Re: Notes on branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:43 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Mike, > > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:12 PM Mike Jumper wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Gunnar Tapper >> wrote: >> >> > Let me offer up a concrete example

Re: Notes on branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Greg Chase wrote: > >> The branding guidelines do not address feedback such as "logo in footer" or >> "disclaimer is buried deep or below the fold". > > Incubation

Re: Policy should be simple (was "Allowed Champions on podlings")

is this just personal catharsis? On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Craig Russell > wrote: >> There is a sorta technical reason for the Champion to be a member of the PMC >> of the

Re: Allowed Champions on podlings

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:33 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > All, > > It was recently pointed out that some of our docs are a bit inconsistent > around who can champion a candidate podling. > > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Champion >

Re: DRAFT report February 2016 -- please review

> >months. > > > > How has the project developed since the last report? > > > > - The software has a few additional features, and bug fixes. > > > > Date of last release: > > > > 2014-07-29 > > > > When were the last committers o

Re: [PORPOSAL] Fineract

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > I'm replying top of thread as this is a general reply regarding mentors. > > We just added Greg Stein as a third mentor. He wasn't on the originally > submitted proposal as he was just checking on availability

Re: [PORPOSAL] Fineract

On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: > Nobody is turned away. Jedi mind tricks won't work on me Ross:) When someone says, "We are not seeking more." it is the same as being turned away. For the rest of it, I reckon we'll have to agree to disagree.

Re: [PORPOSAL] Fineract

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Markus Geiß wrote: > Hey Pierre, James, Jim > > thanks for your interest in mentoring, we will talk about that with our > current mentors to see what will be a good number of overall mentors for > the project. Prolly your mentors will say that if

Re: Mentor disengagement - a suggestion

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: >> >> On 10/12/2015 10:10 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: >>> >>> Regarding inactive mentors, this is quite simple : we have a monthly >>> report that

Re: Mentor disengagement - a suggestion

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Tim Williams <william...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:0

Re: A question: Is it alright to say no to potential podlings?

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > But - and I wanna be very clear that this is a hypothetical - if I were to > still have significant concerns (either ones that weren't addressed in the > DISCUSS thread or I missed the DISCUSS thread, etc), it'd still

Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Oct 2015 ([ppmc])

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > It isn't OK. It may have to happen, but it isn't really OK. Looks like this got written, but I'm not sure why such an unforgiving stance - this happens fairly often on TLPs and the board is always gracious and

Re: [VOTE] Release Blur version 0.2.4-incubating RC1

Thanks for taking the time to review Justin, we appreciate it. On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote: Hi, Sorry but it’s -1 (binding) until the MPL issue can be resolved / explained, other issues can be fixed next release. For the MPL issue it may be

Re: [DRAFT] May 2015 Board Report

incremental ingestion. Date of last release: 2014-07-29 When were the last committers or PMC members elected? 2014-07-28 Signed-off-by: [ ](blur) Doug Cutting [X](blur) Patrick Hunt [X](blur) Tim Williams Shepherd/Mentor notes

Re: [DRAFT] May 2015 Board Report

On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Dave Lester d...@davelester.org wrote: Hi Tim, I found Konstantin's comment to be helpful. Could it have provided additional details? Sure. But I don't think there's a need to make this personal. Shepherd comments tend to be quite brief. We should celebrate

Re: [DRAFT] May 2015 Board Report

On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote: - Blur: Human activity on Dev list is almost zero: high 90% of the emails are from CI system or JIRA notificaitons. Human's drive nearly all of that traffic. What is your point? Honestly, this shepherd comment seems

Re: P. An Excessive Fascination with the Apache Brand

On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: I was wondering... What we *REALLY* want are projects that are interested more in The Apache Way than in the Apache Brand. We need to make it more clear, somehow, that new projects want to enter the ASF because they

Re: [VOTE] accept NiFi into the incubator

+1, best wishes... based on revision #25[1] --tim [1] - http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal?action=recallrev=25 On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful and positive

