Sign me up (
Am 08.02.19, 11:55 schrieb "Lars Francke" :
One more thing: We've got three mentors. If anyone else would like to
volunteer we won't say no :)
I've used the E-Mail addresses from your mails in the proposal. Feel free
to update to an @apache.org address if you
One more thing: We've got three mentors. If anyone else would like to
volunteer we won't say no :)
I've used the E-Mail addresses from your mails in the proposal. Feel free
to update to an @apache.org address if you want to.
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 11:05 AM Lars Francke wrote:
> Thanks to the
Thanks to the three of you.
Those arguments make sense to me and we indeed have a few "newcomers" with
us (that includes me in a non-committer role) so I've changed my opinion
and think the Incubator way would be the best.
I'll edit the Wiki proposal (and add Christofer whom I've forgotten,
My initial thought was: this should go straight to TLP: Training should be
done by people who know what they're training about: whether it be the
Apache Way or a specific project. All the committers will likely be people
who've at least reached committer status in a project, and most of them
will
Hi,
after spending some time thinking about this I also tend towards the
Incubator route as I am sure this will help build and grow an active
community and processes.
Best regards,
Sönke
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 6:38 AM Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > discussion seems to have died down.
Hi,
> discussion seems to have died down. Before moving on I'd really like to
> hear the opinions of the interested contributors on which direction to go.
> Otherwise we might have to put it to a vote?
Perhaps I biased, but I think going via the incubator is alway helpful. :-) The
big question
Hello everyone,
discussion seems to have died down. Before moving on I'd really like to
hear the opinions of the interested contributors on which direction to go.
Otherwise we might have to put it to a vote?
Cheers,
Lars
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 11:52 AM Lars Francke wrote:
> Dmitry,
>
> I
Dmitry,
I agree that there are lots of technical things to discuss and I won't stop
anyone doing that but I'd like to keep this thread about the proposal and
the project itself knowing that technical stuff is what most of us do and
like to do and it's also more interesting but let's get the
Oh and one more thing that I at least want to mention is the name. I know
that podlings can do a name search after the incubation has started.
We thought about using "Training" as the proper name though. It's very
descriptive and easy to understand/recognize in multiple languages.
Hi Lars,
About the project: I've got only one thing to say here: Apache Incubator is
intended to be a place where a community is build up and everybody (mostly
newcomers) learn guides and policies. So straight-to-TLP is also a possible
option, but some incubation process isn't bad at all. But
Hi all,
I have been creating training material for various big data apache projects
(mostly Apache Spark) for the last five years and we would like to contribute
those. I for myself have not been directly involved with the ASF directly,
however I have been contributing to some open source
Hi Chris,
thanks for chiming in and your offer!
The setup you describe sounds pretty much exactly what we envisioned
when we started looking at infrastructure around trainings - back then
I think it just sort of died down for a mixture of reasons like too
much effort for just the few trainings
Hi all,
finally having some time to read through the proposal, I too would be
interested in participating.
I do have quite a bit of experience in creating trainings as this is part of my
job at codecentric.
For the ASF I have for example prepared a Maven training, which I held in
Vancouver a
Dmitry, Kenneth,
sorry for the slow replies. I was offline on vacation for a few days. I'll
add both of you to the Wiki (if you haven't already done so).
I love that we have gathered quite a few interested people to participate
already but I'd love to hear more (or any really) opinions on the
Hi Lars,
I would like to be a part of this too, according to your & the others' best
judgment. I'm PMC at Beam & incubator. I'm not a professional teacher or
trainer, but I have been a part of preparing and delivering a number of
trainings and talks (also the usual teaching, tutoring, talking in
Hi Lars,
I'd like to be a part of this. I'm PMC at Apache Ignite. Sometimes I need
to give individual feedback to developers related to both Apache policies
and spirit of developing software in a community way. Why not invest effort
into training and education materials instead?
I gave several
Craig,
that's great news. Thank you for volunteering. I've added you to the Wiki.
Cheers,
Lars
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 11:01 PM Craig Russell wrote:
> Hi Lars,
>
> I'll volunteer to mentor the project if it ends up incubating. And I'd
> like to join the discussion as a member of the (P)PMC.
Hi Lars,
I'll volunteer to mentor the project if it ends up incubating. And I'd like to
join the discussion as a member of the (P)PMC. The idea of an open source
project to help rationalize training materials is very appealing.
I'm also very interested in the ecosystem of not-for-profit
I've been going back and forth on the topic of TLP vs. Incubator podling.
I don't really have a strong opinion but I'm leaning slightly in favor of
"straight to TLP" and the past discussion (linked in previous mail) did
also have more voices in favor of TLP. But of course there are arguments to
Sharan,
great! I've added you to the Wiki.
Cheers,
Lars
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 10:51 PM Sharan Foga wrote:
> Hi Lars
>
> I'd like to be a part of this, not only from a ComDev perspective, as this
> project and its resources would be a great asset for the community
> development effort
Hi Lars
I'd like to be a part of this, not only from a ComDev perspective, as this
project and its resources would be a great asset for the community development
effort (internally and externally), but also because I have an real interest in
developing documentation and training material.
Hi Mike,
there is not really a specific target group for these trainings. It is
our feeling, that there are a large number of parties out there that
could benefit from properly maintained training materials for open
source software.
We noticed a few issues around training when talking to other
Lars,
Interesting proposal. Can you talk more about who this training is for? I
can't tell if it is for internal use, like helping new mentors and PMC
Chairs, or external use like teaching companies how the ASF does business
or how to use a specific Apache project. Maybe it is all of that.
>
> thank you! I'm not at home right now and can't edit the Wiki now but I'll
> do so later (or you'll do it yourself)?
>
I have added you to the Wiki now.
> Your mail actually sparked a thought. I'm not sure about the "limits" to
> an initial contributor/committer list and how to go about
Furkan,
thank you! I'm not at home right now and can't edit the Wiki now but I'll
do so later (or you'll do it yourself)?
Your mail actually sparked a thought. I'm not sure about the "limits" to an
initial contributor/committer list and how to go about selecting those. I'm
in no position to
Hi All,
I'm a member of The Apache Software Foundation, PMC member of Apache
Incubator, Committer and PMC member of Apache Gora, Committer and PMC
member of Apache Nutch, Committer and PMC member of Apache Clerezza,
Committer of Apache ManifoldCF, Committer of Apache Stanbol and mail list
Justin,
that's great to hear. And yes please. I'll add you to the Wiki.
Cheers,
Lars
On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 12:35 AM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’ll comment on the other parts of the proposal once I’ve thought about it
> a bit, but I’m also have a decent amount of training and course
+1 for Justin
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019, 18:35 Justin Mclean Hi,
>
> I’ll comment on the other parts of the proposal once I’ve thought about it
> a bit, but I’m also have a decent amount of training and course creation
> experience and would like to be on the (P)PMC / initial committer list if
>
Hi,
I’ll comment on the other parts of the proposal once I’ve thought about it a
bit, but I’m also have a decent amount of training and course creation
experience and would like to be on the (P)PMC / initial committer list if
you'll have me. Assuming you go down the IPMC I’d also happy to be
Hello everyone,
this is the result of the discussion I started in December 2018[1].
I would like to start this thread to get feedback on a proposal we've been
working on for a project focused on developing training material for Apache
& 3rd party projects.
The full proposal can be found here <
30 matches
Mail list logo
