Hi,
I'm the author of one of the 3rd party libraries, intgemm, that is
new in 1.8. It is MIT licensed but also includes catch for testing
under Boost. MXNet doesn't compile my tests.
https://github.com/kpu/intgemm/blob/master/LICENSE
In https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/17559 we wavered
back and forth between being a submodule and being fetched by cmake in
build. It ended up on by default for x86_64, fetched during build, and
with the LICENSE dangling a reference to the third_party directory.
We've now discussed this, including with leezu who originally suggested
fetching. It will change to a submodule and at the same time sync the
LICENSE. I hope to have a pull request opened tomorrow and the
committers say this should be in the next rc.
Regards,
Kenneth
On 2020/10/21 21:41:37, Justin Mclean <j...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
> Hi,>
>
> > Thanks for the vote. It looks like we forgot to remove the mentions
of the resolved issues in the DISCLAIMER-WIP. Checking the linked
issues, all of them have been resolved in 1.8. Is this still a blocking
issue if the actual issues that the DISCLAIMER-WIP links to are addressed?>
>
> The DISCLAIMER WIP needs to be keep up to date. When I looked not all
of these issues were resolved.>
>
> > Between 1.8 submodules [1] and that of 1.7 [2] there hasn't been
any addition of submodule. For the four modules with updated commits
(dmlc-core, mkldnn, nvidia-cub, onnx-tensorrt), I didn't find any
license change. What's missing?>
>
> If you compare the copyright statements between the two release
you’ll see there are a number of differences and mention of bundled 3rd
party licenses are missing from the LICENSE file.>
>
> > Regarding NVIDIA licensing, I'm not sure what the standard practice
is given that we are indeed open sourcing our GPU source code with ALv2
and the NVIDIA licensing only comes into picture in binary distribution
and not in a source release. Advice is appreciated.>
>
> You need to tell your users that using the software in this way that
it is not compatible with the Apache license. I think the DISCLAIMER
would be a good place to do this.>
>
> Thanks,>
> Justin>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------->
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
