[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating
The results are in: 3 +1 votes (Ted Dunning, Just Mclean, Lars Hofhansl) 1 -0 vote (Jan I) Thank you to all those who voted. I will move forward with publishing the release. Steven
Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release
This sounds good to me. On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Jacques Nadeau jacq...@apache.org wrote: This vote thread looks like a hanging chad. The current vote count is: +1 Ted +1 Lars +1 Justin +1 or -1: Grant -0 Jan I would love to have a clarification vote from Grant. I read his concern and the subsequent messages to mean +1 but I'm a bit biased as I'd like to see this release go out. Whatever the case, I suggest we give 24 hours for additional feedback and then finish the vote. If Grant does not clarify his stance, I propose that we ignore his ambiguous vote. Steven, how does that sound? thanks, Jacques On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 7:24 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: If it contains sources, it's not a binary release. Not strictly true. Binary artifacts often contain source code examples. Also, for Drill specifically, the code generation strategy that Drill uses requires that snippets of source for different operators and system packaged UDF's will be in the binary release. The user has no clue about this source, much of which is machine generated from templates. From the user's point of view, however, it is a binary distro because they can download it and run Drill with no further build steps. -- Steven Phillips Software Engineer mapr.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release
Is it correct, then, to say that if Drill does not bundle any GPL licensed libraries, we do not need any additional info in the NOTICE? On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 6:24 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: Not sure, and maybe a bit pedantic, but is the NOTICE file a little thin (practically non-existent) given the number of 3rd party libs present? I'm not an expert on what is required there, but when I compare it to projects I'm familiar with like Solr and Mahout, they are vastly different. I _believe_ the NOTICE file is where you are supposed to put NOTICES from licenses that require it. (someone else here can probably help) In the interval since Solr graduated from the Incubator, what constitutes a required notice has been clarified. See LEGAL-59 and LEGAL-62, especially the comments at http://s.apache.org/XAf and http://s.apache.org/jP. The original rationale for separating NOTICE out in the transition from the Apache License 1.1 to the Apache License 2.0 was to move the following clause: * 3. The end-user documentation included with the redistribution, *if any, must include the following acknowledgment: * This product includes software developed by the *Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/). *Alternately, this acknowledgment may appear in the software itself, *if and wherever such third-party acknowledgments normally appear. The presence of that requirement in a license conflicts with the GPL. But as Roy notes, the GPL requires the preservation of notices even when it subsumes all other licenses -- so the kludge of moving it to NOTICE works around the GPL incompatibility. Were the Incubator to review Solr's licensing documentation today, I'm certain that the project would be encouraged to pare things down -- to lower the cost to downstream consumers, and in keeping with the modest original intent of NOTICE. Marvin Humphrey - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Steven Phillips Software Engineer mapr.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release
In case there is any confusion, the first email sent out in this thread had the wrong vote count. The second one has the correct count: +9 binding +3 non-binding I should also mention there was one -0 (binding). This was due to unit test failures when using java 1.8. Jiras were filed, and the fix will be included in the next release, not this one. On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Steven Phillips s...@apache.org wrote: I would like to present the Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release to the general incubator list for a vote. This set of artifacts have passed our drill-dev vote and incorporate a number of improvements with over 30 JIRAs closed in the last month. The vote thread can be found here:http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201410.mbox/%3CCAA_-67fAJFB20wGX462wm7BYvoSy3PvydCPgY9uNSEj3HpQRmg%40mail.gmail.com%3E The vote passed with: +9 binding +3 non-binding You can find the artifacts for the release at this location:http://people.apache.org/~smp/apache-drill-0.6.0.rc0/ I look forward to your feedback. Thanks, Steven -- Steven Phillips Software Engineer mapr.com
[VOTE] Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release
I would like to present the Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release to the general incubator list for a vote. This set of artifacts have passed our drill-dev vote and incorporate a number of improvements with over 30 JIRAs closed in the last month. The vote thread can be found here:http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201410.mbox/%3CCAA_-67fAJFB20wGX462wm7BYvoSy3PvydCPgY9uNSEj3HpQRmg%40mail.gmail.com%3E The vote passed with: +5 binding +6 non-binding You can find the artifacts for the release at this location:http://people.apache.org/~smp/apache-drill-0.6.0.rc0/ I look forward to your feedback. Thanks, Steven
[VOTE] Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release
I would like to present the Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release to the general incubator list for a vote. This set of artifacts have passed our drill-dev vote and incorporate a number of improvements with over 30 JIRAs closed in the last month. The vote thread can be found here:http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201410.mbox/%3CCAA_-67fAJFB20wGX462wm7BYvoSy3PvydCPgY9uNSEj3HpQRmg%40mail.gmail.com%3E The vote passed with: +9 binding +3 non-binding You can find the artifacts for the release at this location:http://people.apache.org/~smp/apache-drill-0.6.0.rc0/ I look forward to your feedback. Thanks, Steven