Re: [PROPOSAL] NiFi for Incubation

+1, good stuff... --tim On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Joe Witt joe.w...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I would like to propose NiFi as an Apache Incubator Project. In addition to the copy provided below the Wiki version of the proposal can be found here:

Re: [VOTE] Accept HTrace into the Apache Incubator

+1 --tim On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: Following the discussion earlier in the thread: http://s.apache.org/Dk7 I would like to call a VOTE for accepting HTrace as a new

Re: Mentors heartbeat

On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Chris Mattmann mattm...@apache.org wrote: Seriously, give me a break. This has been discussed ad naseum - It's a quick simple measure to see if one of the stated requirements for mentors (reading the monthly report, and *signing that you read it*) has been

Re: Podling binding votes

On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote: This is conflicting from what the site said about governance of podling. PPMC is a part of podling and responsible to manage the podling on behalf of IPMC. I suppose you meant that their votes do not bind but

Re: [VOTE] Release Blur version 0.2.3-incubating RC2

On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote: HI, 2 x +1 binding votes 2 x +1 non-binding votes Aren't IPMC votes binding so that would be 4 +1 binding votes? Hi Justin, Apache Blur isn't under the [new] alternate process, if that's what you're referring to.

Re: [VOTE] Release Blur version 0.2.3-incubating RC2

On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 9:31 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote: Hi Apache Blur isn't under the [new] alternate process, if that's what you're referring to. I'm still under that impression [as one of the mentors] that we require 3 binding IPMC votes. I may be mistaken but I

Re: [VOTE] Release Blur version 0.2.3-incubating RC2

On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote: Hi, It requires 3 +1 votes on the podling list, they then bring it here for the 3+1 *binding* votes. In our case we got 4 total +1 {2 IPMC members; 2 PPMC members} and came here for the third binding vote. I

Re: binary release artifacts

will be happy to help resolve this in whatever way is necessary to satisfy all the ASF policy's, but we don't need a big general@ flame thread to do that. ...ant On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 3:46 AM, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote: Moving this[1] to general@ On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 2

Re: binary release artifacts

Moving this[1] to general@ On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 2:55 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: On Saturday, September 14, 2013, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Eric, I've included references inline for your convenience. I'll once again [strongly] suggest you guys remove

Re: KEYS and keys

On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 7:18 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 4 September 2013 02:31, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote: I notice that Chris just pointed[1] spark to the nifty keys listing[1]. Our docs still imply manual maintenance of the typical KEYS file[2]. Honestly, I didn't

Re: [PROPOSAL] Storm for Apache Incubator

+1 --tim On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 4:07 AM, Nathan Marz nat...@nathanmarz.com wrote: Hi everyone, I'd like to propose Storm to be an Apache Incubator project. After much thought I believe this is the right next step for the project, and I look forward to hearing everyone's thoughts and

KEYS and keys

I notice that Chris just pointed[1] spark to the nifty keys listing[1]. Our docs still imply manual maintenance of the typical KEYS file[2]. Honestly, I didn't even know the ldap-driven one was around. I assume its fair for projects to just point to the p.a.o/keys/groups/${project}.asc file

Re: Canonical podling count

Why not take it from the number Clutch reports? On Monday, July 8, 2013, Marvin Humphrey wrote: Greets, For our report, I'd like to supply an official count of podlings under incubation. Here's one way of doing it from the incubator svn checkout: grep . content/report_due_* | wc -l

Re: Stratos proposal: is it possible to add another initial committer?

