[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1

The voting period has ended and the vote is now closed. There was 1 binding +0 vote which identified a number of LICENSE issues. We will correct these issues and resubmit a new candidate RC5. Thanks Kam

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1

Jersey is dual licensed CDDL and a transitive dependency from (at least) Hadoop and Spark. > On Jul 27, 2016, at 7:23 AM, Kam Kasravi wrote: > > Hi Justin > > These were tagged as GPL > > > I'll determine their dependencies linkage - we have no references to

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1

Hi Justin These were tagged as GPL I'll determine their dependencies linkage - we have no references to com.sun.jersey within our codebase but it looks to be dual licensed? ThanksKam On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 6:28 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: Hi, > [Kam] This

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1

Hi, > [Kam] This analyzes jars required to build the binary artifacts - so my > assumption is that it is not relevant to release just the source? Apache project cannot have GPL dependancies [1][5][6] (there are however a few exceptions for optional parts[2] and some build tools [3]). I’d first

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1

Hi Justin Again - thanks for your vigilance and time to review RC4. >All like like there may be license dependancy issues, but I’m not familiar >enough with sbt and the project to comment. This "sbt dependencyLicenseInfo | >grep GNU” shows several GPL dependancies (may be duplicated?). It may be

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1

Jul 20, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Kam Kasravi <kamkasr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi IPMC Community > > > > The PPMC vote to release Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 has > passed > > successfully. > > We would like to now submit this rel

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1

Hi, Looks much better than the last release candidate, however still +0 (binding) due to LICENSE issues, the items brought up for the last RC have not been addressed and possible GPL dependancies. All like like there may be license dependancy issues, but I’m not familiar enough with sbt and

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1

gt; The voting period will be for 96 hours (Friday, July 29 5:30PM PST). > > Thanks > kam > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Kam Kasravi <kamkasr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi IPMC Community > > > > The PPMC vote to release Apache Gearpump (incuba

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1

. The voting period will be for 96 hours (Friday, July 29 5:30PM PST). Thanks kam On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Kam Kasravi <kamkasr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi IPMC Community > > The PPMC vote to release Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 has passed > successfully. > We wou

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1

dy passed the vote deadline but not got a vote yet. > BTW, can we extend the vote because of the weekends ? > > Thanks, > Manu Zhang > >> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:32 AM Kam Kasravi <kamkasr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi IPMC Community >> >> The P

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1

W, can we extend the vote because of the weekends ? > > Thanks, > Manu Zhang > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:32 AM Kam Kasravi <kamkasr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi IPMC Community > > > > The PPMC vote to release Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 has >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1

; Hi IPMC Community > > The PPMC vote to release Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 has passed > successfully. > We would like to now submit this release candidate to the IPMC. > > The PPMC vote thread is here: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a53ecee5575ec998d757a08

[VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1

Hi IPMC Community The PPMC vote to release Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 has passed successfully. We would like to now submit this release candidate to the IPMC. The PPMC vote thread is here: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a53ecee5575ec998d757a084ba5c4132691b1a97fd0e6705ab670fbe