discharged.


-- 
Fabian
http://twitter.com/fctwitt

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



[jira] [Closed] (PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8) Establish whether Apache Stanbol is a suitable name

2012-08-03 Thread Fabian Christ (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Fabian Christ closed PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8.
-

Resolution: Fixed

We found consensus that Stanbol is a fine name for a TLP.

 Establish whether Apache Stanbol is a suitable name
 -

 Key: PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8
 Project: Podling Suitable Names Search
  Issue Type: Suitable Name Search
Reporter: Fabian Christ

 We have to do some investigations to ensure that Apache Stanbol is a 
 suitable name for a TLP. People should start searching on the Web and add 
 their findings as comments.
 We should state:
  * Evidence of the degree of open source adoption for the proposed name.
  * Evidence of trademark registrations for the proposed name.
  * Evidence of the degree of branding usage of the proposed name on the world 
 wide web.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8) Establish whether Apache Stanbol is a suitable name

2012-07-17 Thread Fabian Christ (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13415975#comment-13415975
 ] 

Fabian Christ commented on PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8:
---

Trademarks search on http://www.uspto.gov/
with the Trademark Electronic Search System (TESS)
Basic Word Mark Search for stanbol
= No TESS records were found to match the criteria of your query.

 Establish whether Apache Stanbol is a suitable name
 -

 Key: PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8
 Project: Podling Suitable Names Search
  Issue Type: Suitable Name Search
Reporter: Fabian Christ

 We have to do some investigations to ensure that Apache Stanbol is a 
 suitable name for a TLP. People should start searching on the Web and add 
 their findings as comments.
 We should state:
  * Evidence of the degree of open source adoption for the proposed name.
  * Evidence of trademark registrations for the proposed name.
  * Evidence of the degree of branding usage of the proposed name on the world 
 wide web.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



[jira] [Created] (PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8) Establish whether Apache Stanbol is a suitable name

2012-07-11 Thread Fabian Christ (JIRA)
Fabian Christ created PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8:
-

 Summary: Establish whether Apache Stanbol is a suitable name
 Key: PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8
 Project: Podling Suitable Names Search
  Issue Type: Suitable Name Search
Reporter: Fabian Christ


We have to do some investigations to ensure that Apache Stanbol is a suitable 
name for a TLP. People should start searching on the Web and add their findings 
as comments.

We should state:
 * Evidence of the degree of open source adoption for the proposed name.
 * Evidence of trademark registrations for the proposed name.
 * Evidence of the degree of branding usage of the proposed name on the world 
wide web.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8) Establish whether Apache Stanbol is a suitable name

2012-07-11 Thread Fabian Christ (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13411876#comment-13411876
 ] 

Fabian Christ commented on PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8:
---

Google:
= 111.000 hits
Most of them produced by content that already is related to Apache Stanbol. 
Many other hits found for stan bol in a language I do not understand.

Bing:
= ignores my search for Stanbol and gives me hits for Istanbul.

http://sourceforge.net 
= No hits

Github: 
= Only Apache Stanbol related repos found

URL: stanbol.com 
= Used by a Turkish (?) media agency company. Stanbol Watch Your Think! - I do 
not understand what this company is selling.

URL: stanbol.net 
= seems to be unused

URL: stanbol.org 
=  seems to be unused

http://trademarkregisterfaq.com/  
= no results

ohloh.net: 
= Only the Apache Stanbol project

http://esearch.oami.europa.eu
= no results

 Establish whether Apache Stanbol is a suitable name
 -

 Key: PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8
 Project: Podling Suitable Names Search
  Issue Type: Suitable Name Search
Reporter: Fabian Christ

 We have to do some investigations to ensure that Apache Stanbol is a 
 suitable name for a TLP. People should start searching on the Web and add 
 their findings as comments.
 We should state:
  * Evidence of the degree of open source adoption for the proposed name.
  * Evidence of trademark registrations for the proposed name.
  * Evidence of the degree of branding usage of the proposed name on the world 
 wide web.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Apache Stanbol Entityhub 0.10.0-incubating

2012-07-10 Thread Fabian Christ
Dear Incubator,

the Apache Stanbol podling is still in need for one more vote from an
IPMC member on this release. Please, have a look and make your vote.

This vote is now open for two weeks!

Best,
 - Fabian

2012/7/6 Fabian Christ christ.fab...@gmail.com:
 Hi,

 this vote is now open for about 10 days and we are still in need for
 one more vote from an IPMC member to proceed.

 It would be really great to finish this release vote soon, so that the
 Apache Stanbol podling could go on with the next steps towards
 graduation.

 Thanks for your time,
   - Fabian

 2012/7/3 Fabian Christ christ.fab...@gmail.com:
 Dear Incubator,

 this vote is still open and we are looking for at least one more vote from
 an IPMC member to pass. Would be great if someone finds the time to verify
 the release.

