Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator Quickstep 0.1.0 RC6

2017-03-17 Thread Marc Spehlmann
Thanks for the example links- that's really been our strategy at this point (looking through similar projects). I started work on some of the issues you pointed out, Josh. If the vote is reversed, then I would be happy to continue with 0.1 and include the changes in 0.2. If we get those two +1s

Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator Quickstep 0.1.0 RC6

2017-03-16 Thread Julian Hyde
And by the way, since this would be Quickstep’s first release under incubation, I gave them some leniency in my RC5 vote [1] on the dev list. I called out 2 showstopper issues, which they fixed in RC6, and some other issues that they are going to fix in release 0.2. (Being a mentor is very

Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator Quickstep 0.1.0 RC6

2017-03-16 Thread Josh Elser
Given this is Quickstep's first release, yes, I think I could be persuaded to make this a +1 given LEGAL-291 :) I don't want to cause more confusion if you've already started re-rolling things, Marc. John D. Ament wrote: So, knowing that some of the files are explained under LEGAL-291,

Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator Quickstep 0.1.0 RC6

2017-03-16 Thread John D. Ament
So, knowing that some of the files are explained under LEGAL-291, would you consider changing your vote? While there are some changes to the LICENSE file, its not a killer (since a user would see the correct licenses in the source files). I'd vote a +1 if there's a JIRA covering the fixes. I

Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator Quickstep 0.1.0 RC6

2017-03-16 Thread Josh Elser
Marc Spehlmann wrote: Thank you for reviewing Apache Quickstep 0.1.0 rc6 (incubating), everyone. With this I will close the vote. +1 Julian (binding) Jignesh -1 Josh (binding) As we received one -1 binding vote, we will not release rc6. ___ The biggest issue seems to be our licensing

Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator Quickstep 0.1.0 RC6

2017-03-16 Thread Marc Spehlmann
Thank you for reviewing Apache Quickstep 0.1.0 rc6 (incubating), everyone. With this I will close the vote. +1 Julian (binding) Jignesh -1 Josh (binding) As we received one -1 binding vote, we will not release rc6. ___ The biggest issue seems to be our licensing checks. Now Fixed: -

Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator Quickstep 0.1.0 RC6

2017-03-16 Thread Josh Elser
-1 (binding) * xsums/sigs OK The key you provided isn't the one that was used to sign this release, FYI. You have D280F52E up on your people space, but used 5A29899A to sign this release. * Artifact starts with "apache-quickstep" and includes "incubating" * DISCLAIMER present * Missing

Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator Quickstep 0.1.0 RC6

2017-03-16 Thread Marc Spehlmann
ommit to be voted upon: > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator- > quickstep.git;a=commit;h=f8cf7fba51db3748c1c241c7e8880d499634213b > > > > > > > > > > > > The artifacts to be voted

Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator Quickstep 0.1.0 RC6

2017-03-15 Thread Julian Hyde
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-quickstep.git;a=commit;h=f8cf7fba51db3748c1c241c7e8880d499634213b > > > > > > > > The artifacts to be voted on are located here: > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/quickstep/0.1.0/RC6/ > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator Quickstep 0.1.0 RC6

2017-03-15 Thread Jignesh Patel
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/quickstep/0.1.0/RC6/ > > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key: > > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/spehl > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator Quickstep 0.1.0 RC6

2017-03-14 Thread Julian Hyde
> > The artifacts to be voted on are located here: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/quickstep/0.1.0/RC6/ > > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key: > > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/speh

Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator Quickstep 0.1.0 RC6

2017-03-14 Thread Jignesh Patel
he following key:     https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/spehl     Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Incubating Quickstep 0.1.0.     From: Marc Spehlmann <spehl.apa...@gmail.com> Date: Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 6:36 PM Subject: [

Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator Quickstep 0.1.0 RC6

2017-03-13 Thread Marc Spehlmann
As a general question, do binding votes always get forwarded from the dev vote, and if so, should we report that in the @general VOTE? On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Julian Hyde wrote: > Forwarding my vote from the dev list: > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Mar 10, 2017, at 4:36

Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator Quickstep 0.1.0 RC6

2017-03-13 Thread Julian Hyde
Forwarding my vote from the dev list: +1 (binding) > On Mar 10, 2017, at 4:36 PM, Marc Spehlmann wrote: > > The Apache Incubator Quickstep community has approved a vote to release > Quickstep-0.1.0 RC6. Quickstep is a high performance relational database > system built

[VOTE] Apache Incubator Quickstep 0.1.0 RC6

2017-03-10 Thread Marc Spehlmann
The Apache Incubator Quickstep community has approved a vote to release Quickstep-0.1.0 RC6. Quickstep is a high performance relational database system built from the ground up for modern hardware. This vote will stay open until Wednesday 18:00 cst. -Marc ___ The vote and results thread from