HI,
> - as the original NLPCraft developers from DataLingvo are all a part of
> NLPCraft project
This is not the case, but the SGA from DataLingvo will cover this.
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Inline.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 7, 2020, at 5:07 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
> Looks like the discussion is winding down a bit. So, to sum it up:
>
> - CC shall be removed during code transfer to ASF
> - an SGA will be expected from DataLingvo
> - as the original NLPCraft developers
Looks like the discussion is winding down a bit. So, to sum it up:
- CC shall be removed during code transfer to ASF
- an SGA will be expected from DataLingvo
- as the original NLPCraft developers from DataLingvo are all a part of
NLPCraft project there is no need for explicit copyright
Thanks for the offer Furkan. While we have a pretty packed house
already, I think we can find a spot for one more ;)
Welcome! I will update the proposal to reflect this.
--
Cos
On 2/4/20 5:45 AM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
Hi,
I've checked your proposal, website, and blog posts and seems
Justin,
As far as "all people signing ICLA" - we can't guarantee this as I don't
think we know (or have a record of) all the people who touched the code
years back (I do know main contributors - they are in this proposal). I
think SGA would be the best option as it should make things clear.
I
Hi,
> NLPCraft came originally from DataLingvo.
OK so that clarifies that there is code developed by DataLingvo in this code
base.
> During migration, some DataLingvo artefacts weren't properly
> renamed (it should be fixed by now).
I would question why they were “renamed”, while you’re not
Justin, et. al.,
NLPCraft came originally from DataLingvo. DataLingvo was a legal entity
that originally developed some initial code. It has open-sourced it around
2018 along with the license change and it was developed thereafter within
NLPCraft project (including by all the original developers
Hi,
> perhaps the company changed it’s name but it’s the same organization?
Perhaps or perhaps not, it hard to say with the information currently at hand.
Hopefully the proposed project can clarify.
The IP provenance of the codebase needs to be clear, removing copyright headers
without
Hi -
A little research on Google, Quadra and LinkedIn shows that DataLingvo and
NLPCraft seem to be the same with a name change.
Regards,
Dave
> On Feb 5, 2020, at 5:24 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> Is there perhaps a language problem? I often have trouble saying what I mean
> in a way that
Is there perhaps a language problem? I often have trouble saying what I mean in
a way that can be understood… even by me, a few minutes later.
https://www.datalingvo.com now seems to redirect to https://nlpcraft.org,
perhaps the company changed it’s name but it’s the same organization? I
HI,
> The original code for NLPCraft was developed under DataLingvo.
So wouldn’t they be the copyright owner? If soyou can’t change headers or
remove copyright statements without permission from them, do you have that?
Can you point me to the original repos? It may be that that are other
Justin - let me clarify (sorry for confusion).
The original code for NLPCraft was developed under DataLingvo. A few years
back it was decided to rename the project to NLPCraft and adopt CC w/ASL2.0
license. The codebase was migrated to a new GitHub repo along with these
changes. Apparently, not
Hi,
Thanks for the answers.
> 3. There are historical mentions of DataLingvo in the source code (here and
> there) and that needs to be cleaned up (they are just an artefact of
> migration from repo to repo).
I'm not sure that answers my question(s), historical how?
Thanks,
Justin
Justin,
Let me reply on these.
1. The common clause will be removed (if and when the project enters ASF
Incubator). I mentioned that in my last reply.
2. nlpcraft.* domains will be donated to ASF during the incubation period.
3. There are historical mentions of DataLingvo in the source code (here
Hi,
Great proposal and an interesting project you have there:
Some comments:
- The common clause is a big concern, it basically means this is not open
source software. The project needs to be willing to remove it and have
permission to do so from all contributors.
- Is nlpcraft a company
Hi,
I've checked your proposal, website, and blog posts and seems promising! I
can help as a mentor if needed too.
Kind Regards,
Furkan KAMACI
On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 1:21 PM Paul King wrote:
> All sounds good to me.
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 4:30 PM Nikita Ivanov wrote:
>
> > Hi Paul,
> >
All sounds good to me.
On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 4:30 PM Nikita Ivanov wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> I'm one of the NLPCraft project members, let me chime in here.
>
> 1. The project is very interested in native Groovy/Kotlin/Scala model
> APIs. It is a bit unclear for now how much work needs to be done
>
Hi Paul,
I'm one of the NLPCraft project members, let me chime in here.
1. The project is very interested in native Groovy/Kotlin/Scala model APIs.
It is a bit unclear for now how much work needs to be done specifically for
these languages given that NLPCraft provides a very plain (and
Paul, I think five is the charm! Groovy has been my favorite language for near
a decade so I would love you to join the group of mentors. And I think I am
expressing the unspoken consensus of the rest of us :) So, welcome!
As for the use of Commons Clause: thanks for the good catch. Let's look
Looks like you have close to a full house for mentors. I could certainly
put my hat in the ring if you need another, otherwise I will certainly be
an interested community member. It seems like an interesting project. I
would have a particular interest in Groovy/Micronaut integration.
I did notice
Dave,
appreciate the offer - having someone of your caliber on the team is a huge
help. I will update the proposal shortly!
Welcome and thank you!
--
Cos
On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 04:59PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> This is very interesting. You’ve got a good set of mentors!
>
> If you are looking
This is very interesting. You’ve got a good set of mentors!
If you are looking for a fourth mentor then I volunteer if you are interested.
Regards,
Dave
> On Feb 3, 2020, at 4:43 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
> Good time of the time to all!
>
> I'd like to bring this new interesting
Good time of the time to all!
I'd like to bring this new interesting project for the discussion, comments
and feedback with the aim of starting a formal [VOTE] of its acceptance into
Incubator.
People behind this project aren't new to Apache: some of them were behind the
Apache Ignite
23 matches
Mail list logo