 - Fabian

 *(Sent from my mobile. Sorry for typos.)

 Am 29.06.2012 08:46 schrieb Fabian Christ christ.fab...@gmail.com:

 Hi,

 we are in need of at least one more IPMC vote to get this release out.
 It would be great if someone finds the time to check before the
 weekend.

 Thanks,
  - Fabian

 2012/6/26 Fabian Christ christ.fab...@googlemail.com:
  2012/6/26 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
  Where is the SVN tag for the release?
 
  Here are the SVN tags.
 
  - source-assembly-0.10.0-incubating
   tag:
  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/source-assembly-0.10.0-incubating
  - stanbol-parent-1-incubating
   tag:
  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/stanbol-parent-1-incubating
  - org.apache.stanbol.commons.solr.core-0.10.0-incubating
   tag:
  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/org.apache.stanbol.commons.solr.core-0.10.0-incubating
  - org.apache.stanbol.commons.web.base-0.10.0-incubating
   tag:
  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/org.apache.stanbol.commons.web.base-0.10.0-incubating
  - org.apache.stanbol.data.parent-0.10.0-incubating
   tag:
  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/org.apache.stanbol.data.parent-0.10.0-incubating
  - org.apache.stanbol.data.sites.dbpedia-0.10.0-incubating
   tag:
  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/org.apache.stanbol.data.sites.dbpedia-1.0.4-incubating
  - apache-stanbol-entityhub-0.10.0-incubating
   tag:
  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/apache-stanbol-entityhub-0.10.0-incubating
 
  To check that the released artifacts match those tags, you can use the
  mentioned script
 
   $ check_release_matches_tag.sh 257 /tmp
 
  --
  Fabian
  http://twitter.com/fctwitt



-- 
Fabian
http://twitter.com/fctwitt

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Apache Stanbol Entityhub 0.10.0-incubating

2012-07-10 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi Tommaso,

thanks for your time and vote. It is really appreciated :)

Best,
 - Fabian

2012/7/10 Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com:
 Sorry for my late vote, everything (build, test, sigs, checks, etc.) looks
 fine to me.
 +1

 Tommaso

 2012/7/10 Fabian Christ christ.fab...@googlemail.com

 Dear Incubator,

 the Apache Stanbol podling is still in need for one more vote from an
 IPMC member on this release. Please, have a look and make your vote.

 This vote is now open for two weeks!

 Best,
  - Fabian

 2012/7/6 Fabian Christ christ.fab...@gmail.com:
  Hi,
 
  this vote is now open for about 10 days and we are still in need for
  one more vote from an IPMC member to proceed.
 
  It would be really great to finish this release vote soon, so that the
  Apache Stanbol podling could go on with the next steps towards
  graduation.
 
  Thanks for your time,
- Fabian
 
  2012/7/3 Fabian Christ christ.fab...@gmail.com:
  Dear Incubator,
 
  this vote is still open and we are looking for at least one more vote
 from
  an IPMC member to pass. Would be great if someone finds the time to
 verify
  the release.
 
  - Fabian
 
  *(Sent from my mobile. Sorry for typos.)
 
  Am 29.06.2012 08:46 schrieb Fabian Christ christ.fab...@gmail.com:
 
  Hi,
 
  we are in need of at least one more IPMC vote to get this release out.
  It would be great if someone finds the time to check before the
  weekend.
 
  Thanks,
   - Fabian
 
  2012/6/26 Fabian Christ christ.fab...@googlemail.com:
   2012/6/26 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
   Where is the SVN tag for the release?
  
   Here are the SVN tags.
  
   - source-assembly-0.10.0-incubating
tag:
  
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/source-assembly-0.10.0-incubating
   - stanbol-parent-1-incubating
tag:
  
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/stanbol-parent-1-incubating
   - org.apache.stanbol.commons.solr.core-0.10.0-incubating
tag:
  
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/org.apache.stanbol.commons.solr.core-0.10.0-incubating
   - org.apache.stanbol.commons.web.base-0.10.0-incubating
tag:
  
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/org.apache.stanbol.commons.web.base-0.10.0-incubating
   - org.apache.stanbol.data.parent-0.10.0-incubating
tag:
  
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/org.apache.stanbol.data.parent-0.10.0-incubating
   - org.apache.stanbol.data.sites.dbpedia-0.10.0-incubating
tag:
  
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/org.apache.stanbol.data.sites.dbpedia-1.0.4-incubating
   - apache-stanbol-entityhub-0.10.0-incubating
tag:
  
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/apache-stanbol-entityhub-0.10.0-incubating
  
   To check that the released artifacts match those tags, you can use
 the
   mentioned script
  
$ check_release_matches_tag.sh 257 /tmp
  
   --
   Fabian
   http://twitter.com/fctwitt



 --
 Fabian
 http://twitter.com/fctwitt

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org





-- 
Fabian
http://twitter.com/fctwitt

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Apache Stanbol Entityhub 0.10.0-incubating

2012-07-10 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi,

2012/7/10 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com:
 http://incubator.apache.org/stanbol/team.html says: Bertrand
 Delacretaz, Ross Gardler, Ted Dunning, Tommaso Teofili

in defense of our mentors: Bertrand and Ross already made their vote
and now we have one more from Tommaso.

