* Rainer Döbele doeb...@apache.org
* Eike Kettner e...@apache.org
* Jörg Reiher rei...@apache.org
* Benjamin Venditti benni...@apache.org
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Francis De
Brabandere
Hi,
The Apache Empire-db community has approved the 2.2.0-incubating release and we
are now looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the release.
With this release we have made a major API change removing unrecommended legacy
features that have been non-standard Java. The API now is much
Hi all,
thanks Jukka for your view on this issue and thank you Benson for bringing this
topic up.
I am one of the Empire-db committers and certainly we would appreciate it very
much if there is a way for us to graduate.
It is true that we are a small community of around 5 regularly active
Hi Dave,
I have been with the project from the beginning and so far we have accepted one
new comitter per year - after we felt that they have shown their comittment
submitting patches for some time. So in total we have had 3 new comitters since
incubation and they are all still active.
However
+1
Rainer
Francis De Brabandere wrote:
re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.6-incubating (rc4)
Hi,
We have just prepared the fourth 2.0.6-incubating release candidate
and we are now looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the release.
PMC vote thread:
Hi sebb,
we have thoroughly investigated and discussed this issue and since everything
but the timestamp in the manifest is equal and there is no easy solution for
having only one Maven build, we (and our mentors) considered it a minor and not
blocking issue.
We're still relying on your vote
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:26 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc6)
On 22/09/2009, Rainer Döbele doeb...@esteam.de wrote:
Hi sebb,
we have thoroughly investigated and discussed this issue and since
everything but the timestamp
Hi Sebb,
thanks for checking our release once again but I was shocked to read about your
verdict.
However I have problems to reproduce your findings.
I have downloaded both the zip and the tar from
http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-db/
The only difference I could find, was that the
Francis De Brabandere wrote:
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)
Hi Rainer,
The only difference I could find, was that the zip additionally contains
5 empty directories that are not present in the tar. But the number and
content of the files do match.
could you
Francis I think we can delete that old directory tree in the trunk.
Rainer
Francis De Brabandere wrote:
Re: [VOTE] Release Empire-db version 2.0.5-incubating (take 2)
[inline reply]
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:14 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
The new release candidate uses exactly the
The Empire-db community has completed working on Release 2.0.5 and is now
looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the release.
So far the release has been approved by Empire-db committers, but due to
vacation time and other circumstances the Mentors are unable to review the
release. Hence
I agree with Martijn's view on the first release of a podling which is much
more critical than subsequent releases.
But for subsequent releases the voting process should be simplified in one way
or the other. At the moment we have to get approval from our Mentors first
before we can move to
Excellent proposal. I am totally convinced of the superiority of the approach.
In fact I already have an idea for interoperability plug-in that will allow
access to any SOAP 1.3 capable service. I have already some code in Java that I
am currently converting to Null. My suggestion for the title
Hi Martijn, Hi Niclas,
I was also surprised not to find Empire-db on the November report list.
Because I had planned on writing the report all week I added it anyway before
actually reading your E-Mails.
So it is now in there (see http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2008
not
belonging to the empire-db development team. A few requests have been answered.
Rainer Döbele
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why not leave all licenses as separate files but put them in a subfolder called
licenses?
That would serve both of you.
This is clearly my first choice.
Rainer
ant.elder wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 8:42 AM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 8:23 AM,
+1 (non binding unfortunately)
Rainer
Jörg Reiher wrote:
Hello,
the community has approved a release of apache-empire-db-2.0.4-incubating and
apache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubating.
Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy we would now like
to request the
]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. September 2008 19:48
An: Rainer Döbele
Cc: general@incubator.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [VOTE]apache-empire-db-2.0.4-incubatingandapache-empire-
struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubatingrelease
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 11:00 +0200, Rainer Döbele wrote:
Does anyone
where to obtain distributable versions of the servlet-api.jar
and jsp-api.jar from? The only implementations I know come from Sun
Microsystems and are under CDDL License.
Rainer
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 10:31 +0200, Rainer Döbele wrote:
Hi Henning,
thanks
Hi Henning,
thanks for your vote.
Here are a few answers to your comments:
Testing is currently performed by running the two example applications provided
with the distribution, which contain various tasks. Each of them is run once
for each supported database, and the logs are checked. This
Hi Thomas,
thanks very much for your detailed analysis.
It's a shame we missed that on our empire-db-dev vote.
Jörg has already commented about the md5 and sha file format.
As far as I understand it, there are two major problems with the
empire-struts2-ext-1.0.3 release:
1. the missing
Since no one else seems to vote here, I do.
Here's my +1 (non binding)
Rainer
Jörg Reiher wrote:
Hello,
The community has approved a release of apache-empire-db-2.0.3-incubating
and apache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.3-incubating.
Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy
. Juli 2008 10:57
An: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Rainer Döbele; Matthew Bond; Jörg Reiher; Manuel Gamerdinger; Thomas
Fischer; Martijn Dashorst
Betreff: Empire-DB Incubation Status
Hi,
Current status:
- ICLAS for Rainer, Matthew and Manuel have been received
- Code grant has been received
Before we (hopefully) enter the Apache Incubator we have completed pending
development tasks on Empire-db and Empire-Struts2-Extentsions which are now
available on SourceForge.net with release 2.0.2 (Empire-db) respectively
release 1.0.2 (Empire-Struts2-Extentsions).
The most significant
Referring to: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Empire-dbProposal
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
I find this alarming: when there are no new challenges awaiting the
project, why join Apache? The code is stable and mature, you can just
leave it at sf.net. There doesn't seem to be a plan other than
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Inexperience with Open Source:
Empire-db has been Open Source from its start in 2001, but it has only
been publicly available since January 2008.
This is odd to say the least, and from the empire-db.org [1] website I
find this quote:
In summer 2007 ESTEAM
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Inexperience with Open Source:
Empire-db has been Open Source from its start in 2001, but it has only
been publicly available since January 2008.
This is odd to say the least, and from the empire-db.org [1] website I
find this quote:
In summer 2007 ESTEAM
Hello everyone,
We would like to donate our relational data persistence component called
Empire-db to the apache software foundation. According to the Incubator
documentation we need to find a Champion who can help us with the incubation
process.
Even though with iBatis, JDO and Torgue there
28 matches
Mail list logo
