Re: Podling report for Tuweni

I will then ;) Thanks Regards JB > Le 9 févr. 2022 à 06:38, Antoine Toulme a écrit : > > Thanks! It’s in and ready for review. > >> On Feb 8, 2022, at 9:37 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: >> >> Hi Antoine, >> >> Yes please, I think it’s be

Re: Podling report for Tuweni

Hi Antoine, Yes please, I think it’s better to report even if the report is short. Thanks Regards JB > Le 8 févr. 2022 à 23:28, Antoine Toulme a écrit : > > Hello folks, > > Apologies, it looks like our podling is late to reporting. I can put > something together quickly on our behalf. > >

Re: Question about viability for incubation: BinEd Hexadecimal Editor

Hi Miroslav The main question you have to ask yourself is about the potential community around your project (user and dev communities). So, the fact that your project is small or on a specific use case is not really a problem if we can build a community around. Incubation phase is a good place

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache InLong(Incubating) 0.11.0-incubating Candidate 0

+1 (binding) I quickly checked: - incubating in version - signature and hash files are good - DISCLAIMER is there - LICENSE and NOTICE look good - ASF headers are there - No binary files in source distribution - Compile OK Thanks, Regards JB > Le 1 nov. 2021 à 08:07, Aloys Zhang a écrit : >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache InLong(Incubating) 0.10.0-incubating RC1

+1 (binding) I checked: - version contains incubating - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE files look good - ASF headers are present in all files - I’m able to compile from source - I didn’t find binary in the source distribution Thanks, Regards JB > Le 6 sept. 2021 à 04:22, Charles Zhang

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache InLong 0.9.0-incubating RC1

+1 (binding) Checked: - incubating in the name - signatures OK - LICENSE and NOTICE files look good - DISCLAIMER file is there - ASF header is present in files - no binary file detected in source archive Thanks ! Regards JB > Le 19 juil. 2021 à 04:49, Goson zhang a écrit : > > Hello Incubator

Re: [VOTE] Apache StreamPipes 0.68.0 (incubating) RC1 release

+1 (binding) I quickly checked: - signatures are ok - NOTICE and LICENSE files look good to me - DISCLAIMER file is there - incubating is in the artifacts name Thanks, Regards JB > Le 14 juil. 2021 à 22:00, Dominik Riemer a écrit : > > Hi all, > > this is a call for a vote to release Apache

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Pinot as TLP

+1 (binding) Congrats and good luck for the next steps. Regards JB > Le 24 juin 2021 à 09:16, Paul King a écrit : > > +1 binding, good luck! > > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 5:44 AM Mayank Shrivastava > wrote: > >> Dear Incubator Community, >> >> We have discussed Apache Pinot Podling

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 2.0.0

+1 (binding) Sorry I was late on this vote. Regards JB > Le 16 juin 2021 à 08:36, Furkan KAMACI a écrit : > > Hi, > > +1 (binding, carrying over my vote). > > Kind Regards, > Furkan KAMACI > > On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 3:54 PM John D. Ament wrote: > >> Thanks for clarifying everything. I

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kyuubi into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Good luck, and don’t hesitate to ping if you need help. Regards JB > Le 14 juin 2021 à 15:57, Willem Jiang a écrit : > > Hi all, > > Following up the [DISCUSS] thread on Kyuubi[1], I would like to call a > VOTE to accept Kyuubi into the Apache Incubator. > > Please cast your

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Pinot (Incubating) as a TLP

+1 (binding) Regards JB > Le 11 juin 2021 à 17:57, Felix Cheung a écrit : > > +1 > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 4:18 AM Xun Liu wrote: > >> +1 >> Pinot is an open source project with a broad user base, and the community >> is also very active. >> >> Best regards >> Xun Liu >> >> On Fri, Jun

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal of Kyuubi

Hi Kent Yao, It looks interesting. Correct me if I’m wrong, but it seems to be more a SQL gateway, more than a "server", meaning that the storage is delegated to Hive and processing to Spark, right ? Regards JB > Le 31 mai 2021 à 08:21, Kent Yao a écrit : > > Dear all, > > We want to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Liminal (incubating) 0.0.2rc2-INCUBATING