Thanks!

-- 
Fabian
http://twitter.com/fctwitt

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Apache Stanbol Entityhub 0.10.0-incubating

2012-07-10 Thread Fabian Christ
2012/7/10 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com:
 in defense of our mentors: Bertrand and Ross already made their vote
 and now we have one more from Tommaso.

 So you already have three votes from the IPMC. :-)

Yes, with the vote from Tommaso we have the votes we needed :)

This is the overall vote result including the PPMC vote in [1]:

+1 : 6 votes (including 3 PPMC votes and 3 IPMC votes from Bertrand,
Ross, and Tommaso)
 0 : 0 votes
-1 : 0 votes

[1] http://markmail.org/thread/grjbimzq4x77o37e

The vote has passed and is now closed. We will now go on to publish the release.

Thank you!

-- 
Fabian
http://twitter.com/fctwitt

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Apache Stanbol Entityhub 0.10.0-incubating

2012-07-03 Thread Fabian Christ
Dear Incubator,

this vote is still open and we are looking for at least one more vote from
an IPMC member to pass. Would be great if someone finds the time to verify
the release.

- Fabian

*(Sent from my mobile. Sorry for typos.)
Am 29.06.2012 08:46 schrieb Fabian Christ christ.fab...@gmail.com:

 Hi,

 we are in need of at least one more IPMC vote to get this release out.
 It would be great if someone finds the time to check before the
 weekend.

 Thanks,
  - Fabian

 2012/6/26 Fabian Christ christ.fab...@googlemail.com:
  2012/6/26 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
  Where is the SVN tag for the release?
 
  Here are the SVN tags.
 
  - source-assembly-0.10.0-incubating
   tag:
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/source-assembly-0.10.0-incubating
  - stanbol-parent-1-incubating
   tag:
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/stanbol-parent-1-incubating
  - org.apache.stanbol.commons.solr.core-0.10.0-incubating
   tag:
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/org.apache.stanbol.commons.solr.core-0.10.0-incubating
  - org.apache.stanbol.commons.web.base-0.10.0-incubating
   tag:
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/org.apache.stanbol.commons.web.base-0.10.0-incubating
  - org.apache.stanbol.data.parent-0.10.0-incubating
   tag:
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/org.apache.stanbol.data.parent-0.10.0-incubating
  - org.apache.stanbol.data.sites.dbpedia-0.10.0-incubating
   tag:
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/org.apache.stanbol.data.sites.dbpedia-1.0.4-incubating
  - apache-stanbol-entityhub-0.10.0-incubating
   tag:
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/apache-stanbol-entityhub-0.10.0-incubating
 
  To check that the released artifacts match those tags, you can use the
  mentioned script
 
   $ check_release_matches_tag.sh 257 /tmp
 
  --
  Fabian
  http://twitter.com/fctwitt



[VOTE] Apache Stanbol Entityhub 0.10.0-incubating

2012-06-28 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi,

please vote for releasing Apache Stanbol 0.10.0-incubating (RC3).

This release has already passed the PPMC vote [1] with

+1 : 4 votes (including 3 PPMC votes and 1 IPMC vote)
 0 : 0 votes
-1 : 0 votes

So, we need at least 2 more votes from IPMC members.

[1] http://markmail.org/thread/grjbimzq4x77o37e

The release consists of the following components, fixing the listed
issues. When verifying the release, you have to build the components
in the given order because of dependencies.

