Re: [RESULT] WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept SensSoft into the Apache Incubator WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept

2016-06-21 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
foundation membership. Thanks all! > >Josh > >From: Lewis John Mcgibbney [mailto:lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com] >Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 9:20 PM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Cc: Poore, Joshua C. <jpo...@draper.com> >Subject: [RESULT] WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept SensSo

RE: [RESULT] WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept SensSoft into the Apache Incubator WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept

2016-06-21 Thread Poore, Joshua C.
jpo...@draper.com> Subject: [RESULT] WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept SensSoft into the Apache Incubator WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept Hi general@, 72 hours has come and gone I am therefore closing off this VOTE'ing thread. Thank you to everyone that was able to VOTE. [4] +1 Accept SensSoft into the Apache Incubator

Re: [VOTE] Accept SensSoft into the Apache Incubator WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept

2016-06-17 Thread Sergio Fernández
+1 (binding) On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 1:24 AM, Henry Saputra wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Good luck guys! > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < > lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Title here should be [VOTE] Accept SensSoft into the Apache

[RESULT] WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept SensSoft into the Apache Incubator WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept

2016-06-16 Thread Lewis John Mcgibbney
Hi general@, 72 hours has come and gone I am therefore closing off this VOTE'ing thread. Thank you to everyone that was able to VOTE. [4] +1 Accept SensSoft into the Apache Incubator Lewis John Mcgibbney* Chris A Mattmann* Tom Barber* Henry Saptura* [0] +/-0 Not overly bothered either way [0]

Re: [VOTE] Accept SensSoft into the Apache Incubator WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept

2016-06-16 Thread Henry Saputra
+1 (binding) Good luck guys! On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Title here should be [VOTE] Accept SensSoft into the Apache Incubator > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < > lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept SensSoft into the Apache Incubator WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept

2016-06-16 Thread Tom Barber
Sorry Lewis, I read through it the other day and though I'd replied, clearly not. +1 binding. On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Folks, > The SensSoft proposal needs a bit of TLC from general@ > If software-as-a-sensor, usability

Re: [VOTE] Accept SensSoft into the Apache Incubator WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept

2016-06-16 Thread Lewis John Mcgibbney
Hi Folks, The SensSoft proposal needs a bit of TLC from general@ If software-as-a-sensor, usability testing and user characterization are your thing then please consider giving the proposal a read through. At this stage in the game we are looking at obtaining one more binding PPMC VOTE in order to

Re: [VOTE] Accept SensSoft into the Apache Incubator WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept

2016-06-13 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
+1 Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 13, 2016, at 4:34 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney > wrote: > > Title here should be [VOTE] Accept SensSoft into the Apache Incubator > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < > lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi

[VOTE] Accept SensSoft into the Apache Incubator WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept

2016-06-13 Thread Lewis John Mcgibbney
Title here should be [VOTE] Accept SensSoft into the Apache Incubator On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi general@, > Since I am back from a bit of vacation and it seems the discussion has > died down, I am now calling a vote on