+1 (binding) I checked: - signatures - LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER files - ASF headers - incubating in the same - quick check on the sources Regards JB > Le 23 avr. 2021 à 15:58, Lior Schachter a écrit : > > Hi All, > > We would like to vote on RC2 of version 0.0.2. The main purpose of V >

Re: [VOTE] Accept ShenYu into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Regards JB > Le 26 avr. 2021 à 15:21, Willem Jiang a écrit : > > Hi all, > > Following up the [DISCUSS] thread on ShenYu[1] I would like to call a > VOTE to accept ShenYu Aka Soul into the Apache Incubator. > > Please cast your vote: > > [ ] +1, bring ShenYu into the Incubator

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Liminal (incubating) 0.0.2rc1-INCUBATING

Hi Justin, I agree, with an updated DISCLAIMER, I guess we can move forward with 0.0.2 release. However, we have to double check that chardet is not a "direct" dependency (it seems to come from Airflow, but I didn’t actually check yet). Regards JB > Le 21 avr. 2021 à 00:15, Justin Mclean a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Liminal (incubating) 0.0.2rc1-INCUBATING

ts] >>>> >>>> - apache-liminal==0.0.2rc1 [requires: kubernetes==12.0.1] >>>> >>>> - requests-oauthlib==1.3.0 [requires: requests>=2.0.0] >>>> >>>> - kubernetes==12.0.1 [requires: requests-oauthlib] >&

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Liminal (incubating) 0.0.2rc1-INCUBATING

Good catch. AFAIR chardet is LGPL based (not GPL), and LGPL is Cat B (not X). @Liminal team, do you confirm LGPL license for chardet (on Pypi) ? Regards JB > Le 20 avr. 2021 à 08:43, Justin Mclean a écrit : > > Hi, > > Sorry it’s -1 (binding) form me. If issue re the dependancy is clarified

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Liminal (incubating) 0.0.2rc1-INCUBATING

+1 (binding) I checked: - ASF headers - DISCLAIMER, NOTICE, LICENSE files are there - incubating is in the name > Le 19 avr. 2021 à 17:18, Lior Schachter a écrit : > > Hi All, > We would like to initiate a vote on Apache Liminal (Incubating) V > 0.0.2. The main purpose of this version is to

Re: [MENTORS] Research on the incubator / mentor interviews

Hi, I had an interview with them earlier this week. The discussion was very interesting, Curtis and Charlie were super friendly. Regards JB > Le 18 avr. 2021 à 06:07, Justin Mclean a écrit : > > Hi, > > I was also interviewed and had a nice chat with them. I'm looking forward > to what they

Re: [DISCUSS] YunionCloud Proposal

endent of any one company. >> >> For those members from China am I getting distracted by translation? >> >> Regards, >> Dave >> >>> On Apr 15, 2021, at 11:16 AM, Jian Qiu wrote: >>> >>> Great! How about we use UniOneCloud instead of

Re: [DISCUSS] YunionCloud Proposal

It sounds good indeed. Regards JB > Le 15 avr. 2021 à 18:12, KimmKing a écrit : > > UniOneCloud, it's a wonderfull name. > > > > > -- > > Kimm King(kimmk...@apache.org/kimmk...@163.com) > Apache Dubbo PMC & ShardingSphere PMC Member > > > > > > > > At 2021-04-15 16:23:14, "Jian

Re: [DISCUSS] YunionCloud Proposal

Thanks ! I will do my best to help the project ;) Regards JB > Le 12 avr. 2021 à 16:08, Willem Jiang a écrit : > > Hi JB， > > Thanks for the offering, I just added you into the mentor list. > > > Willem Jiang > > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 12:51 PM

Re: [MENTORS] Research on the incubator / mentor interviews

Hi, I can be available if needed. Regards JB > Le 8 avr. 2021 à 02:57, Justin Mclean a écrit : > > Hi, > > A National Science Foundation-funding research team may be asking you for an > interview to help them understand the ASF mentoring program. > > They are interested in mentors