- source-assembly-0.10.0-incubating-source-release.zip
 MD5 8ce4336700b3967c210f406f0dcc618e
 fixed issues:
 * [STANBOL-645] - Rename source release assembly descriptor
 * [STANBOL-640] - Create Stanbol source release assembly descriptor

- stanbol-parent-1-incubating-source-release.zip
 MD5 19d29a59b3e1eb324feb0f2ba5b8be27
 fixed issues:
 * [STANBOL-553] - Remove dependency management for
   org.apache.stanbol components from parent POM
 * [STANBOL-666] - Missing DISCLAIMER file in artifacts

- org.apache.stanbol.commons.solr.core-0.10.0-incubating-source-release.zip
 MD5 e5a51b7df302896203b590d2dbf6841c
 fixed issues:
 * [STANBOL-606] - Language prefixes are added to non
   TextConstraint in queries for the Entityhub

- org.apache.stanbol.commons.web.base-0.10.0-incubating-source-release.zip
 MD5 c2d5ca5bf5c058577a38453a48e89376
 fixed issues:
 * [STANBOL-555] - Remove test dependency of commons.web.base to
   enhancer.servicesapi
 * [STANBOL-606] - Language prefixes are added to non
   TextConstraint in queries for the Entityhub
 * [STANBOL-607] - SolrYard should use quotes instead of AND for
   multi word TextConstraints

- org.apache.stanbol.data.parent-0.10.0-incubating-source-release.zip
 MD5 3134e99eb72f3bb0bf5ea46e9c2d627f
 fixed issues:
 * [STANBOL-637] - Build warns for downloaded OpenNLP models when
   instead a DBPedia index is downloaded

- org.apache.stanbol.data.sites.dbpedia-1.0.4-incubating-source-release.zip
 MD5 e66249489c978e8305f68340c337890b
 fixed issues:
 * [STANBOL-638] - Make DBPedia data bundle releaseable

- apache-stanbol-entityhub-0.10.0-incubating-source-release.zip
 MD5 1741c62f4850d5c3b00a962112c6a2dd
 fixed issues:
 * [STANBOL-590] - LDPath processor operating on the IndexingSource
   and Implementation for the JenaTDB based indexing source.
 * [STANBOL-592] - LDPath processor operating on the
   IndexingDestination in the post-processing phase
 * [STANBOL-598] - Support Reconciliation properties on the full
   text field of entities
 * [STANBOL-599] - Support Reconcilliation properties on the semantic context
 * [STANBOL-568] - Entityhub indexing tool is not able to
   initialise if the path contains a space
 * [STANBOL-606] - Language prefixes are added to non
   TextConstraint in queries for the Entityhub
 * [STANBOL-610] - Indexing Directory parameter does not work for
   the genericrdf Indexing Tool
 * [STANBOL-616] - Wrong CORS Response
 * [STANBOL-654] - The SolrYard does not correcly enclose multi
   word query terms in quotes
 * [STANBOL-589] - Allow usage of SimilarityConstraints via the
   RESTful API of the Entityhub
 * [STANBOL-595] - Add support for ValueConstraints with multiple values
 * [STANBOL-600] - Update the namespaces used by the Entityhub to
   stanbol.apache.org URIs
 * [STANBOL-607] - SolrYard should use quotes instead of AND for
   multi word TextConstraints
 * [STANBOL-556] - LdPath processor for Entityhub Indexing
 * [STANBOL-591] - Add support for post-processing to the Entityhub
   Indexing Tool
 * [STANBOL-593] - EntityIterator implementation based on Jena TDB
   that allows to filter Entities based on Triple Filters
 * [STANBOL-594] - Google Refine Reconciliation Service support
 * [STANBOL-596] - Add support for full text searches to FieldQuery
 * [STANBOL-597] - Add support for semantic context queries to FieldQuery

The released artifacts can be downloaded from the staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestanbol-257

Keys are at:
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/stanbol/KEYS

Please note, that the staging repository also contains additional
Maven artifacts and binaries of the Entityhub (and of the other
components). However, the source release of the Entityhub is located
in the 'apache-stanbol-entityhub-0.10.0-incubating' folder. The Maven
artifacts and binaries are only deployed for convenience and were
automatically created from the source release. The source release
packages to verify are always named '*.source-release.[zip|tar.gz]'.

To check and verify the release, you can use two utility scripts that are
available in the Apache Stanbol SVN trunk [2].

Usage:
$ check_staged_release.sh 257 /tmp
$ check_release_matches_tag.sh 257 /tmp

[2] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/trunk/

This vote is open for at least 72 hours.

Best,
 - Fabian

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional 

[VOTE] Apache Stanbol Entityhub 0.10.0-incubating

2012-06-26 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi,

please vote for releasing Apache Stanbol 0.10.0-incubating (RC3).

This release has already passed the PPMC vote [1] with

+1 : 4 votes (including 3 PPMC votes and 1 IPMC vote)
 0 : 0 votes
-1 : 0 votes

So, we need at least 2 more votes from IPMC members.

[1] http://markmail.org/thread/grjbimzq4x77o37e

The release consists of the following components, fixing the listed
issues. When verifying the release, you have to build the components
in the given order because of dependencies.

