Re: [VOTE] Increased process on CLA item

2011-08-08 Thread Christian Grobmeier
3) Existing podlings are grandfathered in until the end of the year, at which point they will have to start reporting monthly if they have not completed the item. Sorry I don't understand this point :). Would you please explain ? I think its meant like: All incubator projects, which were

Re: [VOTE] Increased process on CLA item

2011-08-08 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: 3) Existing podlings are grandfathered in until the end of the year, at which point they will have to start reporting monthly if they have not completed the item. Sorry I don't understand this point :). Would you

Re: [VOTE] Increased process on CLA item

2011-08-04 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 09:28:08PM -0700, Henri Yandell wrote: [ ] +1 [ ] -1, because... [ ] BikeShed: I want to continue discussion on some point: +1 I like both the increased focus on this item and the progressive oversight mechanism which was worked out during the discussion thread. We

Re: [VOTE] Increased process on CLA item

2011-08-03 Thread Christian Grobmeier
1) The podling are to list the individuals/entities who need to grant rights for any existing software moving to the ASF. These may be either ICLAs or Software Grants. [Ideally this would be listed, or at least described, in the proposals]. Good idea, we should update the proposal template

Re: [VOTE] Increased process on CLA item

2011-08-03 Thread Craig L Russell
+1 I agree with the points made earlier in the discussion thread. Craig On Aug 2, 2011, at 9:28 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: [By which I mean the following checklist item: Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights

Re: [VOTE] Increased process on CLA item

2011-08-03 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2011-08-03, Henri Yandell wrote: [By which I mean the following checklist item: Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the package, the core code, and any new code produced by the project. ] I'm

Re: [VOTE] Increased process on CLA item

2011-08-03 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
+1 in general although I have some comments, please see below On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: On 2011-08-03, Henri Yandell wrote: [By which I mean the following checklist item: Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF been

[VOTE] Increased process on CLA item

2011-08-02 Thread Henri Yandell
[By which I mean the following checklist item: Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the package, the core code, and any new code produced by the project. ] I'm proposing that the following is added to the