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: I respectfully suggest your intervention is an example of ISSUE 03 (too many cooks). As a champion I'm interested in podlings learning the Apache Way - a significant part of this is to not let unnecessary process

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1]. I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation

Re: [VOTE] Apache Spark for the Incubator

+1 --tim On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: Hi Folks, OK discussion has died down, time to VOTE to accept Spark into the Apache Incubator. I'll let the VOTE run for at least a week. So far I've heard +1s from the following folks,

Re: If I were king of the forest

On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 3:31 AM, Alan Cabrera a...@toolazydogs.com wrote: ... Podlings would be required to have a minimum of two active mentors. A mentor is free to become inactive but must explicitly state this else the mentor risks being removed for not performing their duties. I like

Re: [META DISCUSS] talking about the overall state of this PMC

On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: There was a consensus to add the Champion role, and we haven't even tried it seriously, and now you propose to eliminate it. That doesn't seem reasonable to me. I'd rather try to make it useful and then evaluate

Re: [META DISCUSS] talking about the overall state of this PMC

On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: Discussions on Ross' and Chris' proposals ground to a halt. In my view, there are real issues that drove those discussions, even if those discussions drove some of us to distraction. A bit before the wiki crashed,

Re: svn commit: r1441762 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/onami.xml

On Saturday, February 2, 2013, wrote: Author: grobmeier Date: Sat Feb 2 15:22:33 2013 New Revision: 1441762 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1441762view=rev Log: updated status page for onami Modified: incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/onami.xml Modified:

Re: First attempt at January2013 report template

Hmm... is that the right reporting group? http://incubator.apache.org/report-groups.txt Thanks, --tim On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: Looks good. btw: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2013 On Dec 29, 2012 6:42 PM, Benson Margulies

Re: More and better report nagging

On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: I really don't object, but when the podling has

Re: More and better report nagging

On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote: FWIW, I feel the same. I'd rather see 'did not report

Re: [Incubator Wiki] Update of December2012 by BensonMargulies

fyi, Blur just finished their monthly reporting obligation. I miscalculated where we'd end up when I set it up initially and we should be in group 2 vs. group 3. I've updated podlings.xml, I'll remove us from December, if anyone knows anywhere else needing updated let me know... --tim On Mon,

Re: December reporting: All Mentors Please Sign Off and general note

On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: First of several reminders: For podlings reporting in December, we'd like *all* mentors to sign off on the reports. I hope to use this to get a clearer picture of where we have mentor weaknesses. General note: if

Re: Retirement decision making

On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: 2: While I appreciate that mentors are not entirely fungible, I tend to think in terms of a limited pool of volunteer effort, so indefinite incubation worries me. It's their decision to volunteer their efforts in

Re: September Reports

Hi Jukka, You'll need to add Blur to these rotations I reckon Thanks, --tim On Saturday, September 8, 2012, Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, With apologies for the lateness, here are the shepherd assignments for this month: Benson Margulies - Cordova, Flex, S4 Dave Fisher - Ambari,

reporting schedule

is there a new page that lists the reporting schedule? The old page[1] just has a link to next month but I'm interested in knowing *this* month. Thanks, --tim [1] - http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule - To

Re: reporting schedule

Drats, found it as soon as i hit send... http://incubator.apache.org/report-groups.txt --tim On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote: is there a new page that lists the reporting schedule? The old page[1] just has a link to next month but I'm interested

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: snip I can give the IPMC a hand here, if my point is too obscure. A policy might look

Re: Status of Blur?

Hi Otis, Nice! yeah, we're bootstrapping now... join us on blur-dev@i.a.o and blur-user@i.a.o http://incubator.apache.org/projects/blur.html The ticket's in now to get the git repo up too. Thanks, --tim On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Otis Gospodnetic otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi,

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of DirectMemory as a TLP

With the following votes, this vote passes. I'll submit a suggested resolution to the board shortly. Thanks everyone who voted and supported the DirectMemory community through their incubation... +1's Binding: - Tim Williams - Olivier Lamy - Jean-Baptiste Onofre - Jukka Zitting - Daniel Kulp

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of DirectMemory as a TLP

On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote: The DirectMemory community is ready to graduate and become a full TLP. [...] Please VOTE to submit the below resolution to the board

[VOTE] Graduation of DirectMemory as a TLP

The DirectMemory community is ready to graduate and become a full TLP. We began incubation in October 2011 and have demonstrated our ability to function according to the Apache Way. We've successfully made a release. We have begun to grow the community. We didn't hold a separate formal vote -