- source-assembly-0.10.0-incubating-source-release.zip
 MD5 8ce4336700b3967c210f406f0dcc618e
 fixed issues:
 * [STANBOL-645] - Rename source release assembly descriptor
 * [STANBOL-640] - Create Stanbol source release assembly descriptor

- stanbol-parent-1-incubating-source-release.zip
 MD5 19d29a59b3e1eb324feb0f2ba5b8be27
 fixed issues:
 * [STANBOL-553] - Remove dependency management for
  org.apache.stanbol components from parent POM
 * [STANBOL-666] - Missing DISCLAIMER file in artifacts

- org.apache.stanbol.commons.solr.core-0.10.0-incubating-source-release.zip
 MD5 e5a51b7df302896203b590d2dbf6841c
 fixed issues:
 * [STANBOL-606] - Language prefixes are added to non
  TextConstraint in queries for the Entityhub

- org.apache.stanbol.commons.web.base-0.10.0-incubating-source-release.zip
 MD5 c2d5ca5bf5c058577a38453a48e89376
 fixed issues:
 * [STANBOL-555] - Remove test dependency of commons.web.base to
  enhancer.servicesapi
 * [STANBOL-606] - Language prefixes are added to non
  TextConstraint in queries for the Entityhub
 * [STANBOL-607] - SolrYard should use quotes instead of AND for
  multi word TextConstraints

- org.apache.stanbol.data.parent-0.10.0-incubating-source-release.zip
 MD5 3134e99eb72f3bb0bf5ea46e9c2d627f
 fixed issues:
 * [STANBOL-637] - Build warns for downloaded OpenNLP models when
  instead a DBPedia index is downloaded

- org.apache.stanbol.data.sites.dbpedia-1.0.4-incubating-source-release.zip
 MD5 e66249489c978e8305f68340c337890b
 fixed issues:
 * [STANBOL-638] - Make DBPedia data bundle releaseable

- apache-stanbol-entityhub-0.10.0-incubating-source-release.zip
 MD5 1741c62f4850d5c3b00a962112c6a2dd
 fixed issues:
 * [STANBOL-590] - LDPath processor operating on the IndexingSource
  and Implementation for the JenaTDB based indexing source.
 * [STANBOL-592] - LDPath processor operating on the
  IndexingDestination in the post-processing phase
 * [STANBOL-598] - Support Reconciliation properties on the full
  text field of entities
 * [STANBOL-599] - Support Reconcilliation properties on the semantic context
 * [STANBOL-568] - Entityhub indexing tool is not able to
  initialise if the path contains a space
 * [STANBOL-606] - Language prefixes are added to non
  TextConstraint in queries for the Entityhub
 * [STANBOL-610] - Indexing Directory parameter does not work for
  the genericrdf Indexing Tool
 * [STANBOL-616] - Wrong CORS Response
 * [STANBOL-654] - The SolrYard does not correcly enclose multi
  word query terms in quotes
 * [STANBOL-589] - Allow usage of SimilarityConstraints via the
  RESTful API of the Entityhub
 * [STANBOL-595] - Add support for ValueConstraints with multiple values
 * [STANBOL-600] - Update the namespaces used by the Entityhub to
  stanbol.apache.org URIs
 * [STANBOL-607] - SolrYard should use quotes instead of AND for
  multi word TextConstraints
 * [STANBOL-556] - LdPath processor for Entityhub Indexing
 * [STANBOL-591] - Add support for post-processing to the Entityhub
  Indexing Tool
 * [STANBOL-593] - EntityIterator implementation based on Jena TDB
  that allows to filter Entities based on Triple Filters
 * [STANBOL-594] - Google Refine Reconciliation Service support
 * [STANBOL-596] - Add support for full text searches to FieldQuery
 * [STANBOL-597] - Add support for semantic context queries to FieldQuery

The released artifacts can be downloaded from the staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestanbol-257

Keys are at:
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/stanbol/KEYS

Please note, that the staging repository also contains additional
Maven artifacts and binaries of the Entityhub (and of the other
components). However, the source release of the Entityhub is located
in the 'apache-stanbol-entityhub-0.10.0-incubating' folder. The Maven
artifacts and binaries are only deployed for convenience and were
automatically created from the source release. The source release
packages to verify are always named '*.source-release.[zip|tar.gz]'.

To check and verify the release, you can use two utility scripts that are
available in the Apache Stanbol SVN trunk [2].

Usage:
$ check_staged_release.sh 257 /tmp
$ check_release_matches_tag.sh 257 /tmp

[2] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/trunk/

This vote is open for at least 72 hours.

Best,
 - Fabian

-- 
Fabian
http://twitter.com/fctwitt

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: 

Re: [VOTE] Apache Stanbol Entityhub 0.10.0-incubating

2012-06-26 Thread Fabian Christ
2012/6/26 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
 Where is the SVN tag for the release?

Here are the SVN tags.

