Thanks Ant.
Could you please also create commits@ list for wiki/source commit
mails? The submit button of the web form doesn't change from Disabled.
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:59 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
Please find that the MRQL mailing lists have been created and are
ready to
Let's move the podling chatter to the dev list. :)
Regards,
Alan
On Mar 26, 2013, at 9:55 PM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks Ant.
Could you please also create commits@ list for wiki/source commit
mails? The submit button of the web form doesn't change from Disabled.
Please find that the MRQL mailing lists have been created and are
ready to be used for further discussion:
d...@mrql.incubator.apache.org
u...@mrql.incubator.apache.org
priv...@mrql.incubator.apache.org
Would everyone named on the proposal please go subscribe to them, and
happy MRQL'ing.
True. I'm totally down with your reasoning.
But don't you think it might be a formality we need to comply with, even if
it does not make sense at this stage?
There has been a vote, which passed with enough binding votes, no one has
-1'd, and no one has retracted their vote. Lets wait till
Looks like we can call this finally closed and approved. Edward I think we
can carry forward now.
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.comwrote:
True. I'm totally down with your reasoning.
But don't you think it might be a formality we need to comply with,
No. This doesn't work. That sentence is followed by another:
Where the Champion is not a Member of the Foundation (i.e. is an Officer
only), the Champion shall be a member of the PMC of the Sponsor.
The Sponsor here is the Incubator. The PMC of the Sponsor is the IPMC.
You aren't an IPMC
Hi Eddie,
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
No. This doesn't work. That sentence is followed by another:
Where the Champion is not a Member of the Foundation (i.e. is an Officer
only), the Champion shall be a member of the PMC of the Sponsor.
The
could you please close the Create MRQL tasks in the Infra Jira until
the situation has been cleared up. Whenever this all has been sorted
out you can reopen the issues.
Sure.
Since this might not be fixed soon, proposal can be changed
(especially corporation volunteers). And, thank you for
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote:
could you please close the Create MRQL tasks in the Infra Jira until
the situation has been cleared up. Whenever this all has been sorted
out you can reopen the issues.
Sure.
Since this might not be fixed soon,
Hi
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.comwrote:
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net
wrote:
Are the five binding votes from IPMC members?
It is not 5.
For the record, there were 4 binding IPMC votes in favor.
Mohammed
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.orgwrote:
could you please close the Create MRQL tasks in the Infra Jira until
the situation has been cleared up. Whenever this all has been sorted
out you can reopen the issues.
Sure.
Since this might not be fixed soon,
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.orgwrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org
wrote:
could you please close the Create MRQL tasks in the Infra Jira until
the situation has been cleared up. Whenever this all has been
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:01 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org
wrote:
could you please close the Create MRQL tasks in the Infra
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:01 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org
On Mar 15, 2013, at 7:05 AM, Matt Franklin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:01 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15,
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:01 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Edward J. Yoon
On Mar 15, 2013, at 6:25 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:01 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Suresh Marru sma...@apache.org wrote:
I fully agree. I had a chance also to look at the proposal closely, so will
+1 if the
vote is re-opened, but I see no need for it. Its in the hands of competent
mentors
and the podling is ready to get on board.
+1 to
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:01 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org
I think that this vote should be invalidated.
Are the five binding votes from IPMC members?
It is not 5.
Also, should proposals with only 1 valid Mentor be acceptable?
If two members of the IPMC step forward to Mentor MRQL I might change my mind.
Regards,
Dave
On Mar 12, 2013, at 2:12 AM,
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Are the five binding votes from IPMC members?
It is not 5.
For the record, there were 4 binding IPMC votes in favor.
Mohammed Nour El-Din
Alex Karasulu
Tommaso Teofili
Chris Mattmann
Also, should proposals
Maybe 3 including myself? or If we need to recruit one more Mentor and
re-open the vote with properly updated proposal, Please let us know.
I apologize that I made a mistake here. I was confused with this comment[1].
1. http://markmail.org/message/k6s56f5wlxgqhq3k
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:06
On Mar 14, 2013, at 9:25 PM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote:
Maybe 3 including myself?
Hi Edward,
As you have previously pointed out Champion and Mentors are required to be IPMC
members [1], [2]. So sorry you cannot be counted as a mentor/champion for MRQL.
Since you have asked
OKay I see.
As you have previously pointed out Champion and Mentors are required to be
IPMC members [1], [2]. So sorry you cannot be counted as a mentor/champion
for MRQL.
Regarding Champion, Am I not a Officer of ASF? - A candidate project
shall be sponsored by an Officer or Member of the
24 matches
Mail list logo