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of DirectMemory as a TLP

On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote: The DirectMemory community is ready to graduate and become a full TLP. We began incubation in October 2011 and have demonstrated our ability to function according to the Apache Way. We've successfully made a release

Re: [VOTE] Accept Blur into the Apache Incubator

at nearinfinity dot com) * Tim Williams (twilliams at apache dot org) * Patrick Hunt (phunt at apache dot org) * Doug Cutting (cutting at apache dot org) == Affiliations == * Aaron !McCurry, Near Infinity * Scott Leberknight, Near Infinity * Ryan Gimmy, Near Infinity * Patrick Hunt

Re: inadequate graduation requests being filed with infra

On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote: While the new move to push podlings towards graduation is something I'm happy to see, lately the quality of the tickets being filed with INFRA has hit new lows, bogging down the process considerably. I don't know if

Re: DirectMemory status (Was: Shepherding: chukwa, mesos, directmemory)

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: DirectMemory lacks only a release to be green

Re: Board will be proposing a new TLP

Incubation is unnecessary process in this case. I don't see any reason this should go through incubation. --tim On Saturday, June 30, 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote: For those not following board@, the board is proposing the creation of a new TLP (tentatively called Apache Steve) which will serve

Re: svn commit: r1354971 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/guides/graduation.xml

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 8:38 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 28 June 2012 13:12,  twilli...@apache.org wrote: Author: twilliams Date: Thu Jun 28 12:12:43 2012 New Revision: 1354971 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1354971view=rev Log: typo Modified:    

Re: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] Allura to enter the Incubator

+1 --tim On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: Hi, We are proposing Allura to be admitted to the Apache Incubator, and would like to request that the IPMC votes on this issue. The requisite 72 hours has passed since the initial proposal. The proposal may

Re: Rich you need to requestg IPMC membership (was: Re: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] Allura to enter the Incubator)

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: Rich, I note you mark your vote as non-binding. To be a champion/mentor you need to be an IPMC member. Since you are already an SF member you just need to ask and Jukka will sort it out. For the archives... it's

Re: [VOTE] CloudStack for Apache Incubator

On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Kevin Kluge kevin.kl...@citrix.com wrote: Hi All.  I'd like to call for a VOTE for CloudStack to enter the Incubator.   The proposal is available at [1] and I have also included it below.   Please vote with: +1: accept CloudStack into Incubator +0: don't care

Re: [VOTE] Jukka Zitting for IPMC Chair (was Re: NOMINATIONS for Incubator PMC Chair)

On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: Hi Folks, OK there has been enough discussion here. It's time to VOTE for a new IPMC chair and it looks like the remaining folks (including me) that were in the running have aligned beyond the

Re: [VOTE] Jukka Zitting for IPMC Chair (was Re: NOMINATIONS for Incubator PMC Chair)

On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: On Feb 9, 2012, at 2:00 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (binding) +1 (binding) From my perspective, Chris's proposal and Benson's vote above

Re: principles of Apache communities

On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 1:08 AM, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote: Joe Schaefer wrote: Here are some of the things that guide me in my decision- making about governance and Apache communities.  Please feel to add you own thoughts on the subject! 1) Fairness and Equitable Treatment-

Re: [Incubator Wiki] Update of February2011 by brianleroux

Wrong year:) --tim On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Apache Wiki wikidi...@apache.org wrote: Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Incubator Wiki for change notification. The February2011 page has been changed by brianleroux:

Re: [VOTE] Apache ACE as a TLP

+1 --tim On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Marcel Offermans marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl wrote: Hello all, As the discussion about the resolution [1] offered no further feedback, it is time for the Apache ACE community to request that the IPMC vote on recommending this resolution [2] to the

When are board reports due?