- source-assembly-0.10.0-incubating
 tag: 
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/source-assembly-0.10.0-incubating
- stanbol-parent-1-incubating
 tag: 
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/stanbol-parent-1-incubating
- org.apache.stanbol.commons.solr.core-0.10.0-incubating
 tag: 
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/org.apache.stanbol.commons.solr.core-0.10.0-incubating
- org.apache.stanbol.commons.web.base-0.10.0-incubating
 tag: 
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/org.apache.stanbol.commons.web.base-0.10.0-incubating
- org.apache.stanbol.data.parent-0.10.0-incubating
 tag: 
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/org.apache.stanbol.data.parent-0.10.0-incubating
- org.apache.stanbol.data.sites.dbpedia-0.10.0-incubating
 tag: 
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/org.apache.stanbol.data.sites.dbpedia-1.0.4-incubating
- apache-stanbol-entityhub-0.10.0-incubating
 tag: 
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/apache-stanbol-entityhub-0.10.0-incubating

To check that the released artifacts match those tags, you can use the
mentioned script

 $ check_release_matches_tag.sh 257 /tmp

-- 
Fabian
http://twitter.com/fctwitt

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



[ANNOUNCE] Apache Stanbol 0.9.0-incubating Released

2012-05-09 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi,

The Apache Stanbol PPMC is pleased to announce the first release of
Apache Stanbol versioned as 0.9.0-incubating.

Downloads are available at:
http://incubator.apache.org/stanbol/downloads/releases.html

The Maven artifacts will shortly be available via Maven central.

Regards,

- The Apache Stanbol PPMC

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Stanbol 0.9.0-incubating

2012-05-06 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi,

thanks everyone for checking and voting.

We have one additional (non-binding) +1 vote from Andreas Kuckartz.

Overall vote result:

+1: 9 votes including 3 IPMC votes
0 : 0 votes
-1 : 0 votes

The vote has passed and we will deploy the Apache Stanbol
0.9.0-incubating release soon.

Thanks again,
 - Fabian

2012/5/2 Andreas Kuckartz a.kucka...@ping.de:
 +1 non-binding

 On 02.05.2012 11:28, Fabian Christ wrote:
 Hi,

 this is the first Apache Stanbol (incubating) release. Please vote for 
 releasing

 *Apache Stanbol 0.9.0-incubating*

 The RC7 for this release has passed our PPMC vote and we already have
 three binding +1 votes from IPMC members. The PPMC vote thread can be
 found here
 http://markmail.org/thread/irzmcr6iekjjzuje

 The source release is available for download at:
 http://people.apache.org/~fchrist/apache-stanbol-0.9.0-incubating-RC7/

 The required -deps package is available for download at:
 http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/stanbol/apache-stanbol-0.9.0-incubating-deps/

 Keys are at:
 http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/stanbol/KEYS

 Release tag is:
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/0.9.0-incubating

 This release covers 408 resolved issues marked in JIRA as fixed for
 0.9.0-incubating.
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hiderequestId=12319391

 This vote is open for at least 72 hours.

 Best,
  - Fabian

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org




-- 
Fabian
http://twitter.com/fctwitt

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Incubator Wiki write access

2012-05-02 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi,

I need write access to the incubator Wiki.

My Wiki user name is: Fabian Christ
My Apache user is: fchrist

Best,
 - Fabian

-- 
Fabian
http://twitter.com/fctwitt

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



[VOTE] Release Apache Stanbol 0.9.0-incubating

2012-05-02 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi,

this is the first Apache Stanbol (incubating) release. Please vote for releasing

*Apache Stanbol 0.9.0-incubating*

The RC7 for this release has passed our PPMC vote and we already have
three binding +1 votes from IPMC members. The PPMC vote thread can be
found here
http://markmail.org/thread/irzmcr6iekjjzuje

The source release is available for download at:
http://people.apache.org/~fchrist/apache-stanbol-0.9.0-incubating-RC7/

The required -deps package is available for download at:
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/stanbol/apache-stanbol-0.9.0-incubating-deps/

Keys are at:
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/stanbol/KEYS

Release tag is:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/0.9.0-incubating

This release covers 408 resolved issues marked in JIRA as fixed for
0.9.0-incubating.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hiderequestId=12319391

This vote is open for at least 72 hours.

Best,
 - Fabian
-- 
Fabian
http://twitter.com/fctwitt

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Confusion about inclusion of binary dependencies in source releases

2012-03-30 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi,

the confusion about including binary dependencies in a source release
may result from podling guideline documents like this

http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-dependencies

which contains sentences like: A list should be compiled of the
project's dependencies, including those shipped as binary libraries
and those shipped as source together with the licenses for those
dependencies. I know this is a draft document but people, like me,
read this stuff searching for information. As a rather new member of
the Apache community it's hard to identify which information is
relevant and correct for a podling.