Re: [VOTE] Retire BlueMarlin project from Incubator

gt;> Regards >> JB >> >>> Le 22 févr. 2021 à 07:12, Xun Hu a écrit : >>> >>> Yes, please help us, we are not familiar with the process. Could you >> please work with Reza to finalize the process? We can follow it in the >> future. >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Liminal (incubating) 0.0.1rc6-INCUBATING

+1 (binding) Regards JB > Le 25 févr. 2021 à 16:52, Lior Schachter a écrit : > > Hi All, > We would like to have another round of vote for the first release of > Apache Liminal (Incubating), after fixing the licensing issues found > at the previous voting round. > > This release enables

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TubeMQ (Incubating) 0.8.0-incubating RC4

+1 (binding) I checked: - DISCLAIMER - LICENSE, NOTICE - ASF headers - Signatures Regards JB > Le 1 mars 2021 à 12:29, Saisai Shao a écrit : > > +1 binding. > > Checked license file, ASC and SHA512, LGTM. > > Best regards, > Sasisai > > Goson zhang 于2021年2月26日周五 上午9:40写道： > >> Hi all: >>

Re: [VOTE] Retire BlueMarlin project from Incubator

>> From: Dave Fisher mailto:w...@apache.org>> >> Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2021 9:40 AM >> To: general@incubator.apache.org <mailto:general@incubator.apache.org> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Retire BlueMarlin project from Incubator >> >> Hi JBO, >>

Re: [VOTE] Retire BlueMarlin project from Incubator

gards, > Dave > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Feb 21, 2021, at 8:55 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I kindly request a couple of weeks about moving forward with this vote. I >> try a new time to ping the BlueMarlin team to move

Re: [VOTE] Retire BlueMarlin project from Incubator

;> On Feb 21, 2021, at 8:55 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I kindly request a couple of weeks about moving forward with this vote. I >> try a new time to ping the BlueMarlin team to move forward with code >> donation and bootstrap the p

Re: [VOTE] Retire BlueMarlin project from Incubator

Hi, I kindly request a couple of weeks about moving forward with this vote. I try a new time to ping the BlueMarlin team to move forward with code donation and bootstrap the project. I have to admit that it’s super long and I have some difficulty to interact with the team, but I would like to

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache DolphinScheduler (incubating) as a TLP

+1 (binding) Regards JB > Le 14 févr. 2021 à 11:49, lidong dai a écrit : > > Hello all, > > We've got positive feedback on the DISCUSS thread [1], I'd like to start an > official VOTE thread now. > > Please vote on the resolution pasted below to graduate Apache > DolphinScheduler from the

Re: [DICUSS] Retire Samoa

Fair enough ;) No objection from my side. Regards JB > Le 11 févr. 2021 à 05:57, jus...@classsoftware.com a écrit : > > Hi, > > Sorry I meant to say "Are there any objections to retiring the project?” > > Justin > - > To

Re: [DICUSS] Retire Samoa

Agree to discuss the retirement. Regards JB > Le 11 févr. 2021 à 03:22, Justin Mclean a écrit : > > Hi, > > My message to the Samoa asking them to consider retirement got no response > [1] so I this think it time to discuss their retirement. Are there any > objections to returning the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Livy 0.7.1 (incubating) based on RC1

+1 (binding) Quickly check name, signature, DISCLAIMER, NOTICE and LICENSE. Regards JB > Le 7 févr. 2021 à 02:50, Saisai Shao a écrit : > > The Livy PPMC has voted to release Livy 0.7.1 RC1 as the next Livy release. > > Livy enables programmatic, fault-tolerant, multi-tenant submission of >

Re: [VOTE] Accept EventMesh into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Regards JB > Le 1 févr. 2021 à 07:43, Eason Chen a écrit : > > Hi, > > After the discussion of EventMesh proposal (discussion thread is here[1]), > I would like to call a VOTE to accept it into the Apache Incubator. > > Please cast your vote: > > [ ] +1, bring EventMesh into

