On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
As in any such survey, author identity should be optional. Sometimes it
can be deduced, but not always, and if someone would rather not mention
their name, we should give them that opportunity.
Sometimes preserving anonymity
On 6/21/13 5:58 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013, at 01:52 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
As in any such survey, author identity should be optional. Sometimes
it
can be deduced, but not always, and
Part of how best to handle this is to remind people, when they're
complaining, to keep two things in mind:
a) only state the behavior you observed/read/witnessed, and be specific,
rather than using generalizations such as always, or never.
b) Keep to I statements. As silly as the template
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013, at 03:54 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
wrote:
Solution: require all podlings to submit anonymous exit interviews as part
of the graduation requirements. These exit interviews will be suitably
scrubbed
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:18:16AM +0100, Upayavira wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013, at 03:54 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
wrote:
Solution: require all podlings to submit anonymous exit interviews as part
of the graduation
Anomnity of the individual not the project. I can say my mentor was
crap without stating my name - I could be any one of the PPMC.
Upayavira
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013, at 10:32 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:18:16AM +0100, Upayavira wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013, at 03:54
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
Solution: require all podlings to submit anonymous exit interviews as part
of the graduation requirements. These exit interviews will be suitably
scrubbed and organized by the Incubator Ombudsman; see next proposal.
A
I believe a set of automatically generated monthly metrics including a
number of commits, total number of letters to the project mail list and
number of mentor letters to the list will give a good picture which
projects experience which problems.
15.06.2013 19:48 пользователь Alan Cabrera
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013, at 12:18 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
I'm not keen on this one. I don't like surveys and I don't like mandatory
activities for volunteers.
Yet, Apache does have mandatory reporting for podlings and TLPs. It's
not like this is particularly onerous. (Note, I read the proposal as
Problem: we seem to have unclear and conflicting ideas as to what the areas of
improvement are for the Incubator.
Cause: we have no concrete, anonymized, information on what the podlings'
experiences were during incubation.
Solution: require all podlings to submit anonymous exit interviews as
I'm not keen on this one. I don't like surveys and I don't like mandatory
activities for volunteers.
However, a pro-active invitation to feedback on experiences at any time
during incubation or shortly after would be good. Even better would be
recruiting more valuable people from podlings as
Agreed on the undesirability of making survey participation mandatory. On the
wiki page in question I framed it as a right that surveys are available fwiw.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 15, 2013, at 1:18 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
I'm not keen on this one. I don't like
12 matches
Mail list logo