At Apache Stanbol (incubating) we have the issue of one dependency
that is dual licensed under AL20 and GPL. This dependency is not
available from Maven central. Our idea was to include this dependency
in the source release tar ball. We just define a local Maven
repository and ship this to the user. The feedback from our mentors
was that this should be okay.

From the ongoing discussions on this list I understand that this is a
no go. But how did projects solved this kind of problem before without
using Maven? Where did the dependencies come from if not included in
the downloaded tar ball? Do we have to add a note and tell the user
what she has to download prior being able to compile the software?

Best,
 - Fabian

-- 
http://twitter.com/fctwitt

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC0

2012-03-29 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi,

Am 26. März 2012 17:20 schrieb Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com:
 On Mar 26, 2012, at 4:41 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
 On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:24 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 26 March 2012 02:38, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
 The LICENSE file includes references to lots of jars that are dual
 licensed under CDDL v1.0 and GPL v2.
 However, there is no indication which license has been chosen by the 
 project.

 I think this is a blocker.

 A project does not choose a license.  The license is provided by the copyright
 owner.  We do not change that license, nor do we reduce the number of the
 available licenses to choose from, for downstream recipients.  Therefore,
 it doesn't make any sense to indicate which one is chosen.


I am following all these discussions for doing a first release of
Apache Stanbol (incubating) but get totally confused. According to

http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#mutually-exclusive

you have to choose the license and include only the license that you
have chosen.

-- 
Fabian
http://twitter.com/fctwitt

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] DeviceMap to join the Apache incubator

2011-12-29 Thread Fabian Christ
+1 (non binding)

Am 29. Dezember 2011 22:52 schrieb Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com:
 +1 (binding)

 --kevan

 On Dec 29, 2011, at 11:05 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:

 Hi Incubator PMC members (*),

 I've just reviewed the [PROPOSAL] Apache DeviceMap... thread and I
 think all relevant issues have been adressed now.

 Let's cast your votes to accept DeviceMap as an incubating project,
 proposal is at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DeviceMapProposal and
 copied below as well:

 [ ] +1 approve DeviceMap as an incubating project.
 [ ] -1 reject (explaining why)
 [ ] +/- 0 don't care.

 This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours.

 Here's my +1.

 -Bertrand

 (*) although only votes from Incubator PMC members are binding,
 anybody is welcome to cast a vote


 *** DeviceMap proposal ***
 == Abstract ==

 Apache DeviceMap is a data repository containing device information,
 images and other relevant information for all sorts of mobile devices,
 e.g. smartphones and tablets.

 While the focus is initially on that data, APIs will also be created
 to use and manage it.

 == Proposal ==

 Apache DeviceMap allows users to access a wide array of technical
 specifications, images and other artifacts related to mobile devices.
 Typical mobile devices include smartphones and tablets, such as:

 * Android devices from multiple vendors
 * Apple’s iPhone and iPad family of devices
 * !BlackBerry devices
 * Windows Phone devices from multiple vendors
 * Symbian devices
 * Devices with a small marketshare running Bada, Tizen, WebOS etc.

 The list of Apache DeviceMap devices remains open to other device
 types, as the mobile sector is a highly dynamic marketplace and new
 device forms may surface which may not too well fit into a smartphone
 / tablet matrix, e.g. ChromeOS Devices.

 == Repository Data ==

 The exact structure of the repository data will be defined as the
 project progresses.

 At the moment we envision storing user agent strings and/or regular
 expressions, properties similar to CSS Media Queries, images of the
 actual devices, other attributes similar to what’s in UAPROF
 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UAProf) for example, per-country market
 share data, etc.

 Modern mobile applications often do not need very detailed device
 data, so we will concentrate, at least initially, on basic device
 features as used in html5 websites.

 The W3C’s Mobile Web Initiative specs
 (http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/DDWG/) will also be evaluated for use in
 DeviceMap.

 == Background ==

 The initial motivation for Apache DeviceMap is to provide an open
 repository of mobile device data, available to the general public
 according to the Apache License.

 == Rationale ==

 We propose an open and community driven repository containing mobile
 device data, thereby allowing for analysis of device capabilities and
 feature sets. This is beneficial on several fronts, be it for software
 developers, stakeholders/decision makers or analysts.

 == Initial Goals ==

 * Define what form of data is valuable/required to setup a good
 working repository
 * Define what image sets are valuable/required
 * Define a data retention policy, meaning when should data be purged
 * Collect existing data and setup simple procedures for users to
 contribute and validate such data.