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.0.0-incubating rc1

+1 (binding) I quickly checked: - incubating in name - signature OK - DISCLAIMER is there - NOTICE and LICENSE are there - ASF headers in the source Regards JB > Le 5 févr. 2021 à 05:36, Felix Cheung a écrit : > > Please - any one more vote for this? > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 8:36 PM Ming

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Ratis as TLP Project

+1 (binding) Regards JB > Le 31 janv. 2021 à 18:03, Arpit Agarwal a écrit : > > +1 (binding) > > > On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 4:32 AM Uma gangumalla wrote: > >> Dear Incubator Community, >> >> We have discussed Apache Ratis Podling graduation in the incubator general >> DISCUSS thread[1] and

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

; communities. >>> Through the efforts of the last five months, I am glad to see positive >>> changes in the project and community. >>> >>> @Jean-Baptiste Onofré EventMesh really need >>> to improve its lighter plugin modules, karaf may be a good opt

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

Hi Eason, That’s an interesting proposal, indeed. I would rewrite some part of the proposal, but overall good. I will check if the EventMesh architecture is "pluggable", meaning that we "could" replace RocketMQ with another messaging/async provider. Anyway, if you need some help on the

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Gobblin (Incubating) as a TLP

+1 (binding) Regards JB > Le 17 déc. 2020 à 09:54, Abhishek Tiwari a écrit : > > Hi all, > > After a discussion with the community [1], a positive vote > result [2], and a discussion with the IPMC [7], we believe > Apache Gobblin (Incubating) is ready for graduation to a TLP, > and we'd like

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Gobblin (Incubating) as a TLP

+1 (binding) Regards JB > Le 17 déc. 2020 à 09:54, Abhishek Tiwari a écrit : > > Hi all, > > After a discussion with the community [1], a positive vote > result [2], and a discussion with the IPMC [7], we believe > Apache Gobblin (Incubating) is ready for graduation to a TLP, > and we'd like

Re: [DISCUSS] Wayang Proposal

more into Apache Flink, but with major >>> advantages >>>> as described before. Our focus is more into AI / ML and the >>> productionizing >>>> of models, helping data engineers to get the job with the right tool >> done >>>> in less t

Re: [VOTE] Accept Wayang into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Regards JB > Le 11 déc. 2020 à 17:33, Christofer Dutz a écrit : > > Hi all, > > following up the [DISCUSS] thread on Wayang > (https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r5fc03ae014f44c7c31a509a6db4ac07faedb2e1c6245cd917b744826%40%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E) > I would like to

Re: [DISCUSS] Wayang Proposal

inkedin.com/in/alexanderalten/ > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexanderalten/%E2%80%AC> > m: +49 151 156 81561 > > Scalytics, Inc. > Web: scalytics.io <http://scalytics.ai/> > > > From: Jean-Baptiste Onofre <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net> > Sent: W

Re: [DISCUSS] Wayang Proposal

Hi, As it seems a bit close to Apache Beam, I would be interested by follow and/or mentor the project. Please let me know if you want an additional mentor on this podling. By the way, what’s Wayang position regarding Apache Beam and Apache Nemo ? Regards JB > Le 6 déc. 2020 à 12:13,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TubeMQ (Incubating) 0.7.0-incubating RC0

+1 (binding) Sorry, I forgot to cast my vote here. Regards JB > Le 4 déc. 2020 à 04:11, Jerry Shao a écrit : > > +1 (binding) > > Signatures, checksums are good. > > Best Regards, > Jerry > > Sijie Guo 于2020年12月2日周三 上午3:24写道： > >> +1 (binding) >> >> Signatures, checksums, NOTICE, and

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 1.3.0 release

+1 (binding) I checked signature, headers, build. Thanks, Regards JB > Le 19 nov. 2020 à 20:16, Antoine Toulme a écrit : > > Hi all, > > We're voting on the source distributions available here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tuweni/1.3.0-incubating/ > The release tag is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TubeMQ (Incubating) 0.6.0-incubating RC0

