[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.3.0-rc1

Hi all, Thanks to everyone that participated. The vote to release Apache Daffodil 2.3.0-rc1 is now closed. It has passed with 3 +1 (binding) votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Binding: +1 Dave Fisher +1 Christofer Dutz +1 Sheng Wu Vote thread:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.3.0-rc1

). -- Sheng Wu Apache SkyWalking, ShardingSphere, Zipkin Twitter, wusheng1108 -- Original -- From: "Steve Lawrence"; Date: Tue, Feb 26, 2019 08:09 PM To: "general";"Christofer Dutz"; Subject: Re: [VOTE] Relea

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.3.0-rc1

Thanks Chris. The Daffodil devs agree that the issues you found are not blockers and will be fixed for the next release. As a reminder to the IPMC, Daffodil really only has 1 active mentor so will likely need another vote from a non-mentor for the VOTE to pass. We would greatly appreciate it if

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.3.0-rc1

Changing my vote to +1 (binding) I found the reason for the failing tests on Mac and Windows ... the root cause was the different locale and the way numeric values are encoded. In Germany we separate the 1000s with "." and the decimal part with "," and in the US it's the opposite way. If I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.3.0-rc1

Hi Craig, Sent from my iPhone On Feb 22, 2019, at 4:12 PM, Craig Russell wrote: >> On Feb 19, 2019, at 1:18 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> Hi - >> >> (1) To be fixed on the next release: >>(a) Please do not include the KEYS file in the source release zip. Refer >> the users back to the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.3.0-rc1

That's for all the response from everyone so far. We'll make sure to fix the KEYS issue for the next release. DAFFODIL-2070 [1] was created to track that issue, and we plan to fix it in the next release. Other comments inline. On 2/22/19 3:45 PM, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Hi all, > > I have

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.3.0-rc1

ary 23, 2019 1:12:06 AM To: Incubator Cc: d...@daffodil.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.3.0-rc1 > On Feb 19, 2019, at 1:18 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi - > > (1) To be fixed on the next release: >(a) Please do not include the KEYS fi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.3.0-rc1

> On Feb 19, 2019, at 1:18 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi - > > (1) To be fixed on the next release: > (a) Please do not include the KEYS file in the source release zip. > Refer the users back to the location: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/daffodil/KEYS >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.3.0-rc1

Hi all, I have started verifying this release ... however this is the first time I am validating a project I'm not directly involved in. So I found some things that are different than with the other projects (Not sure if this is bad or good though) So here goes: 1) No KEYS file (Think this

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.3.0-rc1

Hi - (1) To be fixed on the next release: (a) Please do not include the KEYS file in the source release zip. Refer the users back to the location: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/daffodil/KEYS

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.3.0-rc1

Hi - Note below. > On Feb 19, 2019, at 5:21 AM, Steve Lawrence wrote: > > Hi all, > > The Apache Daffodil community has voted and approved the proposed > release of Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.3.0-rc1. > > We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this > incubator

[VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.3.0-rc1

Hi all, The Apache Daffodil community has voted and approved the proposed release of Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.3.0-rc1. We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release. Daffodil is an open source implementation of the DFDL specification that uses