 == Current Status ==

 Proposal has been
 [[http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201112.mbox/%3CCAEWfVJkuv5qmb%2B8JXuF%3D3Zx4dsUNXoMMRKLWpZu4Eh%3D9-vJESg%40mail.gmail.com%3E|discussed]]
 on the Incubator general list, vote is ongoing there now (TODO add
 link).

 == Community ==

 This project will form a new community, driven by the initial
 committers listed below. We hope and feel that Apache DeviceMap will
 draw interest and its community will broaden.

 == Known Risks ==

 For device images and other data, we’ll need to define acceptance
 criteria and traceability rules similar to what Apache uses for code,
 to avoid any legal issues.

 Gathering data of any sort is a potential sensitive area and may
 require good public communication or even public relation activities.

 == Initial Source ==

 The [[http://OpenDDR.org|OpenDDR.org]] team will donate their existing
 source code to the DeviceMap podling.

 == Initial Committers ==

 * Philip Jespersen - philip.jespersen (at) terria (dot) com
 * Bertrand Delacretaz - bdelacretaz (at) apache (dot) org
 * Christian Stocker - chregu (at) liip.ch
 * Scott Wilson - scottbw (at) apache (dot) org
 * Sylvain Wallez - sylvain (at) apache (dot) org
 * Andrew Savory - asavory (at) apache (dot) org
 * Nils Dehl - nils.dehl (at) dkd (dot) de
 * Brian !LeRoux - brian (at) apache (dot) org
 * Stefano Andreani - s.andreani (at) opentecheng (dot) com
 * Alessandro Bellucci - a.bellucci (at) opentecheng (dot) com
 * Werner Keil - werner (at) openddr (dot) org
 * Tim Fernando - info (at) timfernando (dot) com

 == Required Resources ==

 === Mailing lists ===
 * devicemap-dev @ incubator.apache.org
 * 

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache DeviceMap, a data repository and APIs for mobile device information

2011-12-28 Thread Fabian Christ
+1

Sounds like a cool and really useful idea.

- Fabian

Am 27. Dezember 2011 17:10 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org:
 Hi James,

 On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 6:28 PM, James Rosewell ja...@51degrees.mobi wrote:
 ...Would device data licensed under the Mozilla Public License be
 compatible with the aims of this Proposal? If so you may wish to
 evaluate http://51degrees.mobi which provides device data under the
 Mozilla Public License in addition to a premium paid for data set...

 I think DeviceMap will want to control its device data, so using
 external data sets on which we have no control is probably not the
 best option. Supporting various data sets, however, might be
 interesting to allow comparisons, as some data sets might be more
 suitable to certain types of applications.

 I would also encourage people who manage their own data set, as you
 seem to be doing, in joining forces with DeviceMap on test suites for
 those data sets. Sharing (anonymized) lists of user-agent values that
 people see on their websites in different markets, for example, can be
 very useful in testing.

...Both
 the free and premium data set is already integrated into the Apache
 Mobile Filter (http://fiftyone.apachemobilefilter.org/). A clean sheet
 was used when creating this solution avoiding the possible issues
 referred to in earlier posts

 Cool.


 ...You should also consider the matching approach you'll be using early in
 the design stage as this is linked to the device data being used and the
 methods used to maintain the device data. 51Degrees.mobi includes
 matching logic in the data set

 Ok - various strategies for matching devices to their data are
 definitely in scope for DeviceMap, so if you want to join the
 devicemap developers list once it's announced (here, once the podling
 is voted in) to discuss this in more detail you're very welcome!

 -Bertrand

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org




-- 
Fabian
http://twitter.com/fctwitt

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: FOO proposal and Clerezza

2010-11-02 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi,

Am Dienstag, den 02.11.2010, 08:17 +0100 schrieb Reto Bachmann-Gmuer:
  IMO the best is to view Clerezza and FOO as sister projects, with
 lots
  of exchanges between their communities and a sizable chunk of common
  software components, but different end goals and audiences. This
 will
  enable both projects to follow their own goals while finding
  synergies.
 
 
 With the recent development of Clerezza towards adding support for
 Social
 Web features alongside the semantic stack the target audience is
 clearly
 broader than traditional CMS vendors. Still, I don't think the target
 audiences are too distinct and looking at the current FOO code I think
 there's quite some duplication and that a lot could be simplified by
 using
 the pattern supported by Clerezza.

I think Clerezza is a very fruitful basis for FOO and it is used as
such. In this sense, the FOO community should carefully work together
with the Clerezza community and support (move code) to Clerezza if it is
more common Clerezza stuff than FOO specific.

But FOO clearly has a focus on a) CMS vendors and b) knowledge
interaction as FOO has its roots in the IKS project. Unfortunately, the
knowledge interaction is not that much visible in the current state of
the implementation but this will change in the future. So I would agree
with Bertrand and see FOO and Clerezza as sister projects.

-Fabian


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org