+1 (binding) Checked: - Signature looks good - DISCLAIMER & NOTICE look good (minor improvement but not so much) - incubating in the artifact names - Build OK - No binary in package Regards JB > Le 16 oct. 2020 à 08:05, Zhijie Shen a écrit : > > +1. I checked the following: > > - Signature >

Re: BlueMarlin Slow Bootstrap into Incubator

Hi Chris, We had issue with the mailing list (DNS it seems). I will help on the bootstrapping now that these issues are solved. Regards JB > Le 9 oct. 2020 à 04:31, Chris Lambertus a écrit : > > This project needs to have the incubator/their mentors guide them through the > podling creation

Re: [VOTE] Hop proposal

+1 (binding) Don’t hesitate to ping me if you need help. Regards JB > Le 16 sept. 2020 à 15:28, Matt Casters > a écrit : > > Hi Apache, > > I'd like to call a vote on accepting Hop into the Apache Incubator. > Please see the discussion thread [1]. > > Please see the full proposal: >

Re: [DISCUSS] Hop proposal

Hi, Interesting proposal, and happy to help if needed. By the way, did you evaluate the potential relationship with Camel or NIFI (and what’s the pros/cons if it’s possible to compare with) ? Regards JB > Le 8 sept. 2020 à 11:56, Matt Casters > a écrit : > > Hello Apache, > > Our

Re: [VOTE] Accept Sedona into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Regards JB > Le 16 juil. 2020 à 05:49, Felix Cheung a écrit : > > Hi, > > As we discussed the Sedona proposal [1], I would like to call for a vote to > accept Sedona into the Apache Incubator. > > Sedona is a big geospatial data processing engine. The system provides an > easy

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 1.1.0-incubating release

+1 (binding) I checked: - LICENSE, DISCLAIMER, NOTICE - Build and src distribution - ASF header - No binary Regards JB > Le 8 juil. 2020 à 01:12, Antoine Toulme a écrit : > > Hi all, > > We're voting on the distributions available here: >

Re: [MENTORS] July reports due today Wednesday 1st July

Hi, Working on Liminal and BlueMarlin report (they are pretty short as we are in the bootstrap phase, creating resources (git, jira, …) and code donation). Regards JB > Le 1 juil. 2020 à 02:55, Justin Mclean a écrit : > > Hi, > > Thanks for for the submitted from from several podlings. >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache BlueMarlin in the incubator

Hi, This vote passed with only +1. I’m moving forward and bootstrap the project. Thanks all for your vote. Regards JB > Le 25 mai 2020 à 08:28, Jean-Baptiste Onofre a écrit : > > Hi everyone, > > Following the discussion about BlueMarlin, I would like to start a formal &

Re: [VOTE] Accept Rainbow into Apache Incubator

Hi all, Just a quick update about Apache Liminal. I’m bootstrapping right now the projects (repo, Jira, website, etc). We will report next month. Regards JB > Le 24 mai 2020 à 10:56, Justin Mclean a écrit : > > Hi, > > With the name issue resolvedit would be good to see your mentor’s

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TubeMQ (Incubating) 0.3.0-incubating RC0

+1 (binding) Checked build, signature, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER. Regards JB > Le 2 juin 2020 à 04:18, Guangxu Cheng a écrit : > > Hello Incubator Community, > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache TubeMQ(incubating) version > 0.3.0-incubating RC0 > > The Apache TubeMQ community has voted

Re: [MENTORS] Podling reports due today

Hi, For Liminal, I discussed with the team yesterday and actually I missed the "[RESULT]" vote email. As I will take care of bootstrapping step (creating the resources), we don’t have anything to report much. So, I kindly ask to report next month. Thanks, Regards JB > Le 3 juin 2020 à 01:45,

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache BlueMarlin in the incubator

Casting my own +1 (binding) Gently reminder for the other IPMC. Thanks ! Regards JB > Le 25 mai 2020 à 08:28, Jean-Baptiste Onofre a écrit : > > Hi everyone, > > Following the discussion about BlueMarlin, I would like to start a formal > vote to accept BlueMarlin

