LOL know problem Ross ;)
On 8/17/10 1:46 AM, "Ross Gardler" wrote:
Sorry damned iPhone autocorrect. First word should be "I like"
Sent from my mobile device.
On 17 Aug 2010, at 09:38, Ross Gardler wrote:
> Unlike the observer role. It's very close to the current signing off of board
> repo
Sorry damned iPhone autocorrect. First word should be "I like"
Sent from my mobile device.
On 17 Aug 2010, at 09:38, Ross Gardler wrote:
> Unlike the observer role. It's very close to the current signing off of board
> reports by mentors but forces them to do a little more than put there name
Unlike the observer role. It's very close to the current signing off of board
reports by mentors but forces them to do a little more than put there name to a
piece of electronic paper.
Personally I imagined my binding vote, as a mentor, to indicate a) the project
debs want this tongi ahead and
Sorry if I'm late to the party, but my 2 cents...
The more I read about this, the more I latch onto Justin's "Observers" notion.
As a non-Apache Member, non-IPMC, PPMC member for OODT, I feel like I am
qualified to vote on a release in the sense that I am closer to the code than
Justin (sorry t
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> You know when to vote and *how* to vote. I see no reason to deny your vote.
Of course. It's always seemed awkward if you can't contribute
technically to suddenly have a binding vote. I'm sure if I *wanted*
to learn how to build something wit
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> So basically you are moving more towards Joe's proposal, that the PPMC would
> have the binding VOTEs in e.g., new committers/PMC members, and on releases?
> Of course, with the caveats below, as you mention, i.e., the observers c
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 01:08, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Hey Justin,
>
> Thanks so much for your thoughtful reply. My comments below:
>
>> See, here's where I get a bit discomforted by this entire process: I
>> honestly don't feel that I deserve a "vote" on OODT releases. I've
>> known yo
Hey Justin,
Thanks so much for your thoughtful reply. My comments below:
>
> See, here's where I get a bit discomforted by this entire process: I
> honestly don't feel that I deserve a "vote" on OODT releases. I've
> known you and Dave for long enough that I have no concerns advising
> the OODT
[ CCing gene...@incubator as I think I can now place my finger a bit
as to why I'm discomforted with Greg's proposal in the OODT context ;
and more importantly, another potential experiment at the end; leaving
context in for those on gene...@incubator ]
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Mattmann, C