Marvin says... supply board reports 2 weeks before the above date (Wed, Dec 7th). The December report[1] says... reports are due here by the first day of the month And the reporting schedule[2] says... should have their reports ready by no later than the second Wednesday of that month (Wed, Dec

Re: When are board reports due?

On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:33 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 2 December 2011 13:11, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote: Marvin says... supply board reports 2 weeks before the above date (Wed, Dec 7th). That's Incubator Marvin, who requires podlings to provide an extra week's notice

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.2.0-incubating RC2

On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: Since the official vote cut-off date has passed, I'd like to gently remind that, with 6 +1 votes from the community members we would be very grateful if somebody from the IPMC can take a look at the bits and give us

Re: Establishing New Committers

On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: You might consider this nit-picking but it might also be important at some point in the future. You use the phrase committ rights in this template. They are not rights they are privileges. The reason this might be

Incubator docs

The PMC Guide page[1] seems to be redundant information with the Mentor Guide page[2]. Is there a reason for the PMC Guide to remain? The reason I ask is, they're currently inconsistent (re: svn auth) and - while the PMC Guide appears correct - I found the Mentor Guide more helpful. Thanks,

Re: [VOTE] accept DirectMemory as new Apache Incubator podling

+1 --tim On Sunday, October 2, 2011, Ashish paliwalash...@gmail.com wrote: +1 On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: Hi all guys, I'm now calling a formal VOTE on the DirectMemory proposal located here:

Re: [DISCUSS] DirectMemory to join the Apache Incubator

Discussion seems to have waned and with an overall positive vibe - are we ready to call the vote? Thanks, --tim On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: Hi all guys, I would like to propose DirectMemory, a Java OpenSource multi-layered cache

Re: [VOTE] S4 to join the Incubator

On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: It's been a nearly a week since the S4 proposal was submitted for discussion.  A few questions were asked, and the proposal was clarified in response.  Sufficient mentors have volunteered.  I thus feel we are now ready for a

Re: [DISCUSS] DirectMemory to join the Apache Incubator

On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: Hi all guys, I would like to propose DirectMemory, a Java OpenSource multi-layered cache implementation featuring off-heap memory storage (a-la Terracotta BigMemory) originally developed by Raffaele P. Guidi on

Re: Confusion: Sponsoring entity and Champions

On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote: IMO the champion helps clarify the incubator

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo to join the Incubator

On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Doug Cutting cutt...@apache.org wrote: It's been a week since the Accumulo proposal was submitted for discussion.  A few questions were asked, and the proposal was clarified in response.  Sufficient mentors have volunteered.  I thus feel we are now ready for a

Re: [VOTE] Deft to join the incubator

On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 6:35 AM, Niklas Gustavsson nik...@protocol7.com wrote: Hi, With three mentors graciously signed up and the discussion around the proposal settling, it's time for a vote on Deft joining the incubator. The latest proposal can be found below, or in the wiki:

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

-1 As a foundation, we are optimized to support delivery of open source code, it seems to me OOo and its user/community/the public would be best served by an organization built for the delivery of a finished end-user product. OOo would be such an anomaly for us I fear would lead to an

Re: [PROPOSAL] Mesos Project

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Matei Zaharia ma...@apache.org wrote: We would like to propose Mesos as an incubator proposal. +1, best wishes... --tim - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For

Re: [VOTE] Accept Wave into the incubator

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Dan Peterson dpeter...@google.com wrote: Hi everyone, Please vote on the acceptance of Wave into the Apache incubator. The proposal is available at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WaveProposal (for your convenience, a snapshot is also copied below) The

Re: [Proposal] Accept Jena into the Incubator

+1 On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Sander W G van der Waal sander.vanderw...@oucs.ox.ac.uk wrote: +1 (non-binding) Sander From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@apache.org] Sent: 08 November 2010 23:37 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: [Proposal] Accept Jena into the Incubator I

Re: [VOTE] ALOIS to enter the incubator

On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: All, this vote will fail in three hours because nobody responds to it. Are there any objections against this proposal? Or why is this vote ignored? Hi Christian, I ignored it because it was odd to me that there's