[VOTE] Accept Apache BlueMarlin in the incubator

Hi everyone, Following the discussion about BlueMarlin, I would like to start a formal vote to accept BlueMarlin into the incubator. As reminder, here’s the proposal: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Apache+BlueMarlin

Re: [VOTE] Recommend Apache Iceberg graduation to top-level project resolution to the board

+1 (binding) Regards JB > Le 18 mai 2020 à 23:00, Carl Steinbach a écrit : > > +1 (binding) > > > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 6:31 AM Sheng Wu wrote: > >> +1 binding good luck. >> >> Sheng Wu 吴晟 >> Twitter, wusheng1108 >> >> >> Jacques Nadeau 于2020年5月18日周一 上午2:16写道： >> >>> +1 (binding).

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache BlueMarlin proposal

Hi, I think we had a good discussion about this proposal. I propose to move forward with the formal vote. Regards JB > Le 15 mars 2020 à 08:46, Jean-Baptiste Onofre a écrit : > > Hi Justin, > > - Good point about the community. We know it’s a point we have to work >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Rainbow into Apache Incubator

OK, thanks. I will do that with the team. Regards JB > Le 8 avr. 2020 à 14:59, Justin Mclean a écrit : > > Hi, > >> Do you want me to do a quick search about Rainbow ? (It sounds like a very >> generic name to me). > > Yes please. Given it so generic it may or may not be suitable. > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Rainbow into Apache Incubator

Hi Justin, I might have missed your message about the name. Do you want me to do a quick search about Rainbow ? (It sounds like a very generic name to me). Thanks, Regards JB > Le 8 avr. 2020 à 09:27, Justin Mclean a écrit : > > Hi, > > I’m not sure my query about the name has been taken

Re: [VOTE] Accept Rainbow into Apache Incubator

Hi Gently reminder for the IPMC. Regards JB > Le 10 mars 2020 à 07:29, Jean-Baptiste Onofre a écrit : > > Hi, > > Following the discussion about Rainbow proposal [1], I would like to call a > vote to accept Rainbow [2] into the Apache Incubator. > > Pleas

Re: [DISCUSS] Project proposal - Apache Rainbow

Agree, that was my first thought: work during the incubation phase to build project/community. Let’s say what the other IPMC members think (maybe some would like to join the project ;) ). Regards JB > Le 25 mars 2020 à 06:31, Justin Mclean a écrit : > > Hi, > > Really up to the project on

Re: [DISCUSS] Project proposal - Apache Rainbow

Hi, Yes, it’s a very early stage project, discussed between several Apache contributor. We wanted to use the incubator as the "platform" to build the project and the community around the project. Do you think it’s more a "lab" related project ? Regards JB > Le 24 mars 2020 à 05:12, Luciano

Re: [VOTE] Accept Rainbow into Apache Incubator

Hi, Dave asked for the link to the private repo with the current codebase. I will check with the team to push the codebase on a public repo to share the current state. Anyway, any other vote/comment/request regarding Rainbow ? Thanks, Regards JB > Le 10 mars 2020 à 07:29, Jean-Bapti

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache BlueMarlin proposal

Hi Justin, - Good point about the community. We know it’s a point we have to work generally speaking. - +1 about the "inexperience with open source" section, I will add some content. - Agree to start only with dev mailing list - we are kindly asking for gitbox repo (not svn). It’s in the

[DISCUSS] Apache BlueMarlin proposal

Hi, With other guys, I worked on a new proposal for the Apache Incubator: Apache BlueMarlin. The proposal draft is there: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Apache+BlueMarlin Even if the people

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 1.0.0-incubating release

+1 (binding) I quickly checked: * Incubating is present in release name * DISCLAIMER Is there * LICENSE and NOTICE look good * Signatures & checksums verified Regards JB > Le 12 mars 2020 à 05:02, Antoine Toulme a écrit : > > Hello folks, > > Would anybody from the IPMC have time to vote on