Re: [VOTE] ALOIS to enter the incubator

I might be missing it, but is there a link to the existing GPL project/code? Thanks --tim On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Urs Lerch m...@ulerch.net wrote: Hi Since the first call a few weeks ago didn't suceed (more mentors were asked), I would like to call a second vote for accepting the

Re: Role of Incubator PMC Votes

On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 14:11, Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 08:47, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:

Role of Incubator PMC Votes

I'm watching the renaming vote thread and I find it odd that folks are -1-ing the project's vote. I've read the role of the IPMC[1] and the policy[2] and can't find the basis for our (IPMC) doing anything other than ack-ing they're vote. It seems like votes from the IPMC should only be

Re: Role of Incubator PMC Votes

to think through these things... in other words, the basis for us challenging the vote is trademark concern rather than I don't like that name, it's too broad... ... but I haven't seen a mark concern brought up... --tim On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote: I'm

Re: [VOTE] Change name of Lucene Connectors Framework to Apache Connectors Framework

On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: Hi, After much debate both here and on the connectors mailing list, the LCF community has voted (see http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-connectors-dev/201008.mbox/browser) and would like to

Re: [VOTE] Isis to enter the incubator

On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:42 AM, Dan Haywood dkhayw...@gmail.com wrote:  The Isis proposal has now been updated with a champion and several new mentors (thanks again guys), and is ready to be voted on. The proposal is at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IsisProposal , the text is also copied

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Isis

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Dan Haywood dkhayw...@gmail.com wrote:  On 30/08/2010 07:26, Tim Williams wrote: Your proposal caused me to poke around the NO site and the first forum topic I came upon[1] had someone providing a [simple] patch.  This has me curious about the code provenance

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Isis

On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Dan Haywood dkhayw...@gmail.com wrote:  I'd like to formally propose a new project for the incubator, Apache Isis. ... snipped == Source and IP Submission Plan == As mentioned earlier, the NO framework is ASLv2 but copyright belongs to Naked Objects Group

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Isis

- my own understanding is that contributors would need to be tracked down[1]. --tim [1] - http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-ip-clearance On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Dan Haywood dkhayw

Re: Name change from Lucene Connectors Framework to Apache Connectors Framework

On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: It seems to me that the pivotal problem here is the word connector. On the one hand, it could mean almost anything to almost anyone. On the other hand, it has a specific denotation in the vicinity of httpd.

Re: Subversion full/partial committer (was: Re: an experiment)

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote: I wish we had completed this discussion while subversion was still in incubation, while the subversion community could learn the common Apache terminology and have no need for translation of the terms. Instead, a

Re: [VOTE] experimental delegation of new committer votes to PPMC

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote: Now that the board has declared there are no legal obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to restart the vote. Thanks for your patience and consideration. +1, happy experimenting! --tim

Incubator proposal template

I wonder why the proposal template doesn't explicitly ask the proposers about their belief in the Apache Way? It asks about fascination with the Apache Brand and touch on it a bit in the Alignment section. But being that one could easily be fascinated by a brand from the outside even while not

Re: Incubator proposal template

On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana sanj...@opensource.lk wrote: Do you seriously expect any answer other than yay of course to such a question?? Hi Sanjiva, Yes, as I'd expect the question to be open-ended.. Why do you think the Apache Way is a good fit for your project? (or

Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release

On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:59 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote: On 08/09/2009, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: Based on the current active members of the community, it's then going  to be hard to get this

Re: Clutch color coding

On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 4:09 AM, David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Crossley wrote: Tim Williams wrote: Hi David, Nice to hear from you Tim. I suppose you can't please everyone, but the red/green colors in this version are difficult to distinguish - colorblind. It would

Re: Clutch color coding

On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:30 AM, David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Crossley wrote: Martijn Dashorst wrote: Clutch is an invaluable tool, but with some coloring issues according to me: the current coloring schema is not well suited to alert me, or they alert me at the wrong

  1   2   >